Marvel and 'Lost' star Evangeline Lilly protests vaccine mandates

"My direct and special apologies to those most affected by this pandemic," she wrote in a statement. "I never meant to hurt you. When I wrote that post 10 days ago, I thought I was infusing calm into the hysteria. I can see now that I was projecting my own fears into an already fearful and traumatic situation."

Well intended though that seems to have been, I don't think she should have apologized.

Rather, it would have been better to stand her ground saying that it wasn't a "pandemic", that it was, and remains to this day, a "panic-demic".

No one was listening then and only some are listening now, but the facts remain.

How dare she !

Unless she backtracks quickly, her acting career might come to a grinding halt quite soon ...

What follows is the opening to the following article. You do not want to miss this one:

[Link]
Please share everywhere

The powers that shouldn't be are going balls to the wall to program us to believe that healthy children and young adults having sudden-death heart attacks is and always has been normal. Here are some of the reprehensible things they are doing to achieve that perception:

In March of 2021 - just as the COVID vaccine roll-out was spreading far and wide - a study was submitted to the BMJ which claimed that exercise could increase the risk of heart attacks:

[Link]
As anyone who has been paying attention for the past twelve months could tell you, the COVID vaccines cause massive heart attacks on a large scale. One reason that might be is because according to Dr. Andreas Noack - Europe’s now deceased Leading Carbon Expert - they contain nanoscale razors which shred your heart from the inside.

[Link]
Dr. Noack - who was beaten to death within 72 hours of releasing the afore-linked bombshell video analysis of the COVID vaccines and the carbon nano-razors they contain - claimed that regular people who exercise (see above study), and especially athletes are far more prone to falling victim to these razors than sedentary folks because their blood flow increases dramatically while exerting themselves which causes the razors to slice and dice their internal organs with far greater efficiency

Because Tauriel in The Hobbit never existed either.

European civilization is inseparable from the conquest of individual freedoms. It is this civilization, which glorifies Prometheus, Spartacus or Mandrin, which forbids slavery, which invents the Habeas Corpus and which sanctifies the fundamental rights of people.

In this civilization, the fundamental rights of people are considered absolute. These fundamental rights include freedom of movement, freedom of enterprise, freedom of assembly and demonstration, freedom of expression, the right to respect for private life, the right to security, the right to equality. These rights are "absolute" to the extent that the person enjoys them absolutely, by nature and as a citizen. They cannot be taken away from him, unless the latter breaks the law ... provided, however, that the law is neither arbitrary nor tyrannical, in which case the citizen will have another fundamental right: to "resist oppression" .

Many have noticed this: the regime of covidism replaces absolute rights with conditional rights From now on, fundamental rights are no longer absolute freedoms that arise naturally from our citizenship and humanity, but conditional freedoms granted by the state "on condition di ": provided you wear a mask, provided you respect social distances, provided you have a health card or vaccination passport, provided that the person is injected ...

You can go to your workplace "as long as you" ... ..You can go to a restaurant, "as long as you" ...You can move freely, “on condition of”….You can practice this or that profession, "as long as you" ...You can access hospitals, "as long as you" ...You can meet or demonstrate, "as long as you" ...You can express yourself without being censored, "as long as you" ...And soon you will be able to have a private life, "on condition of" ...

The exercise of our most fundamental freedoms, such as that of moving or meeting, is subordinated to an act of obedience and submission: having an experimental substance injected into the body. These pseudo-freedoms are therefore discriminatory advantages granted to some by a higher authority, in this case the government. If the words have a meaning, these "freedoms" granted by the state are therefore "privileges"!

The privileged have certain prerogatives that allow them, for example, to visit a relative in hospital, or to have a coffee on the terrace of a bar. But the privileges granted to them are temporary privileges that will last as long as their submission lasts. On the other hand, the privileges in question can be revoked at any time, by simple decision of the government, and without the privileged having failed in his duty of obedience. A privileged person therefore finds himself in a casual "conditional freedom". He is a kind of prisoner who would accept, for a few crumbs of pseudo-freedom, to respect the conditions imposed on him, and to live permanently under the severe gaze of a sentence execution judge.

According to the state discourse, injection is a duty of the individual towards the community. Out of duty, this one, who would have a sort of medical debt to everyone, would have to entrust his body to an injector paid for by the government. With this operation, the state grants itself on the one hand an incredible right over our body, since it authorizes itself to modify the genetic apparatus, but on the other hand it also means that this apparatus is subject to dispossession and a change of ownership.

Let us ask ourselves the question: to whom does my body belong if the State has the right to dispose of it and to modify its genetic functioning as it pleases?

To whom does my body belong if the state is able to cut it off from any social interaction, to put it anthropologically out of service, in short, in order to "stop" it as a malfunctioning device is put?

Usufruct: “right to use the property without owning it”.

The obligation to have myself injected with a harmful product to obtain the relative liberties and "on condition of" means concretely that I no longer belong to myself, that my soul is only the usufructuary of a body that in fact belongs to the State, since the latter disposes of it as he sees fit.

The System has destroyed the peoples. Today it dissociates the individual, it literally divides him. The state seizes the bodies and restores them at will. The conscience and the soul are nothing more than usufructuaries of a heap of flesh, bones and soon "embodied technologies". The injection thus opens the way to the separation of body and soul. For the state, bodies become objects, for souls the vain search for their bodies lost in the artifact. Zombies and ghosts, these are the entities of the world imagined by Klaus Schwab, Jacques Attali and Bill Gates.

The injected individual is reduced to the state of a biological machine whose internal functioning the state now regulates. The slightest malfunction and is immediately shut down.No third dose? So no more vaccination subscriptions, no more work, no more entertainment, no more social life! But the social engineers will take care of you. A small adjustment here, a small constraint there, an occasional hammer blow… and your machinery reignites, not quite the same, though.

Our basic freedoms become relative at the same time our obedience is expected to be absolute. Now, in our civilization, obedience to Authority can only be conceived from the point of view of legitimacy. Obedience is therefore "relative" by nature: no one must obey the illegitimate, everyone has the duty to resist.On the contrary, fundamental freedoms have always had an absolute character: the authority that does not respect them seems unjust and exposes itself to revolts. Absolute and unconditional obedience associated with fundamental freedoms conceived as relative and conditioned expresses an inversion of values ​​that derives from an approach that does not belong to European civilization. In other words, this crossover reflects a change in civilization .

So what civilization are we entering?

Obviously, in a civilization that is no longer really one, since it is not determined according to a cultural grid, but a mechanical hyper-rationality that reduces the living to things. Here men are no longer either beings of culture or beings of nature, but increasingly connected objects and mechanisms. Ultimately, these mechanisms owned by the System will no longer have the soul of a washing machine or a computer. All these mechanisms will no longer form a people or a civilization, not even a production plant, since artificial intelligence will concentrate all production tasks. This all will be nothing more than a residue of reduced humanity, without true conscience,

You must be aware of this today, before it is too late: when you agree to alienate your free will, when you accept to entrust your body and no longer truly own it, you run the risk of being treated as a thing and reduced to the state of a object.

And no soul will find its place in an object!

The struggle that begins is a metaphysical struggle. It goes beyond anything we ever imagined.

alexal60 I think however you meant " à condition de" [Link] , not "on condition di"

Another minor correction is, Usufruct : the right to enjoy the use and advantages of another's property short of the destruction or waste of its substance.

Whereas what we are actually seeing is: "the forcefully abridged "right " to enjoy the use and advantages of another's property, irrespective of waste or destruction of its substance.

And:

Ultimately, these mechanisms owned by the System will no longer have the soul of a washing machine or a computer.

should read: "Ultimately, these mechanisms owned by the System will have no more than the soul of a washing machine or a computer."