Puppet Masters
Dozens of freedom of information requests have been made to Public Health England (PHE) over the past few months requesting to know how many people have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, but each and every time PHE have claimed they do "not hold the information requested".
It is extremely strange to find that PHE do not hold the information considering their counterpart in Scotland has been able to publish the data on deaths within 28 days of a Covid-19 vaccination.
Public Health Scotland last published the figures on the 23rd June 2021 in their 'Covid-19 Statistical Report' in which they revealed 5,522 people had died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine between December 8th 2020 and June 11th 2021 in Scotland.
PHS were also able to reveal the numbers by brand of vaccine and date of occurrence in a published spreadsheet found here. The spreadsheet shows that 1,877 people died with 28 days of having the Pfizer mRNA jab, 3,643 people died within 28 days of having the AstraZeneca viral vector jab, and 2 people died within 28 days of having the Moderna mRNA jab.
The reason people have been requesting to know the number of people to have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine is because these are the exact same parameters that have been used to count alleged Covid-19 deaths for the majority of the alleged pandemic. Deaths are counted as Covid-19 if they occur within 28 days of a positive test, however, in the beginning they were actually counting deaths as Covid-19 if they occurred within 60 days of a positive test.
But it would seem PHE have been able to elude the requests made for the number of people who have died after having the Covid-19 jab thanks to a technicality. That technicality being the number of days used in their request, because we have discovered that they do hold the data on the number of people to have died after having a Covid-19 injection.
But it isn't the number of people who have died within 28 days, it is instead the number of people who have died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, and the figures have just been published inadvertently by the Office for National Statistics.
A report published by the ONS on September 13th 2021 was a clear attempt to dupe the public into believing the majority of Covid-19 deaths are occurring among the unvaccinated population. But the date parameters used in their report include a huge swathe of deaths that occurred during the second alleged wave of Covid-19 in January 2021, when barely anybody was vaccinated.
The cut off point was also the 2nd July 2021, meaning deaths that have occurred during the summer third wave that we are currently experiencing have not been included.
As you can see from the above graph taken from the UK Governments Covid-19 Dashboard the vast majority of Covid-19 deaths during the period used in the ONS report occurred during the second wave when the vaccine programme had only just begun, so of course the vast majority of deaths occurred among the unvaccinated population.
However, if ONS had decided to cover the third wave that we are currently experiencing then you would have seen that 75% of people who have died with Covid-19 were in fact vaccinated, and just 25% of people who have died were not vaccinated.
Table 5 of Public Health England's 'Vaccine Surveillance Report' found here, shows that between August 9th and September 5th 2021 there were 600 Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population, 97 deaths among the partly vaccinated population, and 1,659 deaths among the fully vaccinated population.
So as you can see the vast majority of deaths during this current wave of Covid-19 are occurring among the vaccinated population, but of course ONS didn't want you to know that so they left it out. But we bet they didn't plan on revealing the number of people who have died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine like they have.
Table 1 of the ONS report (found here) is an attempt to show how well the Covid-19 vaccines have been at preventing deaths. But don't forget they've only covered the first 6 months of the year where the vast majority of deaths occurred when the majority of the population were not vaccinated.
However, by attempting to dupe the public into believing the Covid-19 vaccines have worked at preventing deaths the ONS have revealed that 30,305 people died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine in England between January 2nd and July 2nd 2021.
As you can see above 14,265 people died within 21 days of having the first dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, and 4,388 people died within 21 days of having the first dose of a Covid-19 vaccine whose death allegedly involved Covid-19.
Another 11,470 people died within 21 days of having their second dose of having a Covid-19 vaccine, and 182 people died within 21 days of having their second dose of a Covid-19 vaccine whose death allegedly involved Covid-19.
Therefore 30,305 people died within 21 days of having the Covid-19 vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021.
What's interesting to note here is that a further 123,796 people died 21 days or more after having the Covid-19 vaccine, and we're very eager to know how many of those occurred up to 28 days after being vaccinated, or even 60 days after being vaccinated considering they have and still do use this parameter to count Covid-19 deaths.
But for now we will have to settle for knowing the official number of people to have died in England within 21 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine during the first 6 months of 2021, and that number is 30,305, and we doubt it's a number the authorities actually wanted us to know.
Reader Comments
There are lies, damn lies and then there are statistics.. . . with satanic murderers emplaying all of the above and more besides, for 100s of years
For you info, since the vax started we have had 1 fully vaccinated person die in out ITU. He was 78 and had a lot of other issues. We currently have an ITU full of unvaccinated 38-50 yr olds. Most were previously fit and well, the odd one had hypertension or a slightly high BMI. The vaccinated come in occasionally, but are much older and get better quickly. The unvaccinated come in and deteriorate.
1. What do you consider unvaccinated? (Anyone who hasn't reached 2 weeks post 2nd shot for Pfizer/Moderna and 1st shot for J&J/AstraZeneca?)
2. How do you know they are unvaccinated? (Here in the U.S. if you get your jabs at pop up clinics or pharmacies the data isn't transferring into hospital databases and you would have to interview the patient to find out bc hospital admission screening does not ask about vaccine status)
3. What is your rate of vaccination in the area? (A low vaccine rate would explain low amount of vaccine patients)
4. What is your treatment of unvaxxed? (Here the unvaxxed are vilified and doctors don't want to even treat them. They are sent to different areas of hospital with no visitors allowed. Also Covid treatments are Remdesivir and ventilator instead of early treatment with HCQ/Ivermectin)
5. Have you investigated the death rates of the vaxxed population in your area? (People dying shortly after getting the jab can't be ITU patients.)
We know they are unvaccinated because the patient tells us. And in the UK it is recorded on the NHS system, unless you were part of the very first trials I believe. But that would be very very few people, and you'd expect them to tell us.
We have a very high vaccination rate in our area, the lower vaccinated populations are the immigrant workers - we have seasonal farming work, I think they are being missed rather than wilfully refusing the vaccine, who knows of they are actually registered to work here, and most not be registered with a GP. But it is hard to know because of language barriers. Difficult to get a history via a translator at the best of times, even harder when the patient is gasping. Other groups are the 30-40yr old men who think they are invincible. But these groups are small. The vast majority are now vaccinated.
The unvaccinated and vaccinated are treated exactly the same. Absolutely no difference. There is certainly an amount of pity or eye rolling when talking about the patients in private, handover between shifts etc, but the overall opinion is "how sad - he's got 3 kids in Bulgaria who won't see him again" or similar. I don't know anyone who would actually vilify someone for a decision they've made. We treat many people who make unfortunate decisions for themselves. This is no different.
Why wouldn't patient dying after a jab be an ITU patient? Unless people are literally dropping down dead with no warning and no chance of resuscitation, we would have been involved in at least some. If someone has a heart attack, an fit, a brain bleed etc etc, arrests, and is resuscitated by paramedics to at least have a heart beat, we will take them to ITU, treat them for 24hrs and try to wake them up to see if their brain works. Unless all the people dying of the jab are 90yr old bedbound people who aren't fit for ITU, we would be involved at some point. I have met no one who has had any illness that I could attribute to the vaccine.
Re: treatment, no, we don't ventilate people who don't need it. They are treated with dexamethasone on the main wards, some get remdesivir depending on what arm of a trial they are randomised into. If they deteriorate enough to require respiratory support, they are brought to ITU, started on either high flow nasal oxygen or CPAP or BIPAP, depending on what the individual needs. Some are then given tociluzumab (certain criteria are required). If they deteriorate further and require more respiratory support than CPAP or BIPAP, they are then intubated and ventilated.
They are not given HCQ, the stuff doesn't help and causes more problems than you can imagine. The trial we were involved in was stopped early because people kept going into SVT. Some even needed cardioversions. And it made no difference to their covid.
The Zelenko Protocol is:
HCQ 200mg twice a day x5-7 days
Iron 50-100mg daily x7 days
Azythromycin 500mg daily x5 days OR
Doxycycline 100mg twice a day x7 days
(And of course vitamins C&D)
It is common knowledge that HCQ works and does not cause heart problems when dosed to the Zelenko protocol. It is most effective as early treatment. If someone is in late stage treatment you can also add:
Ivermectin/inhaled budesonide/monoclonal antibodies/colchicine/fluvoxamine/N-acetyl cysteine (NAC)
And don't forget the spike proteins are the problems and travel throughout the body and cause inflammation and blood clots so you need to treat them prophylactically with full-dose blood thinners of Aspirin 325mg daily + Lovenox injections daily as well as anti inflammatory corticosteroids such as prednisone.
HCQ does not work at low doses. To obtain doses that match the studies plasma concentrations that showed any antiviral effect you would need huge amounts. This has adverse effects and had no beneficial effect on the survival of covid patients.
Therapeutic anticoagulation therapy was indeed trialled at the start of covid. This also was shown to have adverse effects that outweighed the benefits. More people suffered catastrophic haemorrhages, strokes and complications than benefited from it.
I'm sure it makes you feel better to believe there is some sort of magic bullet. Unfortunately life and biology doesn't work like that. If something seems to good to be true, it very very likely is.
I'm sure it makes you feel better to believe there is some sort of magic bullet. Unfortunately life and biology doesn't work like that. If something seems to good to be true, it very very likely is.OK, so what does work ?
If you do have any of these, or are over 50 you'd really really be silly not to get vaccinated.
Early disease: dexamethasone, remdesivir has some small benefits in moderate disease but not in severe. I'm not convinced the benefits are really worth it. In severe disease with respiratory failure: dexamethasone, self proning (lying on your front to allow lung bases to expand), tociluzumab (a monoclonal antibody) if no suspicion of concurrent bacterial infection and the person is not too frail, CPAP or BIPAP ventilatory support for as long as possible, intubation and ventilation with relatively high positive end expiratory pressures, intermittent prone positioning if able (staff available to flip the patient over - can't do it if too obese), sometimes ventilating with airway pressure release ventilation helps in extreme situations, as does paralysing them completely with drugs. Continuing nutrition via nasal feeding, clot prophylaxis, all the other basic good nursing care. Often they require dialysis as kidneys tend to shut down in severe covid. But they recover as kidneys tend to do.
If someone eventually improves, early tracheostomy allows the sedative drugs to come off asap, and they can start the long wean to off the ventilator.
If you do have any of these, or are over 50 you'd really really be silly not to get vaccinated.And how do you explain all this please: "Microbiologist explains COVID jab effects: Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi" at this [Link] wherein we can read:
How Effective Are the COVID Shots?
While the COVID injections have been characterized as being somewhere around 95% effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection, this claim is the product of statistical obfuscation. In short, they've conflated relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction. The absolute risk reduction is actually right around 1% for all currently available COVID shots.1
In "Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials"2 Ron Brown, Ph.D. calculates the absolute risk reduction for Pfizer's and Moderna's injections, based on their own clinical trial data, so that they can be compared to the relative risk reduction reported by these companies. Here's a summary of his findings:
Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine BNT162b2 — Relative risk reduction: 95.1%. Absolute risk reduction: 0.7%
Moderna vaccine mRNA-1273 — Relative risk reduction: 94.1%. Absolute risk reduction 1.1%
In a July 1, 2021, commentary in The Lancet Microbe,3 Piero Olliaro, Els Torreele and Michel Vaillant also argue for the use of absolute risk reduction when discussing vaccine efficacy with the public. They too went through the calculations, coming up with the following:
Pfizer/BioNTech — Relative risk reduction: 95%. Absolute risk reduction: 0.84%
Moderna — Relative risk reduction: 94%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
Gamaleya (Sputnik V) — Relative risk reduction: 91%. Absolute risk reduction: 0.93%
Johnson & Johnson — Relative risk reduction: 67%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
AstraZeneca/Oxford — Relative risk reduction: 67%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.3%
Shame really, as I used to enjoy some articles. It is now simply a mouth piece for the extreme and right wing to rally their mindless troops.
Enjoy your darkened cave. You have a few friends here at least.
Further, please explain Dr. Sherri Tenpenny's "20 Mechanisms of [Death Jab] Injuries" downloadable for this [Link] and also Dr. Charles Hoffe's claims as outlined at this [Link] and this [Link]
I'm struggling to estimate the number of people I have met with severe covid, life changing injuries secondary to it, or family deaths due to it. It is certainly in the hundreds. Just in our small hospital we lost a cleaner, a nurse and a support worker. One of our senior consultants has hypoxic brain injury and is now blind. Another senior doctor recovered but has long term lung problems and has not been able to return to work. Another nurse survived, but has recently had a liver transplant due to complications from his 4 month illness. He's 47. We are a small hospital. Others in the region have very similar stories.
Even in our adult ITU in our small town we have now had 2 teenagers with covid related severe inflammatory multisystem syndrome. They have luckily both made a good recovery but they were dog sick and scarily close to death. It's very rare but it happens.
I will have a look at your links later, no time now sorry.
The link between autism and vaccines is one of the most studied subjects in modern medicine, it has been thoroughly disproven,Not if you listen to RFK and have a look at the about 10yo mushroom cloud that is now the childhood autism stat and not if you listen to the many insider whistle blowers who've forward saying they knowingly fudged the stats.
And tell me please how ethyl Hg in a "vaccine" (Thimerosal) to be multiply injected into children can be without effect. That's along the same lines as the insanity of "silver" amalgam tooth fillings that exude Hg vapour their entire lives. I had a mouthful from about age 8-10 and was sick in one way or anther until I had them sloppily removed in my 30s, after which it was another decade of slow de-tox' before Hg stopped showing up in my blood work.
If you think there are hundreds of decent studies that shows HCQ works, you don't know how to assess a study.By itself, HCQ is a non-starter, one needs Zn and an antibiotic, all of which has been well demonstrated and delineated by Zelenko very early on.
The real winner however is Ivermictin where we find at this [Link] the following: "Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 64 studies" and on my business site we see, "The Ivermectin Story" at this [Link] Let it load, then it'll play and you can download using File >>> Save Page As...
Where are you getting this stuff from?Well, there's this: "Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin plus zinc vs hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin alone: outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients" seen at this [Link] where the conclusion reads:
"Conclusion: This study provides the first in vivo evidence that zinc sulfate in combination with hydroxychloroquine may play a role in therapeutic management for COVID-19.=========
40-word summary: Zinc sulfate added to hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin may improve outcomes among hospitalized patients."
Why do you want an antibiotic in a viral infection that is so rarely associated with bacterial infection?To prevent the incredible amount of dead material in the lungs created by an immune system in overdrive from becoming infected.
A Google for, "Why azithromycin in the zelenko protocol" pulls this [Link]
But that's not my point here. My point has to do with Ivermectin, so let's move on to that modality/protocol shall we.
Which means they had been hiding at least half a million deaths.
Comment: The silence of the scam is being heard loud and clear - but not soon enough for up to 30k preventable deaths in the UK. Imagine the statistical obfuscation on the global scale!