Elizabeth Nolan Brown
ReasonWed, 31 Jul 2019 14:45 UTC
© CNN
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) "put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana," said Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) during Wednesday night's Democratic presidential debate.
In its promotional framing and question, CNN pushed hard for another showdown between Harris and former vice president Joe Biden. But the more authentic and substantial spat so far came between Harris and Gabbard.
Responding to Biden, Harris said she was proud of the work she did as attorney general of California, positioning her efforts as a matter of cleaning up policies put in place by people like the former VP. (Biden had just taken a well-deserved takedown from New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker about his "tough on crime" rhetoric.)
But Gabbard wouldn't let this revisionist history stand.
Harris says she's proud of her record, "but I am deeply concerned about this record,"
said Gabbard. "There are too many examples to cite, but...she blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California. And she fought to keep cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way."
Gabbard is right. Given the opportunity as AG,
Harris actually defended the state's death penalty after a judge ruled it unconstitutional. She also ramped up penalties or enforcement for not just drug crimes but prostitution, truancy, and many other misdemeanor offenses.Gabbard told Harris that
the people who "suffered under [her] reign" were owed an apology. "The bottom line is, when you were in a position to make a difference and an impact in these people's lives, you did not. And worse yet, in the case of those who are on death row, innocent people, you actually blocked evidence from being revealed that would have freed them until you were forced to do so. There's no excuse for that."
Comment: See also:
UPDATE: Thursday 1st August 2019RT goes into more
detail about Tulsi's takedown and Twitter's apparent trend rigging:
Gabbard dominated Google searches for the entire country following the Democratic primary debates on Wednesday, buoyed by her confrontation with California Senator Harris, who has downplayed her "tough-on-crime" record as the state's attorney general in favor of a warmer, fuzzier progressive look.
"When you were in a position to make a difference or an impact in people's lives, you did not," the Hawaii congresswoman said, pointing to Harris' reactionary pursuit of low-level drug offenders and her controversial decision to keep prisoners locked up in order to use them to fight California's deadly wildfires.
CNN gave Harris two chances to respond, but she was unable to deny Gabbard's claims, merely insisting she had "done the work" of reforming the state's criminal justice system and defending her record in vague terms.
Despite topping the Google list, some users on Twitter noticed Gabbard's name wasn't among the top trends for them. "Why did you remove Tulsi from trending @Twitter?" one user asked.
Shortly after, she did briefly appear at the top, though only with her first name, and closely followed by 'Assad,' for Syrian President Bashar Assad - 'Assad apologist' being the establishment's go-to rebuke against Gabbard. In fact, it was used as a desperate attempt at deflection by Harris' press secretary, who spent the debate tweeting about Assad.
Whether Twitter tried to 'shadow-ban' Gabbard or not, her message has been suppressed by Big Tech before: She is suing Google for inexplicably removing her ads for several hours following the first round of debates, when her name was also the most-searched. The ads remained in place this time.
Deepening the mystery, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey donated $5,600 to Gabbard's campaign - the maximum individual donation - the day after the first round of debates, triggering a backlash from his establishment media pals.
Twitter deems that Harris was "destroyed" in the debates:
Twitter deemed presidential hopeful Kamala Harris utterly "destroyed," after fellow candidate Tulsi Gabbard landed dizzying verbal haymakers on the former California prosecutor. Naturally, 'Russian bots' were swiftly blamed.
Wednesday night's Democratic debate was not an enjoyable one for Harris, who went into the faceoff as a darling of the media and among the frontrunners for her party's nomination. On the stage in Detroit, Hawaiian Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard grilled Harris on her record as California's attorney general.
In under a minute, Gabbard shredded Harris to pieces for jailing more than 1,500 nonviolent marijuana offenders while admitting in a radio interview that she had smoked marijuana in college, and for her "tough-on-crime" stances. "She blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row... she kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor... and she fought to keep the cash bail system in place," Gabbard continued, leaving Harris unable to counter.
By Thursday morning, "#KamalaHarrisDestroyed" was trending on Twitter in the US.
Of course, any attack on an establishment Democrat is met with an equal and opposite reaction. Establishment pundits and their supporters responded with a familiar cry: "Russia!" Gabbard, they said, is propped up by Vladimir Putin, and #KamalaHarrisDestroyed is the work of "Putin's bots and paid for shills."
Even Harris' press secretary, Ian Sams, labeled Gabbard's supporters part of "the Russian propaganda machine."
It's worth noting that nobody shouting "Russian bots" did any data analysis to support their claims. Few noted too that, during the debate, 'Tulsi Gabbard' was the most searched for politician in every single US state, according to Google Trends.
But if the nefarious hashtag wasn't the work of the Kremlin, then it must have been the work of the MAGA-hatted deplorables, some #resistance commenters argued.
That opponents would default to Russia to attack Gabbard is unsurprising. Running on an anti-interventionist, foreign-policy-focused platform, Gabbard has been accused of cosying up to Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad for her opposition to military action in Syria and for meeting with Assad in Damascus. That stance alone led to accusations that she was more closely aligned with the position of the Kremlin than that of the White House.
At present, Gabbard is a long-shot candidate, and is polling at around one percent.
The Hill
notes that Harris' spokesman is blaming a now
debunked conspiracy theory pushed by the Washington establishment for her pitiful performace:
[...]
Harris had a lively performance during Wednesday night's debate, clashing once again with former Vice President Joe Biden and others on the issues of "Medicare for All," busing and other topics.
The #KamalaHarrisDestroyed hashtag had disappeared from the list of trending U.S. terms by 9:30 a.m. Thursday.
Harris's spokesman, Ian Sams, responded to the hashtag, noting that at least some of the accounts promoting it appeared to be bots.
"The Russian propaganda machine that tried to influence the 2016 election is now promoting the presidential aspirations of a controversial Hawaii Democrat," he said.
Comment: See also:
UPDATE: Thursday 1st August 2019
RT goes into more detail about Tulsi's takedown and Twitter's apparent trend rigging: Twitter deems that Harris was "destroyed" in the debates: The Hill notes that Harris' spokesman is blaming a now debunked conspiracy theory pushed by the Washington establishment for her pitiful performace: