OF THE
TIMES
"We have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction."
~ US State Department, 1948
"It may be the first piece of evidence that people in the West have made a decision to liquidate him. Be afraid, clown!" Seems about right to...
I would take this info with a pinch of salt if the Russian admin didn't know too much about the supposed assassin. There really isn't any worth in...
That headline pic may be from Medvedev’s telegram but the pic itself is altered, clearly, and automatically alerts the reader to the...
They claim 12 in the photo however I see only 10, if 12 than 60% means they supposedly have a total of 20.
The NWO are desperate to keep a lid on the 'covid' injuries and deaths until they can organise a world war. Lots of EU members had signed...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
I believe HFL's comment of simply the spelling of "grammar" is being* facetious** as there are few if any posts that are grammatically perfect; although I have been so accused recently of so posting. (For example, he did not point out "cdondemn" as it's obvious you meant "condemn." and part of me is being facetious in pointing that out at all.)
Beyond all that, I agree with your point - especially, "Sticks and stones...". Indeed, I know I have here, at some point, posted the same words, and, as a general guideline for life, I often quote/paraphrase the title of the book. "Everything I Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten."
R.C.
*Hey, SOTT I.T. GUY SCOTT/SCOTTIE: I say bring back the UTC dates and times rather than "about a year ago"; "about a week ago", etc.! It far better helps in the communications. (I am aware of the fact that IF cracker had 'properly' posted his follow up words as a reply, than as a new comment, I could at least then tell the order of things, but how much harder is it to have the exact dates and times of posts?)
My own opinion is that the use of "about x ago" is a change for the worse (wherever it first came from) reflecting, or at least consistent with, the generalized 'dumbing down' of society. "And dis hyar home boy beez not down witchat!"
** *IMHO, improperly, as I always believe that when dealing with written communication, ALL facetiousness, sarcasm, et al. should be declared in a fashion like this footnote.
R.C.
In my life, I, too, once erred. . . But I was mistaken.
R.C..
- No one could ever get funds for such a study;
- And if the study proved that, the study's author(s) would be careerless.
R.C.
NRN
R.C.
R.C.
[Link]
Said, then received.
Intention, motivation, direction and audience.
There is more to the spoken word that meets the eye.
Before you all go jumping up and down.
The mastery of something, is not to be taught it, but to understand it.
So learn your craft.
That those of lesser ability and lower intelligence are seeking power, and are supported by those in the shadows, is a situation that cannot end well. The SJWs etc, are to me anyway, psychologically still at the toddler stage, as they cannot reconcile reality even in its basic forms. These movements do attract all types of abnormal people.
Anyway, the quote of the day does shine a light on this: "Intelligence is the capacity to receive, decode and transmit information efficiently. Stupidity is blockage of this process at any point. Bigotry, ideologies etc. block the ability to receive; robotic reality-tunnels block the ability to decode or integrate new signals; censorship blocks transmission". - Robert Anton Wilson
Well, with the levels of hysteria that can be generated sometimes over words, I wouldn’t be surprised if militant grammarians didn’t take to the streets demanding tighter controls on prose, and like all things these days it would ultimately descend into an all-out punctuation situation, full stop without a question.
Some grammarians have gone so far as to let loose their terrible thesaurus on innocent commentators, and robbing them of any verb, such is the state of the world these days.
It’s the same with Antifa, I just don’t know the epistemological significance of it all, as somebody stole my dictionary and my thesaurus has gone for a walk.
Anyway, thanks for the talk.
And some seem a bit like this SJW, where Snow Flags caused Feminist SJW Outrage at the mall [Link]
The girl seems as if she’s suffering from some sort of psychosis that might have been induced by postmodern studies and maybe if you were the person responsible for the snow flags then a calm denial of lies might be adequate and it might just result in embarrassment for the young girl, although it seems unlikely.
In the real world reasonable people would think rightly that those were snow flags end of... although when it comes to lies, one could laugh at the idea that you were placing symbols of male domination to mark out areas defining space spaces for cars.
And that saying, ‘sticks and stones...’ is bollocks because people can get fired, lose their homes, family... all depending on the specific situation.
· Institutions/Universities seem to teach you what to think not how to think
· Concepts are just ideas and are not absolute/grounded; need constant "testing"
· Principles are more grounded/weighted because constructive criticism can be applied based to historical observation; consistent results for constant evaluation
As for postmodern corp "hubris" I saw good example of a photo posted with an Indian man holding a nicely designed card that reads Google Go. When I first read it I thought he was making a commentary on google and telling them to get out, but quickly realized, no it is for a new app called Google Go >.<
Anyways...look forward to listening and thanks for putting this together!
The spoken word is truly ambiguous.
Is it those who spoke it, or those who heard it, that are right?
The purists will persecute you for any error in deliverance, the strong minded will try trample all over it, yet, whilst you can speak, speak.
For as of tomorrow, that might be banned too.
The power of such a device is limited, it doesn't forge friendships, help to overcome indifference, foster a air of trust, no, most certainly not.
It's the barbaric means of silencing those who have a right to speak.
Would you call me "glib", and then shoot me down.
You only go to show why gun control is necessary.