OF THE
TIMES
Self-absorption in all its forms kills empathy, let alone compassion.
OK So they intentionally or accidently (allegedly) released a virus that was about as dangerous as a moderate flu, with some severe consequences...
global warming goodness!
20th century ideas die hard but die they will.
The religious supremacist are the worst - I reckon they married calvin in hell. They refute free will - I refute them. ~ For example, I ask this -...
Now this pepper grower might be advise to reach out to me - a chemical engineer out of NC State - land of the Wolfpack - and then maybe his big...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
I would consider myself a pretty semi-progressive liberal person because of my bias towards science and science related arguments.
I'm not a huge proponent for politically correct arguments because I do believe strongly in free speech, but also living un-offended by the words of others.
I've gotta say that, if you are in any way a socially liberal person/libertarian, you have to agree with the "conservatism" of allowing people of differing sexual orientations to marry/exist/practice what have you.
Doesnt seem like its infringing on their rights to not allow them to practce something? They arent hurting anyone other than themselves, if even that