Residents of Icelandic capital Reykjavik woke up to 42 cm (16.5 inches) of snow this morning - the highest depth of snow in December since records began.
According to the Icelandic Met Office, the previous record was set back in 2011, when snow lay 33 cm (13 inches) deep in Reykjavik on 29 December that year.
The highest ever depth of snow recorded in in Reykjavik was 55 cm (21.5 inches) back in January 1937, and if snows continues to fall on the city, this record might also be broken - and soon.
Now at 42 cm, snow levels in Reykjavik were 32 cm just four days ago on Saturday.
While it's always groovy to see out little island getting international attention with the Big Kids of the world, I'd like to point out that compared to the disastrous weather being experienced around the globe, as seen in the excellent SOTT compilation videos which I always share on fb, our snowfall is like a fairytale. We're outside making friendly snowmen with our children and casually (surreptitiously ; ) competing for best Instagram photo of lovely snow-laden branches found throughout town.
In the capital, for instance, we haven't seen real inclement weather for decades (most people recall there being much more intense winters back in the 'old days') and even those heavier winters are a piece of cake compared to what Boston dealt with just last year. I'm afraid the new-ish English language Iceland Monitor is being a bit click-bait-y with their recent weather headlines...
The fact of the matter is, Iceland is totally mild given its latitude and overall exposure. The weather changes quickly, which can be disastrous is people who are traveling out in the countryside are caught unawares, but that also means that snow usually doesn't stick for very long before it's rained away. It looks like we're in for an extended cold snap going into December, (http://en.vedur.is/) but frankly, we just don't really live up to our name ; )
The folk? story is that Greenland and Iceland were so named to direct population migration AWAY from Iceland to the colder Greenland, which, as I understand it is much colder- which makes sense given its hugely?/mostly? a glacier.
(Pray the Gulfstream remains strong.)
So, Icelandeyes, is that true or a folk story? I'll trust your thoughts over those of wiki pee pee aaahhh.
BUT...I've always had my doubts. I have my doubts about our entire history, i.e. the story that some Norsemen and women came over in 874AD-ish as the very first settlers, aside from a lingering Irish priest or two who then fled the crazy Viking newcomers. We know that some Irish were here, but could it be that they were many, and here for way longer than we know?
In my opinion, this island, heavily forested in the first millennia AD, was a sacred spot, a destination, for peoples from the south. Imagine: a lava-crafted, steaming, mud-pit-bubbling, glacia, hot river landscape filled with groves of ancient trees, with raw mountains in fantasy shapes and colors, thundering waterfalls...it must have been magical! And since I believe long-range seafaring was much more common from at least the time of the Phoenecians, if not muchmuch earlier, it's a given that by island-jumping up to Norway and then over to Iceland, people would have easily been able to get here.
That said, I just took a google to see if I could back my theory up, and I found this:
"Ein hugmyndin er að nafnið sé mun eldra en heimildir segja frá og að nafn landsins komi frá Isis, Egypskri gyðju sem dýrkuð var um alla Evrópu á fornöld. Gyðjan er náttúrugyðja og nafn landsins Island þýddi því Land Gyðjunnar, eða land Guðanna. Önnur hugmynd er að nafnið komi frá keltneskum þjóðflokki sem nefndist Iceni (c-ið hér er borið fram eins og s) frá svæði sem nú heitir Norfolk í Norðaustur Bretlandi." - www.upprettiapinn.blog.is
This gentleman also believes that the common story is just too...well...common. In his quote he's saying that one idea that's been passed around is that the name is much older than 9th centuryAD, and is a reference to Isis, meaning this would be "Land of the Goddess."
Maybe. The other idea, which is a bit sexier, imo, is that the lost Celtic Iceni tribe ended up here (Wikki's got an entry on them: www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceni)
That idea I kind of like a lot!
Anyway, I'm going to contact this guy and ask to translate his piece, and I'll probably then share it on my blog. I'm not plugging my site, but I do have a good list of alt facts re: Iceland that adds to this extended answer.: Go visit if you'd like [Link]
While it's always groovy to see out little island getting international attention with the Big Kids of the world, I'd like to point out that compared to the disastrous weather being experienced around the globe, as seen in the excellent SOTT compilation videos which I always share on fb, our snowfall is like a fairytale. We're outside making friendly snowmen with our children and casually (surreptitiously ; ) competing for best Instagram photo of lovely snow-laden branches found throughout town.
In the capital, for instance, we haven't seen real inclement weather for decades (most people recall there being much more intense winters back in the 'old days') and even those heavier winters are a piece of cake compared to what Boston dealt with just last year. I'm afraid the new-ish English language Iceland Monitor is being a bit click-bait-y with their recent weather headlines...
The fact of the matter is, Iceland is totally mild given its latitude and overall exposure. The weather changes quickly, which can be disastrous is people who are traveling out in the countryside are caught unawares, but that also means that snow usually doesn't stick for very long before it's rained away. It looks like we're in for an extended cold snap going into December, (http://en.vedur.is/) but frankly, we just don't really live up to our name ; )