Health & Wellness
Rather, the study found that it was the carbohydrates in people's diets that were linked with increased levels of a type of fatty acid linked to heart disease and type-2 diabetes. The results of the study, which followed 16 middle-aged, obese adults for 21 weeks, were published Nov. 21 in the journal PLOS ONE.
Saturated fats, largely from meat and dairy products, have been vilified for decades as a primary culprit in promoting heart disease. And most health authorities maintain this stance.
However, in recent years, scientists have seen the ill effects of completely replacing saturated fat with carbohydrates, particularly the simple carbs that are found so commonly in processed foods. A large analysis published in 2009 in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that swapping saturated fats with carbs had no benefit in reducing people's risk of heart disease. But replacing those so-called bad fats with polyunsaturated fats - found in fish, olives and nuts - did.
"The unintended consequence of telling everyone to restrict fat was that people ate an even greater amount of carbohydrates," said Jeff Volek, senior author on the new study and a professor of human sciences at The Ohio State University. "This is a fact. It's not a stretch to make the connection between overconsumption of carbs and the obesity and diabetes epidemic."
The new study "challenges the conventional wisdom that has demonized saturated fat," Volek said, because it shows that saturated fats don't need to be replaced at all, neither with carbs nor polyunsaturated fats.
The study, it should be noted, was funded by a grant from the Dairy Research Institute, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, the Egg Nutrition Center, and the Robert C. and Veronica Atkins Foundation, although the researchers reported that the funders had no role in the study design or decision to publish the research.
For the analysis, researchers placed 16 participants on a tightly controlled diet of fats and carbs. The participants were on their own high-carb, low-fat diets before entering the study. For the first three weeks of the study, they doubled or tripled their saturated-fat intake, consuming 84 grams of saturated fats, and 47 grams of carbs per day. Researchers found no jump in the levels of saturated fat in the blood during this phase.
Then, every three weeks after this, the dieters decreased the fat and increased their carb intake, ending the study on a diet of 32 grams of saturated fat and 346 grams of carbs per day. The final phase modeled U.S. dietary recommendations for carbs and included whole grains.
"You can sort of think of this experiment as a dose-response study, where we exposed individuals to a range of dietary carb levels and monitored their fatty-acid levels to determine if they were accumulating saturated fatty acids and turning carbs into fat," Volek told Live Science.
The researchers found that as the amount of dietary fat was decreased, there were no changes in the levels of saturated fat in the participants' blood. But one kind of fatty acid, called palmitoleic acid, did progressively increase.
"Higher proportions of palmitoleic acid in blood or adipose tissue are consistently associated with a myriad of undesirable outcomes, such as obesity, ...inflammation, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, coronary disease, heart failure, and incidence and aggressiveness of prostate cancer," the researchers wrote.
Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, dean of the Friedman School of Nutrition Science & Policy at Tufts University, who was not involved in the research, described the work as a well-controlled interventional study confirming that dietary refined carbohydrate is the primary driver of circulating saturated fatty acids in the bloodstream.
"White bread, rice, cereals, potatoes, and sugars - not saturated fat - are the real culprits in our food supply," said Mozaffarian.
Dr. Walter Willett, the chair of the Department of Nutrition at Harvard School of Public Health, also thought this was a reasonably done study, but he added it is difficult to make conclusions about the risk of heart disease from a study so small and short.
"Basically in their study they are comparing two bad diets, and the adverse of carbohydrates is likely to be particularly serious in the obese and insulin resistant population that they studied," Willett said.
We know from many long-term studies, Willet added, that replacing saturated fats from red meat and dairy with vegetable fats high in polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fats will reduce risks of heart disease. This is characteristic of the Mediterranean diet.
Also, other studies have shown beneficial properties of dietary palmitoleic acid, and its role in health remains an open question.
Reader Comments
SoTT DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE FULLNESS TO WHICH THEY ARE CORRECT
SoTT are also a very passive organisation in that they observe and report but do not act is any significant way and yet they are in a very strong position to act and demonstrate in a very positive and useful fashsion what is actually going on AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT
You're stance on this issue is as ridiculous as saying if you pour sand into the gas tank of a vehicle that is the ONLY thing that will damage the engine, so don't worry go ahead and pour sugar into the gas tank. The fact is that trans fats have been around only about a 100 years or so. But all the evidence shows that heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and all the other so-called "diseases of civilization" started showing up and ever spreading when humans went from hunting (mostly) and gathering, to settled agriculture. They became shorter, had smaller brains, weaker bones and tooth decay (something hunters never had), and all the above mentioned diseases.
You are one among many SOTT readers that go on a verbal rampage every time your closely held belief, i.e. sacred cow, is offended. Some of the "hot topics" that trigger these are climate change occurring throughout the solar system and having turned to global cooling for nearly two decades vs. the man-made global warming scam; "chem trails" disinfo instead of the changing atmosphere that effects contrails; the benefits of unadulterated tobacco and lack of evidence for all the harmful effects claimed about tobacco smoking; the beneficial effects of high fat (mostly saturated animal fat), very low carbohydrate diets; the vegetarian myth, so to speak, and others. You are, like anyone, entitled to your own opinions, but NOT to your own facts.
Another analogy to the volumes of text you've written here and elsewhere is that if someone assaults your knees with a hammer, it will do NO damage, but only if they assault your knees with an ax will any damage be done. The whole point of SOTT and the sister sites are for people to get over their "hot topic" triggers and false, oversimplified beliefs by working on those issues. And as it says at the top of the page: SOTT is for People Who Think.
Ah! yes. I didn't bother to read much of the propaganda but yes the whole article is stuffed full of deceptions. I can't be arsed to read all the treachery these vermin sprout but highlight:
Quote: We know from many long-term studies, Willet added, that replacing saturated fats from red meat and dairy with vegetable fats high in polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fats will reduce risks of heart disease. This is characteristic of the Mediterranean diet.
Again the plug is for vegetable fats which are the cause of CV disease and diabetes when in the trans form. I do not know how the trans-labelling works in the USA but in the UK there is no labelling required and the unsaturated fats (mono and poly) are trans fats. This is likely to again become the case in the USA when Obama removes the requirement to label food with trans fat content using the excuse that he banned hydrogenation so it isn't necessary. Hydrogenation doesn't cause trans fats, hydrogenation plants do. The plan is to cause more diabetes, CV disease and modern alzheimers so the pathalogical can profit all the more, with a lot of help from SoTT.
... at least sort of.
Both CV disease and diabetes are caused by transfatty acids derived from trans fats. This is an absolute known and in the scientific literature. Junk research like this is designed to distract from the truth so the medical infrastucture can keep profiting at the expense of their victims. This knowledge leads to a cure for type 2 diabetes which is effective only in two out of four genetic subtypes but in these subtypes the cure is absolute even from very advanced conditions. Trans fats (vegetable oil form) were introduced into the human diet in 1911 and the first cases of type 2 diabetes turned up in the early 1930s. It is therefore absolutely the case that diabetes cannot be caused by sugar or carbohydrates (which convert to sugar during digestion) as they have been consumed for all preceeding human history with no diabetes. Likewise HFCS was not introduced until the nineteen sixties after diabetes first occured therefore it is absolutely the proven case that HFCS does not cause diabetes. It is so simple an absolute moron could work it out in five micro-seconds...
So you can either take the SoTT stamped blue pill or start looking into this. If it is still online an interested pink pill person my try looking up: "The Diabetes Deception" by Thomas Smith but be warned: his understanding of diabetes is incorrect and he references papers on insulin resistance which is NOT diabetes. The cure he presents which has been known for decades can be found there. It does of course absolutely cure insulin resistance in all cases and the metabolic syndrome (the cause of most obesity). It also cures CV disease to some degree and lots of other things like peripheral neuropathy for obvious reasons. It only cures diabetes proper in genetic subtypes 'C' and 'D' which I explained earlier on this site.
So be warned everybody. SoTT publishes the lies of the psycopaths. This may be in ignorance but there may be an element of wilful ignorance too!
SoTT: Check it out for yourself, maybe you could organise trials and thereby achieve some redemption for your collective souls?