Are these UFOs orbiting our sun? NASA apparently doesn't want to talk about them

Of course! I would love to have a NASA "expert" explain them too. But I somehow doubt that I/we would get a straight answer. (NASA = never a straight answer)

What a totally stupid/ bigoted response.
In case you didn't know that is an example of what is called an ad hominim fallacy. That is, saying something can be dismissed simply by knowing its source. I.e. Relativity is bullshit because everyone knows Einstein was a Jew...
So you are either stupid and or you are incapable of rational thought (or both) or (more likely) you are a disinformation agent. In either case I wish you would shut up or go away.

I guess because I make a joke and disagree with the source of an article, I'm now stupid and a bigot?

What “scientific method” did you use in making all these assumptions out of three sentences containing less than fifty words? The answer is your own” bigotry and your preconceived judgments” toward me because I don’t agree with your believe in your Pseudoscience theory about “Aliens and UFOs”.

I’m sorry I prescribe to Merton's Norms as a test for “New Found Evidence”.[Link]
Originality: The tests and research done must present something new to the scientific community.
Detachment: The scientists' reasons for practicing this science must be simply for the expansion of their knowledge. The scientists should not have personal reasons to expect certain results.
Universality: No person should be able to more easily obtain the information of a test than another person. Social class, religion, ethnicity, or any other personal factors should not be factors in someone's ability to receive or perform a type of science.
Skepticism: Scientific facts must not be based on faith. One should always question every case and argument and constantly check for errors or invalid claims.
Public accessibility: Any scientific knowledge one obtains should be made available to everyone. The results of any research should be openly published and shared with the scientific community.

At other times I use my “Faith” as my muse, But not in this incidence.

So just because my humor and opinions aren’t your believe doesn’t make me stupid nor irrational and it defiantly doesn’t make me more or less intelligent than you either.
So your warrantless attack is uncalled for and revels more about your character than you know.
Thanks for your insults.
No need to reply. Your acceptance nor response is not required.

You are engaging in a logical fallacy Rocker. You suggest that the content of the article must be false because you have reason to doubt the credibility of the web site on which the article appears. But if you look at the content, you will realise that it comes from a NASA website and comprises images with anomalous 'things' in them. The article simply calls them "UFOs" and says that NASA need to provide an explanation of what they are rather than calling them "broken pixels", which is as about as convincing as the infamous "venus reflecting off swamp gas".

Logical fallacy? Huh?

"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem"
Stop over-thinking.
Just because you see deer tracks in the snow on Christmas Day doesn't mean there's a Santa Claus.
Any more than an optical anomaly on a photo is proof of Alien life or “Flying Saucers” (saw most of those movies as kid too, still don’t believe)

Also, FunCoTech brought up Einstein, another great over-thinker. If any scientific theory which has holes that you have to invent a new math and leaves room for "boogeymen" is flawed. I'm sure that spins your head around, or Steven Hawkins’ chair. Lol

All these negative comments make me laugh.
All this because I disagree, with the now “faith based” (because "statically" the longer no conclusive scientific evidence surfaces, the more this pseudo-science theory becomes based in "belief" than facts) UFO people and because I made a joke.

And you too, Joe?

Yeh Joe, stop thinking. Don't you know SOTT.net is 'the world for people who think too much'?

"an optical anomaly on a photo is proof of Alien life or 'Flying Saucers'..."

Who said anything about "proof"?

" still don’t believe"

Believe what? What don't you believe in?

You're pleading Occam's Razor, but have not explained what you believe is the simple explanation being missed here. Instead you 'joke' about men masturbating in their parents' home.

Occam's Duct Tape

Damn, I can’t believe I now have two Senior Editors commenting on my off color joke and my non-believe in Einstein’s boogeymen.

I love all the articles and stories both Joe and Niall post here on SOTT.net and I have read most of the ones on their website/blogs too.

Please, please, never stop "thinking" or writing. Not my intent at all.

As far as my knowledge, theories, and believes, I’ll be sure and send you a first addition.

claude os meum

You don't have to shut your mouth, just give a wash with soap first, the detergent-free kind. Reductio ad absurdum

Another stupid response.

@ FunCo Tech

Can you care to explain how his statement is stupid?

"Data. Scientific reports. Verification from the authorities. Isn't that exactly what even a common schmoo will demand before he believes anything 'extraordinary'?"

Are you joking? being ironic?
I really hope so, otherwise I'll have to call you out as another Idiot/shill/whatever...

Sad, is Sott totally infested these days?