OF THE
TIMES
"We have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction."
~ US State Department, 1948
Nineteen or twenty people in the foto, and one with face obscured - what is the point?
Is it any wonder, that failed leaders of the West, are concerned by demise.....There is a long list throughout the Western sphere if influence,...
Interesting in ancient time women were considered the shamans of the society. Some societies in the ancient world, was not through the male...
This interesting analysis from the Judge interview with Max Blumenthal [Link] Max Blumenthal: Hamas Still Stands.
This article and so called research demonstrates to me nothing more than a sophisticated to use of language to describe the Darwinian theory of...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Every traffic fatality is a tragedy, but the wailing family seems a bit stupid.
"There was not much swelling and stuff like that, so we think she was living in that vehicle," said her daughter in law.
It's much more likely that the driver's body didn't have more swelling and obvious injuries because the woman died quickly if not instantly during the crash.
The state trooper who came across the accident scene didn't see the driver, which means she wasn't wearing a seat belt during the accident. Looking at the photo, you can see tire marks showing that the car went off the right side of the road into the ditch, where it came to a sudden stop. If not seat belted, the driver in the left front seat would have been thrown violently up and to the right, and probably was killed instantly by a broken neck or major head injuries.
The family wants to win a lawsuit but likely deserves to receive nothing.