Secret History
With nearly 100 on board, the 245m airship was preparing to land at Lakehurst, New Jersey, on 6 May 1937, when the age of airship travel ended. In front of horrified onlookers, the Hindenburg exploded and plunged to the ground in flames. Thirty-five of those on board died.
Now, 76 years later, a team of experts claims to have solved one of the greatest mysteries of the 20th century: the real cause of the Hindenburg air disaster. And they name static electricity as the culprit.
Led by a British aeronautical engineer, Jem Stansfield, and based at the South West Research Institute in the US, the team blew up or set fire to scale models more than 24m long, in an attempt to rule out theories ranging from a bomb planted by a terrorist to explosive properties in the paint used to coat the Hindenburg.
Investigations after the disaster concluded that a spark had ignited leaking hydrogen gas, but could not agree on what caused the spark, or the leaking gas. Conspiracy theories took hold that the airship had been brought down by a bomb, or had been shot down from the ground. Through recreating different scenarios with mini-replicas, and studying archive footage of the disaster, along with eyewitness accounts, experts believe they have discovered what really happened.
Mark Heald was eight when he watched the Hindenburg coming in to land. He was watching from a distance and able to see what those closer to the airship couldn't - where the fire started. "Years later, my father realised that he should have volunteered testimony in some of the initial investigations, because we were probably in a rather unusual location. As I recall, we were seeing it from pretty much a side view. We saw a little bit of blue fire just forward of the vertical rudder, the upper rudder. It hung right to the top ridge."
In a documentary being broadcast on Channel 4 on Thursday, experts reveal the sequence of events that triggered the explosion. The airship had become charged with static as a result of an electrical storm. A broken wire or sticking gas valve leaked hydrogen into the ventilation shafts, and when ground crew members ran to take the landing ropes they effectively "earthed" the airship. The fire appeared on the tail of the airship, igniting the leaking hydrogen.
"I think the most likely mechanism for providing the spark is electrostatic," said Mr Stansfield. "That starts at the top, then the flames from our experiments would've probably tracked down to the centre. With an explosive mixture of gas, that gave the whoomph when it got to the bottom."
The airship historian Dan Grossman agrees. "I think that's exactly what happened. I think you had massive distribution of hydrogen throughout the aft half of the ship; you had an ignition source pull down into the ship, and that whole back portion of the ship went up almost at once."
Reader Comments
[Link]
It took them a long while to figure out that it may have been static electricity in addition to the environment that caused the explosion.
..already..
Many, many... years ago , and yes, static electicity was deemed the cause...
A retired employee of NASA came to the same conclusion in the late 90s. See Wikipedia Addison Bain.
I saw a great tv documentary looong time ago. Very interesting...
They focused first on the eye witness descriptions of the specific ignition/fire characteristics, then the photos* footage -- which did not correspond to famous hydrogen explosion popular thesis. So they looked for other explanations.
Sound familiar?
So, The answer seemed to be the "dope" caught fire FIRST.
"Dope" = an old name for the varnish used on early canvas or or other fabric airofoil/airship surfaces. When it dried, the dope created a taught smooth strong surface. As a 10year-old school boy making model planes in 1960s England, my friends and I made all sorts of balsa wood models. Blessed with a fabulous local model shop, there was big choice of kits.As well as special tissue papers and other fabric. The tins of DOPE were quite intoxicating. Loved to get innocently high on that activity, as well as polsyrene cement used weekly for assembling cheap precision 1/72" scale plastic models.
When the dope dried over the delicate balsa structures, the tissue was transformed. Later if the model plane crashed, it was often easy enough to patch repair. A few years later there arrived a new generation of materials. These were much tougher, slicker, and based on applying heat to stick and contract, related to tubing for electrical connections.
Anyway, the analysis determined the doped canvas was the prime catalyst. It was well know dangerous for early aviators and pioneering designer-builders. They concluded static was most likely the spark, but it could have come from some other electrical or engine source in static conditions.
I was reminded of this story when the WTC twin towers fell and then read conflicting analyses of the pyro mechanics and assumptions of what happens to catastrophic sudden failure of very large innovative structures.
That was the big problem and it was forced on the Germans by the USA who controlled virtually the only practical source of helium. I still think sabotage was the cause, no way were the German engineers unaware of the danger of static electricity.






Entire ship painted with it