This new era called a 'solar hibernation' or 'grand minimum' is caused by a repeating 206 year cycle of the Sun. These hibernations are accompanied by historic reductions in the energy output of the Sun. SSRC research shows the next solar hibernation will bring a long period of cold just as it has done before every time this cycle 'turns over' from its global warming phase to its global cooling phase. In addition, SSRC research backed by that of other researchers has shown a high degree of correlation between solar hibernations and the world's largest earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.Mr. Casey, President of the SSRC was the first authority to notify the White House and other government agencies of this coming solar hibernation in early 2007. Numerous other scientists discovered the same cycles of the Sun. Their findings have been ignored or buried in science journals and thus essentially unknown to the public.During the first six months of 2011, NASA, The US Air Force, and the National Solar Observatory all confirmed the coming solar grand minimum. The next solar hibernation and according to the SSRC and many other scientists, the next climate change to decades of record cold has begun.
This cold era is expected to last for approximately 22 to 33 years with the coldest temperatures to be seen during the 2020's and 2030's either side of the bottom year of the cycle in 2031, and have temperatures on the order of that observed during the Dalton Minimum (1793-1830). We have already seen the early signs of the new climate with record cold winters globally for some of the past four years. During the winter of 2011-2012, while the central and eastern USA experienced a relatively warm winter, Europe and Asia had a difficult winter. We have entered a period of record temperature setting both hot and cold. This trend of highly variable extremes of both hot and cold within a general trend of globally declining temperatures is fully characteristic of the transition between climate changes.
That does not mean we can wait to prepare. Now that the hibernation has begun, it is possible for these unusual variations in temperatures to strike with little warning. We should not be surprised to see occasional severe crop damage and recurring food shortages in many nations at any time. Comparisons to the Dalton Minimum show that there is a high probability of social, economic and political turmoil worldwide as a result of massive crop losses from the coming cold weather. The SSRC believes this damage to the world's agricultural systems will be sufficient to create conditions that could lead to the world's worst subsistence crisis in recorded history. This same food crisis occurred during the last hibernation, though with significantly fewer people to feed. Historian John D. Post called that time"...the last great subsistence crisis."
Additionally, SSRC research and that of other respected researchers shows that geophysical upheavals like the largest earthquakes and volcanic eruptions are likely to occur during these solar events. As before with the Mt. Tambora eruption in 1815 that took place during the last solar hibernation, large volcanic eruptions may greatly add to the cooling of the Earth on top of that created by the reduction in the Sun's output. Further, the largest recorded earthquakes in US history took place in the middle of the last hibernation, the New Madrid quakes of 1811-1812. The SSRC Research Report 1-2010, (See The RC Theory page) similar to that of other researchers, established a strong link between solar hibernations and these largest geophysical disturbances. Given the likelihood of major quakes and volcanic eruptions here in the US, the SSRC immediately notified US authorities and major news outlets after release of the report.
The SSRC predicts the first possible time frame for an instance of large scale crop damage is during the record drop in global temperatures predicted by the SSRC to take place between June 2010 and November-December 2012. (See press release 2-2010). Earthquakes and volcanic eruptions of historical scale can happen at any time now that the next solar hibernation has begun.
This is the nature of the threats that the SSRC sees during the new climate era that has just begun. The obvious message here is that we need to prepare as best we can. The SSRC will do all it can to spread the word about this new climate period and its ill-effects. We will continue to pursue the SSRC Mission of urging the government and our fellow citizens to prepare for this new climate era.
Earth Changes
Reader Comments
good example
like blizzards in tx in the middle of january ? or rapid change in the atmosphere from cold to hot in winter my lucky guess every thunderstorm we ever had in history we thought was bad does not compare to whats at hand just a thought though good article peace . predictability.
like blizzards in tx in the middle of january ? or rapid change in the atmosphere from cold to hot in winter my lucky guess every thunderstorm we ever had in history we thought was bad does not compare to whats at hand just a thought though good article peace . predictability.
PHYSICS IS CORRUPT
solar hibernation?
Change of the solar emission spectrum and much much more:
-earthquakes, more like visible tide on the land;
-flood ( Star waters );
-earth expansion;
-coming of the light;
-change of earth orbit ( further from the Sun );
-setting earth axis straight;
-magnetic field alteration;
Due to double star interaction.
Do not relay on a "science", from ( for profit ) organization just because it has research in the name.
PHYSICS IS CORRUPT
[Link]
Do your home work.
We need to study double stars.
The Rising Sea - By Joel Rea
[Link]
When It Comes - By Joel Rea
[Link]
A Beautiful End - By Joel Rea
[Link]
solar hibernation?
Change of the solar emission spectrum and much much more:
-earthquakes, more like visible tide on the land;
-flood ( Star waters );
-earth expansion;
-coming of the light;
-change of earth orbit ( further from the Sun );
-setting earth axis straight;
-magnetic field alteration;
Due to double star interaction.
Do not relay on a "science", from ( for profit ) organization just because it has research in the name.
PHYSICS IS CORRUPT
[Link]
Do your home work.
We need to study double stars.
The Rising Sea - By Joel Rea
[Link]
When It Comes - By Joel Rea
[Link]
A Beautiful End - By Joel Rea
[Link]
We thrive on clues
Emeli Sandé’s “Clown”: A Song About Selling Out to the Music Industry?
...
On one of the walls we read the words “Anywhere in the world and solar system”. These words often appear on music industry contracts as a way of defining the true reach of it in case of legal issues. Also these words give this meeting room an ethereal dimension, one that transcends time and place.
...
[Link]
Emeli Sandé’s “Clown”: A Song About Selling Out to the Music Industry?
...
On one of the walls we read the words “Anywhere in the world and solar system”. These words often appear on music industry contracts as a way of defining the true reach of it in case of legal issues. Also these words give this meeting room an ethereal dimension, one that transcends time and place.
...
[Link]
Its somewhat incorrect
A Dalton cold phase is associated not with a Grand Minimum but a Grand Regular cycle. A Maunder cold phase is associated with a Grand Minimum. This is much worse.
The jury is still out on whether we are about to get a Grand or a Regular solar cycle or even something unknown. There is no question that the current low solar cycle is a harbinger of a prolonged cold phase to come and it has been predicted by several including Landscheidt whose work on the solar torque cycle provides a sensible basis for the predictions even if his solar physics was lacking.
De Jaeger a solar physicist of some renown was a Maunderist but is now calling a new Dalton as part of a new Grand Regular solar cycle and I hope he is right.
My own best guess is 50% Maunder (Grand Minimum), 30% Dalton (Regular Minimum) and full blown Ice Age (20%) although this is unlikely to be triggered for twenty or more years.
As Wellington said in the depths of the last Dalton after the battle of Waterloo: "It was a close run thing" and whether we get a new Dalton or Maunder seems to be in the balance also. All that we really know with some certainty is cooling will steepen post 2014/15, perhaps moderated by a weak El Nino thereafter a plunge down into colder times, setting the conditions for a new Waterloo or worse.
While mass famine was averted at the end of the second millennium by increases in agricultural production due to increased atmospheric CO2 (not warming) this will not be sustained through the shorter growing seasons which lie in our immediate future with grain harvests across Asia and North America collapsing.
Many hundreds of millions are likely to die of famine or wars caused by imminent global cooling and the lack of any preparation because of the deceivers of the Global Warming Movement. The price to pay will be much higher than the money already wasted on the biggest ever pseudo science scam in history.
A Dalton cold phase is associated not with a Grand Minimum but a Grand Regular cycle. A Maunder cold phase is associated with a Grand Minimum. This is much worse.
The jury is still out on whether we are about to get a Grand or a Regular solar cycle or even something unknown. There is no question that the current low solar cycle is a harbinger of a prolonged cold phase to come and it has been predicted by several including Landscheidt whose work on the solar torque cycle provides a sensible basis for the predictions even if his solar physics was lacking.
De Jaeger a solar physicist of some renown was a Maunderist but is now calling a new Dalton as part of a new Grand Regular solar cycle and I hope he is right.
My own best guess is 50% Maunder (Grand Minimum), 30% Dalton (Regular Minimum) and full blown Ice Age (20%) although this is unlikely to be triggered for twenty or more years.
As Wellington said in the depths of the last Dalton after the battle of Waterloo: "It was a close run thing" and whether we get a new Dalton or Maunder seems to be in the balance also. All that we really know with some certainty is cooling will steepen post 2014/15, perhaps moderated by a weak El Nino thereafter a plunge down into colder times, setting the conditions for a new Waterloo or worse.
While mass famine was averted at the end of the second millennium by increases in agricultural production due to increased atmospheric CO2 (not warming) this will not be sustained through the shorter growing seasons which lie in our immediate future with grain harvests across Asia and North America collapsing.
Many hundreds of millions are likely to die of famine or wars caused by imminent global cooling and the lack of any preparation because of the deceivers of the Global Warming Movement. The price to pay will be much higher than the money already wasted on the biggest ever pseudo science scam in history.
The article is probably true
but
"declining temperatures is fully characteristic of the transition between climate changes. "
So the author has lived through previous climate changes to tell us what to expect as a matter of fact?
Interesting to know...
but
"declining temperatures is fully characteristic of the transition between climate changes. "
So the author has lived through previous climate changes to tell us what to expect as a matter of fact?
Interesting to know...
Well...
If the mainstream idea is that we are living a global warming and that we should worry about the earth cooking under the sun rays, we can almost tell right away that the oposite is most likely to happen (if you catch my drift).
Science is highly corrupted indeed (just ask Arkadiusz, he'll tell you about it). I've read the IPCC report already and it's just... not right... (osit).
The major flaw I see (although I could be wrong) in regards to greenhouse gases (GHG) is the impact of CO2 on the radiation balance of the earth. Most of these guys (that I know anyways) say that CO2 has a lifetime of several hundread years (to fix about 80%) while the remaining will remain for several more thousand years.
Is it me or it just seems improbable? I mean, with all the photosynthetic entities on this planet (plants and algae) I can't figure out why CO2 would take soooooo long to be fixed. In my mind, it would probably only take a few years (under 10) to fix it.
Now since producing CO2 by combustion requires oxygen and that fixing CO2 releases oxygen, is there anybody who has really and objectively tried to "balance" that cycle and see if the proportions are the same? I mean, if it takes hundreads / thousands of years to fix CO2, wouldn't we see the air's oxygen concentration diminish non-stop with all the fossil fuel we burn on a daily basis?
Anyhow, just speculating here. I'm not an expert in the matter per se.
If the mainstream idea is that we are living a global warming and that we should worry about the earth cooking under the sun rays, we can almost tell right away that the oposite is most likely to happen (if you catch my drift).
Science is highly corrupted indeed (just ask Arkadiusz, he'll tell you about it). I've read the IPCC report already and it's just... not right... (osit).
The major flaw I see (although I could be wrong) in regards to greenhouse gases (GHG) is the impact of CO2 on the radiation balance of the earth. Most of these guys (that I know anyways) say that CO2 has a lifetime of several hundread years (to fix about 80%) while the remaining will remain for several more thousand years.
Is it me or it just seems improbable? I mean, with all the photosynthetic entities on this planet (plants and algae) I can't figure out why CO2 would take soooooo long to be fixed. In my mind, it would probably only take a few years (under 10) to fix it.
Now since producing CO2 by combustion requires oxygen and that fixing CO2 releases oxygen, is there anybody who has really and objectively tried to "balance" that cycle and see if the proportions are the same? I mean, if it takes hundreads / thousands of years to fix CO2, wouldn't we see the air's oxygen concentration diminish non-stop with all the fossil fuel we burn on a daily basis?
Anyhow, just speculating here. I'm not an expert in the matter per se.
Why should we be concerned about the next cold climate era?
This new era called a 'solar hibernation' or 'grand minimum' is caused by a repeating 206 year cycle of the Sun. These hibernations are accompanied by historic reductions in the energy output of...