If that's a contrail, where's the plane?
SOTT
SIGNS
OF THE
TIMES
OF THE
TIMES
Welcome to Sott.net
The World for People who Think
Fire in the Sky
Reader Comments
contrail
Its another contrail. Far too slow for anything entering the Earth's atmoshphere.
A meteor would be much faster and gone in a few seconds. Please SOTT stop publishing these contrails as anything other than that. The twin orange tails are a give away as it the slow movement, judged by the time base. Asteroids (I have seen one) transit horizon to horizon in typically less than 20 seconds depending upon their height. Meteors usually less because they break up (unless they just skim the atmosphere).
Its another contrail. Far too slow for anything entering the Earth's atmoshphere.
A meteor would be much faster and gone in a few seconds. Please SOTT stop publishing these contrails as anything other than that. The twin orange tails are a give away as it the slow movement, judged by the time base. Asteroids (I have seen one) transit horizon to horizon in typically less than 20 seconds depending upon their height. Meteors usually less because they break up (unless they just skim the atmosphere).
Actually, cometary fragments are known to travel very slowly across the sky, so your assumption that if it moves that slowly is must be a contrail is false.
Think again anart. No cometary fragment moves that slow. Whatever that thing is, a hypervelocity object it ain't. Even a relatively slow cometary fragment would have hit the atmosphere at something like 5 to 10 kilometers per second. A falling satellite would hit the atmosphere at something like15,000 kph. And Whether comet fragment, or meteorite, if you are close enough to see it like that, you're also going to see it breaking up. Note that we see no evidence of a breakup.
Anyone who's seen a real fieball event will tell you that if you don't already have your camera in hand, and pointed at the sky you're too late. And that thing's speed is clearly subsonic.
I've actually seen one. The experts tell me the large fireball I saw fall, and breakup over Montana in '72 was remarkably low, and slow. Yet it traversed the entire sky in just unde 6 seconds.
Anyone who's seen a real fieball event will tell you that if you don't already have your camera in hand, and pointed at the sky you're too late. And that thing's speed is clearly subsonic.
I've actually seen one. The experts tell me the large fireball I saw fall, and breakup over Montana in '72 was remarkably low, and slow. Yet it traversed the entire sky in just unde 6 seconds.
Self Propelling Contrail?
I have photographed a dozen or more of these chemtrails? and have recently posted images of them on Flikr.
There is no aircraft of any sort involved,they are self propelling chemtrails or possibly holographic imagery?
Whatever they are who knows? but jiggery pokery is in play!
I have photographed a dozen or more of these chemtrails? and have recently posted images of them on Flikr.
There is no aircraft of any sort involved,they are self propelling chemtrails or possibly holographic imagery?
Whatever they are who knows? but jiggery pokery is in play!
It's a chemtrail. It's a new type of spraying system that pumps out a trail that is up to 10 times the width of the jet. Lots of folks around here have seen them, at low and high altitudes. Seriously, these new sprayer jets really put the pedal down on the floor. Gross Polluters.
Q: (L) Okay. Anything about this new asteroid - what's it called?
(Perceval) 2012...
(L) DA-14?
(Perceval) Something like that.
(L) So, what are the odds of it hitting earth?
(Perceval) On February 15th next year?
(L) Well, let me ask that question differently. I don't want to know what the odds are. That's a stupid question. I want to know if it's very likely, just in simple English terminology because let's forget all this statistics crap because I'm sick of reading that book. (laughter)
(L) I mean, is it very likely to hit the planet?
A: No. But there are other things out there that most likely will!