While antibiotics typically hold first prize in depleting the body's gut flora levels, there may be a new culprit looking to take the spotlight which you may know as genetically modified food.
Monsanto's Roundup Ready Crops Leading to Decreased Gut Flora
A formula seems to have been made to not only ruin the agricultural system, but also compromise the health of millions of people worldwide.
With the advent of Monsanto's Roundup Ready crops, resistant superweeds are taking over farmland and public health is being attacked. These genetically engineered crops are created to withstand large amounts of Monsanto's top-selling herbicide, Roundup. As it turns out, glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is actually leaving behind its residue on Roundup Ready crops, causing further potential concern for public health.
According to Dr. Don Huber, an expert in certain science fields relating to genetically modified foods, the amount of good bacteria in the gut decreases with the consumption of GMO foods. But this outcome is actually due to the residual glyphosate in animal feed and food.
Dr. Huber states that glyphosate residues in genetically engineered plants are responsible for a significant reduction in mineral content, causing people to be highly susceptible to pathogens.
Although studies have previously found that the beneficial bacteria in animals is destroyed thanks to glyphosate, a stronger connection will need to be made regarding human health for this kind of information to stick.
Poor Gut Flora Means Poor Health
As awareness grows, more and more people are realizing that poor gut flora often means poor health. Without the proper ratio of good bacteria to bad bacteria, overall health suffers and you could be left feeling depressed. In fact, poor gut health has been directly tied to mental illness,which may explain the influx of people being diagnosed with a mental illness. Not only that, butobesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome have all been tied to poor gut health.
Reader Comments
an example of how bad the non-science is on the anti-GM people - the reality GM crops should really be endorsed by the organic groups. They have massively reduced insecticide use - there is ample logic to back this up. They have increased the use of roundup (glyphosate) and gluphosinate herbicides that couldn't be used until Gm resistant crops were produced but these (despite what is said) are some of the safest herbicides to use for a variety of reasons and if you know that 99% of soybeans and corn acres use herbicide then its better we use the safest. You have to rationally assess these issues not blindly believe everything you read. The biggest change to ecosystems is cultivation versus no cultivation (whether it is organic or conventional or GM. When you take 30 million acre of corn treated with a nerve poison insecticide and replace it with Bt corn that a is a massive reduction in insecticide. I you had the choice of drinking a ;lethal cup of chemical insecticide or a cup of Bt corn (Bt used in the organic area and with no unsafe limit set by EPA) what makes sense to drink? Its not realist to stop the use of the Bt corn - we use corn for many things especially the production of meat - good luck getting everyone to go veggie
(For the inquiring reader who has not done so, you should read "The Vegetarian Myth" or listen to Lierre Kieth's presentations and interviews to see what human agriculture has done to the biosphere of the planet and what awaits humanity in the near future.)
Your spewing of utter nonsense is a major disservice to the readers and an attempt. consciously or not, to mislead people and is NOT appreciated.
MONSANTO has a program called "Cradle to Grave" It offers up to $4.50 per acre if a farmer will use new highly toxic pesticides on their crops. These new untested highly dangerous chemicals have names such as 'Reaper' and 'Terminator' and are expected to be applied to the food plant from the moment the sprout emerges from the soil all the way to harvest. Thus the name "Cradle to Grave".
Post Script: So, above commenter, put that in your cup and drink it.
unfortunately for the science Dr Huber is a crackpot- his claims are not backed by any data no papers reviewed by peers and he has been disowned by his previous employers and peers. The USDA was made aware of this and has done nothing. Because there is nothing to investigate. This is bad for anyone who is actually worried about the safety since it discredits all who are foolish to believe it