Smoking will increase your risk of cancer, emphysema, heart disease, stroke, and dying young, but if you manage to dodge all those bullets, it may actually reduce your need for joint-replacement surgery later in life.
Comment: Ah yes, they must start with the requisite propaganda mustn't they? If they didn't, they would be accused of working for tobacco companies because they printed the results of scientific studies that showed anything positive about smoking. This is the way of anti-tobacco activists. If you say anything that counters their message of "Smoking kills and there is nothing positive about it" you are attacked.
But we digress. If you subscribe to the Dot Connector now, you'll get to read a very revealing upcoming article on what is really known about smoking and what is only propaganda.
Curious as it may sound, a new study of nearly 11,000 older men in Australia has found that the longer the men smoked, the less likely they were to undergo surgery to replace hips and knees damaged by arthritis or other conditions.
Those who smoked for 48 years or more -- the bulk of their adult lives -- were 42 to 51% less likely (depending on their age) to need the surgeries than men who had never smoked, according to the study, which appears in the journal Arthritis & Rheumatism.
Previous studies have hinted at a similar link, but this is the first to show a clear relationship between the number of years spent smoking and the likelihood of joint-replacement surgery, says George Mnatzaganian, the lead researcher and a Ph.D. candidate in public health at the University of Adelaide.
Comment: Isn't that curious? Previous studies have hinted at a similar link--an unabashedly positive result of smoking--and you never heard about it. We'd be willing to wager you haven't heard a fraction of the studies that have shown positive results of smoking, or that have countered the "Smoking kills" line that has been force fed into your brain your entire life.
Mnatzaganian and his colleagues can't fully explain the findings. Obesity and habitual vigorous exercise both increase the risk of arthritis and also tend to be less common among smokers, but the link between smoking and joint replacement remained even when the researchers took those factors into account.
(They also adjusted the data to account for medical conditions besides arthritis-- and the fact that the smokers survived into old age in the first place.)
Comment: Perhaps they should take a look at the life expectancy for countries around the world compared to the smoking habits of those countries. There is no correlation. For example, those statistics from the mid 1990s showed that while 59% of Japanese men smoked, the life expectancy for a Japanese man was 76.5 years. Counter that to the U.S. where only 28% of men smoked, yet life expectancy was 72.6 years. As a matter of fact, of the top 15 western countries in terms of life expectancy (all above the U.S.) only one of them, Sweden, had a lower smoking rate...and 7 of them had a smoking rate that was at least twice that of the U.S.
Nicotine may play a role, however. Lab experiments using animals and human tissue have suggested that nicotine may stimulate the activity of the cells found in joint cartilage, which could help lessen the severity of osteoarthritis, the study notes.
"What we would like to see now is increased research by laboratory and clinical scientists, so we can clarify the exact mechanisms by which smoking confers protection on weight-bearing joints," Mnatzaganian says. "If this led to development of new preventative or treatment strategies then, eventually, we might reasonably expect to see a fall in the need for major joint replacement."
But he is quick to point out that smoking is not the answer to joint health.
"Whatever new preventative or treatment strategies may be developed in the future," he says, "they will certainly not include smoking."
Leigh Callahan, Ph.D., an arthritis researcher and professor of medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, says the findings are likely to spur scientists to explore the relationship between smoking and arthritis more closely.
The study "makes you want to understand the mechanism underlying the association," she says.
Source: Health Magazine
who are positively affected in this way or maybe they just didn't poll for women. My mom has smoked all her life (since she was 13; she's 58 now) and has had both knees replaced, one of them twice! She's also had two neck surgeries and is looking at possible back surgery. I realize that she may be that one in a thousand people in any survey but she sure doesn't seem to be benefitting any from smoking. I heartily agree that the government spews out propaganda most of the time, and I believe that some of the smoking information is propaganda, but as a nurse in hospice I have seen many, many people who were long term smokers, die from essentially suffocating to death as a result of emphysema. It is one of the worst types of deaths I have witnessed (aside from liver disease and cancer) and it might be avoided if the lungs weren't further damaged by inhaling smoke. Notice I say "further damage" because I also realize that a lot of damage is done just breathing the air around us. On the other hand I have seen my mother try everything under the sun to try to stop smoking and never succeeding, well only succeeding at being miserable, that I don't care if she smokes a pack a day if it makes her happy. I just think that completely denying that smoking doesn't cause any harm whatsoever is not true either.