Society's Child
Otherwise known as cyber bullying, sometimes known as cyberstalking, it is an epidemic as at least 40% of our population has posted something at some time. "Google Yourself" is very virgin territory. What happens when you do and you see shocking things about you? Ask Gene Cooley, he did not even own a computer so it took a painfully long time for him to find out about the devastating remarks.
Read more at the website of the North County Gazette
.
Reader Comments
Difficult to prove without actually investigating the North Country Gazette. Their archives are full of stories with no by-line. Anonymous postings.
"Dupree" I find your work of fiction fascinating. Maybe you should spend more time on your trial defense than on your computer. Since we are "bonding" where did your "highly authoritative" links go?
Good call Dupree! The entire case looks like a typical screwball pro se endeavor that is taxing our already strained Federal budget, with the taxpayers footing her bills all the way around. (I'm referring to her conflicted bankruptcy filing that was initiated simultaneously with this case.) All-in-all, this is an interesting order > [Link]and summarizes facts of the case suspiciously left out of this article that no doubt any real reporter would've caught. Answering your question, Dupree: that's obvious. What is written is NOT what the court records and filings show and to anyone beyond a casual observer it is obvious that this fake news story is a hoax by the screwball plaintiff. Wonder if the author’s terming it as a “financial trial” was a Freudian slip. The whole lawsuit looks like a bunch of not so thought out speculations by this pro se plaintiff. Her pleadings only contain ridiculous hearsay and hysterics. I could not imagine any Federal judge who would wants this trash on their docket. If it ever gets there, the thunder will roll!
Here’s where I found the info > [Link]
It’s pro se cases like this one that gives meaning to the old saying that anyone who represents themselves has an idiot for a client. I'm sure this one will eventually have her a$$ handed to her.
A period at the end of the sentence made the link I posted above defunct. Here's the link:
>> [Link]
Okay, here’s the difference between the Deborah Harvey Dolen’s lawsuit and Gene Cooley’s lawsuit:
Gene Cooley was a genuine victim of somebody posting phony claims about him, and the defendant in that case posted that he had felony convictions. Gene Cooley researched and pulled his criminal records and it was blank, making those claims libel. The defendant also admitted to doing this. He had proof and a justifiable case. Deborah Dolen on the other hand, with a whole host of felony convictions and arrests under her belt, trolled message boards hunting for people to sue so she could steal some easy pocket change from them. (She’s been well known to do this and has for many years.) This, I’m sure, was a deliberate scam in a long history of her scamming for easy money.
Deborah Dolen is the very same person (as Deborah R. Harvey) who was arrested and convicted of a racketeering scam where she hired people for $10 an hour to wear official looking Spina Bifida T-shirts and stand on street corners throughout the Southeast collecting money in buckets for the Spina Bifida Association. In each city the boxes of cash would be put on a Greyhound Express, then picked up and delivered to her office/apartment in Sarasota. She then kept the money. It is estimated that her $10 an hour employees collected millions. She was sent to prison for this scam.
Deborah Harvey Dolen is the same person who was convicted of credit card factoring and prostitution linked charges when she was accepting credit cards for services and when cash flow was low, the “John’s” credit cards were run again.
Deborah Dolen is also the same person who owned and operated a national work-at-home Paralink scam and was shut down and fined by the FTC and they named her a top 10 scammer. That's some serious stuff! Let me just say: Deborah Dolen is NO victim. As many of us have known since her Spina Bifina scam days, Deborah is a career con and this "lawsuit" was probably a big money scam attempt for her. It has her calling cards all over it. Looks like she crashed and burned at this latest scam attempt though!!
I’ll bet Deb’s excuses will be interesting as to why she has a judgment against HER now, but she’s always been nuts so is probably hanging on to the thought that there is someone out there that would believe her. I feel sorry for the people she targeted for this one.
I don’t know about her partner Deborah Dolen, but Angela Ledcke was just arrested and booked into the Hamilton County jail in Indiana for felony burglary and criminal mischief charges. Two felony counts and one misdemeanor count was just added to her criminal record. I found this site here when looking up arrest info on her. She's a con artist, a user, and 100% nuts. Didn’t know she had a partner in crime and cons, but that doesn’t surprise me. Interesting info. Birds of a feather and all. Screwball criminals, felons and cons always try to make themselves out to be the victims. ROFLMAO!!! What a joke!
THIS MIGHT SOUND CRAZY BUT REMAINS THE TRUTH. I CAME ACROSS SO MANY COMMENT ONLINE ABOUT HOW TO USE A HACKED CREDIT CARDS OR ATM CARDS TO WITHDRAW MINIMUM $500,000.00 UNITED STATE DOLLARS. I DOUBTED THIS UNTIL I CONTACTED MR. GREG, WHO TOLD ME THAT THE CARDS WHERE FOR SALE AND I PURCHASED ONE, AFTER WHICH THE CARD WAS DELIVERED TO MY HOME HERE IN UNITED STATES . I AM NOW $500,000.00 RICHER, ALL THANKS TO GREG ATM CARDS HACKERS. CONTACT THEM VIA EMAIL: mustapha_ibrahim.h@cyber-wizard.com
THIS MIGHT SOUND CRAZY BUT REMAINS THE TRUTH. I CAME ACROSS SO MANY COMMENT ONLINE ABOUT HOW TO USE A HACKED CREDIT CARDS OR ATM CARDS TO WITHDRAW MINIMUM $500,000.00 UNITED STATE DOLLARS. I DOUBTED THIS UNTIL I CONTACTED MR. GREG, WHO TOLD ME THAT THE CARDS WHERE FOR SALE AND I PURCHASED ONE, AFTER WHICH THE CARD WAS DELIVERED TO MY HOME HERE IN UNITED STATES . I AM NOW $500,000.00 RICHER, ALL THANKS TO GREG ATM CARDS HACKERS. CONTACT THEM VIA EMAIL: mustapha_ibrahim.h@cyber-wizard.com
THIS MIGHT SOUND CRAZY BUT REMAINS THE TRUTH. I CAME ACROSS SO MANY COMMENT ONLINE ABOUT HOW TO USE A HACKED CREDIT CARDS OR ATM CARDS TO WITHDRAW MINIMUM $500,000.00 UNITED STATE DOLLARS. I DOUBTED THIS UNTIL I CONTACTED MR. GREG, WHO TOLD ME THAT THE CARDS WHERE FOR SALE AND I PURCHASED ONE, AFTER WHICH THE CARD WAS DELIVERED TO MY HOME HERE IN UNITED STATES . I AM NOW $500,000.00 RICHER, ALL THANKS TO GREG ATM CARDS HACKERS. CONTACT THEM VIA EMAIL: mustapha_ibrahim.h@cyber-wizard.com
THIS MIGHT SOUND CRAZY BUT REMAINS THE TRUTH. I CAME ACROSS SO MANY COMMENT ONLINE ABOUT HOW TO USE A HACKED CREDIT CARDS OR ATM CARDS TO WITHDRAW MINIMUM $500,000.00 UNITED STATE DOLLARS. I DOUBTED THIS UNTIL I CONTACTED MR. GREG, WHO TOLD ME THAT THE CARDS WHERE FOR SALE AND I PURCHASED ONE, AFTER WHICH THE CARD WAS DELIVERED TO MY HOME HERE IN UNITED STATES . I AM NOW $500,000.00 RICHER, ALL THANKS TO GREG ATM CARDS HACKERS. CONTACT THEM VIA EMAIL: mustapha_ibrahim.h@cyber-wizard.com
THIS MIGHT SOUND CRAZY BUT REMAINS THE TRUTH. I CAME ACROSS SO MANY COMMENT ONLINE ABOUT HOW TO USE A HACKED CREDIT CARDS OR ATM CARDS TO WITHDRAW MINIMUM $500,000.00 UNITED STATE DOLLARS. I DOUBTED THIS UNTIL I CONTACTED MR. GREG, WHO TOLD ME THAT THE CARDS WHERE FOR SALE AND I PURCHASED ONE, AFTER WHICH THE CARD WAS DELIVERED TO MY HOME HERE IN UNITED STATES . I AM NOW $500,000.00 RICHER, ALL THANKS TO GREG ATM CARDS HACKERS. CONTACT THEM VIA EMAIL: mustapha_ibrahim.h@cyber-wizard.com
Something doesn’t seem right about this article. This topic caught my eye because of a project I am currently working on so I tried to find some relevant facts about this trial. Instead, I found no trial was ever scheduled or held. I did find a case study for Dolen V. Ryals that was listed on Citmedialaw.org [Link]where the case docs were provided. This article is not even remotely similar to what is represented by the litigation. From what I could tell, the pro se litigant failed to ever substantiate what appear to be haphazard and tenuous allegations. Each of the plaintiff’s pleadings appear to be conjured and inconsistent (putting it nicely), and nowhere in the docs is any supportive material to the claims. Blame and allegations shifted from one defendant to another and then back and forth again as the claimant continued to amend and refile the case. In one instance this plaintiff made false factual allegations that a near 90 year old woman cyberstalked her. In the 1st amended complaint Plaintiff Deborah Dolen demanded that criminal charges be brought and also demanded the court to imprisonment ALL defendants for five years, including this one. It was stated in the defendants’ answers that none of them ever had any indication who this plaintiff was prior to the lawsuit against them, but this one woman in particular that was being sued for cyberstalking not only didn’t know who the plaintiff was, she did not own or know how to use a computer!
In an order dated 2/24/2011, the court describes this plaintiff Deborah Dolen’s action as torturous and denies further amendments. What is clearly defined in the court docs is that defendants named in this article had been previously dropped from the case in mid 2010 and after a hearing on the pleadings they were dismissed from the action with prejudice to any further claims against them. Odd that all this was absent from the subjectively written article. Then again, maybe not so odd, as it says a lot.
I found no similarity to the Cooley case this one is being compared to either. Unlike the Cooley case, this plaintiff (Deborah Dolen), according to record has been a repeat offender, is a seasoned veteran of the penal system, and is a convicted felon. She is also no stranger to filing baseless litigation. In the 2/24/2011 PDF court order on Citmedialaw, it addresses fair use of her criminal history being used in this case. Again, odd that all this was also absent from the subjectively written article. Then again, maybe not so odd, as it says a lot.
After read the case history, doing a little Google homework, and putting together some pieces to this puzzle from other information found online, I would guess that the case plaintiff Deborah Dolen aka Mabel White may have been the author and reporter of this article as a means to try and seek further attention with her claim of being “cyberstalked”. If the intent and purpose of this article is to hoax and misinform the public in the way it appears to be, it makes me wonder: Who’s the real bully here?