Fire in the Sky
The old way of imagining of those things was to think of it as a point explosion high in the atmosphere. And it's still popular in the press to pretend the atmosphere dissipates the blast. As you can see, it doesn't. Using super computers has allowed them to retain the downward momentum. So we can see the impact vortex hit the ground as a supersonic blast hotter than the surface of the sun. It would be naive to a fault to think such energies can be dissipated without significant planetary scarring, or ablative geomorphology.
And, in fact, in central Mexico, the recent marks of thermal airburst down blasts are terribly common. Forensically speaking there are thousands of square miles of pristine blast effected materials in central Mexico that describe the fall of a super cluster of too many air bursting fragments like the one Dr Boslough's simulation shows, and even larger, to count.
I've chosen an ordinary-typical example of what a geo-ablative airburst does when the fragment is among the last to fall in a super cluster hundreds of miles wide, lat 29.702168 lon - 105.686617:
The white line in the image is 5 miles long.
The mountain, and others like it, are the central uplift of an airburst impact structure that is different from anything ever described before. As you can see, the radial, outwards flowing ejecta curtain is almost perfectly pristine, exposed on the surface. There is no question but that the mountain is the source location of the materials in the ejecta curtain. But the mountain consists of uplifted meta sedimentary strata. It's not a volcanic vent, or rift. There is no crater here either.
The picture begins to make since when we realize that the mountain, and its pristine ejecta curtain is only a few thousand years old.
This ejecta curtain of geo-ablative melt was blown outwards by the impact down-blast. These are the patterns of movement you see when a fluid is driven across a surface by high velocity atmospheric pressure like the froth on a stormy beach.
The indication of the speed of the materials in the emplacement of the ejecta curtain is the outwards pointing chevrons.
The shocker here, is that the mountain did not exist in any form at all at the moment of impact. To really understand the process that formed the uplift, we need to look closely at the ablative patterns in its outer surface.
In the simulation, note the supersonic upwards flow in the center of post impact vortices. The mountain was born almost in an instant as the surface rebounded up into the impact vortex. So, at the same time the material in the radial ejecta curtain was being ablated, and blown outwards, the rebounding surface at the center was ablated, and pulled up into the impact plume by the upwards flow at the center of the vortex.
And the signature of that ablative upwards flow is in the deep V shaped excavations that are wider at the top, and center of the flow.
There are well over 50,000 square miles of geo-ablative terrains like this in central Mexico alone. And the region is unique on the surface of the Earth. The Arid climate has preserved the blast effected materials in context, and in perfect condition. Most of it is in almost the same condition as it was the first year after the impact storm.
These kind of strange, and surreal geo-ablative terrains can also be found in other parts of the world. But everywhere else on Earth the geo-ablative ejecta has decomposed to become soils. And the patterns of movement, and flow, in the emplacement event are no longer legible. So the melt has become indistinguishable from ordinary volcanic tuff.
This is where the fledgling science of Fluid Mechanics comes into its own, and takes flight. The ability to read the fluid emplacement motions of all of the blast effected materials of such an event with such confidence, and in such detail, makes it a kind of written language, or choreographic dance chart.
The blast effected materials of the Mexican impact zone can be thought of as a kind of cipher key, or 'Rosetta Stone', for learning to read the empirically true, geo-history of the world from the rocks themselves. And those truths can be tested.
Reader Comments
Is that an aspect of the programming or the attemptive look at a thermal event as described?
Quite a shocking, revelatory, and yet inspiring piece of good science. It makes me suddenly wonder about the mountainous terrain of my homeland Scotland, and all those vitrified forts, and also ranges of hills and mountains close to home such as the Pennines, which are often said to be the backbone of England. This also explains a lot more about all those uplifted areas around the globe which have not as yet been adequately explained by the "accepted norms" of all the bad science of tectonic movement out there. Also pretty humbling considering what's heading our way!
Keep in mind that the simulation is a cross-section of the down-blast, and resulting airburst vortex. So, post impact, we see a series of toroidal vortices stacked around the rising impact plume.
The rotation speeds you see there are supersonic.
The colors are graded by temperature. White = 5800 K; Red = 2000 K.
Dr Boslough’s statement that: “Simulations suggest strong coupling of thermal radiation to the ground, and efficient ablation of the resulting melt by the high-velocity shear flow.” would seem to be spot on, from where I sit.
Dennis Cox
of the rather violent ways that mountains are formed....and it happened not so long ago.
Mark Bosloughs's simulations only depict a single, lone bolide.
But if we look at images of comets like Linear, or SW-3 we see the potential for a different kind of catastrophe. The typical kinds of fragile, and fragmented, objects we see in the Taurid complex would seem to imply that a large cluster of smaller fragments is a far more likely catastrophic impact scenario than a single large bolide.
So let's connect a couple of dots. What if a large cluster of fragments like comets Linear, or SW -3 did hit? At say, 30 km/s. And at a fairly low angle. What do we expect to happen when only the first fragments on the leading edge of the cluster fall into cold atmosphere, and the rest fall into the impact plasma of the fragments falling only a few dozen feet ahead of them, and just crank up the heat, and pressure?
The model of the Taurid Complex provided by Clube, and Napier, describes the very high probability that the impacts of the Taurid Progenitor arrived that way.
And the mountain you see above is not alone. It is in the middle of more than 50,000 square miles of such materials. And it is all in eqully pristine condition.
"What if a large cluster of fragments like comets Linear, or SW -3 did hit?"
Hits must generate electromagnetic disturbances as well, because of comet metal content and lightning tornado-like effects. Would a cometary bombardment also cause cracks in dimensional curtains, causing collapse of the density barrier locally?
How many impacts are needed for the density barrier to collapse entirely - counting in human creative energy / life force release - blasting the whole planet into 4thD?
that as those mountains are formed with that sucking up motion, wouldn't the air also get sucked out into space leaving what? A hole to be filled a with freezing vacuum? Kinda reminds me of those Mammoths found with "fresh" buttercups still in their mouths ans stomachs...
Another example of the same kind of geomorphology that's not in as pristine condition can be found to the north of ther at the Sierra Madera Cryptoexplosion Structure in Southwest Texas. [Link]
The vacuum doesn't cause the uplift at the center.
The simulations suggest that the mountain formed as a kind of kinetic rebound effect, similar to the effect that creates the central uplift in a normal crater. But since all of the energy of the fragment gets translated into heat, and pressure, in the atmosphere, and there is no longer a solid object left at the instant of impact. The shock is spread out over a broader area, and the impact happens without making a crater. The surface gets momentarily depressed downwards at the instant of impact. And as the surface rebounds from the impact shockwave, it creates an uplifted structure called a 'Cuesta', like the mountain you see there.
It would probably be correct to say the mountain 'bounced up'. In that respect, it's like a wave in a storm tossed sea; it's motions frozen in time.
As the updraft forms at the center of the vortex, and above the uplifted Cuesta, the mountain gets ablated, the upwards flow forming the deep 'V' shaped excavations that get wider at the top, and center of the flow. This happens simultaneously with the formation of the ejecta curtain. But the ablated material from the center goes up into an impact plume. And is thrown back along the entry path of the exploding fragment.
So that "hole" you're talking about gets filled with hot, vaporized rock. And you do not want to be under the fiery rain as it precipitates, and falls back to Earth.
Dennis
It struck me that while many of us have been hunting around looking for crater impacts as a tell tale sign of any cometary type bombardments in our past, that there is likely just as much evidence, if not more, of such cometary visitors and their affects if we take a closer look at many similar geo-oblative terrains, such as you have found in surprising numbers in Mexico. My mind is still being boggled by your work ;o)
This note's for Laura, and the moderators.
I very much appreciate having this short article mirrored on SOTT.NET. But how 'bout changing 'Crater Hunter' in the author bar at the top, to my real name?
Thanks s'more,
Dennis Cox
so wild...it has it's own beauty. Somehow, all these Earth changes coming and happening now have me stoked, I don't know why.
And the uniformitarian Paradigm.
The old clichés like ‘buying a pig in poke’, ‘don’t let the cat out of the bag’, and ‘empty sack of lies’ all have their roots in the same old con. It went something like this: At an old country fair, a con artist would approach a likely looking mark to sell him a piglet in a ‘poke’ bag. But it’s not really a pig in the bag; it’s a cat. The cat wiggles, and squirms, just like a little pig when you poke him through the bag. And as long as the bag stays closed, the con works just fine. But as soon as the bag is opened, the cat escapes. And the victim is left holding nothing but an empty sack of lies.
The Earth Sciences are founded on the unquestioned 19th century assumptions of Sir Charles Lyell. Namely, the assumptions of gradual, uniform, geologic change. And the foundation principle that ‘the present is the key to understanding the past’. Churches, governments, and big institutions, loved it. They bought it like a pig in a poke. And they bought with generous funding packages. And with rules that shut the door to any publication, or consideration, of sudden catastrophic events, as a driving force in the geo-morphology of this world for more than 150 years. That’s a cruelly long time time to leave the poor kitty in a bag.
But the questions of just what the hell happened around 13,000 years ago that caused the extinctions of the mega fauna in North America, the disappearance of the Clovis culture, and a return to Ice age conditions that lasted more than a thousand years, has caused us to take a closer look, and I’m afraid we’ve let the cat out of the bag.
We are clearly on the cusp of a major paradigm shift in the Earth Sciences as far reaching as the realization that the world isn’t flat. But, while standard uniformitarian geology may appear to some to be a dead horse walking, it isn’t. Any new model for the surface terrains of this world that opens the door to consideration of occasional impact related catastrophe as a major driving force in the geomorphology of the terrains of this world is incomplete without a gradual change, ’steady state’ component. Gradualism works pretty good as long as nothing sudden happens.
Dragon/Mr. Cox:
Great article and I LOVE the:
truly "quotable quote"
that ends your note.
About a pig in a poke:
"Gradualism works pretty good as long as nothing sudden happens."
Beauteous.
R.C.
This is my first comment on this site, as after a few years of following, I finally signed up.
Appollynon, I have found all of your comments on many of the articles in this site very thoughtful and enlightning. I thoroughly enjoy reading your comments.
In your first comment to this article and other comments you have made in other articles, you speak of "what is to coming our way"
Could you enlighten me? what excactly is coming our way?
As my baseball playing father would have said, “I’ll try to field that one:”
Comment: Tunguska, Psychopathy and the Sixth Extinction at
[Link]OR
The Golden Age, Psychopathy and the Sixth Extinction at
[Link]
Of course, I defer to Appollynon, who alone knows best what he meant. Indeed, if he knows more than those, I'm all ears. (In the meantime, just trying to help spread some honest searches for truth around.)
I do find VERY interesting the large number of comments that this article has so quickly received, particularly from those who tend (IMHO) to be the wiser of the SOTT commentators*, (which, as a group overall, are, far “wiser than your average bears” posting comments anywhere else I’ve ever read.)
R.C.
* A/k/a, what I refer to as prototypical “SOTT Type Folks.”
RC
I would imagine more of the above, as that example is fairly recent.
From what i've read so far, impact events come in cycles depending on our position in the cosmos.
These airburst cluster events certainly do look more scary than single impacts.
It's quite sad that that does, pretty much sum up my knowledge on the subject. I'll certainly be looking at your website Dennis. Thanks for the great work.
Anyone any idea when the next one is coming?
jeff
As I've mentioned before, fireballs caught my attention a couple of years ago, and I've been trqacking them ever since. I use the data from The American Meteor Society ( [Link]) complied since 2005.
In 2005, the average number of fireballs reported over the US was 1.28 per day, 38.83 per month. So far as my researches have revealed, the 1.28 per day was relatively steady for many decades.
As of 18 September 2012, the average has shot up to 5.13 per day, 156.4 per month. When you plot the curve it is frighteningly steep. The numbers for the years are:
2005 1.28/day
2006 1.41/day
2007 1.61/day
2008 1.98/day
2009 1.90/day
2010 2.59/day
2011 4.46/day
2012 5.13/ day, so far
(I'd put the pdf file of the chart here, but I don't know how to embed it.)
I am coming to believe that the so-called "Mayan" (they really got from the Olmec, who got it from who knows where?) calendar is a countdown calendar created by the survivors of the Younger Dryas impact event to forewarn of the return of a dense cloud of cometary debris. If the Younger Dryas event was extended over a long enough period, those people may have worked out its exceedingly long orbital period and constructed the calendar as the only possible hope of forewarning the future.
The increase in the number of daily fireballs has added sufficient material to the upper atmosphere to majorly increase the frequency and extent of noctilucent clouds:
Anyone who’s ever seen a noctilucent cloud or “NLC” would agree: They look alien. The electric-blue ripples and pale tendrils of NLCs reaching across the night sky resemble something from another world.
Researchers say that’s not far off. A key ingredient for the mysterious clouds comes from outer space.
“We’ve detected bits of ‘meteor smoke’ imbedded in noctilucent clouds,” reports James Russell of Hampton University, principal investigator of NASA’s AIM mission to study the phenomenon. “This discovery supports the theory that meteor dust is the nucleating agent around which NLCs form.”
[Link]
I also am pretty certain that the increase has been a factor in the weird weather that has become more frequent of late: we're heating the bottom of the atmosphere, while the impacts are heating the upper atmosphere.
I really hope I'm wrong, but given the increasing frequency of ground strikes, I think we entering the leading edge of what will become a fireball storm of unknown length and intensity. I'm not sure if December marks the peak, or merely the true beginning of it, but I do know that bigger objects are coming by more frequently every day.
... have comparatively thin sheet of debris associated with it? like Saturn, and Jupiter. and for the same electro-magnetic (not gravitational) reason?
If so, then the Maya (or Olmec, or other) could have a very rational reason for ending their calander at an exact and precise moment in time – when we pass through the Galactic plane on 21/12/12.
If that is indeed when the solar system passes through from 'galactic south' to 'galactic north'. I have read different opinions of that and don't have an independent understanding of the astronomy of it myself.
You've given me food for though, I'll have to do some research. If I find anything to substantiate it, I'll report back on it.












Wow