OF THE
TIMES
What was it like out here when the soil could still sequester carbon? (Insert eye-roll here). Counterpunch perpetually panders to...
Egypt are being paid very handsomely to turn a blind eye
Never ever, carry "Tater Tots" in a pocket in your cargo pants...
Fingers crossed for a Mothra La Niña to offset the Godzilla devastation.
Nothing is an accident.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

I'm a pro photographer and I know that to even consider that it may be a close up object is just not feasible. Whatever the object is, it's pretty far away, almost inline with the moon as opposed to being some sort of near debris. If it was near, you would see blur, aka bokeh, not a defined point of focus as is clearly visible. And that's regardless of the smallest aperture one could obtain.