Please login to continue
Axis of Evil
AFP
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:00 EST
WASHINGTON - The CIA has set up secret joint counterterrorism centers in Europe, Middle East and Asia to track and capture suspected terrorists and penetrate their networks, The Washington Post said.
The centers, known as Counterterrorist Intelligence Centers, or CTICs, act on initial tips that may come from the CIA, but the operations to pick up suspects are usually organized by one of the joint centers, current and former US and foreign intelligence officials told the daily.
By Spengler
Asia Times
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:00 EST
Never have the governments of the old Atlantic alliance appeared as weak as they do today. President George W Bush, his popularity ruined and his political agenda junked, is boxed into a corner, but his position seems enviable compared to that of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who just lost a decisive battle over anti-terror measures.
By Conn Hallinan
Asia Times (Posted with permission from Foreign Policy in Focus)
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:00 EST
In wake of a United Nations investigation implicating a number of Syrian and Lebanese officials in the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri, the Bush administration is calling for international sanctions and leaking dark hints of war.
Agence France Presse
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:00 EST
WASHINGTON - The former US commander of Abu Ghraib prison says that she was held up unfairly as a scapegoat by "male warriors" but the real blame for the abuse scandal rests with military leaders and the White House.
Comment: As the former commander of Abu Ghraib, it is highly unlikely that Karpinski had no idea what was happening in "her prison". On the other hand, it seems very likely that she was used as a scapegoat to protect the Bush gang.
BBC
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:00 EST
US Vice-President Dick Cheney has launched a vitriolic attack on politicians accusing the White House of misusing intelligence to invade Iraq.
Opposition Democrats were guilty of spreading "cynical and pernicious falsehoods", he said.
As a principal architect of the war, the vice-president has come in for a good deal of personal criticism.
Comment: Well, we agree with one thing Mr. Cheney said. The Democrats are, indeed, opportunists. When US public opinion wanted war, they wanted war; now that public opinion has shifted, so have the Dems. That's principle for ya!
That aside, it is both remarkable and predictable to see the Bush administration picking up the "Our opponents are rewriting history" meme. It is predictable because what else are a bunch of psychopaths going to do but accuse the opponents of the war of their own crimes. It is remarkable because the White House has bragged about how it is creating a new reality while their opponents are mired in a reality-based mindset, so the Bush administration have admitted that their history is fake. This idea appears to be the key to understanding what they are trying to do.
It has nothing to do with the truth.
When the president or vice-president accuse their opponents (we hestitate to call the Democrats opponents of the war for obvious reasons) of rewriting history, they are referring to a rewriting of the false history that was written by the White House in the first place, a history that was, by its own admission, not reality-based, that is to say, not true. However, Cheney and Bush have not accused the Democrats and others of not telling the truth; they are accused of telling a different story than the White House. The Democrats are writing a different history than the false Republican history.
However, one shouldn't fall into the trap of thinking that the new Democratic history has any more to due with the truth than the original, for the truth is that the US is an imperialist aggressor in Iraq, had no justifiable or legal reason whatsoever for invading the country, and has no justifiable or legal reason for remaining. The US is the wrong side in this war.
How many Republicans or Democrats are willing to write that history?
by Mike Whitney
Op Ed News
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:00 EST
How can the Senate vote to ban habeas corpus?!?
It makes no sense at all. It's like voting for an end to freedom. And, yet, this is exactly what happened on Friday, November 11, when the Senate passed the (Lindsay) Graham amendment which overturns an earlier Supreme Court ruling (Rasul vs. Bush) allowing Guantanamo detainees to challenge their imprisonment in federal court. By a 49 to 42 margin the Senate approved the measure which effectively deprives them of the right to know why they are being held or of any legal means to defend themselves.
None of the Guantanamo inmates have ever been charged with a crime. The Senate vote ensures that they never will.
Comment: There is clearly only one reason as to why the U.S. government would hold anyone prisoner and deny them the right to know why they are being held or present any charges against them. Surely we don't have to actually spell it out?...
KATHERINE SHRADER
Associated Press
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00 EST
Enough prisoners to nearly fill the NFL's largest stadium...
WASHINGTON - The United States has detained more than 83,000 foreigners in the four years of the war on terror, enough to nearly fill the NFL's largest stadium. The administration defends the practice of holding detainees in prisons from Afghanistan to Guantanamo Bay as a critical tool to stop the insurgency in Iraq, maintain stability in Afghanistan and get known and suspected terrorists off the streets.
Comment: What was the number of Jews detained by the Germans during the first two years of WW II? Are we getting close yet?
Agence France Presse
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00 EST
LONDON - Home Secretary Charles Clarke ordered the extradition of British national Babar Ahmad to face terror charges in the United States.
Ahmad's family said they would appeal against his extradition to the United States, which alleges he tried to set up a terrorist training camp in Arizona in 1998 and raised money to finance attacks in Chechnya and Afghanistan.
Comment: Attorneys in the UK argued that if Ahmad is sent to the US, his rights may very well be violated. We're not sure which is more shocking: that the Bush administration can get away with violating the civil and human rights of even US citizens, or that other countries - knowing full well what will happen to their own nationals - nevertheless ship them off to "stand trial" in the US.
ROBERT BURNSAP
Associated Press
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00 EST
WASHINGTON - Pentagon officials acknowledged Tuesday that U.S. troops used white phosphorous as a weapon against insurgent strongholds during the battle of Fallujah last November. But they denied an Italian television news report that the spontaneously flammable material was used against civilians.
Comment: From
The Independent:
Jeff Englehart, a former marine who spent two days in Fallujah during the battle, said he heard the order go out over military communication that WP was to be dropped. In the RAI film, Mr Englehart, now an outspoken critic of the war, says: "I heard the order to pay attention because they were going to use white phosphorus on Fallujah. In military jargon it's known as Willy Pete ... Phosphorus burns bodies, in fact it melts the flesh all the way down to the bone ... I saw the burned bodies of women and children."
Given that the US government lied about the use of WP in the first place, it is clear that they have no qualms about deceiving the American people. As such, nothing they say - including their recent clarifications - can be trusted.
Donald Macintyre
UK Independent
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00 EST
The guilty plea by Sharon means that he is likely to bear the full brunt of the charges of illegal funding of the campaign which secured his father the Likud leadership.
The one shadow still hanging over the Prime Minister himself is a continuing investigation into payments by the South Africa-based businessman Cyril Kern which were allegedly made to cover the cost of repayment of illegal campaign contributions. The investigation is said to be progressing very slowly.
266,971 people have viewed this page since Mon, 11 Dec 2006
Emails sent to Signs of the Times, Ark, Laura, or Cassiopaea become the property of Quantum Future Group, Inc and may be republished without notice.
Some icons appearing on this site were taken from KDE-look.org, Afterglow, Mayosoft, Everaldo, IconDrawer, VisualPharm, IconFactory, Klukeart, Icons-land, TpdkDesign.net, and IconShock.com.
Remember, we need your help to collect information on what is going on in your part of the world!
Send your article suggestions to:
Original content © 2009 by SOTT.net/Signs of the Times. See: Fair Use Policy