- Signs of the Times for Fri, 29 Sep 2006 -



Sections on today's Signs Page:



Signs Editorials


Editorial: Murdering Children - Israel's Domestic Policy

Joe Quinn
Signs of the Times
29/09/2006

In the past 8 weeks alone, the Zionist government of Israel and it's military aparatus have murdered 228 Palestinians, 37 of them children. Almost all of these children's names have been completely excluded from Western media reports, while at the same time, almost everyone knows the name of the single Israeli soldier whose capture ( allegedly by Palestinian militants) in June was used by the Israeli government to attack Lebanon and murder 1300 civilians.

The death of any child is a tradegy beyond compare, yet when we are faced with the deliberate mass murder of children by members of the Israeli military, under orders from their political leaders, and with the full conscious support (both military and political) of the Bush and Blair administrations, a feeling of anger accompanies the grief. Yet we are helpless, it seems, to stop them. We can do little more than publicly and in the strongest possible terms, denouce these evil men and women who should be allowd no part in the evolution of the human race. Indeed, under their stewardship, the human race seems destined for a future of war, death and suffering on an unimaginable scale.

The Israeli politicians responsible for the murders of 37 Palestinian children over the past 8 weeks would dearly love for their names and short lives to be wiped from the pages of history, yet we cannot and will not allow that to happen. Below are the names of these children, their young and innocent lives brutally taken from them by the actions of men who are simply not human beings. They are animals.

Bara Nasser Habib, 3 (hit by shrapnel to the head and body, Gaza City, 26 July)
Shahed Saleh Al-Sheikh Eid, 3 days old (bled to death after airstrike, Al-Shouka, 4 August)
Rajaa Salam Abu Shaban, 3 (died of fractured skull in air raid, Gaza City, 9 August)
Jihad Selmi Abu Snaima, 14 (killed by a shell, Al-Shoukha, 10 september)
Khaled Nidal Wahba, 15 months (died of wounds from an airstrike, 10 July)
Rawan Farid Hajjaj, 6 (killed with his mother and sister in an airstrike, Gaza City, 8 July)
Anwar Ismail Abdul Ghani Atallah, 12 (shot in the head, Erez, 5 July)
Shadi Yousef Omar 16 (shot in the chest by IDF, Beit Lahya, 7 July)
Mahfouth Farid Nuseir, 16 (killed by missile while playing football, Beit Hanoun, 11 July)
Ahmad Ghalib Abu Amsha, 16, (killed by missile while playing football, Beit Hanoun, 11 July)
Ahmad Fathi Shabat, 16 (killed by missile while playing football, Beit Hanoun, 11 July)
Walid Mahmoud El-Zeinati, 12 (died of shrapnel wounds, Gaza City, 11 July)
Basma Salmeya, 16 (killed in Israeli airstrike, 12 July, Jabalia)
Somaya Salmeya, 17 (killed in Israeli airstrike, 12 July, Jabalia)
Aya Salmeya, 9 (killed in Israeli airstrike, Jabalia, 12 July)
Yehya Salmeya, 10 (killed in Israeli airstrike, Jabalia, 12 July)
Nasr Salmeya, 7 (killed in Israeli airstrike, Jabalia, 12 July)
Huda Salmeya, 13 (killed in Israeli airstrike, Jabalia, 12 July)
Eman Salmeya, 12 (killed in Israeli airstrike, Jabalia, 12 July)
Raji Omar Jaber Daifallah, 16 (died of shrapnel wounds from missile, Gaza City, 13 July)
Ali Kamel Al-Najjar, 16 (killed by Israeli tank shell, Al-Maghazi refugee camp, 19 July)
Ahmed Ali Al-Na'ami, 16 (killed by Israeli tank shell, Al-Maghazi refugee camp, 19 July)
Ahmed Rawhi Abu Abdu, 14 (killed by drone missile, Al Nusairat refugee camp, 19 July)
Mohammed 'awad Muhra, 14 (killed by Israeli bullet to the chest, Al-Maghazi refugee camp, 20 July)
Fadwa Faisal Al-'arrouqi, 13 (died from shrapnel wounds, Gaza City, 20 July)
Saleh Ibrahim Nasser, 14 (killed by artillery fire, Beit Hanoun, 24 July)
Khitam Mohammed Rebhi Tayeh, 11 (killed by artillery fire, Beit Hanoun, 24 July)
Ashraf 'abdullah 'awad Abu Zaher, 14 (shot in the back, Khan Younis, 25 July)
Nahid Mohammed Fawzi Al-Shanbari, 16 (killed by artillery fire, Beit Hanoun, 31 July)
'Aaref Ahmed Abu Qaida, 14 (killed by artillery fire, Beit Hanoun, 1 August)
Anis Salem Abu Awad, 12 (killed by airstike, Al-Shouka, 2 August)
Ammar Rajaa Al-Natour, 17 (killed by drone missile, Al Shouka, 5 August)
Kifah Rajaa Al-Natour, 15 (killed by drone missile, Al Shouka, 5 August)
Ibrahim Suleiman Al-Rumailat, 13 (killed by drone missile, Al Shouka, 5 August)
Ahmed Yousef 'abed 'aashour, 13 (killed by missile fire, Beit Hanoun, 14 August)
Mohammed 'abdullah Al-Ziq, 14 (killed by drone missile, Gaza City, 29 August)
Nidal 'abdul 'aziz Al-Dahdouh, 14 (killed by rifle fire, Gaza City, 30 August)
Jihad Selmi Abu Snaima, 14 (killed by artillery fire, Rafah, 10 September)

In the above list, you will notice one name, that of Aref Abu Qaida, is highlighted. Aref was 16 years old when on the 1st August 2006 he had just finished playing football with his friend. His friend, Sharif Harafin, 15, who was with him a the time, explains what happened:

"We had been playing football and we had just finished. I was carrying the ball. I was going to my home, and [Aref] was going to his home. I heard a loud boom and then I saw him cut to pieces. His chest was torn out by the rocket. People were collecting parts of his body. I was crying a lot."

Many of the other children, the youngest just 3 days old, were murdered in similar fashion by the Zionist state. Normal decent human beings must take a stand against the brutal and inhuman policies of the state of Israel. The slaughter of Palestinians, young and old alike, by Israel has been continuing for almost 100 years. If we do take a stand now and reject these acts of inhumanity in the name of the bigus war on terror that many Westerners tacitly support, in 10 year's time, there will be no Palestinans left alive, and you will have played a part in the genocide.

Notes:

UK Indpendent: Children Killed in a War the World Doesn't Want to Know About
Comment on this Editorial



Editorial: Remembering Gaza beach - how it all started

The Truth Will Set You Free
27/09/2006

A heart-wrenching, blood-drenched reminder of what our Zionist-controlled mainstream media wants you to forever forget - how this whole bloody fiasco started in Gaza.

Israelis deliberately fired several rounds of shells onto a crowded beach ripping to pieces this 12 year old girl's entire family before her very eyes.

But, instead of this incident and many more in between, our Zionist controlled media inserts their celebrated Shalit "kidnapping" following EVERY new grisly murder of Palestinian civilians by bloodthirsty Israelis, in order to "remind" readers how it allegedly all started. They even include Israel's 'cause celebre' in photo captions to justify images of dead children - killed by Israel's war machine, and paid for by our tax dollars.

An Israeli warplane bombed and destroyed a home in the Gaza Strip on Wednesday, [September 27, 2006] killing a teenage girl in a neighboring building and wounding 10 other people, Palestinian medics said.

The Israeli army confirmed it had fired at a house camouflaging a weapons-smuggling tunnel in the southern Gaza town of Rafah, on the Egyptian border, and that its occupants had been warned [MINUTES] beforehand to leave.

Dr. Ali Mousa, the director of Rafah's hospital, told Reuters a girl, 14, died when a block from the house that Israel bombed twice ricocheted into a neighboring building causing it to collapse.

He said 10 other people were wounded by the blast, most of them women and children who suffered broken bones, bruises and shrapnel wounds.

The Israeli strike came hours after a rocket fired from Gaza wounded an off-duty Israeli soldier in the southern Israeli town of Sderot.

Israel has stepped up military operations in Gaza, a coastal strip it had withdrawn from last year, after Palestinian militants captured a soldier in a June 25 cross-border raid.
TOO BAD IT'S A LIE.

It all started June 9th, on a beach in Gaza.
The tears have not yet left the innocent face of one astonished girl, Huda Ghalia, 12, who lost 7 members of her family yesterday, while they enjoyed their weekend at the shore in the town of Beit Lahia, north of Gaza.

These enjoyable moments did not continue for long. Soon, the Israeli navy gunboats shot two bombs among the beachgoers.

Ali hailed a taxi and called for his family members to leave quickly, as soon as possible, and they collected their luggage, the children collected their toys, and they fled the now-dangerous beach.

"Suddenly, a rocket hit our family. I was only several meters away. The rocket fell among my mother, father, sisters and brothers. The dust was so intense that I couldn't see anything," she said, while laying on her bed at Kamal Udwan Hospital.

Seven members of the family were killed on the spot - the father Ali, 45, his son Haitham, 6 months, daughter Hanadi, 18 months, daughter Sabreen, 3, daughter Ilham, 7, daughter Alia, 25 and Ali's second wife, Raifa, 26. Several other women and children were wounded.

"I was so scared and ran away for several meters, and then I came back. I saw my brothers and sisters bleeding. I saw a head and hands but did not realize to whom they belonged. I saw my father - he was dead, lying on the dunes."

Eyewitness, Moneer Ghabin, said that he saw the "unbelievable and horrible" scene at the sea soon after the bombardment.

"Huda was running between the sand dunes as if she were looking for something. She was weaving between the bodies, and the body parts, of her family. She was scared, astonished, surprised and crying," Ghabin said.

Ayham, 20, another of Ali's sons, said that he was talking to his father just seconds before the attack.

"When the shell hit us, I do not know what happened. Within seconds, I realized that my family had been turned into a heap of flesh. Unconsciously, I carried someone's hand or leg - I'm not sure whose. I did not know what to do, and do not know why it happened," Ayham said.

Samir Kullab, 33, was carrying his bag leaving the shore. As his children followed, he said that the Israelis committed this crime because "they feel angry to see Palestinians enjoying their lives."

Kullab said that he could not understand why it happened and promised that he will never come, or allow his children to come, to see the sea again.

And to this day, the bloody massacre continues, unabated.

Nothing can justify this wholesale slaughter of innocents.

Spread the word. Israel must pay for its war crimes.
Comment on this Editorial


Editorial: The Subtleties Of The Terrorist Mind

Joe Quinn
Signs of the Times
29/09/2006

A little quiz for the weekend to test how well you have been paying attention to the evolution of world politics over the past few years:

The new "al-Qaeda in Iraq leader" has issued a new statement urging all Muslims to:

A) Eat more hummus this Ramadan

B) Eat less hummus this Ramadan

C) Stop waging physical 'holy war' since the concept doesn't even exist in the Koran and only serves to provide the American and Israeli governments with an excuse to murder Palestinian and Iraqi civilians

D) Make Ramadan a month of 'holy war'

If you picked D, then you've obviously been paying attention, and if you have been paying too much attention to the likes of Fox News, then you are probably already beginning to feel the creeping fear that only the words "Islamic terrorism" can produce. But before your thinking abilities go completely off-line, let me sneak in another little tidbit of information.

This latest statement was allegedly made by a man that the US government claims is the new "leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq", the guy who took up the gauntlet after we all had to say our farewells to the much-loved "al-Zarqawi" in July. You know, I still can't believe that I'm not going to be using the name 'al-Zarqawi' on a regular basis anymore, it had become so familiar to me, it was almost like I knew him; but then I used to feel that way about my other favorite cartoon characters too.

Anyway, as stated, this new guy, 'Abu Hamza al-Muhajir' - also known as 'Abu Ayyub al-Masri' on a taped recording published on an Islamic website (www.muslimsterroristsRus.com also known as www.bywayofdeception.com) urged Muslims to make the holy month of Ramadan a "month of holy war," in an audiotape posted on an Islamic website yesterday.

Sadly however, and I know you're going to be disappointed about this, while the person on the tape identified himself as 'al-Muhajir', the voice could not, alas, be independently identified. Indeed, neither could it be personally identified by 'al-Muhajir' himself, given that, as reported by the BBC a few months ago, he has been languishing, incommunicado, in Cairo's Tura prison for the past seven years.

Now, if you are one of the people who picked D in our little quiz, you're probably the type of smarty pants that has already started wondering how he does it. How in Allah's name does the "new leader of al-qaeda in Iraq" manage to get a recorded message out from his spartan Egyptian hideaway and directly into your head, much less lead 'al-Qaeda' terror operations in Iraq? Well, you see, there's the rub. The fact is, you won't understand the true subtleties of US-Israeli geo-political strategy until you understand the all-important fact that you can't know the answer to that question.

The bottom line is that, despite your highly developed geo-political awareness, these t'rrists are much more savy than you. Heck, they're tricky, 'sneaky', 'Evil' even, and they have all sorts of nefarious ways and means that are simply beyond the ability of the average pasty white Westerner to fathom - and thank's be to jeebus too, the very last thing any of us wants is to sully our "beautiful minds" by accessing the depraved imaginings of these 'crazed terrorists' in an attempt to understand the ethos and rationale behind their "war on terror".

No siree, it's best to leave such perilous jobs to the professionals, the Israeli Mossad, the CIA and MI6, the guys who really understand the benefits of terrorism as a tool to mass manipulate the masses.
Comment on this Editorial


Editorial: Enemy combatants: who decides

Dave Neiwert
Thursday, September 28, 2006

While Congress rushes to pass the torture bill, it's worth remembering just who gets to decide who is an enemy combatant:

Here's what former Solicitor General Ted Olson -- the architect of the Bush administration's executive power grab -- told the Washington Post back in 2002:

"At the end of the day in our constitutional system, someone will have to decide whether that [decision to designate someone an enemy combatant] is a right or just decision," Olson said. "Who will finally decide that? Will it be a judge, or will it be the president of the United States, elected by the people, specifically to perform that function, with the capacity to have the information at his disposal with the assistance of those who work for him?"

And what will be this all-knowing executive's criteria? Well, here's what else Olson said:

In a recent legal brief, Olson argued that the detention of people such as Hamdi or Padilla as enemy combatants is "critical to gathering intelligence in connection with the overall war effort."

Nor is there any requirement that the executive branch spell out its criteria for determining who qualifies as an enemy combatant, Olson argues.

"There won't be 10 rules that trigger this or 10 rules that end this," Olson said in the interview. "There will be judgments and instincts and evaluations and implementations that have to be made by the executive that are probably going to be different from day to day, depending on the circumstances."


In other words, it will be at George W. Bush's whim. With a little help, no doubt, from Karl Rove and Dick Cheney.

Original
Comment on this Editorial


Sacrificing Palestinians to Yahweh


Over 4,000 Palestinians killed in uprising

www.chinaview.cn 2006-09-28 19:18:06

GAZA, Sept. 28 (Xinhua) -- Israeli troops killed some 4,348 Palestinians since the eruption of the second Palestinian Intifada (Uprising) began in 2000, said a report on Thursday.

The report was issued by the official Palestinian Central Bureau for Statistics of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) Thursday on the sixth anniversary of the Intifada.
The statistics showed that 2,372 were killed in Gaza Strip during clashes with Israeli troops or in various Israeli raids while 1,940 Palestinians where killed in West Bank. Among the killed during the Intifada, 847 were children aged under 18.

The report added that some others were killed both outside the occupied Palestinian territories and in Israel.

Moreover, the figure didn't include the number of Palestinians killed in the Israeli offensive action dubbed operation "Summer Rains" launched in late June after the capture of Israeli Corporal Gilad Shalit in Gaza Strip by Palestinian militant groups. At least 250 have been killed in this operation which is still ongoing.

The Intifada was erupted on Sept. 28, 2000 when the then Israeli opposition leader Ariel Sharon visited the disputed al-Aqsa mosque compound in the Old City of Jerusalem.

The Palestinians, who considered Sharon's visit as provocative, took suddenly to the streets and clashed with Israeli troops.

However, affected by the Israeli operations and blockade, the Palestinian economy declined to the lowest level in 2002 and is still suffering today in spite of limited progress, said the report.



Comment on this Article


Two teenagers killed in Gaza strike

Friday 29 September 2006, 13:37 Makka Time, 10:37 GMT

Two teenage boys have been killed by an Israeli military strike in northern Gaza, Palestinian security services and witnesses said.
Witnesses said that the two boys were riding bicycles in the street near the entrance of Beit Hanoun town when a missile fired by an Israeli reconnaissance plane hit them.

An Aljazeera correspondent said their bodies were badly lacerated, making it difficult to identify them.

The Israeli army said it could not release details on the attack but said it had targeted two men suspected of involvement in firing rockets into Israel.

An army spokeswoman said the two had been hit as they were collecting a launcher that had been used several times over the past week to fire rockets from northern Gaza.

She said they had been targeted by ground forces, not from the air, but would not confirm what sort of weaponry was used.

Eyewitnesses said the two boys did not have weapons on them.



Comment on this Article


Israel restricts 'foreign' Palestinians

By Charmaine Seitz in Jerusalem
Friday 29 September 2006, 12:50 Makka Time, 9:50 GMT

Palestinian-American Jamal Abu Asi spent his summer trying to find a way into the West Bank. Turned away from Israeli-controlled borders three times since July, the Florida businessman was only allowed into the country last week.

"I don't know what to do. My options are either to stay and have my visa expired, or to leave and not come back for a year or two," he explains.

Asi, one of hundreds of Palestinians with foreign passports, who has been affected by a tightening of Israeli visa rules, may have to move his wife and four children back to the US.
Speaking about why he moved his family to Palestine, Asi said: "I want my children to learn the language, and our traditions. When they finish high school here, they will go to study in the US."

US officials say they began receiving complaints in March from Americans who were refused entry by Israeli border officials.

The consulate is recording these accounts, and diplomats have raised the issue with Israel.

But Israeli officials say the problem is procedural.

Sabine Haddad, a population administration spokesperson of the Israeli ministry of interior said: "I want to clarify that nothing has changed.

"The only thing that has changed is that for two or three years we let people enter without permits."

Permits required

Haddad says that Israeli border officials and the military were notified by the ministry of justice that any foreigner planning to enter the West Bank or Gaza needs a pre-arranged permit. Those who have tried to attain this permit, however, find that neither the Israeli army nor the Palestinian interior ministry is able to help them.

Since Israel's disengagement from the Gaza Strip in September last year, Israeli authorities have required foreign passport holders to co-ordinate with them before entering Gaza via Israel.

The only other access point, the Rafah crossing to Egypt, is reserved for Palestinians carrying residency documents, and has been closed for much of this year.

Palestinians fear that the West Bank, like Gaza, will be cut off from foreign tourism and trade.

Those affected by the visa crackdown include prominent business persons, educators, government consultants, development workers and the Palestinian diaspora.

Palestinian-Americans

An estimated 35,000 Americans live in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Some are of Palestinian origin, while others are married to Palestinians or work for Palestinian or international organizations.

Sociologist Salim Tamari says that trade and family lines leading to the Americas are typical of Eastern Mediterranean societies.

"It's only with recent times and the Israelis that it became difficult to come back," he says.

But the majority of foreign nationals seeking residency in the West Bank are Jordanian citizens requesting to join children, parents or spouses. They are Palestinians who were separated from their homeland by war.

Procedures for legalising residency in the West Bank and Gaza Strip were frozen by Israel in 2000, with the start of the Palestinian uprising. The Palestinian ministry of the interior says it has a backlog of 120,000 petitions.

Israeli human rights workers say the tightening of visa rules is an additional form of pressure on the Palestinian government.

But Yehezkiel Lien, research director of the Israeli human rights organisation B'Tselem says Israel's main reason for freezing Palestinian residency petitions is the "demographic consideration" or the desire to maintain a Jewish majority between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River.

Illegal, but defiant

Nevertheless, many foreign passport holders have continued to live in the West Bank despite the freeze by renewing a tourist visa every three months. Still others have remained illegally.

Last week, nearly 200 Palestinians gathered at the al-Bireh municipality at a meeting called by the Campaign for the Right of Entry/Re-Entry to the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

Ramallah council member Mahmud Abd Allah told the group that villages and towns in his district, many of them hosting US and Latin American citizens, would be deeply impacted by the visa crackdown.

There has been no official contact between the Israeli government and Palestinian ministries since the Islamist movement Hamas won elections in January.

Israel and the US are leading an international economic and diplomatic boycott of the Palestinian Authority.



Comment on this Article


Thousands of Palestinians rally behind Hamas

September 29, 2006

JABALIYA REFUGEE CAMP, Gaza Strip (AFP) - More than 10,000 Palestinians have demonstrated in a Gaza refugee camp in support of the Hamas-led government as the embattled cabinet marked six months in office.

Thousands of men, women and children gathered Friday in the impoverished Jabaliya refugee camp, a Hamas bastion, amid a sea of the Islamist movement's green banners, children decked out in green and homemade placards.
"He who stands firm before these conspiracies, is the most qualified to lead the Palestinian people," said one banner held up by a child alluding to Western pressure on Hamas to recognise Israel and renounce violence.

"We support the Palestinian government and (prime minister Ismail) Haniya specifically to send a message to the world that we are prepared to continue our resistance," Mohammed Abu Askar, a Hamas official, told AFP.

"We will die of hunger before we compromise the principles of the Palestinian cause," he added.

The European Union and United States suspended direct aid after Hamas took office last March owing to its status, in their eyes, as a terrorist organisation and because of its refusal to change its hardline stance.

An ensuing financial crisis, exacerbated by an ongoing Israeli military offensive in the Gaza Strip and closures have seen living conditions plummet.

"We reject the unjust siege imposed on our people and any unseating of the government. We will never recognise the legality of the occupation," said Hamas spokesman Mushir al-Masri.

He said his movement would "make every effort" to form a national unity cabinet, despite discussions in limbo with Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas and his moderate
Fatah party over reaching an agreement.

"I cannot say that there has been progress in any sense," Abbas admitted to reporters in Doha on Friday.



Comment on this Article


The Human Catastrophe of Gaza Is a Time Bomb

By Jan Egeland and Jan Eliasson
Le Figaro
Thursday 28 September 2006

While global attention is still centered on Lebanon, less than 200 km to the south, Gaza constitutes a time bomb. Some 1.4 million people, mostly children, are piled up in one of the most densely populated regions of the world, with no freedom of movement, no place to run, and no space to hide. Virtually without external access since June, Gaza is experiencing a rise in poverty, unemployment, penury, and despair. Sadly, that which Gaza most needs today is precisely what it lacks the most: hope.
Earlier in September, 35 countries, to which were joined the UN, the Red Cross movement and NGOs, met in Stockholm to contribute to the restoration of some small measure of hope for the Gaza population. Donor countries announced a supplementary 116 million dollars for urgent humanitarian needs in the occupied Palestinian territories, half of which was in response to the appeal for 384 million dollars from the UN. While we must congratulate the donors on their constructive initiative, the Gaza population needs much more, and quickly. The UN's humanitarian appeal still requires 42% of the funds requested in spite of the warnings about a situation that is deteriorating rapidly, susceptible to destabilizing many families.

Since the Israeli operation "Summer Rain" began end-June in response to the kidnapping of an Israeli Defense Forces soldier, one Israeli soldier has been killed. During the same period, 235 Palestinians have been killed, including 46 children. Every loss of human life must be deplored. But there is no doubt that the response, measured in terms of civilian victims, is disproportionate. For the Palestinians, as for the Israelis, the consequences of the confrontations of the summer are devastating, just as they are pernicious to the perspectives for peace in this troubled region.

A ccess by air, sea, and land has been virtually cut off for Gaza. The movements of goods and peoples have practically ceased. Supplies of electricity and water, interrupted by Israeli Defense Forces attacks on electric power stations, is irregular and insignificant. Civilian infrastructures have been affected. Gaza today remains dependent on outside sources for its food and commercial supplies. Hygienic conditions are deteriorating, while access to potable water is inadequate. With a Palestinian economy in continuous freefall, we must expect a more severe deterioration in sanitary conditions.

Imagine: You are a mother or a father in Gaza, living in a space inferior to a quarter of that of greater London (1,620 sq. km) with a population the size of Leeds (1.49 million inhabitants). You cannot leave this territory, nor import nor export products. Your children live in continuous fear of violence. Shortages of essential goods, including water, increase the propagation of contagious illnesses and reinforce the problems of daily life. Every day, as many as 185 artillery shells strike your territory. Every night, you witness blind rocket attacks on Israel by militant groups. You know that when the reprisals come, you and your family will not be spared their effects.

Now, imagine that you live in Israel, where every night the rockets fall. Armed groups undermine your country, your daily life and your existence. We think it is not in either party's interest for violence to prevail in Gaza and the West Bank, situated at the crossroads of all the great world cultures and religions. To help disarm the Gaza time bomb, we need action on three fronts: humanitarian, economic, and political. In the first place, civilians and civilian infrastructure must be protected by all parties. We ask the Israeli government in its capacity as occupying power, the Palestinian Authority, and all armed groups to acquit themselves of their responsibilities in the eyes of international law.

A cessation of hostilities must be accompanied by freedom of movement for civilians and humanitarian workers. For the Gaza population, the perception of being trapped, confined, of living in a cage is intolerable and feeds the feeling of despair. The November 15, 2005, agreement on movement and access must be wholly carried out.

Freedom of movement is also essential to allow humanitarian personnel to reach those in need in Gaza and the West Bank. The Karni passage, the main passageway between Israel and Gaza, must be transformed into a no-conflict, protected zone, open to the flow of products essential for the Palestinian population. An independent third party could be designated to maintain surveillance of this zone in response to Israel's security expectations. With the majority of Gaza's population dependent on outside aid for its basic survival, restricting humanitarian access becomes a matter of life and death. On the economic front, we ask Israel to free up the roughly 500 million dollars of income from taxes and duties that it retains.

These funds are indispensable to respond in all urgency to humanitarian and economic needs. But money alone is certainly not the answer, any more than are "humanitarian Band-Aids on open wounds." In the end, only a return to the peace process and a durable two state solution can bring hope and healing to this troubled region. The need is urgent. The time is now. It's a question of solidarity and a question of security for all of us.

Jan Egeland is the UN Assistant Secretary for Humanitarian Affairs and Coordinator of Emergency Aid. Jan Eliasson is Sweden's Foreign Affairs Minister and former (1992-1994) UN Assistant Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs.



Comment on this Article


Meanwhile in Iraq


Saddam judge's brother-in-law killed

Friday 29 September 2006, 13:45 Makka Time, 10:45 GMT

A brother-in-law of the judge trying Saddam Hussein on genocide charges has been shot dead by gunmen while driving in western Baghdad.

One police source told Reuters news agency that the 10-year-old nephew of chief judge Muhammad al-Uraybi and a third person in the car were also wounded in the attack on Thursday evening.
A second source said the nephew had died and the third person, who was al-Uraybi's sister, was seriously wounded.

It was not immediately clear if the attack was linked to al- Uraybi's work at the Iraqi High Tribunal.

He was appointed chief judge only last week after the government sacked his predecessor for telling Saddam, the former president, he was "not a dictator".

Three defence lawyers working for Saddam and his co-accused have been killed over the past year, and international legal rights groups have questioned whether he can receive a fair trial in the country.

The first police source said the dead man was Kadhim Abdul Hussain, who was in his 40s, and said his son was Karrar.

"They were attacked in Ghazaliya [a largely Sunni neighbourhood] around 7pm yesterday," the source said.

Al-Uraybi has taken a firm line with the defendants in the month-old trial and has ejected Saddam from court in each of the three sessions over which he has presided.

Gunmen frequently attack the relatives of prominent figures because they receive considerably less protection than leading political figures and judges.



Comment on this Article


Bob Woodward: Bush Misleads On Iraq; Tells 60 Minutes' Wallace That Kissinger Is Regular Visitor To White House

CBS
Sept. 28, 2006

NEW YORK - Veteran Washington reporter Bob Woodward tells Mike Wallace that the Bush administration has not told the truth regarding the level of violence, especially against U.S. troops, in Iraq. He also reveals key intelligence that predicts the insurgency will grow worse next year.

In Wallace's interview with Woodward, to be broadcast on 60 Minutes this Sunday, Oct. 1, at 7 p.m. ET/PT, the reporter also claims that Henry Kissinger is among those advising Mr. Bush.
According to Woodward, insurgent attacks against coalition troops occur, on average, every 15 minutes, a shocking fact the administration has kept secret. "It's getting to the point now where there are eight-, nine-hundred attacks a week. That's more than 100 a day. That is four an hour attacking our forces," says Woodward.

The situation is getting much worse, says Woodward, despite what the White House and the Pentagon are saying in public. "The truth is that the assessment by intelligence experts is that next year, 2007, is going to get worse and, in public, you have the president and you have the Pentagon [saying], 'Oh, no, things are going to get better,'" he tells Wallace. "Now there's public, and then there's private. But what did they do with the private? They stamp it secret. No one is supposed to know," says Woodward.

"The insurgents know what they are doing. They know the level of violence and how effective they are. Who doesn't know? The American public," Woodward tells Wallace.

Woodward also reports that the president and vice president often meet with Henry Kissinger, who was President Richard Nixon's secretary of state, as an adviser. Says Woodward, "Now what's Kissinger's advice? In Iraq, he declared very simply, 'Victory is the only meaningful exit strategy.'" Woodward adds. "This is so fascinating. Kissinger's fighting the Vietnam War again because, in his view, the problem in Vietnam was we lost our will."

President Bush is absolutely certain that he has the U.S. and Iraq on the right course, says Woodward. So certain is the president on this matter, Woodward says, that when Mr. Bush had key Republicans to the White House to discuss Iraq, he told them, "I will not withdraw, even if Laura and Barney are the only ones supporting me."

Woodward reported for two years and interviewed more than 200 people, including top officials in the Bush administration, to learn these and other revelations that he makes in his latest book, State of Denial, published by Simon & Schuster, part of the CBS Corp.



Comment on this Article


Cost of Iraq war nearly $2b a week

By Bryan Bender
The Boston Globe
September 28, 2006

WASHINGTON -- A new congressional analysis shows the Iraq war is now costing taxpayers almost $2 billion a week -- nearly twice as much as in the first year of the conflict three years ago and 20 percent more than last year -- as the Pentagon spends more on establishing regional bases to support the extended deployment and scrambles to fix or replace equipment damaged in combat.

The upsurge occurs as the total cost of military operations at home and abroad since 2001, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, will top half a trillion dollars, according to an internal assessment by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service completed last week.

The spike in operating costs -- including a 20 percent increase over last year in Afghanistan, where the mission now costs about $370 million a week -- comes even though troop levels in both countries have remained stable.
The reports attribute the rising costs in part to a higher pace of fighting in both countries, where insurgents and terrorists have increased their attacks on US and coalition troops and civilians.

Another major factor, however, is "the building of more extensive infrastructure to support troops and equipment in and around Iraq and Afghanistan," according to the report. Based on Defense Department data, the report suggests that the construction of so-called semi-permanent support bases has picked up in recent months, making it increasingly clear that the US military will have a presence in both countries for years to come.

The United States maintains it is not building permanent military bases in Iraq or Afghanistan, where the local population distrusts America's long-term intentions.

But for the first time, a major factor in the growth of war spending is the result of a dramatic rise in "investment costs," or spending needed to sustain a long-term deployment of American troops in the two countries, the report said. These include the additional purchases of protective equipment for troops, such as armored Humvees, radios, and night-vision equipment; new tanks and other equipment to replace battered gear from Army and Marine Corps units that have been deployed numerous times in recent years; and growing repair bills for damaged equipment, what the military calls "reset" costs.

At least one lawmaker, referring to reports of equipment shortages in the war zones and at US bases where troops are training for combat, says some of the spending is misplaced. "While we are spending billions in Iraq to build and maintain massive bases, we cannot [effectively] repair our abused equipment or replace it," US Representative Martin T. Meehan , a Lowell Democrat and member of the House Armed Services Committee, said in a statement.

The Pentagon, which had previously made public its own estimate of operating costs, has not released up-to-date war costs.

The Congressional Research Service report estimates that after Congress approves two pending bills, the total war costs since Sept. 11, 2001, will reach about $509 billion. Of that, $379 billion will cover the cost of operations in Iraq, $97 billion will be the price tag for Afghanistan operations, and $26 billion will have gone to beefed-up security at US military bases around the world.

Though the military's operational costs in Iraq and Afghanistan have gone up despite a level number of US troops, the report attributes a large portion of the increased spending to the military's ongoing preparations to sustain combat operations in the two countries for the foreseeable future.

For example, the report shows that under the category of "procurement," the funds designated for "resetting the force" -- replacing or repairing equipment damaged in combat and preparing for long-term fighting -- has jumped from $7.2 billion in 2004 to $20.9 billion in 2005, and $22.9 billion this year. Separately, the Army has told Congress that it estimates it will need at least $36 billion more for equipment, while the Marine Corps has reported it needs nearly $12 billion.

Another major war cost is for infrastructure -- bases, landing strips, repair shops -- for the forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. These "operations and maintenance" costs remained steady at about $40 billion per year in 2003, 2004, and 2005, but have spiked to more than $60 billion this year.

Those factors alone, however, are "not enough to explain" the spiraling increase in operating costs, according to the report.

"You would expect [operating costs] to level off if you have the same level of people," said the report's principal author, Amy Belasco, a national defense specialist at the Congressional Research Service. "You shouldn't have as much cost to fix buildings that were presumably repaired when you got there. It's a bit mysterious."

The Pentagon has not provided Congress with a detailed accounting of all the war funds, making it impossible to conduct a full, independent estimate of how much Americans are spending in Iraq and Afghanistan -- or to predict what future costs might be.

"In congressional hearings, the Department of Defense has typically provided estimates of the current or average monthly costs over a period of time for military operations, referred to as the 'burn rate,' " the report stated. "While this figure covers some of the costs of war, it excludes the cost of upgrading or replacing military equipment and improving or building facilities overseas, and it does not cover all funds appropriated."



Comment on this Article


Bush calls Democrats 'cut and run' party

Friday, September 29, 2006
TOM GORDON
News staff writer



President Bush said Thursday the Democrats want to cut and run from Iraq, while he and his fellow Republicans will do what it takes to win the war on terror.

"Five years after 9/11, the worst attack on American homeland in our history, the Democrats offer nothing but criticism, obstructionism and endless second guessing," Bush said in a speech at the Birmingham-Jefferson Convention Complex.
"That's right," replied someone in the friendly audience of about 2,000 gathered at a luncheon fund-raiser for Gov. Bob Riley's re-election campaign.

"The party of FDR and the party of Harry Truman has become the party of cut and run," Bush said to applause.

Republicans, he said, "see the stakes. We understand the nature of the enemy. We know that the enemy wants to attack us again. We will not wait to respond to the enemy. We're not going to wait for them to attack us in order to respond. We will fight them wherever they make a stand. We will settle for nothing less than victory."

The president's toughly worded speech, one of the harshest he's made this campaign season, was given with an eye toward the Nov. 7 elections, in which public concern over Iraq may help Democrats regain control in Congress.

Bush spent part of his remarks urging Riley's re-election on Nov. 7, but most of his 40-minute speech was a dogged defense of the 3½-year war in Iraq and criticism of Democrats who oppose the war or how it is being waged.

"Now's the time for the United States of America to lay the foundation of peace, to confront the challenge we have square on, to protect our country, to do our duty, so that generations will look back and say, 'Thank God this generation of Americans was willing to serve and serve strong,'" said Bush, who received at least nine standing ovations during his speech.

Riley, who introduced the president, reflected the war on terror theme when he said, "Ladies and gentleman, this is exactly the kind of man I would want to lead our country in a time of war."

People paid $250, $500 or $1,000 to attend the luncheon, which was expected to raise as much as $1 million for Riley's re-election campaign. Bush called Riley one of the nation's finest governors and credited him with creating an environment that spurred economic growth in Alabama, which now has a jobless rate of 3.5 percent.

"When you have people working, it makes sense to put the man in charge of setting the tone for the state back in office," Bush said.

He also said that he and Riley shared the same view that tax cuts help economic growth.

"You see, we believe that when you've got more of your own money in your pocket to save, spend or invest, the economy grows," Bush said. "He (Riley) told me that he's running on cutting taxes, another reason to put him back in office ... And I'm telling you, cutting taxes works."

Focus on terror:

But Bush's main focus was the war on terror and what he termed Democrats' "policy of withdrawal from Iraq." He referred to the House passage this week of a bill to set out rules governing the trials and interrogations of suspected terrorists. Bush said the bill would set up military commissions "to enable us to bring to justice the people that ordered the attacks on the United States of America. The Supreme Court said, 'You must work with the legislature to achieve these objectives,' and we're doing just that."

Bush noted the bill passed "over the objections of 160 House Democrats, including the entire Democrat leadership.

"We must give our professionals the tools necessary to protect the American people in this war on terror," he said, "and those in the House of Representatives were wrong to vote against this bill."

Democrats who opposed the bill said it was faulty and could lead to a Supreme Court decision overturning terrorist convictions.

Presidential visits sometimes help candidates win in election years. Though Riley has been leading his Democratic opponent, Lt. Gov. Lucy Baxley, by wide margins in recent opinion polls, Rep. Mike Hill, R-Columbiana, said Bush's visit should give a shot of adrenaline to Riley supporters.

Bush "may not pick up that many more votes, but what he does is, he gives the voters out there that really ... respect him and love him a vitality they may not have," Hill said. "Right now everybody's so tired of the campaign ... I am sickened every time I turn on the TV and see a negative ad being run. This (Bush's visit) is sort of bringing a breath of fresh air."

Comment: Uh, are we on the same planet here? The Democrats have done nothing since Bush got into power. They rolled over and have been playing "We love Israel more than you do!" while Americans are losing their jobs, being killed in the occupation of Iraq and Afghanisan, losing their rights, and are suffering under a more and more openly tyrannical state.

Bush wants war. He says it openly, clearly, and proudly. And he cynically calls it laying "the foundation for peace". With the new detention laws being passed, you, too, will one day be defined as an enemy combatant for expressing your outrage at the killing and war crimes that people of conscience the world over are horrified by.

It is normal, natural, and completely right to see this killing as horrific and to demand that those responsible be brought before the courts. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, the whle gang should be arrested and tried. Unfortunately, the pieces are being put into place to silence you, at best, or to lock you up.

The time to take a stand is now.


Comment on this Article


Halliburton Gave $4 Million to Politicians and Received 600 Percent Gain on Contracts Since 2000

28/09/2006
Common Dreams

WASHINGTON - Halliburton spent $4.6 million since 2000, buying influence in Washington via campaign donations and lobbying, a HalliburtonWatch analysis reveals.

The board of directors and their spouses personally gave $828,701 to candidates for Congress and the presidency while Halliburton's political action committees gave $1.2 million, most of it donated to Republicans and political organizations with strong Republican ties, according to the analysis.

The company spent an additional $2.6 million lobbying members of Congress, the White House and federal agencies.

Conclusion: Halliburton's $4.6 million in political arm- twisting since 2000 has paid-off magnificently as the company's government contracts ballooned by over 600 percent in value by the end of 2005, mostly because of the war in Iraq. Web: http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/reports/waxman0606.pdf

In 2000, Halliburton was the 20th largest federal contractor, receiving $763 million in federal contracts. By 2005, Halliburton had grown to become the sixth largest federal contractor, receiving nearly $6 billion in federal contracts during that year.

Between March 2003 and June 30, 2006, Halliburton received $18.5 billion in revenue from the federal government for the war in Iraq.

The company has seen its profits in government contracting almost quadruple to $330 million in 2005 compared to $84 million in 2004.

During one quarter in 2005, Halliburton's war profits skyrocketed by 284 percent. Web: http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/news/earnings072205.html




Comment on this Article


Peaceful Iraq war protests prompt 71 arrests

CNN
26/09/2006

Two Presbyterian ministers were among 71 people arrested during a series of peaceful protests against the Iraq war Tuesday, said a spokeswoman for a group participating in the protests.

Demonstrators held sit-ins, prayer services and sing-alongs at four locations in the Capitol complex, including the central atrium of the Senate Hart Office Building.

The demonstrations were reminiscent of the Vietnam era, with protesters strumming guitars, singing peace songs, holding flowers and wearing hats made of balloons.

Senate staffers watched the demonstrators from their offices. Protesters said that several workers gave them a thumbs-up or other signs of approval.

"We are trying to protest a lack of civil liberties and to try and end a war culture," said protester Alex Bryan of New York.
Thirty-three of those arrested were charged with unlawful conduct inside the Hart Building, said Sgt. Kimberly Schneider of the Capitol Police.

Thirty-eight more demonstrators were arrested at separate protests near the Capitol, she said. Of those, 23 were charged with crossing a police line and 15 were charged with demonstrating without a permit.

All of those arrested were cooperative with police, Schneider said.

The National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance, which has organized dozens of anti-war protests around the country, coordinated Tuesday's effort, which included several religious and secular groups.

Among those arrested during the demonstrations were two Presbyterian ministers, a Catholic activist and a member of a Quaker group, said Jennifer Kuiper, spokeswoman for The Declaration of Peace, one of the groups participating in the protests.

Both groups apparently expected participants to be arrested. On a notice posted at The Declaration of Peace Web site, the protests are described as an "interfaith religious procession around the Capitol, followed by peace presence and nonviolent resistance, including risking arrest at the U.S. Senate."

The National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance Web site adds, "Those willing to engage in nonviolent acts of civil resistance against the war and occupation are encouraged to join us. We also enthusiastically call upon those who cannot risk arrest, but who are willing to support those who do."

Despite a rising tide of war opposition, the protesters said they represent no party or political movement.

Baptist minister Jamie Washam of Wisconsin, who led an interfaith service during the protests, said she is adamantly opposed to the war.

"My congregation wants peace," she said. "And I think it's an offense to God."

Tuesday's events in Washington were part of 375 protests and other activities being held around the country this week in opposition to the war, according to The Declaration of Peace.

There were hundreds of arrests in a protest organized by the National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance a year ago. On September 26, 2005, 371 people were arrested during the "Resist and Remember" protest in Washington, one of the organization's founders, Gordon Clark, wrote in an online article.

Of those, 104 were arrested at the White House for refusing to leave after being denied an audience with President Bush, Clark wrote.

Comment: And you all thought we were scaremongering when we said that the US was becoming an overt fascist regime. Ha!

Comment on this Article


Target: Iran


Iran rules out suspending nuclear activities

by Aresu Eqbali
AFP
September 29, 2006

TEHRAN - Iran has said there was no reason to suspend its nuclear activities, maintaining a tough line despite talks with the European Union aimed at persuading Tehran to halt uranium enrichment.

"Iran does not see any reason to suspend nuclear activities," state television quoted Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki as saying Friday, a day after another key round of talks between Iran and the European Union ended in Berlin.
Mottaki's comments appeared to refer to uranium enrichment, a sensitive nuclear process that the West wants Iran to suspend as proof that it is not seeking nuclear weapons.

A suspension at least of temporary nature is a key demand of the European Union and United States. Enriched uranium can be used both to make nuclear fuel and, in highly enriched form, the explosive core of an atomic bomb.

But Mottaki said Western countries "have found out that threatening language and a referral to the United Nations Security Council is not efficient and there is no way for them now but to negotiate."

Iran insists that its nuclear programme is solely for peaceful energy needs, vehemently rejecting US allegations that it is seeking to manufacture nuclear weapons.

Washington is leading a push for UN sanctions against Iran if it fails to halt uranium enrichment and agree a deal proposed by the five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany that offers Tehran incentives and negotiations.

Mottaki's comments represented Tehran's most explicit signal yet since the talks between its top nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani and EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana that it does not intend to suspend enrichment.

The talks that ended Thursday in Berlin failed to produce an accord but both men said they were positive and constructive, with Solana hailing what he described as progress.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had vowed in a speech Thursday that Iran "would not bend" over its nuclear programme and also questioned the value of suspending uranium enrichment.

There have been conflicting reports over whether Iran made any offer in the EU talks to suspend enrichment for a limited time, with some Iranian officials denying assertions by EU diplomats that it had done so.

The Washington Times reported Tuesday that Iran was close to agreeing a secret deal that would have it suspend uranium enrichment for 90 days in order for additional talks to take place.

"Why are they insisting that we stop it (enrichment) even for one day? Why should we pretend to stop it even for one day?" Ahmadinejad asked the cheering crowd in his speech.

The United States, which has backed the EU talks while also showing increasing impatience with Tehran, warned that time was running out for Solana to convince Iran to suspend its uranium enrichment activities.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack confirmed that a new deadline for Iran to halt enrichment agreed last week among the permanent five UN Security Council members and Germany was looming and would not be changed.

"The timeline that was agreed in New York stays, and we are getting short now in terms of that time." The deadline has not been officially revealed but European diplomats involved in the negotiations said it was sometime next week.

Iran defied a previous UN deadline of August 31 to halt uranium enrichment but was given more time to see if the talks between Larijani and Solana were successful.

Meanwhile, Mottaki was also quoted as vowing that should the standoff intensify "Iran will not use oil as a political weapon and there is no need to do so either."



Comment on this Article


Iran seen borrowing nuclear strategy from Israel

Reuters
27/09/2006

In developing its nuclear program Iran is using strategies that allowed its enemy Israel to assemble the Middle East's only atomic arsenal without admitting it had one, according to a leading expert on the Israeli program.

"Whether deliberately or inadvertently, there are elements of resemblance between the way Iran is pursuing its nuclear program today and the way Israel was pursuing its own program in the 1960s," Avner Cohen, author of a landmark study entitled "Israel and the Bomb," in a telephone interview.
"This is a great irony of history but Iranian policymakers and nuclear technocrats may be strategically mimicking the Israeli model," said Cohen, senior research scholar at the University of Maryland's Center for International and Security Studies.

As Cohen sees it, the elements the Israeli and Iranian nuclear programs have in common are secrecy, concealment, ambiguity, double talk and denial.

Iran's probable strategy, he says, is to create the perception of having a secret weapons program, or being close to it, without actually testing a bomb or declaring its possession or impending possession.

That echoes the Israeli program, which began in the late 1950s at the Dimona nuclear complex in the Negev Desert. Since then, Israel has declined to confirm or deny it has nuclear weapons, saying only it would not be the first to "introduce" them into the Middle East.

Over the decades, Israel's attitude has been "let the world guess" or as former Prime Minister Shimon Peres called it, "deterrence by uncertainty."

INTELLIGENCE GAPS

Intelligence agencies are guessing again. The current Washington debate on Iran features widely varying estimates of how close the Islamic state might be to a nuclear weapon.

Iran has consistently denied it is working on a weapons program and the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, has found no evidence of one. Last month, the IAEA disputed a U.S. congressional report saying Iran was already producing weapons-grade uranium.

The
Central Intelligence Agency and the 15 other U.S. intelligence agencies use equipment from spy satellites and supercomputers to subterranean listening devices. But there are few spies on the ground in Iran, where Washington has had no official presence for more than a quarter of a century.

"The ... nature of the Iranian target poses unique HUMINT (human intelligence) challenges; since American officials have so little physical access to Iran, it is difficult to collect information there," a congressional intelligence report said last month.

"There is a great deal about Iran that we do not know."

That includes, intelligence officials acknowledge, insight into the small circle of religious figures in Iran with the authority to decide whether to pursue building a nuclear bomb and how many resources to devote to the project.

U.S. intelligence czar John Negroponte said in February that Iran was 10 years away from a bomb but later talked about "the beginning of the next decade perhaps to the middle of the next decade" - four to ten years.

He added: "Iran is ... a hard (intelligence) target. They engage in denial and deception. They don't want us necessarily to know everything that they are doing. So we don't, for example, know whether there is a secret military program and to what extent that program has made progress."

While there are parallels between Iran now and Israel then, the political context is vastly different. Beginning with
Richard Nixon, a succession of U.S. presidents looked the other way as Israel built up its arsenal, historians says. Published estimates of the number of Israel nuclear devices range from 75 to 200.

In contrast, the administration of George W. Bush has said it would not tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran, a country the president has termed part of an "axis of evil."

Comment: Hypocrisy? What hypocrisy?

Comment on this Article


Iran wanted to work with the US regime to prevent the diplomatic crisis but was ignored

BBC News
25/09/2006

The US and Iran almost never speak to each other.

"It's the most unusual relationship we have with any country in the world," explains US Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns.

"It's been 27 years since we've had a normal diplomatic, social and political relationship. And so for instance I am one of the people responsible for Iran in our government and yet I have never met an Iranian government official in my 25-year career."

The fiery rhetoric between Iran and the US of recent months has made it appear that the two countries are on a collision course. But did it have to be this way and could the two sides still sit down face to face?
9/11 opportunity

In the wake of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the US, there were some tentative steps.

In Iran, vast crowds turned out on the streets and held candlelit vigils for the victims. Sixty-thousand spectators respected a minute's silence at Tehran's football stadium.

Some of Iran's leaders also sensed an opportunity. America quickly fixed its sights on the Taleban in Afghanistan with whom the Iranians had nearly come to war just three years earlier.

With a common enemy in the Taleban, the two found grounds to co-operate.

After the Afghan war, US negotiators worked closely with Iranian counterparts to form a new Afghan government.

Some of the talks between US and Iranian officials moved beyond Afghanistan and there was hope that it could lead to tentative re-engagement and eventually a restoration of relations.

But back in their respective capitals, there were voices of dissent.

Debates in Washington and Tehran paralleled each other. Hardliners and moderates clashed about whether it was worth talking to the other side and whether it could ever be trusted.

Hardliners in Iran, scarred by the past, cited Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's dictum that any friendship between the US and Iran was like that between a wolf and a sheep.

And just a few weeks after Iran and the US had worked so closely over Afghanistan, Iran was described by President George W Bush as part of an "axis of evil" in his 2002 State of the Union address.

Javad Zarif, now Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, said this was a big surprise at after the co-operation over the Afghan government.

"We were all shocked by the fact that the US had such a short memory and was so ungrateful about what had happened just a month ago," he said.

But the hardliners in Washington had been bolstered by Israel's discovery just a few weeks before the speech of a consignment of arms alleged to be heading from Iran to Palestinian groups.

Surprise overture

Another potential opening came in May 2003.

America's swift march to Baghdad the previous month had led to fears in Tehran that it would be next.

So Tehran made a dramatic - but surprisingly little known - approach to the Americans.

Iran's offer came in the form of a letter, although Iranian diplomats have suggested that their letter was in turn a response to a set of talking points that had come from US intermediaries.

In it, Iran appeared willing to put everything on the table - including being completely open about its nuclear programme, helping to stabilise Iraq, ending its support for Palestinian militant groups and help in disarming Hezbollah.

What did Iran want? Top of the list was a halt in US hostile behaviour and a statement that "Iran did not belong to 'the axis of evil'".

The letter was the product of an internal debate inside Tehran and had the support of leaders at the highest level.

"That letter went to the Americans to say that we are ready to talk, we are ready to address our issues," explains Seyed Adeli, who was then a deputy foreign minister in Iran. But in Washington, the letter was ignored.

Larry Wilkerson, who was then chief of staff to US Secretary of State Colin Powell, thinks that was a big mistake.

"In my mind it was one of those things you throw up in the air and say I can't believe we did this."

He says the hardliners who stood against dialogue had a memorable refrain. "We don't speak to evil'.

The problem was that at the very moment that Iranian vulnerability was at its greatest, thanks to America's swift march to Baghdad, Washington was at its most triumphalist.

Why talk to Iran when you could simply dictate terms from a position of strength?

Gift to the hardliners

The effect of America's rejection of talks was far reaching.

It would tilt the balance of power within Tehran towards the hardliners.

"The failure is not just for the idea, but also for the group who were pursuing the idea," explains Seyed Adeli.

Over the following years, the hardliners in Tehran who were far less supportive of dialogue moved into the ascendancy. And the balance of power between Iran and the US began to shift.

America's victory in Iraq began to look like something far more ambivalent as a bloody insurgency gathered strength. Meanwhile, Iran's influence both in Iraq and across the Middle East grew, augmented by rising oil prices.

In March 2005, the US announced it would back the EU's negotiations with Iran over its nuclear programme, which Iran says is peaceful but the US and others believe is geared towards weapons.

The possibility of talks is currently on the table. But the US insists that Iran must suspend its nuclear activity first.

At the UN, Iran's ambassador Javad Zarif argues that this is the source of the problem.

"Had it not been for those arbitrary red lines and the pressure that went along with those arbitrary red lines imposed on our negotiating partners, I believe the nuclear issue could have been resolved long time ago."

But the US believes that Iran has failed to be open about its nuclear programme and needs to abide by UN demands that it halt its activity first.

The two sides may be able to sit down and talk face to face in the coming months, if agreement can be reached regarding some form of Iranian suspension of nuclear activity. But if this chance is lost, there may not be many more.

Mixed Messages and Secret Diplomacy was broadcast on BBC Radio 4 at 8pm on Monday 25 September.



Comment on this Article


Iran To Mass Produce New Artillery Gun

Sep 27, 2006
Spacewar.com

Iran on Wednesday announced it has started mass production of a marine artillery gun, the Fajr 27, which it said is capable of firing 85 76-millimeter shells a minute. "The Fajr 27 addresses our naval forces' needs and is capable of hitting surface as well as aerial targets. Six years of work by our military specialists have borne fruit," Defense Minister Mostafa Mohammad Najjar said.

"This weapon is capable of quickly reacting to any incoming aerial and surface attacks, has the capability to fire 85 rounds of 76 millimeter shells a minute and can be controlled automatically," he added on state television.

He added that the cannon, which can be mounted on a ship or dry land, has a range of 17 kilometers (10.5 miles).

Najjar said at the unveiling of the weapon's mass production plant that since 54 countries have this kind of artillery, its mass production will open up export markets for the Islamic republic.

The announcement is the latest of a string of military breakthroughs claimed by Iran over the past month and comes at a time of mounting tension with the West over the Islamic republic's nuclear program.




Comment on this Article


Americans favor diplomacy on Iran: Reuters poll

September 28, 2006
ABC News

WASHINGTON - A majority of Americans want the United States to increase diplomatic efforts over Iran's nuclear ambitions, while 70 percent oppose the use of U.S. troops to thwart Iran, according to a Reuters/Zogby poll released on Thursday.

Asked the best course of action for the United States in dealing with Iran's nuclear ambitions, 45 percent said Washington should join with allies to increase diplomatic efforts and another 17 percent said the United States should step up diplomacy on its own.

One in four respondents, 26 percent, said they supported the use of U.S. ground troops in Iran, while 70 percent opposed it. Nine percent favored air strikes on selected military targets in Iran.
President George W. Bush said last week at the U.N. General Assembly that he was willing to give diplomacy more time before resorting to sanctions to resolve its nuclear dispute with Iran.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has accused Washington of trying to deny his country the right to peaceful nuclear power.

The Reuters/Zogby poll found 42 percent supported a strike on Iranian facilities if carried out by the Israeli military, with 47 percent opposed.

The national poll of 1,000 likely voters, conducted on September 22-25, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.2 percentage points.

Comment: Ya know what? It doesn't matter what the American people think. America has ceased to be a Democracy. Bush and his handlers will do as they see fit, and the people be damned!

Comment on this Article


Israeli and the Non-Existent Lobby


GOP Slanders Dems With 'Anti-Israel' Ads

Howard Berman
Fri. Sep 29, 2006
The Forward

Over the last month, the Republican Jewish Coalition has placed ads in Jewish newspapers across the country making the outrageous and ridiculous assertion that Democrats are "turning their backs on Israel." At the same time, the accusation has been made by individuals who have sent out thousands of e-mails to all those in their inboxes.

That the Republican Jewish Coalition is deliberately distorting the facts is bad enough. But it is even worse when it is done as part of a reckless strategy to politicize support for Israel - a strategy that will have negative long-term consequences for the vital American-Israeli relationship.
President Bush, former House speaker Newt Gingrich and many other Republicans have certainly been reliable friends of Israel. But they have been no better friends than the great majority of Democratic leaders - including former president Bill Clinton, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi - all of whom are unwavering supporters of the Jewish state.

Democrats have a long and proud tradition of supporting Israel. It was a Democratic president, Harry Truman, who recognized Israel just minutes after David Ben-Gurion proclaimed the founding of the Jewish state.

When Democrats controlled Congress, we passed legislation prohibiting American contact with the Palestine Liberation Organization until it recognized Israel's right to exist, approved massive increases in aid for Israel, blocked certain arms sales to Israel's enemies in the Middle East and took other steps to enhance Israel's security.

As members of the minority, Democrats have played an integral role in legislative efforts to cut off funding for Hamas and stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Both of those legislative efforts have, unfortunately, been blocked by the Bush administration.

I'm not even going to make the case - and there is a strong case to be made - that a number of Bush administration actions and blunders in the international sphere have hurt America's credibility and have therefore weakened America's effectiveness in its support for Israel.

The Republican Jewish Coalition chose to feature former president Jimmy Carter in its political ads, but notwithstanding his comments to the contrary, he is an outlier on this issue and does not represent the mainstream of Democrats. Even more ludicrous is the notion that Cindy Sheehan speaks for any meaningful number of Democrats on the subject of Israel. If Democrats wanted to sink to the Republican Jewish Coalition's level, we could just as easily trot out statements made by a number of prominent Republicans and claim that the GOP is therefore hostile to Israel.

In the increasingly polarized American political system, support for Israel is one of the few issues that remains truly bipartisan. This gives Israel confidence that no matter which party occupies the White House or controls the House and Senate, the United States will always be committed to Israel's security and right to exist free from terrorism. The Republican Jewish Coalition is making a conscious effort to destroy that bipartisan consensus in the pursuit of illusory short-term political gains. But it is not acting on behalf of Israel when it sets one party against the other. This cheap ploy will inject uncertainty into the American-Israeli relationship - and ultimately make Israel less secure.

If Republican leaders really care about Israel's wellbeing, then they should renounce the Republican Jewish Coalition's dangerous campaign and devote their energies to strengthening the longstanding bipartisan consensus on supporting Israel.

Rep. Howard Berman, a California Democrat, is a member of the House International Relations Committee.

Comment: More evidence that when it comes to Israel, there is only one policy in US politics: Israel's.

Comment on this Article


House approves Iran sanctions

JTA Daily Briefing

The Iran Freedom Support Act, approved in a voice vote Thursday, would extend existing sanctions, scheduled to lapse Friday, and expand them to include overseas companies that deal with Iran.
The Senate is due to consider the act, sponsored by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), before Congress breaks Friday for midterm elections.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which led lobbying for the act, praised its passage.

"The passage of IFSA is an important step in further isolating the radical regime in Tehran, and represents a unified American commitment from both the administration and Congress toward ensuring that Iran does not obtain the world's most dangerous weapons," AIPAC said in a statement.



Comment on this Article


House passes homeland security cooperation

JTA Breaking News

The U.S. House of Representatives approved legislation that would formalize homeland security cooperation with Israel and four other allies.
The bill, passed Tuesday night, establishes an office in the Homeland Security Department that would foster legal and research cooperation with Israel, Britain, Australia, Singapore and Canada.

The office will be funded at $25 million a year for three years.

The Promoting Antiterrorism Capabilities Through International Cooperation Act now goes to the U.S. Senate.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which lobbied for the bill, said its passage would allow the United States "to leverage the anti-terrorism expertise of our leading allies in the global war against terror.

It provides a framework for expanded homeland security collaboration and creates increased opportunities for the United States and Israel to work together to address the common terrorist threat."



Comment on this Article


Israeli-powered dream team to create a 'no-hijack' plane of the future

September 25, 2006
Israel21C

Omer Laviv can't usually name a lot of names in his line of work.

As chief operations officer for Israel's Athena GS3 Security Implementations Ltd., Laviv and his company usually work behind the scenes with governments or super-corporations in creating and implementing proactive security solutions against threats of terrorism or crime.

But one project that the former Israeli naval officer and security duty manager at Ben-Gurion Airport can reveal details about is Athena's involvement in the four-year, $45.7 million project, called SAFEE, or Security of Aircraft in the Future European Environment.
Implemented in 2004 with the European Commission contributing $25 million, the project's end goal is to develop a system that will be able to prevent airplane hijackings through an ambitious security program to combat on-board threats.

"The starting point of the project is the assumption that ground security has failed, and there's an in flight perpetrator - it could be a terrorist with a weapon, a bomb or bomber or a hijacker. They're up there and the question is, what do we do about it," Laviv told ISRAEL21c.

Since Sept. 11, the idea that civilian planes can be used as weapons by hijackers has become a real threat, and the SAFEE project has taken the reins of international efforts to fight that threat. In attempting to build a last barrier against attacks on planes, the project is working on a number of features that would be part of a 'non-hijackable' plane: computer systems designed to spot suspicious passenger behavior, and a collision avoidance system that will correct the plane's trajectory to prevent it from being steered into a building or mountain.

But SAFEE - and Athena GS3- are not just about technology. According to Laviv, security relies on much more than a good system.

"Airplane security since 9/ 11 has changed radically. Before 9/11 the budget for security was very limited, now especially in the US, there's no limit, but it's not necessarily invested in the right places. Our concern is that almost all of the security budgets go to technology. Security is built on three cornerstones: technology, procedure and protocol, and human resources and training," he explained.

"When you put all your eggs in the one basket of technology, you don't have a security system, and that's unfortunately the situation today. It's evident at Heathrow. If the British hadn't stopped the plot at that stage, the technology wouldn't have been able to stop them at the airport. What the terrorists planned to do there would not have worked at Ben-Gurion, due to the different security considerations. Technology is wonderful, but you need an overall system," Laviv added.

While Athena is dwarfed in name recognition by its partners in the SAFEE project - including aircraft maker Airbus, its parents EADS and BAE Systems, as well as Thales and Siemens AG - the 10-year-old company's expertise and influence is the fuel that's driving it ahead. ATHENA GS3's client roster consists of notable Global 100 companies, governments and public organizations including: the EU, Microsoft, Northwest Airlines, Pittsburgh International Airport, MWAA, Exelon Generation and many others.

"You could say that we're security concept designers. As an analogy, let's use this comparison. If someone is buying a home and they want to redesign the interior, the first thing they'll do is to take on an architect or interior designer. They design the concept and only after that is a contractor or an integrator hired to actually implement the designs and do the job," said Laviv.

"We're not only security concept designers but also security integrators. But we'll almost never take on the integration if we didn't have input into the planning. For most of our clients, it works out that we do the design work, and if possible the integration as well. Doing both enables a better job in the end."

"As concept designers, we've played a major role in designing the system whose motto is 'zero hijacking policy.' What we've planned is a system that will be able to give early warning of an actual terror event in flight and provide the means to prevent it."

Founded by Shabtai Shavit, the former head of the Israeli Mossad (1989-1996) and a leading authority on homeland security, intelligence gathering and counter terrorism issues, ATHENA GS3 has assembled a team of top international security experts from the Israeli Security Services, El Al Airlines and the Israeli Navy, along with leaders from the public sector and private industry, who focus on the core areas of security and crime fighting.

Careful not to divulge any information which might compromise the identity of a client, Omer describes an actual customer.

"In a certain country, there was a very high percentage of a certain kind of crime, and the country couldn't deal with the problem using their own police squad because they suspected the criminals were getting inside information from the police. The government approached us for a plan ? what we did was to establish a totally new unit within the local police that would report directly to the internal security minister of the government.

"We provided this unit with the system and training to gather intelligence and the tools to handle crisis situations. They came to Israel for six months, learned about intelligence work and how to understand the background of criminal activity, and how to plan actions to prevent that activity. They went back home and mobilized and the result was a decrease of 60% in six months in that kind of crime in the part of the city where the unit was deployed. Now, as a result of that success, we're preparing the next stage which is doubling the number of officers in the unit," said Laviv with pride.

He added that part of the company's uniqueness is their ability to provide and train personnel.

"We help our clients recruit and train people - we recruit new people from universities or from wherever applicable and train them from scratch. You need to go outside because you don't know who you can trust inside. We have our system tools and a psychologist as part of our team, and they undergo extensive exams and we do background checks. But we're not a manpower company," he said.

Laviv said that Athena joined SAFEE at the very beginning "even before it was authorized by the EU" after being headhunted and offered the position. He credits the company's expertise in security technology consulting as being one of the main factors in the confidence the project has placed in them.

"We have tremendous know-how in current technologies that are evolving in the security area. For some companies, we're constantly monitoring what's happening out there and what new developments there are. We're constantly keeping up with the latest literature, going to expositions which are presenting the front line of technological innovations. Israeli companies come to us because they know we're in a position to recommend them. Being concept designers, we're in that position to recommend certain technologies to solve a client's specific problem," he said.

Laviv often lectures around the world. He has addressed the issue of airport security technologies at an airport security conference in Hong Kong, and in November will be speaking at an Aviation Security Technology Symposium in Washington DC.

Athena's staff is spread out around the globe with the management team in Israel numbering 10, and another 20 employees in Africa and Europe. Laviv said that a good amount of resources are being devoted to the SAFEE project, and that the cooperation and exposure of the multinational partners to Athena's way of thinking has resulted in some unexpected benefits.

"We were accepted into the 'club' very easily, and I think we're appreciated as an Israeli company. And the other companies are making use of our experience to benefit the project. We also used the opportunity to bring delegates to Israel, which under normal circumstance wouldn't have likely happened. About six months ago, we organized a conference here on security aviation and many of our colleagues from the project came here," he said.

With the SAFEE project due to end next year, Laviv is confident that the group will meet its goals of devising a plan to prevent planes from being hijacked.

"The goals of our projects are just for a design, and at the end of the project, there will be a system that's workable. Then, I presume and I hope that it will start a new phase of implementation."

Comment: Israel has long since developed technology to remotely hijack planes. They used it on 9/11. See our book: 9/11: The Ultimate Truth for the details.

Comment on this Article


Israeli group calls power plant attack a 'war crime'

UK Independent
28/09/2006

A 34-page report says the cuts in power are: harming health care; drastically limiting water supplies to three hours a day; plunging sew-age treatment to near crisis levels; limiting the mobility of high-rise dwellers by halting lifts; and threatening residents with food poisoning because of interruptions to refrigeration.




Comment on this Article


Christians: We'll fight for Israel

Ynet
27/09/2006

Evangelical delegates from around the world arrive at Knesset to express 'love for Israel'

Millions of Evangelical Christians around the world support and constantly pray for the State of Israel , representatives at a meeting of the Knesset's Christian Allies Caucus said Wednesday.

Dozens of Evangelical pastors, parliament members, and leaders from an array of countries gathered at the Knesset in Jerusalem to proclaim their support for the country, during a meeting of the Caucus, which was also attended by Knesset Members from across the political spectrum.

"We see Israelis as our spiritual mothers and fathers. It's an honor for us to be here," Pastor Norman Miller of Australia told Ynetnews. "We love your God, Israel," Miller told the meeting, to a round of warm applause.

"The line between the political and the biblical is disappearing," Josh Reinstein, Director of the Caucus, told the meeting. "Around the world, we see the rise of radical Islam come against our Judeo-Christian values, and we must meet it with a well organized response," Reinstein said. "We formed the Christian Allies Caucus to coordinate cooperate and communicate with our Christian allies around the world... we want to work with you, and we thank you for your support," he told delegates.

Speaking to Ynetnews, Reinstein said that modern events were shaping up to fit well with Torah prophecies. "If you can read the newspaper, than you can read the Torah, because things are coming into place like people have predicted many years before us."

"This isn't just a time to shake hands... this is really the start of a relationship, of a political relationship, and that means an economic relationship, a social cooperation, and that also means political support for the State of Israel," he said.

Addressing concerns voiced by some about an alliance with Evangelical Christianity, Reinstein said: "Of course we have to be vigilant to make sure that we're not working with organizations that are just befriending us to convert us, but what we are doing is finding real friends and creating real relationships, so we can promote each other.

"Evangelical Christians around the world are the greatest friends Israel has. And for us to turn our noses at them because of past transgressions is a ridiculous idea... the relationship between Jews and Christians in the 21st century is going to be the most important issue of our time, I think."

Reinstein said concerns about the Evangelical belief in the second coming of Jesus were unfounded: "We also have our own beliefs. For our purpose, it's completely irrelevant. If you're a Jew and you're concerned about what's going to happen in the Christian faith, you're not really a practicing Jews, because that's something you shouldn't be concerned about."

'We have soldiers for you'


During the lunch-meeting, delegates introduced themselves, declaring their love for Israel. A delegate from Africa said: "We have soldiers in Africa, not just spiritual soldiers, but those who even want to come and fight with you." A Kenyan member of parliament said he would soon run for prime minister in his country, promising that should he win, "the next morning the Kenyan embassy would be moved to Jerusalem."

"The friendship that we receive from you, our Christian friends, has significance far beyond the good feeling it gives to us Israelis," Knesset Member Gilad Eran said. "It is clear proof to us, and to the whole world, and particularly to the terrorists, that Israel is not alone," he said.

"It says in the book of Isaiah that Egypt, Israel, and Syria will worship God together," Tom Hess, an American Evangelical pastor who has lived in Israel for the past 19 years, told the delegates.

"What's beginning to happen in the Middle East is that there are Arab leaders that God's raising up as pillars, that are standing with God's covenant, that are saying the land of Israel belongs to the Jewish people," Hess said, introducing a number of Evangelical pastors from east Jerusalem, Egypt, and Turkey, described by Hess as "biblical Syria."

"They are teaching their people in their nations, they are the leaders of their nations, against replacement theology, to stand with God's covenant with the people of Israel and the Land of Israel," Hess said.

Palestinian: Jerusalem belongs to Israel and Jesus

Amir Boutros, and Egyptian Christian, said to warm applause: "I assure you, Members of Knesset, and the government here in Israel, that no one can wipe away Israel. I'm not talking nonsense. It's from my own experience. I've been in the Six Days war, 1967, fighting against Israel.

"And in those days, president Nasser assured to the whole world that he is going to wipe away Israel from the map... thousands of tanks and troops came to the border, and Nasser said that we are going to throw Israel into the Mediterranean Sea. But I tell you people, that the God of Israel is defending Israel."

Boutros said he had a revelation, during which he was ordered by God to love Israel.

Naim Khoury, a Palestinian Christian, said he is "wanted" by Islamic groups, adding: "I believe the land of Israel is going to prosper... the Iranian president cannot touch this land, because it belongs to God's chosen people. And God is going to protect this land, and keep Jerusalem a united city, forever and ever. Because Jerusalem does not belong to Iran, Hamas, Hizbullah, or Syria. It belongs to the State of Israel, and the great king the lord Jesus Christ."



Comment on this Article


British politician claims Zionists have taken over the world

BBC News
21/09/2006

Lib Dem peer Jenny Tonge has been summoned for talks with her leader after saying her party was "probably in the grip" of the pro-Israel lobby.

Ms Tonge said: "The pro-Israeli lobby has got its grips on the western world, its financial grips. I think they've probably got a grip on our party."

The peer, who has been sacked before for comments on suicide bombers, was speaking at a conference fringe event.

Senior Lib Dem officials said they were "deeply disturbed" by the remarks.
Norman Lamb, chief of staff to the Lib Dem leaders, said: "We will be seeking a meeting between Jenny, Ming Campbell and Tom McNally, our leader in the Lords, at the earliest opportunity to seek an explanation."

'Despicable'

Ms Tonge's outburst comes despite the conference overwhelmingly passing a motion on Wednesday condemning the Israeli military action in Lebanon as "disproportionate".

And it comes after a group of MPs warned this month that anti-Semitism was on the rise.

Jon Benjamin, Chief Executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, said the remarks were of exactly the kind of problem identified by the MPs' report.

"At a time when anti-Semitism is on the increase everyone should be working to develop communal harmony, I find it despicable that she believed it was appropriate to make comments such as these at a major political conference," he said.

Repeating controversy

Ms Tonge was sacked from the Lib Dem front bench in January 2004 after saying she would consider becoming a suicide bomber if she was a Palestinian.

She insisted she was not condoning suicide attacks. Since then she has retired as an MP but entered the House of Lords.

At a conference fringe meeting, she said she stuck by her original remarks.

"I said, and I would repeat it now: if I had had to live through that as a Palestinian over decades and I was being given no hope for the future whatsoever I might have considered being a suicide bomber," she said.

"I condemn terrorism, whether it comes from bomber pilots dropping bombs on Iraq or Afghanistan or Lebanon or whether it's a suicide bomber.

"The suicide bomber is prepared to give his life, the bomber pilot goes home for a beer in the bar afterwards. That is the only difference."

Gavin Stollar, a spokesman for the Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel, said: "Jenny Tonge's original support for suicide bombers in Israel got her sacked from the front bench.

"I think her vulgar repetition and rhetoric means that her position within the party needs to be seriously reviewed."

And Karen Pollock, chief executive of the Holocaust Educational Trust, said: "Jenny Tonge's remarks are based around one of the oldest discredited myths about Jewish people and serve to plant the seeds of racism for others to harvest in justifying acts of anti-Semitism."

Comment: We too are deeply disturbed by the fact that Zionists are pushing the world towards massive conflict. Can we get rid of them somehow?

Comment on this Article


Israel caught supporting terrorists in Iraq

BBC News
20/09/2006

The BBC has obtained evidence that Israelis have been giving military training to Kurds in northern Iraq.

A report on the BBC TV programme Newsnight showed Israeli experts in northern Iraq, drilling Kurdish militias in shooting techniques.

Kurdish officials have refused to comment on the report and Israel has denied it knows of any involvement.

The revelation is set to cause enormous problems for the Kurds, not only in Iraq but also in the wider region.

Israel is seen as an enemy of Arabs and Muslims, both inside Iraq and elsewhere in Arab and Muslim countries.
'Against Israeli law'

Kurdish politicians will most likely come under pressure to explain what their semi-autonomous government has been up to.

Israeli security experts who spoke to the BBC said they could not have worked inside Kurdistan without the knowledge of the Kurdish authorities.

The news will most probably increase tension between the Kurds and Iraq's Arab population, both Sunnis and Shias, reinforcing fears that the Kurds are pursuing a secessionist agenda.

This would be a serious blow to efforts for national reconciliation at a time when hundreds of Iraqis are killed every month in inter-communal violence.

Iraq's neighbours, too, will be outraged.

Iran and Syria, which have long accused the Kurds of allowing the Israelis to operate on Iraqi territory, will most likely demand an explanation from the government in Baghdad.

The Israeli government says it is conducting an investigation into the BBC report because it is against Israeli law to export military know-how without prior permission.

'Conspiracy evidence'

The BBC report will be like the smoking gun the Arab media has spent years looking for.

Ever since the US-led invasion of Iraq began over three years ago, Arab journalists have been speaking of Israelis operating inside the autonomous region of Kurdistan.

They said this was evidence that toppling Saddam Hussein was only the first chapter in a wider American-Israeli conspiracy to eliminate threats to their strategic interests and re-draw the map of the Middle East.

Syria and Iran, which have common borders with Kurdish areas, are believed to be the primary target.



Comment on this Article


Foreign Affairs


Georgia-Russia 'spy' row heats up

by Maya Topuria
AFP
Thu Sep 28, 2006

TBILISI - Georgian security forces have imposed a blockade around a Russian military office as Moscow recalled its ambassador and launched a furious verbal assault on the government here after several Russian officers were arrested on spying charges.

Defence Minister Irakli Okruashvili angrily rejected Russian accusations Thursday that Georgian forces had beaten the arrested men, who were detained overnight near a Russian military base on the Black Sea coast for carrying weapons without relevant permits.

The interior ministry said five Russian officers and a driver had been arrested in all.
"There was no beating. Certainly we detained them, which naturally was in the interests of the security of the region, where President Mikheil Saakashvili was travelling," Okruashvili said.

"All the rest is pure invention," said Okruashvili.

Georgia's foreign ministry said it had formally asked Russia to hand over another Russian officer, who was believed to be hiding in the Russian military headquarters building in Tbilisi.

Georgian police formed a blockade around the building using dozens of vehicles.

Georgian Interior Minister Vano Merabishvili told reporters Wednesday that Russian officers of the military intelligence service had been arrested as they "were spying in Tbilisi, Batumi and all over Georgian territory".

Relations between Russia and this ex-Soviet state in the strategic Caucasus region have been tense on and off for two centuries.

They have worsened significantly in the three years since US-educated Mikheil Saakashvili came to power in Tbilisi and vowed to lead Georgia away from Russian influence and toward the West.


The current row comes after NATO said last week that it had agreed to start "intensified dialogue" with Georgia over the country's possible entry to the alliance.

Russia on Thursday said it had recalled its ambassador to Tbilisi for consultations and was evacuating some personnel for safety reasons.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, quoted by domestic news agencies, demanded the immediate release of the Russian officers and said the case should be taken to the UN Security Council, complaining that "the party of war" was getting the upper hand in Tbilisi.

Speaking from Sakhalin in Russia's far east, Lavrov also lashed out at Georgia's increasingly warm relationship with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), saying it had served only "to intensify the anti-Russian policy" of the government in Tbilisi, the reports said.

"There are grounds for the Security Council to address this problem," the RIA Novosti and Interfax agencies quoted Lavrov as saying.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov meanwhile unleashed a blast of vitriol himself, describing the actions of the authorities as "completely wild and hysterical."

Ivanov warned that Russia could be expected to deliver an "appropriate" response to Georgia and compared the arrests of the Russian officers to 1930s repression by the regime of Josef Stalin, according to Interfax news agency.

Ivanov said that six Russian servicemen had been detained and beaten by Georgian police near the western Georgian port of Batumi before being released.

The Russian embassy in Tbilisi on Thursday indefinitely suspended the issue of visas to Georgian citizens for travel to Russia, an embassy spokesman told AFP.

Russia's foreign ministry meanwhile said that the deputy foreign minister had met with the US ambassador to Moscow to inform him of the "baselessness" of the Georgian accusations, adding that Russia "counts on the understanding and support of its American partners".

Comment:
"Relations between Russia and this ex-Soviet state... have worsened significantly in the three years since US-educated Mikheil Saakashvili came to power in Tbilisi and vowed to lead Georgia away from Russian influence and toward the West."


Comment on this Article


Russia begins evacuation from Georgian capital as tensions rise

by Maya Topuria
AFP
September 29, 2006

TBILISI - Russia started evacuating personnel from its embassy in the Georgian capital as Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili angrily denied that they were in any danger, during a row over the arrest of alleged Russian spies.

A first plane arrived in Tbilisi to begin the partial evacuation of embassy staff and family members and would leave later in the day, the embassy said.
Russian ambassador Mikhail Svirin told AFP Friday that in the Russian view the "security threat is credible".

At the United Nations in New York, Russian envoy Vitaly Churkin called for Security Council action to restrain Georgia, which he accused of "serious provocations".

Churkin said he had circulated a draft statement Friday for possible adoption by the Security Council expressing "deep concern" over Georgia's actions and demanding a withdrawal of Georgian troops from a gorge overlooking the separatist region of Abkhazia.

The latest row between Russia and its Caucasus neighbour blew up after Georgia arrested four Russian officers and a driver Wednesday, saying they had been spying on Georgian military installations.

Another arrested man said earlier to be a Russian officer was in fact a Georgian citizen and is under investigation, interior ministry official Shota Khizanishvili told AFP Friday.

The officers' driver has been released, Khizanishvili said.

The four Russian officers were to appear at an initial court hearing later Friday after formal charges were lodged against them earlier for spying, Khizanishvili said.

Georgian police maintained a cordon of dozens of vehicles Friday around a Russian military headquarters building in Tbilisi, demanding the hand-over of another Russian officer wanted by Georgia on suspicion of spying and said to be hiding there.

Relations between Russia and this ex-Soviet state in the strategic Caucasus region have been tense at various times for two centuries.

They have worsened significantly since 2003, when the US-educated Mikheil Saakashvili came to power in Tbilisi and vowed to lead Georgia away from Russian influence and towards the West.

Saakashvili on Thursday denied that there was any need for Russia's evacuation of personnel.

"I don't understand why this hysteria is being created. There are no kind of threats to the security of Russian families in Georgia as our country acts strictly in accordance with international agreements," Saakashvili told journalists.

The arrests were aimed "at the maintenance of Georgian law," he said.

"Nothing illegal has happened. We are building democracy and protecting our statehood. That's how all democratic countries act," Saakashvili said.

The current row comes against a background of Russian anger at Georgia's growing links to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) and in particular an announcement on those links by the alliance last week.

NATO said it was starting "intensified dialogue" with Georgia over the country's possible entry into the alliance.

Adding to the tensions, Saakashvili visited the Kodori gorge, which overlooks the Russian-backed breakaway region of Abkhazia, on Wednesday.

His visit came after Georgian forces this summer dislodged a local militia leader who dominated the gorge.

Saakashvili said the restoration of central power there would in time lead to the return of Abkhazia proper to Georgian control, announcing that the gorge would henceforth be known as Upper Abkhazia.

On Thursday Russia recalled its ambassador for consultations.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, quoted by domestic news agencies, demanded the immediate release of the Russian officers and said the case should be taken to the UN Security Council, complaining that "the party of war" was getting the upper hand in Tbilisi.

The Russian embassy has indefinitely suspended the issue of visas to Georgian citizens for travel to Russia.



Comment on this Article


Mexico's leftists continue protest

www.chinaview.cn 2006-09-29 10:15:57

MEXICO CITY, Sept. 28 (Xinhua) -- Leftist protesters backing former Mexican presidential candidate, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, clashed with security officers, trying to block the door to president-elect Felipe Calderon's transition headquarters on Thursday.
Elite soldiers of the Presidential Staff and officers from the Federal Preventative Police, who were guarding the headquarters, frustrated the plans of the Revolutionary Democratic Party (PRD) members.

Gerardo Fernandez Norona, a spokesman for Obrador's PRD, and Marti Batres Guadarrama, PRD chief in Mexico City, were trying to hang a sign saying "Illegitimate President and Usurper" on the front of the building.

Obrador and his supporters are waging a campaign, which they describe as "resisting the imposition of a right-wing candidate," alleging that the election that brought Calderon to power was a fraudulent one.

After a scuffle with security officers, some 40 PRD supporters engaged in a shouting match, chanting "Felipe the Usurper" across the barriers, while Calderon supporters shouted back "Felipe won" and "keep dancing for six more years."

Calderon, President Elect and former candidate of the ruling National Action Party (PAN) won the July 2 election with a slim margin of 0.56 percentage point, and will take office on Dec. 1.

Lopez Obrador has refused to concede defeat, alleging massive fraud in the electoral process, and said he will not recognize the incoming administration.



Comment on this Article


Blair pinched speech from Murderer in 'The Grapes of Wrath'

Daily Mail
27/09/2006

His promise to the party faithful that he would 'always' be with them earned Tony Blair a seven-minute standing ovation.

But the Labour conference may have been slightly less overawed if they had realised that the Prime Minister had based the finale to his farewell speech on the words of a fugitive double murderer.
Mr Blair has confided to friends that he drew inspiration for his big sign-off from a favourite passage of John Steinbeck's 1939 classic The Grapes of Wrath.

The Premier ended his last conference speech by telling delegates: 'Whatever you do, I'm always with you. Head and heart. Next year I won't be making this speech. But in the years to come, wherever I am, whatever I do, I'm with you. Wishing you well, wanting you to win.'

He later admitted he had borrowed heavily from a speech by Tom Joad, the central character of Steinbeck's Pulitzer prize-winning novel about the Great Depression.

Joad, played by Henry Fonda in the film version, tells his mother he is going to come out of hiding to confront a gang of vigilantes, one of whose number he had earlier killed.

Knowing he is likely to be murdered himself, Joad tells his tearful mother that he will always be with her in spirit.

'I'll be everywhere - wherever you look,' he says. 'Wherever there's a fight so hungry people can eat, I'll be there. Wherever there's a cop beatin' up a guy, I'll be there... an' when our folks eat the stuff they raise an' live in the houses they build - why, I'll be there. See?'

Steinbeck's seminal work caused controversy when it was first published because of his sympathetic portrayal of the killer Tom Joad, who is released on parole at the start of the book after being jailed for murdering a man with a shovel in a drunken fight.

Having broken his parole conditions by moving from the Oklahoma dust bowl to California in search of work, Joad then kills a vigilante who has murdered a friend striking over low wages.

The book is now regarded as the definitive portrayal of poverty and social injustice in 1930s America.

Comment: What's the big deal? Is it strange that Blair, a murderer himself, would identify with a fictional murderer?

Comment on this Article


Woman pensioner arrested in UK Peaceful CND demo

London Independent
September 28 2006

A 62-year-old woman was arrested and cautioned for common assault yesterday, after a Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament protest involving 70 people was broken up by mounted police and officers with dogs.

Kate Hudson, the CND chairperson, complained the response was heavy-handed. Greater Manchester Police said last night that a Section 14 order, compelling the protesters to disperse, was served after they "refused to co-operate".

Joe Richardson, a graphic designer, who was also arrested, said he was merely a passerby who stopped to watch. He said he was told by officers that CND had failed to provide advance notice of the protest.
"I couldn't help but stop to look because the protest had seemed so insignificant - just a bunch of old peaceniks," he said.

Nathan Jackson, 30, one of the protesters said: "There were fewer than 100 people gathered and no sign of any trouble."

Police said they believed the group "intended to cause disruption to the city centre and conference area".




Comment on this Article


Lebanon: French UN tanks block Israeli Military

Ynet
29/09/2006

According to reports, the IDF force asked to advance deeper into Lebanese territory, but was stopped about 500 meters from the road leading to the village by four UNIFIL tanks manned by French soldiers as two Israeli Merkava tanks operated nearby on Lebanese soil, setting up checkpoints.




Comment on this Article


Soiling the Nest


Thousands flee 'mud volcano' in Indonesia

September 29, 2006
BY CHRIS BRUMMITT

PORONG, Indonesia -- Factories that once produced watches and shoes lie under a sea of thick, stinking mud. Villagers stand on hastily constructed dams and gaze at the thousands of homes swallowed by brown sludge.
Four months ago, a torrent of hot mud from deep beneath the surface of Indonesia's seismically charged Java island began surging from a natural gas exploration site following a drilling accident.

The ''mud volcano'' pours out some 165,000 cubic yards of mud every day -- enough to cover a football field about 75 feet deep. Often spewing out in geyser-like eruptions, the mud has left some 665 acres swamped or abandoned as unsafe, forcing more than 10,000 people from their homes.

Experts say the mud volcano is one of the largest ever recorded on land. Geologists fear the technology may not exist to stop the eruption, saying mud could flow for years or even centuries -- or stop on its own at any time.

Police seize drilling rig

The mud is believed to come from a reservoir 3½ miles below the surface that has been pressurized by shifts in the crust or by the accumulation of hydrocarbon gases.

The calamity has underscored the patchy safety record of mining companies exploiting the natural resources of this Southeast Asian nation made up of thousands of islands.

Police seized the drilling rig involved in the accident and are investigating whether to bring criminal charges against the principal well owner, PT Lapindo Brantas.

Lapindo, which is linked to the wealthy family of Indonesia's welfare minister, is paying for an ever expanding network of earthen dams to contain the mud, but many people fear the resulting slimy ponds will overflow during the approaching rainy season.

''The volume of mud that is coming out of the hole is not just large, it's enormous,'' Earl Hunt Jr., an engineer from Oklahoma, said while supervising dredging operations.