- Signs of the Times for Fri, 14 Jul 2006 -



NEW! Podcast: Zinedine Zidane, Israeli Crimes Against Humanity, and Ten Films to Better Understand our Reality


Sections on today's Signs Page:



Signs Editorials


Editorial: Dispatch from Gaza: We Suffer Together

Testimony recorded by Silvia Cattori on July 14, 2006

Our friend Swiss journalist Silvia Cattori is in Palestine reporting on the criminal actions of the Israeli army in Gaza. She sent us this report.

The testimony of this Palestinian living in the north of Gaza gives an idea of the way Palestinians are reacting to the events that are hitting them.

Silvia Cattori: What is the mental state of the population after weeks of bombings and deprivations?

A: We have suffered. We are in a dramatic situation. The Israeli army has entered up to Saladine Street; the military has cut Gaza in two: it is like it was before. They have installed a base. There are a dozen tanks with bulldozers. They are in the process of razing land, greenhouses; they are destroying all that remains of life. For two weeks, the F-16s and the drones bomb and destroy our homes. There are hundreds of dead and badly wounded.

S.C.: Is it blind bombing of everything as opposed to bombing that is targeting "terrorists"?

A: The day before yesterday, for example, the Israelis attacked a house, assassinating an entire family, under the pretext that it sheltered Mohamed Daif, the head of those firing the Qassam rockets. However, it wasn't true. Unfortunately, an entire family, a father, a mother, five daughters and two sons lost their lives.

S.C.: Having cut Gaza in two, are the soldiers threatening the population from this position?

A: Yes, their tanks, posted in the centre of the Gaza Strip, between Del Balla and Kahn Younes, are currently firing rockets - just like in the north of Gaza.

S.C.: Are the tanks moving?

A: No, the Israeli soldiers are chicken; they are afraid of being attacked by the resistance.

S.C.: Do the members of the Hamas Government still show themselves on the street?

A: We are seeing no one. They are all on the list of the next assassinations. They only come out when they have a rendez-vous, but it is always done with great secrecy.

S.C.: During the two weeks of the bombings that have left you without water, without electricity, without food, have you been afraid for your family?

A: The first attack by the Israeli planes at Betlaya was near my house. It was there that there were a large number of wounded and killed. The children were in a panic. Fearing that Israel would attack our neighbourhood, we left our house to move away from the zone. Now, we have returned home.

S.C.: How do people put up with living in such a horrible situation? Do they want you to free the captured soldier as quickly as possible to end Israel's pretext to continue the collective punishment?

A: The majority of the Palestinians support the position of the resistance, the position that the soldier won't be released until Israel releases 1000 of the weakest prisoners they hold, women and children. Prisoners that are living - contrary to the Israeli propaganda film shown recently on television in the west that we have heard about - under inhuman conditions. This film didn't talk about the torture of the prisoners, didn't show prisoners being held like beasts in tents, plagued by insects and disease, didn't say that most of the prisoners can only see their families once every six months. [1]

S.C.: Has the accord signed between Fatah and Hamas two weeks ago taken affect?

A: They were speaking of an entente. But on the ground, it is the contrary. The Fatah militia continues their assassinations, so the Palestinians continue to be threatened by two enemies: that is, by Israel and by those Palestinians who are collaborating with the occupier in order to destablize Hamas. The Israeli attacks actually prevented a civil war between Palestinians. At this moment, each Palestinian, no matter what party, feels above all like a target of Israeli shooting.

S.C.: Can even the father of a family like you, who has nothing to do with the resistance, be hit by what they call a targeted assassination?

A: You must know that our crime is being Palestinian, to belong to Palestine. If I find myself by chance in the same taxi as someone that an Israeli plane wants to assassinate, I can be killed.

S.C.: For that you will have to face more and more aggression? The Israeli army has announced that Operation Summer Rain will last as long as necessary.

A: You know that Israel is government by lunatics at this moment. They are narrow-minded politicians. They have unleashed war in Gaza, and, as of two days, they have declared war on Lebanon. Maybe that will give us a bit of a break because the pressure is only longer only concentrated on us.

S.C.: One thing that is worrisome in any situation of war is the trauma undergone by the children. Are they still normal after all they have had to endure?

A: The other day I wanted to take my kids to the sea. My three-year-old daughter started to cry. She said, "No, Daddy, I never want to go to the beach again." I asked her why. "I don't want to die." I said, "OK, if you don't want to die, I'll go with your brothers and sisters." "You neither. No one should go to the beach," she cried. You can see how a three-year-old child reacts after seeing on television the family massacred on the beach. If I talk about the beach, she cries.

S.C.: Were the victims these last months people like you, people who are not armed, who have no protection, and who do not harm anyone?

A: Almost all of the victims are civilians. However, the Israeli army justifies the bombings of families who are eating or sleeping saying that there are fighters among them. There are members of the resistance, but they aren't among these victims. Everyone in Palestine, with the exception of the collaborators, is a resistor in spirit.

S.C.: With such a catastrophic situation, one that is ongoing, in what kind of mental state are you?

A: We continue to live in spite of the unlivable situation Israel imposes upon us. We are accustomed to living this life that isn't a life. There is no food, there is only brackish water, there is no electricity. This is our life. But it is better than living a life were we crush ourselves.

SC.: How will you be able to rebuild yet again the entire infrastructure that the Israel bombing is destroying? Do you think they can be put back in action quickly?

A: The Israelis will never leave standing anything we build. Each time that we repair the transformer in the north or the south of Gaza, they bomb it again. We have yet to hear any protests from the Arab or European states. Some states have condemned the Israeli operations, but their condemnations are too weak. It isn't enough to make Israel back off. From the moment that Europe cut off our aid, it meant they have been collaborating with Israel in its collective punishment, to starve us and to make us suffer more.

S.C.: Do you have the impression that the journalists who obtained permission to enter Gaza have been correctly informing the world on the suffering you are undergoing?

A: It is always the same thing, whether they come or not. I would have been very happy it if had been you who had gotten permission to come, because I am certain you would have reported with honesty. We follow the news. It is always a superficial and Israeli version of things that is shown. The suffering of the people, our pain, all those at CNN, Fox News, the BBS, have no idea what it is. They lie in our faces. We watch their lies live.

S.C.: Don't you think that those journalists that ignore your reality and repeat the same things are led into error by the Palestinian chauffeurs and guides accompanying and supervising them and informing them in a biased way?

A: All they have to do is what you do, go out into the street and get people to talk. It's not by them all staying in the same five star hotels in Gaza that they will be able to find the truth.

S.C.: They don't go out into the streets?

A: Even when they go, they conform to the information given by Israeli press officers or the supervision of their agencies. At the end of the day, they say what their Jerusalem or other office tells them to say and don't say what they have been told not to say. You're a journalist; you should know how it works.

S.C.: I wasn't able to enter Gaza this time and can't report on what is happening to you. It makes me all the more sad because I have remained very attached to the place and I knew so many Palestinians who were suffering and two members of the ISM as well as the London journalist James Miller - who wanted to report about your suffering and the assassination of children - who were killed in 2003 by the Israeli army.

A: They won't let you in because you are too honest. Israel well knows that you do not look at our reality in the same way as the journalists who generally come here. If you were seeing everything through the eyes of Israeli propaganda, you could have entered Gaza....

S.C. I was interrogated by the Israel secret service Sabak on my arrival at Ben Gurion airport. Won't I put any Palestinian I meet into danger if these services, which have their spies on every Palestinian street, are watching me now?

A: You can't put anyone in danger. Every Palestinian is in danger. At any moment, the drone that is flying overhead can strike me. Don't let yourself be intimidated. Do you know why they intimidated you when you arrived and why they follow you? Because those people are afraid of you?

S.C.: Afraid of me? Are you joking?

A: All of these soldiers and spies that make up the most formidable army in the world, in spite of their power, are afraid of anyone who uses his words...to speak the truth. They are afraid of those who speak the truth. They are weak people. We can win this fight even though our means are nothing compared to theirs, because we have the will and the courage that they don't have.

S.C.: What I have seen since I started traveling through the West Bank is without a doubt less atrocious than what is happening in Gaza, but, believe me, it is already too much to support. I cried when I saw a group of people being held like animals in an enclosed space at the checkpoint in Bethlehem. I cried when I arrived in Naplouse and I saw the crowd of silent people who were waiting for the soldiers to condescend to let them leave. You Palestinians seem so strong in the face of all of these humiliations they impose. Do you cry sometimes?

A: Of course I cry. I often cry now when I see all of these families who have been assassinated. A quarter of the victims are children.

S.C.: Does your wife cry, too?

A: Yes, often. Everywhere around, here in Gaza, or over there in the West Bank, are people struck by misfortune that breaks your heart. We are one people and we are suffering together. We are one unique body.

[1] It may be the film recently shown by the television network Arte.

P.S.: This interview was conducted via internet and telephone.

Translated by Signs of the Times
Comment on this Editorial


Editorial: Acts of war, or war crimes?

Eli Stephens
Left I on the News
July 13, 2006

Israel says the seizing of two Israeli soldiers by Hizballah is an "act of war" (on the part of the Lebanese government). I wonder what they consider this to be, then?
Police said 52 Lebanese civilians, including 15 children, were killed in attacks on Hezbollah targets in Beirut's southern suburbs and across southern Lebanon.

Security sources said the air strikes in south Lebanon also wounded 100 people. Ten members of a family were killed in Dweir village and seven family members died in Baflay.
Note that Israel has not declared war. Therefore these acts can be nothing other than war crimes. Not that most of the Israeli attacks wouldn't qualify as war crimes even if they had declared war.

Update: Note how this story is being headlined and reported, e.g., in this AP story.

Note that the murder of 50 civilians takes a distinct second place to bombing an airport runway, and note also the language: "More than 50 people have died in violence." Not "been killed by Israeli bombs or missiles." They just died in some sort of unspecified violence. Sure they did.

Second update: Kyra Phillips on CNN just now did a summary of what's going on. I'll paraphrase: "Israel has bombed Beirut airport. Hizballah is firing rockets at Israel, including at Haifa. Israeli ships are blockading Lebanese ports." Not one word about the death of 52 (probably more by now) Lebanese civilians. Not a word. Then, just a couple minutes later, she was grilling the Syrian ambassador, asking him about civilian deaths. Israeli deaths, of course. How could she ask about the death of Lebanese civilians when she doesn't even acknowledge that they occur?

Third update: Every reporter on CNN is describing the reported (not completely confirmed; actually denied by Hizballah) landing of two Hizballah-fired rockets in Haifa as a "dangerous escalation." Can anyone explain how that could possibly be an "escalation" after Israel has bombed Lebanese bridges, Beirut airport runways and Beirut airport fuel storage tanks, is blockading ports, and has killed 52 civilians with missile attacks? None of those things has been described by CNN as a "dangerous escalation," yet when (if) Hizballah fires two rockets at Haifa, that's a "dangerous escalation."
Comment on this Editorial


Editorial: Beirut waits as Syrian masters send Hezbollah allies into battle

By Robert Fisk
The Independent
07/13/06

It's about Syria. That was the frightening message delivered by Damascus yesterday when it allowed its Hizbollah allies to cross the UN Blue Line in southern Lebanon, kill three Israeli soldiers, capture two others and demand the release of Lebanese prisoners in Israeli jails.

Within hours, a country that had begun to believe in peace - without a single Syrian soldier left on its soil - found itself once more at war.

Israel held the powerless Lebanese government responsible - as if the sectarian and divided cabinet in Beirut can control Hizbollah. That is Syria's message. Fouad Siniora, Lebanon's affable Prime Minister, may have thought he was running the country but it is President Bashar Assad in Damascus who can still bring life or death to a land that lost 150,000 lives in 15 years of civil conflict.

And there is one certain bet that Syria will rely on; that despite all Israel's threats of inflicting "pain" on Lebanon, this war will run out of control until - as has so often happened in the past - Israel itself calls for a ceasefire and releases prisoners. Then the international big-hitters will arrive and make their way to the real Lebanese capital - Damascus, not Beirut - and appeal for help.

That is probably the plan. But will it work? Israel has threatened Lebanon's newly installed infrastructure and Hizbollah has threatened Israel with further conflict. And therein lies the problem; to get at Hizbollah, Israel must send its soldiers into Lebanon - and then it will lose more soldiers.

Indeed when a single Merkava tank crossed the border into Lebanon yesterday morning, it struck a Hizbollah mine, which killed three more Israelis.

Certainly Hizbollah's attack broke the United Nations rules in southern Lebanon - a "violent breach" of the Blue Line, it was called by Geir Pedersen, the senior UN official in the country - and was bound to unleash the air force, tanks and gunboats of Israel on to this frail, dangerous country. Many Lebanese in Beirut were outraged when gangs of Hizbollah supporters drove through the streets of the capital with party flags to "celebrate" the attack on the border.

Christian members of the Lebanese government were voicing increasing frustration at the Shia Muslim militia's actions - which only proved how powerless the Beirut administration is.

By nightfall, Israel's air raids had begun to spread across the country - the first civilians to die were killed when an aircraft bombed a small road bridge at Qasmiyeh - but would they go even further and include a target in Syria? This would be the gravest escalation so far and would have US as well as UN diplomats appealing for that familiar, tired quality - "restraint".

And prisoner swaps is probably all that will come of this. In January 2004, for example, Israel freed 436 Arab prisoners and released the bodies of 59 Lebanese for burial, in return for an Israeli spy and the bodies of three Israeli soldiers.

As long ago as 1985, three Israeli soldiers captured in 1982 were traded for 1,150 Lebanese and Palestinian prisoners. So Hizbollah knows - and the Israelis know - how this cruel game is played. How many have to die before the swaps begin is a more important question.

What is also clear is that for the first time Israel is facing two Islamist enemies - in southern Lebanon and in Gaza - rather than nationalist guerrillas. The Palestinian Hamas movement's spokesmen in Lebanon yesterday denied that there was any co-ordination with Hizbollah. This may be literally true but Hizbollah timed its attack when Arab feelings are embittered by the international sanctions placed on the democratically elected Hamas government and then the war in Gaza. Hizbollah will ride the anger over Gaza in the hope of escaping condemnation for its capture and killing of Israelis yesterday.

And there is one more little, sinister question. In past violence of this kind, Syria's power was controlled by the Hafez Assad, one of the shrewdest Arabs in modern history. But there are those - including Lebanese politicians - who believe that Bashar, the son, lacks his late father's wisdom and understanding of power. This is a country, remember, whose own Minister of Interior allegedly committed suicide last year and whose soldiers had to leave Lebanon amid suspicion that Syria had set up the murder of Rafik Hariri, Lebanon's former prime minister, last year. All this may now seem academic. But Damascus remains, as always, the key.

[ Original ]
Comment on this Editorial


Editorial: A Wave of Sexual Terrorism In Iraq

By Ruth Rosen
Tomdispatch.com
July 14, 2006

Behind the rape and murder of an Iraqi girl and her family lies a far larger story of what's happened to women in Iraq since they were 'liberated' by the Bush administration.

Abu Ghraib. Haditha. Guantanamo. These are words that shame our country. Now, add to them Mahmudiya, a town 20 miles south of Baghdad. There, this March, a group of five American soldiers allegedly were involved in the rape and murder of Abeer Qassim Hamza, a young Iraqi girl. Her body was then set on fire to cover up their crimes, her father, mother, and sister murdered. The rape of this one girl, if proven true, is probably not simply an isolated incident. But how would we know? In Iraq, rape is a taboo subject. Shamed by the rape, relatives of this girl wouldn't even hold a public funeral and were reluctant to reveal where she is buried.

Like women everywhere, Iraqi women have always been vulnerable to rape. But since the American invasion of their country, the reported incidence of sexual terrorism has accelerated markedly -- and this despite the fact that few Iraqi women are willing to report rapes either to Iraqi officials or to occupation forces, fearing to bring dishonor upon their families. In rural areas, female rape victims may also be vulnerable to "honor killings" in which male relatives murder them in order to restore the family's honor. "For women in Iraq," Amnesty International concluded in a 2005 report, "the stigma frequently attached to the victims instead of the perpetrators of sexual crimes makes reporting such abuses especially daunting."

This specific rape of one Iraqi girl, however, is now becoming symbolic of the way the Bush administration has violated Iraq's honor; Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has already launched an inquest into the crime. In an administration that normally doesn't know the meaning of an apology, the American ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad and the top American commander in Iraq, Gen. George W. Casey Jr. both publicly apologized. In a fierce condemnation, the Muslim Scholars Association in Iraq denounced the crime: "This act, committed by the occupying soldiers, from raping the girl to mutilating her body and killing her family, should make all humanity feel ashamed."

Shame, yes, but that is hardly sufficient. After all, rape is now considered a war crime by the International Criminal Court.

It wasn't always that way. Soldiers have long viewed women as the spoils of war, even when civilian or military leaders condemned such behavior, but in the early 1990s, a new international consensus began to emerge on the act of rape. Prodded by an energized global women's movement, the General Assembly of the United Nations passed a Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women in 1993. Subsequent statutes in the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda, as well as the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court in July 2002, all defined rape as a crime against humanity or a war crime.

No one accuses American soldiers of running through the streets of Iraq, raping women as an instrument of war against the insurgents (though such acts are what caused three Bosnian soldiers, for the first time in history, to be indicted in 2001 for the war crime of rape).

Still, the invasion and occupation of Iraq has had the effect of humiliating, endangering, and repressing Iraqi women in ways that have not been widely publicized in the mainstream media: As detainees in prisons run by Americans, they have been sexually abused and raped; as civilians, they have been kidnapped, raped, and then sometimes sold for prostitution; and as women -- and, in particular, as among the more liberated women in the Arab world -- they have increasingly disappeared from public life, many becoming shut-ins in their own homes.

Rape and sexual humiliation in prisons

The scandal of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib focused on the torture, sexual abuse, and humiliation of Iraqi men. A variety of sources suggest that female prisoners suffered similar treatment, including rape.

Few Americans probably realize that the American-run prison at Abu Ghraib also held female detainees. Some of them were arrested by Americans for political reasons -- because they were relatives of Baathist leaders or because the occupying forces thought they could use them as bargaining chips to force male relatives to inform on insurgents or give themselves up.

According to a Human Rights Watch report, the secrecy surrounding female detentions "resulted from a collusion of the families and the occupying forces." Families feared social stigma; the occupying forces feared condemnation by human rights groups and anger from Iraqis who saw such treatment of women by foreigners as a special act of violation.

On the condition of anonymity and in great fear, some female detainees nevertheless did speak with human rights workers after being released from detention. They have described beatings, torture, and isolation. Like their male counterparts, they reserve their greatest bitterness for sexual humiliations suffered in American custody. Nearly all female detainees reported being threatened with rape. Some women were interrogated naked and subjected to derision and humiliating remarks by soldiers.

The British Guardian reported that one female prisoner managed to smuggle a note out of Abu Ghraib. She claimed that American guards were raping the few female detainees held in the prison and that some of them were now pregnant. In desperation, she urged the Iraqi resistance to bomb the jail in order to spare the women further shame.

Amal Kadham Swadi, one of seven Iraqi female attorneys attempting to represent imprisoned women, told the Guardian that only one woman she met with was willing to speak about rape. "She was crying. She told us she had been raped. Several American soldiers had raped her. She had tried to fight them off, and they had hurt her arm. She showed us the stitches. She told us, 'We have daughters and husbands. For God's sake don't tell anyone about this.'"

Professor Huda Shaker, a political scientist at Baghdad University, also told the Guardian that women in Abu Ghraib have been sexually abused and raped. She identified one woman, in particular, who was raped by an American military policeman, became pregnant, and later disappeared.

Professor Shaker added, "A female colleague of mine was arrested and taken there. When I asked her after she was released what happened at Abu Ghraib, she started crying. Ladies here are afraid and shy of talking about such subjects. They say everything is OK. Even in a very advanced society in the west it is very difficult to talk about rape."

Shaker, herself, encountered a milder form of sexual abuse at the hands of one American soldier. At a checkpoint, she said, an American soldier "pointed the laser sight [of his gun] directly in the middle of my chest... Then he pointed to his penis. He told me, 'Come here, bitch, I'm going to fuck you.'"

Writing from Baghdad, Luke Hardin of the Guardian reported that at Abu Ghraib journalists have been forbidden from talking to female detainees, who are cloistered in tiny windowless cells. Senior US military officers who have escorted journalists around Abu Ghraib, however, have admitted that rapes of women took place in the cellblock where 19 "high-value" male detainees were also being held. Asked how such abuse could have happened, Colonel Dave Quantock, now in charge of the prison's detention facilities, responded, "I don't know. It's all about leadership. Apparently it wasn't there."

No one should be surprised that women detainees, like male ones, were subjected to sexual abuse at Abu Ghraib. Think of the photographs we've already seen from that prison. If acts of ritual humiliation could be used to "soften up" men, then the rape of female detainees is hardly unimaginable.

But how can we be sure? In January, 2004, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the senior U.S. military official in Iraq, ordered Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba to investigate persistent allegations of human rights abuses at Abu Ghraib. The Taguba Report confirmed that in at least one instance a U.S. military policeman had raped at least one female prisoner and that guards had videotaped and photographed naked female detainees. Seymour Hersh also reported in a 2004 issue of the New Yorker magazine that these secret photos and videos, most of which still remain under wraps by the Pentagon, show American soldiers "having sex with a female Iraqi prisoner." Additional photos have made their way to the web sites of Afterdowningstreet.org and Salon.com. In one photograph, a woman is raising her shirt, baring her breasts, presumably as she was ordered to do.

The full range of pictures and videotapes are likely to show a great deal more. Members of Congress who viewed all the pictures and videotapes from Abu Ghraib seemed genuinely shaken and sickened by what they saw. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn called them "appalling;" then-Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle described them as "horrific." Ever since the scandal broke in April 2004, human rights and civil liberties groups have been engaged in a legal battle with the Department of Defense, demanding that it release the rest of the visual documents. Only when all those documents are available to the general public will we have a clearer ¬and undoubtedly more ghastly ¬record of the sexual acts forced upon both female and male detainees.

Sexual Terrorism on the Streets

Meanwhile, the chaos of the war has also led to a rash of kidnappings and rapes of women outside of prison walls. After interviewing rape and abduction victims, as well as eyewitnesses, Iraqi police and health professionals, and U.S. military police and civil affairs officers, Human Rights Watch released a report in July, 2003, titled Climate of Fear: Sexual Violence and Abduction of Women and Girls in Baghdad. Only months after Baghdad fell to U.S. forces, they had already learned of twenty-five credible allegations of the rape and/or abduction of Iraqi women. Not surprisingly, the report found that "police officers gave low priority to allegations of sexual violence and abduction, that the police were under-resourced, and that victims of sexual violence confronted indifference and sexism from Iraqi law enforcement personnel." Since then, as chaos, violence, and bloodletting have descended on Iraq, matters have only gotten worse.

After the American invasion, local gangs began roaming Baghdad, snatching girls and women from the street. Interviews with human rights investigators have produced some horrifying stories. Typical was nine-year-old "Saba A." who was abducted from the stairs of the building where she lives, taken to an abandoned building nearby, and raped. A family friend who saw Saba A. immediately following the rape told Human Rights Watch:

"She was sitting on the stairs, here, at 4:00 p.m. It seems to me that probably he hit her on the back of the head with a gun and then took her to [a neighboring] building. She came back fifteen minutes later, bleeding [from the vaginal area]. [She was still bleeding two days later, so] we took her to the hospital."

The medical report by the U.S. military doctor who treated Saba A. "documented bruising in the vaginal area, a posterior vaginal tear, and a broken hymen.'

In 2005, Amnesty International also interviewed abducted women. The story of "Asma," a young engineer, was representative. She was shopping with her mother, sister, and a male relative when six armed men forced her into a car and drove her to a farmhouse outside the city. They repeatedly raped her. A day later, the men drove her to her neighborhood and pushed her out of the car.

As recently as June 2006, Mayada Zhaair, spokeswoman for the Women's Rights Association, a local NGO, reported, "We've observed an increase in the number of women being sexually abused and raped in the past four months, especially in the capital."

No one knows how many abducted women have never returned. As one Iraqi police inspector testified, "Some gangs specialize in kidnapping girls, they sell them to Gulf countries. This happened before the war too, but now it is worse, they can get in and out without passports." Others interviewed by Human Rights Watch argued that such trafficking in women had not occurred before the invasion.

The U.S. State Department's June 2005 report on the trafficking of women suggested that the extent of the problem in Iraq is "difficult to appropriately gauge" under current chaotic circumstances, but cited an unknown number of Iraqi women and girls being sent to Yemen, Syria, Jordan, and Persian Gulf countries for sexual exploitation.

In May 2006, Brian Bennett wrote in Time Magazine that a visit to "the Khadamiyah Women's Prison in the northern part of Baghdad immediately produces several tales of abduction and abandonment. A stunning 18-year-old nicknamed Amna, her black hair pulled back in a ponytail, says she was taken from an orphanage by an armed gang just after the US invasion and sent to brothels in Samarra, al-Qaim on the border with Syria, and Mosul in the north before she was taken back to Baghdad, drugged with pills, dressed in a suicide belt and sent to bomb a cleric's office in Khadamiyah, where she turned herself in to the police. A judge gave her a seven-year jail sentence 'for her sake' to protect her from the gang, according to the prison director."

"Families and courts," Bennett reported, "are usually so shamed by the disappearance [and presumed rape] of a daughter that they do not report these kidnappings. And the resulting stigma of compromised chastity is such that even if the girl should resurface, she may never be taken back by her relations."

Disappearing women

To avoid such dangers, countless Iraqi women have become shut-ins in their own homes. Historian Marjorie Lasky has described this situation in "Iraqi Women Under Siege," a 2006 report for Codepink, an anti-war women's organization. Before the war, she points out, many educated Iraqi women participated fully in the work force and in public life. Now, many of them rarely go out. They fear kidnap and rape; they are terrified of getting caught in the cross-fire between Americans and insurgents; they are frightened by sectarian reprisals; and they are scared of Islamic militants who intimidate or beat them if they are not "properly covered."

"In the British-occupied south," Terri Judd reported in the British Independent,"where Muqtada al-Sadr's Mehdi's Army retains a stranglehold, women insist the situation is at its worst. Here they are forced to live behind closed doors only to emerge, concealed behind scarves, hidden behind husbands and fathers. Even wearing a pair of trousers is considered an act of defiance, punishable by death."

Invisible women -- for some Iraqi fundamentalist Islamic leaders, this is a dream come true. The Ministry of the Interior, for example, recently issued notices warning women not to go out on their own. "This is a Muslim country and any attack on a woman's modesty is also an attack on our religious beliefs," said Salah Ali, a senior ministry official. Religious leaders in both Sunni and Shiite mosques have used their sermons to persuade their largely male congregations to keep working women at home. "These incidents of abuse just prove what we have been saying for so long," said Sheikh Salah Muzidin, an imam at a mosque in Baghdad. "That it is the Islamic duty of women to stay in their homes, looking after their children and husbands rather than searching for work---especially with the current lack of security in the country."

In the early 1970s, American feminists redefined rape and argued that it was an act driven not by sexual lust, but by a desire to exercise power over another person. Rape, they argued, was an act of terrorism that kept all women from claiming their right to public space. That is precisely what has happened to Iraqi women since the American invasion of Iraq. Sexual terrorism coupled with religious zealotry has stolen their right to claim their place in public life.

This, then, is a hidden part of the unnecessary suffering loosed by the reckless invasion of Iraq. Amid the daily explosions and gunfire that make the papers is a wave of sexual terrorism, whose exact dimensions we have no way of knowing, and that no one here notices, unleashed by the Bush administration in the name of exporting "democracy" and fighting "the war on terror."

Ruth Rosen is a historian and journalist who teaches public policy at UC Berkeley. She is a senior fellow at the Longview Institute.

[ Original ]


Comment on this Editorial


Zionists Gone Wild


IDF bombs Hizbullah stronghold in Beirut

Hanan Greenberg
Ynet News
July 14, 2006

Wreckage in Beirut

Wreckage in Beirut, Friday morning (Photo: Reuters)


Night attack in Beirut: Israeli planes struck a bridge in the southern suburb of Beirut, a Hizbullah stronghold, and the fuel stores of the Jiyyeh power plant south of the city early Friday, witnesses and security sources said.

Three people were killed and 55 wounded in the pre-dawn raids on the Shiite Muslim suburb, the Beirut police said. Shops and buildings were damaged and dozens of cars wrecked in the district, home to hundreds of thousands of people.
Eyewitnesses and security sources reported that Israeli aircrafts fired at least seven missiles at the neighborhood. The Lebanese Army responded with anti-aircraft fire. Residents heard at least three strikes. Lebanese security sources also reported that Israeli planes struck the main highway leading to Beirut's international airport and south Lebanon.

Other news reports said a playground where Hizbullah leaders hold rallies for thousands of their supporters was also targeted.

Israel Defense Forces officials confirmed that the army had struck targets in Beirut.

On Friday morning, the Lebanon police reported that IAF aircrafts attacked a base of Ahmed Jibril's organization, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - General Command, at the Bekaa Valley, only 2 kilometers (1.24 miles) away from the Syrian border.

Earlier, Israeli planes struck the main highway linking Beirut to the Syrian capital Damascus, a Lebanese security source said.

The jets struck at least five separate times along different points of the international route, the source said.

Witnesses said the road was clear of traffic after earlier congestion as tourists fled Lebanon to neighboring Syria.

IDF officials said Friday morning that "targets at the Hizbullah organization's main headquarter in Beirut were struck from the air. The IDF attacked the security building and the guard at the organization's main headquarters. In addition, the IDF attacked the bridges and access routes to the area."

According to the army, "the center attacked releases orders and instructions and conducts terror activities."

Israeli officials said on Thursday that Israeli forces planned to strike the key highway as part of an assault aimed at retrieving two soldiers seized by Lebanese Hizbullah guerrillas.

Israel had already bombed Lebanon's airports and blockaded the country from the sea, bringing trade and tourism to a halt.

Lebanese officials said Israeli aircraft dispersed thousands of leaflets above the Shiite-dominated areas of southern Beirut warning citizens to stay clear of Hizbullah offices and operatives.

"For your own safety and because of our desire not to harm any civilians who are not involved (with Hizbullah), you should refrain from staying in areas where Hizbullah is present and operating," said the Arabic-language leaflets, signed "The State of Israel".

'We have no intention of seeking revenge'

Eyewitnesses said hundreds of residents were seen leaving the capital.

IDF sources said several senior Hizbullah members have gone into hiding.

"We assume Hizbullah will continue to launch attacks, also on Haifa, but at the end of the day the organization will be defeated," one official said.

Beirut's Dahiya neighborhood, a Hizbullah stronghold, has been marked as the IDF's key target for the next 24 hours.

The organization maintains several weapons cashes and its headquarters in the neighborhood.

"We have no intention of seeking revenge, but to simply strike what is dearest and most important to Hizbullah," a military source said.

The security establishment decided to intensify the attacks in Lebanon after a 122 millimeter missile was fired at Haifa.

"This is a simple upgraded Katyusha," an army source said. "Hizbullah has more of these Katyushas, and it may launch them."

'We must remain patient'

The IDF rejected Hizbullah's claims that it was not behind the missile attack, saying it had proof the organization did in fact launch the missile toward Haifa. A similar Katyusha was fired just hours earlier at Carmiel.

Comment: Okay. So show the proof to the international community...


Lebanon has asked for an immediate ceasefire, but a senior Northern Command officer said "we do not intend to respond positively until the operation's objectives have been attained. The resident of the north understand this and are willing to accept the disruption of their daily lives, including the cancellation of summer camps.

"We must remain patient; the operation began only 24 hours ago," he said.

IDF sources said that after Hizbullah stated that "If Beirut or its suburbs will sustain Israeli attacks, we will attack Haifa," it will not show restraint in its actions against the organization.

"We hold Lebanon, which allows Hizbullah to operate from its capital, responsible for the attacks on the north," an IDF official said.



Comment on this Article


Israel Intensifies Attacks Against Lebanon, Claims Hezbollah is Moving Two Captive Israelis to Iran

By SAM F. GHATTAS
Associated Press
July 13, 2006

BEIRUT, Lebanon - AP Video Israel unleashed a furious military campaign on Lebanon's main airport, highways, military bases and other targets Thursday, retaliating for scores of Hezbollah guerrilla rockets that rained down on Israel and reached as far as Haifa, its third-largest city, for the first time.

The death toll in two days of fighting rose to 57 people, including 10 Israelis, with the sudden burst of violence sending shock waves through a region already traumatized by Iraq and the ongoing battles in the Gaza Strip between Israel and Hamas. It shattered the relative calm in Lebanon that followed Israel's pullout from its occupied zone in south Lebanon in 2000 and the withdrawal of Syrian forces last year.
Israel's target was Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militant Shiite faction which has a free hand in southern Lebanon and also holds seats in parliament. Hezbollah sparked the current conflict Wednesday with a cross-border raid that captured two of Israel's soldiers.

Israel said it was determined to beat Hezbollah back and deny the militant fighters positions they have held along the border since 2000.

The Lebanese government, caught in the middle, pleaded for a cease-fire.

"If the government of Lebanon fails to deploy its forces, as is expected of a sovereign government, we shall not allow Hezbollah forces to remain any further on the borders of the state of Israel," Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz said.

Israeli analysts warned that Syria, which supports Hezbollah and plays host to Hamas' political leader Khaled Mashaal, could be Israel's next target.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said any Israeli attack against Syria would be an aggression on the whole Islamic world and warned of a harsh reaction, the official Iranian news agency reported Friday.

Israel's offensive was among its heaviest in Lebanon since it invaded the neighboring country and occupied its capital 24 years ago. Two days of Israeli bombings killed 45 Lebanese and two Kuwaitis and wounded 103. Two Israeli civilians and eight Israeli soldiers have also been killed, the military's highest death toll in four years.

With Beirut's international airport closed after Israeli bombs ripped apart its runway, many tourists were trapped while others drove over the mountains to Syria - though Israeli warplanes struck the highway linking Beirut to the Syrian capital of Damascus early Friday, closing the country's main artery and further isolating Lebanon from the outside world.

Beirut residents stayed indoors, leaving the streets of the capital largely empty. Others packed supermarkets to stock up on goods. Long lines formed on gas stations, with many quickly running out of gas.

Israel said its attacks were to prevent the movement of the captured soldiers and hamper Hezbollah's military capacity. It said it had information Hezbollah was trying to take the two soldiers to its ally, Iran - an allegation denied by the Iranian Foreign Ministry.

Fears mounted among Arab and European governments that violence in Lebanon could spiral out of control in a volatile region already torn by conflicts in Iraq and in Gaza. Israel launched an offensive in Gaza against Hamas, whose fighters are holding another Israeli soldier captured two weeks ago.

The shockwaves from the fighting on two fronts began to be felt as oil prices surged Thursday to a record above $78 a barrel in world markets, also agitated by the threat of supply disruptions in the Middle East and beyond.

At the United Nations, the United States blocked an Arab-backed resolution that would have demanded Israel halt its military offensive in the Gaza Strip, the first U.N. Security Council veto in nearly two years.

President Bush, speaking of the Lebanon offensive, backed Israel's right to defend itself and denounced Hezbollah as "a group of terrorists who want to stop the advance of peace."

But he also expressed worries the Israeli assault could cause the fall of Lebanon's anti-Syrian government. "We're concerned about the fragile democracy in Lebanon," Bush said in Germany.

The European Union took a harsher tone, criticizing Israel for using what it called "disproportionate" force. EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana said he was planning a peace mission.

The Arab League called an emergency meeting of foreign ministers in Cairo on Saturday, and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas warned that Israel's Lebanon offensive "is raising our fears of a new regional war."

Egypt launched a diplomatic bid to resolve the crisis, amid apparent frustration among moderate Arab nations that Hezbollah - and by implication its top ally Syria - had started the fight with Israel.

Saudi Arabia, the Arab world's political heavyweight and economic powerhouse, accused Hezbollah guerrillas - without naming them - of "uncalculated adventures" that precipitated the latest Middle East crisis.

"The kingdom sees that it is time for those elements to alone shoulder the full responsibility for this irresponsible behavior and that the burden of ending the crisis falls on them alone," according to a Saudi official quoted by the Saudi Press Agency.

Hezbollah's rocket attack on the port city of Haifa was its deepest such strike into northern Israel yet. No injuries were reported in Haifa, home to 270,000 residents and a major oil refinery 30 miles south of the border. Still, the Israeli ambassador to the United States, Daniel Ayalon, called the attack "a major, major escalation."

"Those who fire into such a densely populated area will pay a heavy price," said David Baker, an official in the Israeli prime minister's office.

Hezbollah's deputy leader denied its fighters fired on Haifa, but Israel blamed the group, which had warned earlier in the day it would strike the city if Beirut were targeted. Israeli officials said it was a Katyusha rocket launched from southern Lebanon. Witnesses also confirmed that a rocket hit the city.

The militants also fired rockets at four other northern Israeli towns, killing a 40-year-old woman on her balcony in Nahariya and a man in Safad.

Soon the Haifa attack, Israeli helicopter gunships raked fuel depots at Beirut's seaside airport with machine guns and missiles. The tanks exploded, sending gigantic flames into the night sky just outside Beirut. Earlier in the day, warplanes shut down the airport with strikes that pounded craters into all three of its runways, and Israeli warships sealed Lebanon's ports.

By evening, strikes in Hezbollah's stronghold in Beirut's southern neighborhoods appeared imminent. After nightfall Israeli planes dropped leaflets in south Beirut warning residents to avoid areas where Hezbollah operates.

Among the Lebanese dead were a family of 10 and another family of seven, killed when strikes hit their homes in the southern village of Dweir.

"It's a massacre," said Abu Talal, a 48-year-old resident who joined scores of Hezbollah supporters and townspeople at the funeral of Shiite cleric Sheik Adel Akkash, who was killed along with his wife and eight children, ages 3 months to 15 years.

"This is the (Israeli) arrogance. The raids aim to terrorize us, but morale is high."

The last time Israeli strikes targeted Beirut was in 2000, when warplanes hit a power station in the hills above the city after a Hezbollah attack killed Israeli soldiers. Israel has not hit Beirut's airport since its 1982 invasion of Lebanon and occupation of the capital.

Israel says it holds Lebanon responsible for Hezbollah's snatching of the two soldiers, Ehud Goldwasser, 31 and Eldad Regev, 26. The Lebanese government insisted it had no prior knowledge of the move and did not condone it - and even withdrew its ambassador to the U.S. after he made comments seemingly in support of the guerrillas.

Hezbollah fighters operate with almost total autonomy in southern Lebanon, and the government has no control over their actions. But the government has long resisted international pressure to disarm the group. Any attempt to disarm Hezbollah by force could lead to sectarian conflict.



Comment on this Article


Israel orders more strikes

By Lin Noueihed
Reuters
Jul 14, 2006

BEIRUT - Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert ordered more intense strikes on Lebanon on Friday, ratcheting up retaliation against Hizbollah guerrillas following the capture of two Israeli soldiers in a cross-border raid.

The move came at a late-night meeting of security chiefs and followed Israel's blockading of Lebanese ports, the bombing of Beirut airport and strikes against two military airbases.
"The decision was made to intensify Israel's operations in Lebanon," Army Radio quoted political sources as saying after Olmert met with Israeli security chiefs.

Israeli airstrikes and shelling have already killed at least 55 Lebanese civilians since the two soldiers were captured on Wednesday, while a steady barrage of Hizbollah rocket fire into northern Israel has killed two Israeli civilians and wounded 90.

Israeli aircraft struck the main highway linking Beirut with the Syrian capital, Damascus, early on Friday, a Lebanese security source said. It was not immediately clear if there were casualties.

Two Hizbollah missiles hit the Israeli port of Haifa, the country's third largest city, in a move Israel described as a "major escalation" since Haifa, home to around 250,000 people, lies more than 30 km (18 miles) from the Lebanese border.

No one was injured in the Haifa attacks. Hizbollah denied firing on Haifa. In total, Israel said Hizbollah, backed by Iran and Syria, fired more than 100 rockets at towns and villages in the north on Thursday, causing widespread panic and injuries.

The military offensive coincided with an major Israeli offensive into the Gaza Strip to retrieve a captured soldier and halt Palestinian rocket fire.

Israeli troops fired a tank shell at a vehicle in Gaza on Friday, killing a Palestinian and wounding another, Palestinian medics said.

The threat of a larger-scale Israeli ground offensive into Lebanon to prevent the rocket fire gained currency after the Haifa strikes although the military remained tight-lipped.

"All options are available," army spokesman Captain Jacob Dallal said when asked about the possibility of an offensive. "Strategically speaking, if the third largest city in Israel is under attack, it's a big thing and a response can be expected."

In Tehran, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad warned Israel not to attack Syria, saying such action would be considered an assault on the whole Islamic world that would bring a "fierce response," state television reported.

RESTRAINT

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, speaking in Germany, urged Israel to exercise restraint but also demanded that Syria put pressure on Hizbollah to stop attacks on Israel.

But Israel's ambassador to the United States Daniel Ayalon told CNN Israel believed its offensive was now the right way to deal with Hizbollah.

The violence was the fiercest since 1996, when Israeli troops still occupied part of south Lebanon.

President Bush voiced concern about the fate of Lebanon's anti-Syrian government, but offered no direct criticism of the punishment Israel meted out.

"Israel has the right to defend herself," he said while on a visit to Germany.

The European Union and Russia criticized Israel's strikes in Lebanon as a dangerous escalation of the Middle East conflict.

Saudi Arabia, though, blamed "elements" inside Lebanon for the violence with Israel, in unusually frank language directed at Hizbollah and its Iranian backers.

AIR AND SEA BLOCKADE

Lebanese Information Minister Ghazi al-Aridi said that Lebanon wanted an end to "this open-ended aggression" by Israel.

In New York, the U.N. Security Council set an urgent meeting for Friday at Lebanon's request.

The United States on Thursday vetoed a council resolution put forward by Qatar on behalf of Arab states that called on Israel to immediately end its military incursion in Gaza.

The bombing of Beirut's international airport forced flights to divert to Cyprus. Later, Israeli aircraft targeted fuel tanks at the airport, setting at least one tank ablaze.

Planes dropped leaflets in a Beirut suburb, urging residents to stay away from Hizbollah offices, witnesses said, a move that raised the possibility that Hizbollah's leader, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, could be targeted.

Israeli naval vessels enforcing the siege turned away three ships carrying fuel to Beirut, a shipping source said.

Israel has rejected Hizbollah demands that it release Arab prisoners in exchange for the captive soldiers, named by the Israeli army as Ehud Goldwasser, 31, and Eldad Regev, 26, but says it fears the soldiers could be spirited to Iran.

Iran said Israel was "talking absurdities."



Comment on this Article


Israel widens Lebanon assault

By Alistair Lyon
Reuters
July 14, 2006

BEIRUT - Israel battered roads, mobile phone antennas and fuel tanks in Lebanon on Friday, further devastating its neighbor's economy after Hizbollah guerrillas captured two Israeli soldiers and killed eight.

Hizbollah, which wants to trade its captives for prisoners held in Israel, has showered rockets across the frontier in its fiercest bombardment since Israeli troops left Lebanon in 2000.

Israeli warplanes blasted the main Beirut-Damascus highway overnight, tightening an air, sea and land blockade of Lebanon, and bombed targets in Beirut's teeming Shi'ite Muslim suburbs, killing three people and wounding 40, security sources said.

Their deaths brought to 60 the number of people, almost all civilians, killed in Lebanon since Israel's campaign began.
The Israeli military said Hizbollah had fired more than 130 missiles into Israel in 48 hours, killing two civilians and wounding over 100. It said Hizbollah's main security compound in southern Beirut had been among targets hit on Friday. Reuters reporters said they could see no sign of damage at the site.

Black smoke billowed from a burning fuel depot at the Jiyyeh power plant south of Beirut and from fuel tanks bombed at the capital's international airport on Thursday evening.

Israeli naval vessels sporadically shelled the coastal road near Jiyyeh, witnesses said. Air raids struck several mobile telephone relay stations in eastern Lebanon.

Israeli jets also struck a Palestinian guerrilla base in eastern Lebanon. The pro-Syrian Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command said there were no casualties.

LEBANESE GOVERNMENT POWERLESS

Israel holds Lebanon responsible for the actions of Hizbollah, a Syrian- and Iranian-backed Islamist group which has members in parliament and in the mainly anti-Syrian cabinet.

The fragile Beirut government, too divided to disarm the Shi'ite faction that effectively controls south Lebanon, has urged the U.N. Security Council to call on Israel to halt its onslaught when the top world body meets later on Friday.

But Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and his security chiefs opted on Thursday evening to ramp up the punishment. "The decision was made to intensify Israel's operations in Lebanon," Israeli Army Radio quoted political sources as saying.

That followed two unprecedented missile strikes on the port of Haifa, blamed by Israel on Hizbollah, which denied it had fired on the city, 30 km (18 miles) from the Lebanese border.

No one was hurt in the attack.

The violence in Lebanon coincided with an Israeli incursion into the Gaza Strip launched last month to try to retrieve another captured soldier and halt Palestinian rocket fire.

The army said on Friday it had pulled out of the central Gaza Strip, which it entered as part of the offensive. It said its forces had targeted an office of the ruling Hamas militant group in the northern Gaza Strip and a bridge overnight.

Troops fired a tank shell at a vehicle, killing one Palestinian and wounding another, Palestinian medics said.

Fearing a prolonged Israeli-Hizbollah confrontation, Lebanese queued for petrol and hoarded food and drink. Power rationing began and many shops and offices stayed shut.

The crisis has helped drive world oil prices to record highs and has shaken financial markets in Israel and Lebanon.

WARNING LEAFLETS

Israeli planes dropped leaflets in Beirut suburbs and some southern cities urging residents to stay away from Hizbollah offices, witnesses said, fuelling speculation that the group's charismatic leader, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, could be targeted.

"Nasrallah, I think, has pronounced sentence on himself but we will settle the account with him fully somewhere, sometime," Israeli Interior Minister Ronnie Bar-On told Israel Radio.

President Bush has said Israel has the right to defend itself, but should not weaken the Lebanese government. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice urged Israel to exercise restraint and demanded that Syria rein in Hizbollah.

Syria's ambassador to the United States said Washington should restrain Israel and push for renewed peace talks.

The European Union and Russia have criticized Israel's strikes in Lebanon as disproportionate.

Israeli Justice Minister Haim Ramon, when asked about the scale of the attacks on Lebanon, said his country was acting just as Russia did against the Chechens and the United States did against al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.

Comment:
"Israeli Justice Minister Haim Ramon, when asked about the scale of the attacks on Lebanon, said his country was acting just as Russia did against the Chechens and the United States did against al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan."
Gosh, we never saw that one coming...


Comment on this Article


Israel appears to 'wish to destroy' Lebanon: Chirac

AFP
July 14, 2006

PARIS - French President Jacques Chirac has said that there appears to be a "wish to destroy Lebanon" in reference to
Israel's bombardments following the abduction of two soldiers.

"One may well ask if there isn't today a kind of wish to destroy Lebanon -- its infrastructure, its roads, its communications, its energy, its airport. And for what?

"I find honestly -- as all Europeans do -- that the current reactions are totally disproportionate," he said in a live television interview to mark France's July 14 national day.
"In the Middle East we are currently in a situation of great fragility and instability. We are in a dangerous situation, a very dangerous situation. We must be very, very careful," he said Friday.

The president welcomed the dispatch of a UN mission to the Middle East, whose aim he said should be to secure the release of the Israeli prisoners -- including one held in Gaza -- establish a ceasefire and study new security arrangements along the Israeli-Lebanese border.

At the same time, he said that Lebanon's Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas movement "need to stop something which is totally inadmissible, unacceptable, irresponsible -- the rocket attacks which are now regular on Israel."

"There is a kind of process engaged in by Hamas and Hezbollah based on provocation-repression .... These people are totally irresponsible," he said.

Asked if the organisations were being encouraged by
Syria and Iran, he said: "I have the feeling ... that Hamas and Hezbollah cannot have taken these initiatives on their own, and that consequently there must be somewhere support from this or that nation."

Comment:
"I have the feeling ... that Hamas and Hezbollah cannot have taken these initiatives on their own, and that consequently there must be somewhere support from this or that nation."
Yes indeedy. Given Mossad's history of false flag operations, somehow we doubt that "this or that nation" is really Syria or Iran.


Comment on this Article


Israeli army says it pulls out of central Gaza

Reuters
July 14, 2006

GAZA - The Israeli army pulled out on Friday from the central Gaza Strip, which it entered as part of an offensive launched last month to free an abducted soldier, the army said.

"IDF forces (Israeli Defense Forces) have currently completed their activities in the area," the army said in a statement.
Comment: Um, so where's the soldier??



Comment on this Article


Israel continues air assault on Gaza

by Adel Zaanoun
AFP
July 14, 2006

GAZA CITY - Israel has pressed on with its air assault on Gaza in a bid to retrieve a soldier abducted nearly three weeks ago and stop rocket attacks but troops withdrew from the centre of the territory.

The continued offensive came as the United States vetoed a UN resolution calling on Israel to halt its military operations in Gaza, as the Security Council prepared for an emergency debate on escalating violence in Lebanon.

The air force carried out at least two overnight raids, while ground artillery and naval gunboats pounded the north and south of the Palestinian territory as part of its campaign to secure the release of Corporal Gilad Shalit.
One raid struck the house of an MP for the governing Palestinian movement Hamas, whose administration has been directly targeted in the offensive, in Beit Lahiya in north Gaza, and a bridge in the central part of the territory.

At least 76 Palestinians and one Israeli soldier have now been killed since Israel stepped up a ground assault on Gaza July 5 in a bid to retrieve Shalit, snatched in a deadly raid on June 25, and stop Palestinian rocket attacks.

Three rockets fired from Gaza exploded in the southern Israeli town of Sderot on Friday but caused no damage or any casualties, the military said.

The armed wing of radical movement Islamic Jihad claimed to have fired one rocket on Sderot in response to continued Israeli "aggression".

One Palestinian was killed late Thursday when a tank fired a shell at a vehicle moving towards Israeli forces stationed in the Qarara in southern Gaza.

But tanks and armoured jeeps positioned in the centre near the Deir al-Balah refugee camp and the town of Khan Yunis withdrew from the area Friday, witnesses and the army said.

Ahmed al-Kurd, the Hamas mayor of Deir al-Balah, said at least 30 hectares of farmland and orchard, largely olive trees, were badly damaged by the Israeli troops in the town and around 20 homes partially or entirely destroyed.

"There is a lot of damage to Salaheddin street (the main road running north and south in the Gaza Strip). We are trying to repair it but that won't be easy," said Khan Yunis governor Osama Farra.

An army spokeswoman said the only place where Israeli ground forces remain in Gaza is in Dahaniya, in the south, near the former international airport that was destroyed by the army after the second Palestinian uprising erupted.

The pullback came after Israel's chief ally the United States vetoed a UN resolution urging Israel to halt military operations in Gaza, condemning the assault and calling for the immediate withdrawal of its troops.

US Ambassador John Bolton said the veto was because of the "unbalanced" nature of the draft text which he argued laid a disproportionate amount of blame on Israel for the current crisis in the region. The text had also condemned the firing of rockets from Gaza into Israel and Shalit's abduction.

What has become the worst Israeli-Palestinian crisis in months was sparked when the 19-year-old was snatched by Palestinian militants, including members of the armed wing of Hamas, on the Gaza border.

Faced with twin Israeli offensives in Gaza and Lebanon, following Wednesday's abduction of two soldiers by Hezbollah, Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas issued a stark warning against the eruption of "regional war".

Shalit's captors have, like Hezbollah, demanded the release of prisoners in exchange for their hostage.

But Israel has refused any talks with the Islamist movement that advocates the destruction of the Jewish state, or to engage in a prisoner swap, vowing the assault will continue "in places, in time, in measures" at its convenience.



Comment on this Article


More than 20 rockets fired at Israel

AFP
July 14, 2006

NAHARIYA, Israel - More than 20 rockets have been fired by guerrillas in Lebanon into northern Israel, where two people were killed in similar attacks a day earlier.

Four rockets exploded in the centre of the Mediterranean coastal resort of Nahariya, unleashing a fire and damaging houses and businesses but not causing any casualties, an army spokeswoman said Friday.

Another three rockets landed in Safed, missing buildings, while seven more hit the outskirts.

One person was slightly wounded, the spokeswoman said.
Several Katyusha rockets also landed near army bases and outposts near the border with Lebanon but did not cause casualties or damage.

On Thursday, two Israeli civilians were killed and more than 50 were wounded in similar rocket attacks on the north.

Around 130 rockets have been fired from southern Lebanon in the past 48 hours, a military source said, including on the port of Haifa.

In the south, three makeshift rockets fired by Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip landed in the southern desert town of Sderot, exploding but causing no casualties or damage, the military said.

The Al-Quds Brigades, the armed wing of militant Palestinian group Islamic Jihad, issued a statement saying it had fired one rocket at Sderot "as part of our response to the Israeli aggression".

Separately, the armed wing of the Hamas Islamist group, the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades, said in a statement it had fired a rocket towards the southern Israeli coastal town of Ashkelon. The attack could not be independently confirmed.

Israel launched two deadly offensives, in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip, following the capture of two soldiers by Hezbollah guerrillas Wednesday and last month's seizure of another serviceman by Palestinian militants -- among them Hamas loyalists.

At least 76 Palestinians have been killed in the Gaza offensive and at least 50 people have been killed by Israel's relentless attacks on Lebanon.



Comment on this Article


US vetoes UN resolution urging end to Israeli attacks in Gaza

AFP
July 13, 2006

The United States vetoed a UN draft resolution that would have called for an end to Israeli attacks and "disproportionate use of force" in the Gaza Strip as well as for the release of a kidnapped Israeli soldier.

The Security Council resolution received 10 votes, one against from the United States with four abstentions, French Ambassador Jean-Marc de la Sabliere, the council president for July, announced.
Explaining his negative vote, US Ambassador John Bolton described the text as "unbalanced" and was "not only untimely but also outmoded" because of the attacks against Israel by Lebanese Hezbollah militants and UN chief Kofi Annan's decision to send a crisis team to the region.

He said adoption of the resolution would have exacerbated tensions in the region and would have undermined "our vision of two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security."

The United States, Israel's staunchest ally, last used its veto in the Security Council in October 2004, to block a similar draft demanding that Israel end all military operations in northern Gaza and withdraw from the area.

Comment:
Bolton said, "...adoption of the resolution would have exacerbated tensions in the region and would have undermined 'our vision of two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security.'"
How exactly does calling for an end to "disproportionate use of force" exacerbate the tension in the Middle East?! Bolton must logically believe that more violence in the Middle East is a good thing.


Comment on this Article


Israeli Web Sites Attacked

RedHerring
July 13, 2006

The fighting along Israel's northern border with Lebanon has brought with it an upsurge in attacks on Israeli-related web sites in the past 24 hours, Israeli web sites reported Thursday.

As the violence escalated, hackers from the Islamic world have targeted web sites hosted by all of Israel's major Internet service providers.

To counter the threat, the ISPs added even more security to protect their servers from the latest round of digital warfare. Most of the attacks are coming from hackers located in Morocco and Turkey.
"We witnessed hundreds of application layer attacks against Israeli-related web sites," said Ariel Pisetsky, manager of engineering and security at NetVision, one of Israel's leading ISPs. He added that this kind of attack has become increasingly prevalent in recent years.

Local ISPs are deploying more aggressive security to deal with the threat. The latest onslaught came within hours of Wednesday morning's outbreak of hostilities. The hackers look for vulnerabilities on Israeli web sites and domains.

They search for domains ending with the suffix co.il. Typically the hacker searches for file-uploading or scripting capabilities. Once the vulnerability of these capabilities is located, files are uploaded to deface the site.

Rapid Response

NetVision and other ISPs responded within a matter of minutes. "Our immediate response was to make it far more difficult for all users to enter the web sites," noted Mr. Pisetsky.

In NetVision's case, the company immediately deployed two new security technologies that it began testing in recent weeks on a trial basis on the servers that had come under attack.

Israeli ISPs are tightlipped about the latest security software systems they are deploying to counter the sharp rise in application layer attacks, but many are being developed by local startup companies.

"This field of security is very hot and a number of local startups are focusing their attention on this space," said Dan Yachin, a Tel Aviv-based research director for emerging technologies at IDC.



Comment on this Article


Dollars and Nonsense


Oil hits record over $78

By Paul Marriott
Reuters
Thu Jul 13, 2006

SYDNEY - Oil prices surged to record highs above $78 on Friday as global geopolitical storm clouds gathered, with supply disruption in OPEC exporter Nigeria and tensions across the Middle East driving crude into unchartered territory.

U.S. crude for August surged $1.40 to $78.10 a barrel by 0147 GMT, after hitting a record $78.40 as gains came on top of Thursday's $1.75 rally. London Brent was $1.01 up at $77.70, also touching a record after Thursday's $2.30 jump.

Escalating conflict between Israel and Lebanon and fresh supply fears in the world's eighth-largest exporter, Nigeria, took center stage, firing prices 1.8 percent above Thursday's close and over $80 a barrel for fourth-quarter delivery contracts.
Iran's nuclear stand-off with the West limped back to the U.N. Security Council, North Korea stormed out of talks with South Korea, and falling crude stocks in the world's top oil consumer, the United States, continued to bolster prices.

"Oil is being hit from all fronts by geopolitical problems," said Mark Pervan, a resources analyst at Daiwa Securities. "A raft of problems could keep prices at record levels for some time."

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday warned that any Israeli strike on Syria would be considered an attack on the whole Islamic world that would provoke "a fierce response."

Israeli jets struck Hizbollah's southern Beirut stronghold on Friday, a day after blockading Lebanese ports and bombing Beirut's airport in reprisals against the Lebanese guerrilla group's capture of two Israeli soldiers.

Neither Israel nor Lebanon are oil producers but both lie at the heart of the Middle East, which collectively pumps nearly a third of global output, leaving oil traders very nervous.

"Israel has flared up badly this week, but it's tension which has been brewing for years," said Daiwa's Pervan. "Then there's Nigeria, where instability is endemic, politics is in turmoil and it's unlikely to change before elections next year."

In Nigeria, two suspected explosions at a crude pipeline operated by Agip, a unit of Italy's Eni, caused oil spills, Nigerian officials said. Eni denied reports of sabotage and extensive oil spills and said the damage would be repaired soon.

It spells fresh uncertainty in Nigeria after Royal Dutch Shell has already shut down 473,000 barrels per day of supply, almost a quarter of output in Africa's top oil supplier, due to attacks by rebel militants.

LOWER STOCK CUSHION

Oil in New York is up around 28 percent in 2006, rallying from below $20 in January 2002 amid rising demand led by the United States and the second-largest oil consumer China, together with a series of real or potential supply disruptions.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the world's fourth-largest oil exporter would not abandon its right to nuclear technology as Tehran's case was referred back to the U.N. Security Council after it delayed accepting a package of incentives designed to prevent it developing nuclear weapons.

"With Israel and Nigeria, Iran completes the triumvirate of key tensions supporting prices," said Daiwa's Pervan.

Elsewhere, in Asia, North Korea blamed the South for the collapse of their first high-level talks since Pyongyang's missile tests sparked a regional crisis last week, saying Seoul would "pay a price" for the failure.

Robust U.S. demand in the face of high prices and falling inventories also supported oil's gain.

"Today's records are a supply-side story not a demand story," said Pervan. "But the draw on U.S. stocks was really severe and you can't underestimate the effect on prices."

U.S. crude inventories slid 6 million barrels last week as imports fell, a government report said Wednesday, five times the decline forecast in a Reuters poll.



Comment on this Article


Markets slide on oil price and war threats

By Andrew Dewson
The Independent
14 July 2006

Global equity markets suffered a big sell-off yesterday as concerns over the price of oil again threatened economic growth. Brent crude futures prices hit a record $76.18 per barrel in London trade as a combination of war threats in the Middle East, Iran and North Korea and violence in Nigeria pushed prices higher with no sign of weakening demand. The FTSE 100 fell by 95.6 points, its biggest fall for a month, while the Dow Jones closed down 166.89 points after falling 121 on Wednesday.

In Hong Kong, the Hang Seng was down 216 points overnight, while in Japan, the Nikkei dropped more than 150 points. The FTSE 100 should benefit more than other markets because of its heavy weighting in oils stocks, with BP, Shell and Cairn Energy making up almost one quarter of the total index. However, if the oil price continues to rise there will be no escape from higher costs and slowing economic growth.
Only a month ago, BP's chief executive, Lord Browne of Madingley, predicted that long-term oil prices would eventually fall to below $30 per barrel, a prediction that now looks less credible. Increased use of technology and exploration success may drive prices down eventually, but with increasing political and military tension in the world's oil-producing nations and unquenchable demand from developed and developing economies, the oil price is showing few signs of any meaningful decline.

Georgina Taylor, a UK equity strategist at the investment bank Goldman Sachs, says that stock markets have been slow to price in higher oil prices. She said: "The oil price has been ignored to a certain extent, and while forecasts for cost increases are rising the market is still behind the oil price. Should the price of oil rise to, say, $100 per barrel, there would be a hugely negative impact on global equity markets, real incomes and growth. That said, the London market should be best positioned of the major markets to benefit from a higher oil price and fundamentally UK equities remain good value."

Despite concerns over the oil price and yesterday's record prices, in real terms the per-barrel value was higher during the oil shock of the 1970s. According to BP, oil hit an inflation-adjusted average of $87.65 per barrel during 1980, a period also marked by high inflation, slow economic growth and higher interest rates. Even so, oil is more expensive in real terms now than it has been since 1983.

One oil trader said: "Last year, global geopolitical tensions were exacerbated by the extremely active hurricane season in the United States. All the predictions are that this year will be every bit as active, and the situation in Israel looks like it is spiralling out of control."

He added: "In these circumstances, oil prices are only going to head in one direction. Unless Opec bows to political pressure from consumers and opens the floodgates, oil is going to stay expensive for the foreseeable future."



Comment on this Article


Bank of Japan ends over five years of zero interest rates

AFP
Friday July 14, 2006

The Bank of Japan has ended over five years of zero interest rates in a watershed decision for the world's number two economy which has finally escaped from its long deflationary spiral.

The unanimous decision by the BoJ's policy board Friday to raise the overnight call rate target by a quarter point to 0.25 percent is the strongest sign yet that Japan's economy has returned to normality after years of emergency measures.

It was the first interest rise in Japan for almost six years, reflecting a global trend of monetary tightening and an end to the era of easy credit that will force Japanese to kick their addiction to virtually free money.
"The Japanese economy has been in a difficult period for over 10 years but thanks to efforts by the private and public sectors it is beginning to return to a normal state," said BoJ governor Toshihiko Fukui.

"We think prices will remain on a steady upward trend. The risk of a return to deflation has dissolved," he told a press conference.

The Bank of Japan sought to assuage worries that the rate rise might stifle economic growth, saying further increases would be made only gradually and that rates would be kept "very low" for some time.

Fukui said the BoJ had no plans for a series of consecutive interest rate rises at future meetings.

Even so, many analysts were pencilling in another interest rate rise before the end of the year.

"Recent history suggests we should be very sceptical of verbal assurances that policy will only tighten gradually," warned Richard Jerram, chief economist for Japan at Macquarie Securities.

But he added: "We think the very slow acceleration in inflation is likely to be an impediment to a rapid string of rate hikes."

The policy board also increased the official discount rate, or the rate at which it lends directly to commercial banks, to 0.4 percent from 0.1 percent.

The central bank first adopted the zero-rate policy in February 1999 to try to stop Asia's largest economy from falling into a deflationary spiral.

With the economy seemingly on the mend, the BoJ increased its overnight call rate to 0.25 percent from zero percent in August 2000.

But the economy quickly reversed course and it was forced to drop the rate back to zero again in March 2001, when it also introduced its unprecedented quantitative easing policy -- flooding the system with cash -- which it ditched in March.

Fukui said he was confident that the central bank had not made a similar blunder this time.

"If you compare the situation in 2000 with the current situation, the foundations of the economy's growth have grown more robust and its vulnerability to shocks has declined."

Asia's largest economy now finally seems to be out of deflation, with core consumer prices up for a seventh straight month in May and the overall economy on track to its longest post-war expansion.

But it has left a hangover -- public debt now stands at over 150 percent of Japan's annual economic output after the government spent trillions of yen trying to revive the economy when the economic bubble burst in the early 1990s.

The end to zero interest rates was made in spite of calls from several government ministers, including Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki who said just this week that there was no need yet for an interest rate rise.

However, Japanese Economic and Fiscal Policy Minister Kaoru Yosano on Friday gave his approval for an rate rise, saying it was the "right thing" to do as zero rates were an exceptional policy.

The BoJ's historic decision has also been overshadowed somewhat by controversy over the BoJ governor's links to a scandal-tainted investment fund, with polls showing a large majority of Japanese wanting Fukui to resign.

The BoJ chief indicated Friday he still has no plans to stand down, saying he wanted to fulfill his responsibility as central bank governor.

Financial markets took the rate rise news in their stride, focusing instead on high oil prices and violence in the Middle East as they fell sharply.



Comment on this Article


Why Dell, Apple Declined: The US Computer Industry Slump

By Catherine Holahan
BusinessWeek Online
JULY 13, 2006

The second quarter is rarely a good time for computer makers. Back-to-school buying won't get started in earnest for months, the holidays are half a year away-in both directions-and corporate IT budgets are still far from spent. But there's growing concern that this year's lull is hitting especially hard.

Concerns over the U.S. computer industry surfaced on July 12, as some prominent Wall Street analysts made bearish remarks about Dell, the world's largest PC maker, and Apple, which makes computers and the popular iPod digital music player.

By the end of the trading day, tech stocks had taken a beating, with computer makers some of the biggest losers. Dell shares fell more than 4%, while Apple slumped almost 5%. Hewlett Packard dipped 2.7%.
DEMAND DOWN. While the day's losses were pegged to company-specific issues, some analysts say growth for the entire year will be slower than previously thought. Among the concerns: delays in key computer-related technologies including the latest Microsoft operating system and next-generation DVD players.

Some are concerned price wars are imminent and that economic slowdown could crimp overall demand. "There's a softness in the market that's building," says Richard Shim, a senior research analyst at IDC. In the past two weeks, IDC cut its 2006 forecast for U.S. PC growth to 5.7%, from 6.8%. "In '04 and '05 there was tremendous growth. In a market that's as mature as this industry is, there's no way you can maintain those levels."

Dell fed worries on July 12 by announcing that the following day it would unveil a "major pricing initiative" for U.S. consumers and small businesses. The same day, UBS Investment Research (UBS) said it was cutting earnings estimates for Dell on the belief the company "continues to be impacted by competition and adverse mix shifts within the PC market." Dell's performance in recent quarters (it lost U.S. share to rivals in the first three months of the year) has given investors little reason for confidence-though the company has embarked on a turnaround campaign that includes beefing up customer service (see BW, 6/19/06, "Dell: Facing Up To Past Mistakes").

Credit Suisse (CSR) issued a report the same day that did a number on Apple's stock. The computer maker, which reports fiscal third-quarter results July 19, will probably issue sales and earnings forecasts for the current period that falls short of analysts' expectations, Credit Suisse analyst Robert Semple wrote.

Apple is likely to tell analysts that fourth-quarter sales will be $4.6 billion to $4.8 billion, compared with analysts' estimates for sales of $5 billion, the report says. "We expect Apple will once again use the September quarter to reduce iPod inventories as the company prepares for a refresh of its product lineup."

NEW PRODUCT DELAYS. Apple has been dogged by reports from analysts at other firms that the next version of the popular iPod music player will be delayed. If that's the case, Apple won't be alone in experiencing tech delays. Microsoft has already owned up to delays in Vista, the next version of its operating system, and Office, its package of business-productivity applications. That in turn could affect the timing of PC purchases, say analysts including Wendy Abramowitz, a senior analyst at Argus Research.

Backers of the competing next-generation DVD technologies weren't ready with their wares as early as planned either, notes Shim at IDC.

So how long will the bearish sentiment linger? Shim sees the market "bouncing back in '07." NPD analyst Stephen Baker is even more upbeat. "We continue to be very bullish about the third quarter," he says. Not only will consumers be buying machines for students, but many are upgrading to notebooks and adding second computers for the home, he says.



Comment on this Article


Intel to ax 1,000 managers

By Stephen Shankland and Michael Kanellos
CNET News.com
July 13, 2006

Intel will begin cutting about 1,000 manager jobs worldwide this week as part of an effort to become more competitive.

"This step is important because it addresses a key problem we've found in our efficiency analysis: slow and ineffective decision-making, resulting, in part, from too many management layers," Chief Executive Paul Otellini told employees in a memo sent out Thursday and seen by CNET News.com.
Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy confirmed the layoffs Thursday, saying they would "both reduce costs and improve decision-making and communications." He didn't disclose the financial costs or benefits of the cuts, but said Intel plans to share more details Wednesday when it discusses financial results for the last quarter.

The restructuring and regrouping effort comes after two years of sluggish performance at Intel. In 2004, the company had to delay or cancel a number of products. In 2005, Intel steadily lost market share to rival Advance Micro Devices.

"Intel has been besieged by slowing PC market demand and uncharacteristically fierce competition from rival AMD. The primary concerns facing Intel's operations are declining revenues and profitability," said Martin Kariithi, an analyst at Technology Business Review.

The move, along with the sale of some communications processor assets to Marvell Technology Group in June, is part of an efficiency review Intel launched in April to become more competitive. More cuts are likely as a result of the review, Otellini said.

"You should expect that we will continue to take actions, including selective reductions, as we complete analyses and decisions about investments, expense levels and organizational structures," Otellini said in the memo. "Over the last five years at Intel, the number of managers has grown faster than our overall employee population. Our efficiency analysis and industry benchmarking have shown that we have too many management layers, top to bottom, to be effective."

Kariithi estimated that the revenue per Intel employee dropped from $408,175 in the fourth quarter of 2005 to $371,075 in the first quarter of 2006, but he expects another layoff to be announced during the financial results announcement.

To return revenue per employee to where it was a year ago, Kariithi said, Intel will have to lay off 10 percent of its staff--about 10,000 people.

Although AMD has been gaining share against its rival, it has had its own difficulties as well. Last week, the company announced revenue of $1.21 billion, significantly less than the $1.3 billion average expected by analysts and a 9 percent decrease over the first quarter.

Most managers losing their jobs will be notified Thursday and Friday, Otellini said, and will get a minimum of three months' separation pay.

Henri Richard, executive vice president of sales and marketing at AMD, earlier this year said that AMD made some of its gains in part because of Intel's complacency. Characterizing Intel as fat and sluggish has become a recurring theme with AMD.

Institutional intertia

In an interview Wednesday, Thomas Sonderman, director of automated precision manufacturing at AMD, said that the chipmaker realized in the 1990s that it never would be able to have as large a factory footprint as Intel. As a result, it optimized what it could do in a single factory.

"We didn't have the luxury to be fat, dumb and happy," he said.

Otellini rebuffed the notion that Intel had become self-satisfied earlier this year. Still, Intel has had trouble overcoming institutional inertia. In early 2004, CNET News.com asked then-CEO Craig Barrett and Otellini if the company's emerging problems were the result of overconfidence. The two said no, arguing that the problems that had emerged had fairly specific causes. A few months and a few more product problems later, Barrett issued an internal memo warning employees that the company had become somewhat complacent and needed to refocus.

Despite the warning, Intel didn't rebound. And employee head count went from about 85,000 at the end of 2004 to 100,000 at the end of 2005.

Otellini called for a thorough examination during the first-quarter earnings call in April. The project was then reiterated at a meeting with analysts.

The 90-day efficiency review began in late April and therefore should be complete in coming weeks. Mulloy declined to say when actions resulting from the review would be done because the company doesn't yet know, he said.

That review has already resulted in the sale of Intel's XScale communications and applications chip technology to Marvell. There have been some smaller actions from the review, Mulloy said, including the closure of a 19-person lab in Glasgow, Scotland.

Intel periodically conducts purges. After a mini downturn in 1998, the company reduced head count through voluntary departures and layoffs. After bulking up with several acquisitions in the dot-com era, the company subsequently whacked divisions and sold off other groups.

In Thursday's memo, Otellini sought to fan Intel employees' competitive fires.

"We have done extremely well over the past 25 years of the PC era. But we need to adjust now for where our industry is going. Competition will intensify across our product lines. Pricing will be aggressive," he said. "Our objective, and our destiny, is to refashion Intel now while we have the means and the time to do so, and ensure we continue to remain No. 1."



Comment on this Article


States sue chip makers over price-fixing

By Michael Kahn and Kiyoshi Takenaka
Reuters
July 14, 2006

SAN FRANCISCO/TOKYO - Global computer memory chip makers including Samsung Electronics Co. and Micron Technology Inc. were sued on Thursday by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer for allegedly conspiring to raise memory chip prices.

The action will be followed on Friday by a similar but separate suit by California and 33 other U.S. states against seven memory chip makers such as Micron, Infineon Technologies AG and Hynix Semiconductor Inc..

The multi-state lawsuit, which seeks damages estimated as high as hundreds of millions of dollars, does not name Samsung, the world's largest memory chip maker, to provide a window to reach a potential settlement, said Tom Dresslar, a spokesman for California Attorney General Bill Lockyer.
South Korea's Samsung expected the lawsuit to be "resolved smoothly," and had provisioned for such lawsuits, according to Chu Woo-sik, the senior vice president of Samsung's IR team.

The suits come at a time when dynamic random access memory (DRAM) chip makers enjoy relatively steady prices and look for firmer demand toward the year-end shopping season and the consumer launch early next year of Microsoft Corp.'s Vista operating system.

Lockyer said on Thursday that he, joined by 33 other state attorneys general, would file the complaint alleging the chip makers violated state and federal antitrust laws during a conspiracy to fix prices for DRAM chips, from 1998 through June 2002, when there was a glut in the market.

The lawsuits follows a U.S. Justice Department probe launched in 2002 that resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in fines levied against Samsung, Hynix, Infineon, Elpida Memory Inc. and other chip makers.

The federal investigation followed a sharp plunge in the prices for memory chips used in computers and other electronics, which forced a wave of industry consolidation and pushed several chip makers near bankruptcy.

"If these suits are completed by the end of the year and the scale of fines are fixed, that would be a substantial blow to each company," said a Tokyo-based analyst at a European brokerage.

"But that is rather unlikely. The more likely scenario is that they would set aside reserves gradually as the suits progress, harming their profit margins."

The multi-state complaint accuses the companies of fixing DRAM chip prices, artificially restraining supply and rigging bids for contracts.

Those actions caused computer makers such as Dell Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co. to pay more for chips and then pass those costs on to consumers, said Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist, another lead plaintiff in the case.

Micron spokesman Dan Francisco said he could not comment specifically on the lawsuit because the company had not yet seen it. But he noted that the Boise, Idaho-based chip maker has been in talks to resolve the issue.

"We have been involved in discussions with state attorneys general for a long period of time," Francisco said. "As I understand it they wanted to get these cases on file while we discuss the potential for resolution."

Germany's Infineon could not immediately be reached for comment.

The multi-state lawsuit names many of the world's top-ranked memory chip makers including Hynix; Taiwan's Mosel Vitelic and Nanya Technology Corp.; Japan's Elpida and NEC Electronics Corp.'s NEC Electronics America.

Samsung shares fell 2.67 percent to close at 584,000 won after it reported an 11 percent drop in its quarterly profit, and Hynix lost 3.13 percent to 30,900 won. The benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index ended down 2.33 percent.

Shares in NEC Electronics closed down 2.03 percent at 3,380, and Elpida lost 1.99 percent to 4,430 yen, roughly in line with the Tokyo stock market's electrical machinery index.

An Elpida spokeswoman said she could not comment since it was still in the process of looking into the matter. An NEC Electronics spokesman said it was too early to make any comment.



Comment on this Article


Militarism and the Corporate Welfare State

By Charles Sullivan
www.opednews.com
July 11, 2006

Right wing politicos and their conservative constituents are always bemoaning big government. Yet wealthy people of all political stripes constantly use big government to their own benefit. The rich widely assume, falsely, I think, that what is good for them is good for the country. By extension they also assume that what is good for the corporations is good for the people. But that has never been the case. No one should be allowed to make a living on the misery of others.

The latter seems odd, given that business people are always harping about getting the government out of our (their) lives; all the while they are using government to obtain no bid contracts, to write legislation in the corporate interest, stocking the judiciary with pro-corporate judges, redrawing political districts and using the military to invade and occupy sovereign nations in order to privatize them. Iraq provides a compelling case study.
Of course, what businessmen really mean by getting government off our backs is preventing government from regulating commerce, as if there were some connection between capital and democracy, democracy and freedom. In corporate speak democracy and free trade has nothing to do with human beings and their freedoms. What Bush and his kind are really talking about is absolute corporate rule and continued Plutocracy.

According to author Antonia Juhasz, "Prior to the first Gulf War in 1991 and even after eight years of war with Iran, Iraq was ranked 15 out of 130 countries on the 1990 United Nations Human Development Index. Before the first Bush invasion, Iraq had the highest percentage of college-educated citizens in the Middle East and above average overall literacy rates. According to the World Health Organization, prior to 1991 health care reached approximately 97 percent of the urban population and 78 percent of rural residents, while the infant mortality rate was well below average for developing countries. "

Constitutional government was established in Iraq in 1922. Prior to the 1991 U.S. invasion, Iraq was in essence a socialist government, since most of its political and economic infrastructure, including its burgeoning oil industry was nationalized. Despite Saddam Hussein's abuse of the constitution (the U.S. is suffering similar abuses under Bush), the Iraqi people enjoyed a high standard of living and many freedoms. This allowed them benefits such as socialized health care and access to free higher education that Americans have never known.

All of those freedoms and the high standard of living were demolished with the U.S. invasion and permanent occupation of Iraq. A huge corporate fire sale was under way.

Under the imposed dictatorship of Paul Bremmer granted under the Coalition Provisional Authority during the first months of the occupation, all of Iraq's 192 state-owned enterprises were privatized and divided among 150 U.S. corporations that have so far realized more than $50 billion in profits. Every aspect of the Iraqi economy was dismantled, privatized, and divided up among corporate America with no benefit to the Iraqi people.

With the U.S. occupation the Iraqi Constitution was torn asunder and replaced with a new charter that places Iraq under virtual corporate rule. Under the U.S. imposed Corporate Constitution, the Iraqis no longer have access to clean water, reliable electricity, medicine, healthcare, or higher education. Ownership of Iraq's once prosperous economy, including her extensive oil fields, was transferred from the Iraqi people to U.S. corporations.

This is the democracy we have brought to Iraq, punctuated by suffering, misery, and death. When innocent blood flows so too does the money. See how the stocks of Halliburton and Bechtel rose with the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

The blueprint for the economic plunder of Iraq was orchestrated by Bearing Point, Inc. of Mclean, Virginia. The Bearing Point plan turns Iraq from a socialist state to a full bore capitalist entity over three years. For their services Bearing Point made the tidy sum of $250 million.

Not surprisingly, Bremmer has strong ties with corporate America and such luminaries of dementia as Donald Rumsfeld, Henry Kissinger and George Schultz that extend more than a quarter of a century. All of these men have economic ties with the same businesses that stole Iraq's wealth. Each of them has realized great personal fortune by profiteering on the spoils of war and occupation: policies they helped to forge.

The government is studded with men like Paul Bremmer and Henry Kissinger, who migrate back and forth from corporate America into the halls of government, create policy that is favorable to their own business interests, then return to business to realize the wealth they have created for themselves and their shareholders. It is men like them who are responsible for America's aggressive war posture, among them the quagmire in Iraq.

Consider the ties regarding officials in the Bush regime and the Halliburton- military-war profiteering connection, as documented by Antonia Juhasz in The Bush Agenda:

- Joe Lopez, a retired four star general and former aide to Cheney joined Halliburton in 1999.
- Dave Gribbon, Cheney's former assistant in Congress was Halliburton's Vice President and returned to the Whitehouse with Cheney when Bush stole the 2000 election.
- Ray Hunt, who provided money to both of the Bush presidencies joined Halliburton in 1998 and serves to this day.
- Lawrence Eagleberger, former president of Kissinger Associates and Bush, senior's Secretary of State also served on Halliburton's board of directors
- Charles Dominy, a retired three star general and former Halliburton executive currently serves as Halliburton's chief lobbyist.

Halliburton is only one of many corporations profiting from the invasion and the permanent occupation of Iraq. Other corporations have people as favorably placed in the Bush regime as Halliburton. Bechtel, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Electric-all the usual suspects-are well represented in the government; and all of them lobbied extensively for war and occupation. They have no intentions of stopping in Iraq either. The world is their oyster and the military can procure it for them.

It is worth noting that crony appointments are not peculiar to the Bush regime or to the Republican Party. They have a long and sordid history. That is how business is conducted and fortunes are made-through outright theft and conquest. None of this would be possible without the military. Our soldiers are the pawns of the rich but they think they are making the world safe for democracy. All they are doing in fact is opening the world up to capitalism and private ownership.

Since the occupation began in 2003 the Iraqi people have been forced to exist under conditions of extreme brutality and abject poverty. After the deliberate bombing of water sanitation facilities, hospitals, and electric generating sites there have been outbreaks of disease such as tuberculosis and dysentery, causing suffering and death. There has been no peace and no security for the innocent victims of unbridled greed.

There is also the matter of depleted uranium munitions used by U.S. forces that litters the country in aerosolized form that is easily taken up by the wind and remains radioactive forever. Depleted uranium is an indiscriminate killer whose effects linger for generations in the bodies of the occupiers and the occupied. Can you say Agent Orange? That is the great free market democracy that we have brought to the Middle East.

The war machine keeps turning like a sausage grinder, spewing its product into the coffers of the rich. Into the hopper go our sons and daughters and dark-skinned nations-out comes sausage and huge bank rolls for Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld and corporate America. Corporations, government, and militarism comprise the unholy trinity of capitalism. Together they form a corporate welfare state that boggles the mind.

The American military is not abroad defending freedom and sowing the seeds of democracy, as they seem to believe. One need only examine the history of this nation to recognize the familiar patterns of conquest and oppression. The occupation of Iraq is the continuation of the policies that created the institution of slavery, following the genocide of the Indians. The military, far from being a defender of peace and freedom, has evolved into an extension of the corporate welfare state.

The world will know no peace until enough citizens are sufficiently aroused to dismantle the military apparatus. Furthermore, we must recognize the link between militarism, war, and capital and build a better system-a form of government that serves the people rather than capital. Code Pink and other groups that maintain a constant presence in Washington are on the right track. They deserve our full support.

Charles Sullivan is a photographer, social activist and free lance writer residing in the hinterland of West Virgina. He welcomes your comments at earthdog@highstream.net



Comment on this Article


Bushwhacked


US admits more troops are needed

By Faye Bradbury
The Independent
14 July 2006

General George Casey, the top US commander in Iraq, has admitted that extra American troops may be drafted into Baghdad and the surrounding area to combat the recent surge in sectarian killings.

Highlighting the growing risk from insurgents killing Shia Muslims, and from Shia militias responsible for the indiscriminate killing of Sunnis, General Casey said more troops were needed to tackle "death squads".
"So you have both sides now attacking civilians, and that has caused the recent spike in violence", he said at a joint press conference yesterday with the US Secretary of Defence, Dick Cheney, who was on a surprise visit to Iraq. Asked if the violence might mean more troops in Baghdad, General Casey replied: "It may, yes."

Dozens have died in or around Baghdad during the past four days. The situation has been described as a low-level civil war.

On Sunday, more than 40 Sunni Arabs were massacred by Shia gunmen. The killings were prompted by the bombing of Shia shrines the previous day.



Comment on this Article


US sees three more years in building Afghan army

By Will Dunham
Reuters
Thu Jul 13, 2006

WASHINGTON - It will take three more years for the U.S.-trained Afghan army, intended to assume security responsibilities now shouldered by foreign forces in Afghanistan, to reach the planned goal of 70,000 soldiers, a U.S. commander said on Thursday.

Army Maj. Gen. Robert Durbin, who heads the U.S. effort to train and equip Afghan government security forces, said the national army numbers "a little bit over 30,000," and that it is growing at a rate of 1,000 per month, with a plan to reach 70,000 in roughly three years.
As in Iraq, U.S. officials have emphasized the importance of forming capable government security forces to take up the task of bringing law and order to a war-ravaged country. U.S. commanders in Iraq have pledged to have a 137,500-strong Iraqi army fully manned by the end of this year.

It has been almost five years since U.S.-led forces toppled Afghanistan's Taliban leaders, blamed for harboring the al Qaeda network responsible for the 2001 attacks on America, and U.S. forces have been helping build a new national army from scratch in a country battered by decades of strife.

Durbin, commander of Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan, told a Pentagon briefing that Afghan security forces are making steady progress, but overcoming absenteeism and developing capable leaders remain "a challenge."

He said 3,500 U.S. troops out of an American force of 23,000 in Afghanistan are dedicated to training the Afghan army and police.

Afghanistan is experiencing the bloodiest phase of Taliban violence since 2001, as groups of Taliban fighters have entered large parts of the south and east and unleashed a fierce wave of bombings, ambushes and raids.

SHORTAGE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT

Durbin said there are about 62,000 police officers in Afghanistan. About 58,000 are considered trained but only 37,000 are considered equipped. He said 86,000 vehicles are needed for the national police, and there are only 2,000 now.

He said will take "at least the next year or two" to make the police force fully trained and equipped.

Asked why it will take three more years to have the all-volunteer Afghan army at full strength, Durbin said, "Based on how we have put the program together, we feel that the 1,000 a month is appropriate to retain the quality and establish the quantity that we feel is effective."

Durbin said some of the first Afghans who volunteered for three-year stints in the army are reaching the end of these terms, and about 35 percent are re-enlisting, well below the goal of 50 percent.

Durbin cited illiteracy in the ranks as an issue facing Afghan forces.

"We must all be clear to understand that illiterate definitely does not mean stupid. It means a different learning technique. And the Afghan soldiers are very quick to learn and to pick up the training. They are very intelligent in that respect," he said.

Durbin said U.S. trainers are mindful about weeding out corruption in the police forces.

"There are perhaps many bad lessons or behaviors that these policemen have learned, and they don't understand the true essence of rule of law and to serve and protect," Durbin said.

Defense Minister Abdul Rahim Wardak was quoted this week as saying an Afghan army of 150,000 to 200,000 would be needed to secure the country.

Durbin said that while the plan is for an army of 70,000, he did not rule out a larger force sometime in the future. "The government of Afghanistan, in consultation with the international community, may revisit that number," he said.



Comment on this Article


Pa. mayor tells illegal immigrants to go

By MARK SCOLFORO
Associated Press
Fri Jul 14, 2006

HAZLETON, Pa. - Illegal immigrants seeking to make a home in this northeastern Pennsylvania city could face barriers to finding a home and job after the city council passed one of the nation's strictest ordinances to fight illegal immigration.

City documents would be printed in English, landlords would face $1,000 fines for each illegal immigrant found renting their properties and business who employ illegal immigrants wouldn't be granted licenses.

The ordinance, designed to make the city one of the most hostile in the country for illegal immigrants, passed on a 4-to-1 vote after two hours of passionate debate.
"The illegal citizens, I would recommend they leave," said Mayor Lou Barletta, who said he wore a bulletproof vest to the vote as a precaution because the issue was emotionally charged.

The measure has divided the former coal town about 80 miles northwest of Philadelphia and thrust the 31,000-population city to the fore of the national debate on illegal immigration. After the vote, hundreds of people on both sides of the issue congregated outside City Hall, separated by a line of police officers brought in anticipation of any trouble.

Barletta proposed the Illegal Immigration Relief Act last month as a response to what he said were Hazleton's problems with violent crime, crowded schools, hospital costs and the demand for services. Opponents argued it was divisive and possibly illegal, but supporters argued illegal immigrants' growing numbers have damaged the quality of life in this northeastern Pennsylvania city.

"What you see here tonight, really, is a city that wants to take back what America has given it," Barletta said.

Outside City Hall, about people gathered with opponents of the measure, some with signs that read "Bias," separated by a line of police from supporters, some waving American flags.

Anna Arias asked the council, "Are any of us ready to support U.S. citizens born of someone who is undocumented?" Several people in the audience responded, "Yes!"

She warned the council that approving the ordinance would make Hazleton "the first Nazi city in the country."

The ordinance adopted at the meeting had been extensively amended from an earlier draft; one change would deny a license to any business that provides goods or services to an illegal immigrant. City solicitor Christopher B. Slusser said the provision would likely be invoked only against business people who knowingly violated it, and the city would deal with violators "on a case-by-case basis."

The number of Hispanic residents in Hazleton has increased dramatically in the past six years. City officials acknowledge they do not know how many are illegal immigrants, whom Barletta has blamed for higher crime rates, failing schools and a diminished quality of life.

In a letter sent to Barletta earlier this week, attorneys with the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund threatened to sue on the grounds that the ordinance infringes upon the federal government's power to regulate immigration.

Other municipalities across the country also have considered acting to address illegal immigration. Ordinances similar to the Hazleton measure have been proposed in the Florida communities of Palm Bay and Avon Park and the California towns of Escondido and San Bernardino.

Carolina Taveras, a 30-year-old naturalized citizen from the Dominican Republic who moved to Hazleton from New York City a year ago, said the mayor's proposal has made her feel unwelcome.

A few doors down from where Taveras was getting her hair done at a downtown beauty salon that caters to Hispanic women, restaurant owner George Giannakouros said he is sympathetic to Barletta's approach.

"I agree with the mayor, there is a problem," Giannakouros said. "I work at my business at night, I like to feel safe."



Comment on this Article


U2's Bono Backs Videogame with Venezuela Invasion Theme

by Venezuela Solidarity Network*
Voltaire Network
July 11, 2006

U2's Bono, well recognized for his campaigns to reduce poverty and treat AIDS in Africa is backing a videogame which promotes the invasion and destruction of Venezuela in order to check "a power hungry tyrant" who has "seized control of Venezuela and her oil supply." Bono has failed to respond to concerns raised by the Venezuelan Solidarity Network about his funding of this project.
"Mercenaries 2: World in Flames," created by Los Angeles based Pandemic/Bioware Studios, simulates a mercenary invasion of Venezuela in the year 2007. Pandemic is a subcontractor for the US Army and CIA funded Institute for Creative Technologies, which uses Hollywood techniques to mount war simulations in California's high desert in order to conduct military training.

"Mercenaries 2: World in Flames" simulates destruction in downtown Caracas, and promises to leave no part of Venezuela untouched.

Elevation Partners is an investment firm that Bono helped create in order to exploit marketing opportunities between U2 and its fans, including projects from Pandemic/Bioware Studios. Pandemic states that as a partner in Elevation Partners, Bono "has visibility into all projects at Pandemic and Bioware."

Pandemic's target market is young men of military recruitment age and indeed this is not Pandemic's first military adventure. MSNBC reported that the videogame "'Full Spectrum Warrior' was created through the Institute for Creative Technologies in Marina Del Rey, Calif., a $45 million endeavor formed by the Army five years ago to connect academics with local entertainment and video game industries. The institute subcontracted work to Los Angeles based Pandemic Studios."

One cannot escape the irony that today, July 5, Venezuela celebrates its independence - just one day after the US celebrated its own. The most enduring aspect of an independent country is assertion of its sovereignty and demand that the world recognize international laws protecting that sovereignty. Yet, amid relentless US threats against Venezuela, a US-based company, Pandemic, which collaborates with the US Army to promote war, plans to market a videogame which advocates a most violent violation of Venezuela's sovereignty.

Although Bono remains silent on the matter and Pandemic insists that "Mercenaries 2: World in Flames" is "a work of fictional entertainment" and "Venezuela was chosen for the setting of Mercenaries 2 (because it) is a fascinating and colorful country full of wonderful architecture, geography and culture," members of the Venezuela Solidarity Network are appalled by the game's openly racist, interventionist attitude. Says Chuck Kaufman, of Alliance for Global Justice, "if it's 'just a game' and it's all about selecting fascinating and colorful locales, why didn't Pandemic select Dublin or Washington, D.C.? Because people would be outraged, that's why. Pandemic is simply capitalizing on negative and inaccurate U.S. press stories about Venezuela and its leader, Hugo Chavez, in order to make a quick buck. It's another piece of anti-Venezuelan propaganda that serves only the U.S. military, pure and simple."

Gunnar Gundersen of the Oregon Bolivarian Circle says, "We have family and friends in Venezuela and many of us have walked and stayed in the places featured in the war game. To us, these are not just clever abstract pictures. They are scenes of a place we consider our second home. Please try to imagine how Venezuelans must feel viewing a bulky, blonde, military man laying waste to their country, a country that is finally rising above a 500-year history of oppression and exploitation by foreign powers."The Venezuelan Solidarity Network calls for Bono, who has appealed to the world on many occasions for peace and poverty reduction, to apply those same values to block the manufacture and distribution of this videogame.

Comment: Bono, who is recognized for his campaigns to reduce poverty, is backing a videogame that promotes the invasion of Venezuela and the overthrow of Hugo Chavez, who in fact HAS reduced poverty since he became Venezuela's leader...

Comment on this Article


Northrop Grumman Tops Off America's Newest Aircraft Carrier

SPX
Jul 14, 2006

Newport News, VA - Northrop Grumman Corporation reached a major milestone as it lifted the 700-ton island onto the flight deck of the nation's newest and most advanced nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, George H. W. Bush (CVN 77). The ship's namesake and 41st President of the United States, George H. W. Bush, participated in the event. He was accompanied by his wife and former First Lady Barbara Bush.

Bush said this construction milestone was a reminder that, "The muscle behind every American, the military, is as strong as ever."
"Let me thank everybody involved in making this genuine dream a reality and in so doing serve our country in a way that transcends any individual honor involved in the production of this mind-boggling vessel," he said.

Bush also thanked the shipbuilders for their hard work. "It is an absolutely amazing piece of work up till now, and I just can't wait to be back in October for the christening. I salute all -- these are the best shipbuilders, the best workers we have."

Bush and the Prospective Commanding Officer for CVN 77, Capt. Kevin O'Flaherty, placed their naval aviator wings underneath the island during the ceremony. This custom, called "stepping the mast," dates from antiquity and consists of placing coins under the step or bottom of a ship's mast during construction. One belief from Greek mythology is that should the ship be wrecked during passage, the coins would ensure payment of the crew's wages for their return home. Since at least the construction of USS Constitution in the 1790s, this tradition of placing coins or other items of significance has been passed on as a symbol of good luck for U.S. Navy ships.

"I am quite honored to participate in the island landing event as a member of the pre-commissioning crew," O'Flaherty said. "It's a significant milestone for the shipyard, and it's the first opportunity for a member of the commissioning crew to contribute a symbol of the Navy's aviation heritage to the ship."

Other ceremony participants were Bush's daughter and Ship's Sponsor, Doro Bush Koch; the Secretary of the Navy, Dr. Donald C. Winter; Northrop Grumman Newport News President Mike Petters; and CVN 77 shipbuilders and sailors.

"This is the final island landing on a Nimitz-class," Petters said. "So today, in some respects, we're witnessing the end of an era. This ship is the tenth and last of the class that has served America for the last 26 years and will continue to serve for the next half-century."

Northrop Grumman's Newport News sector is building the George H. W. Bush using modular construction, a process where smaller sections of the ship are welded together to form units called "super lifts."

These super lifts are pre-outfitted and then lifted into the construction dry dock with the sector's massive 900-ton gantry crane. The island is the 162nd and final super lift in the ship's construction schedule.

The George H. W. Bush is the nation's tenth and final Nimitz-class aircraft carrier. The ship's keel was laid Sept. 6, 2003. The christening will occur October 7, 2006 with delivery to the U.S. Navy in late 2008.

Comment: The muscle behind every American isn't freedom, democracy, unity, or anything silly like that. No sir, the muscle behind every American according to George H.W. Bush is the military.

Comment on this Article


FBI grapples with out-of-date computers

By Anne Broache
CNET News.com
July 14, 2006

Four years ago, a former FBI project manager lamented the state of the agency's primitive electronic case-management system.

"There's no mouse; there's no icon," the official told the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee in July 2002, according to a recent government report. "There's no year 2000 look to it. It's all very keyboard-intensive."

Not much has changed since then. According to recent reports, a string of managerial blunders, financial indiscretions and assorted snags have accompanied efforts to modernize the agency's computer systems.
A former government contractor assigned to an earlier incarnation of the upgrades was sentenced Thursday to three years of probation, six months' home detention and $20,000 in restitution after pleading guilty in March to "exceeding authorized access" to FBI records, the agency said. According to court filings, he abused his network administrator privileges and used free hacking software that's readily available on the Internet to crack 30,000 agency user names and passwords.

Despite that latest embarrassment, the FBI says a turnaround is near.

The bureau in March sealed a six-year, $305 million deal with prominent defense contractor Lockheed Martin to start over. For the upcoming year, it's requesting $100 million from Congress to launch the four-phase, 42-month overhaul, known as Sentinel, with the target completion date set for 2009.

"In the past few years we have struggled with our information technology programs," FBI Director Robert Mueller told a Senate committee in May. "However, we have learned hard lessons from our missteps, and we are doing things very differently this time."

For now, Sentinel "appears to be on the right track," with a new crop of management and oversight processes already in place, Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine assured the senators in May. But his office has already flagged potential obstacles, such as incomplete staffing, the agency's ability to track and control the project's costs, and the possibility that systems won't be compatible with those of other investigative agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security.

With that in mind, auditors plan to "aggressively monitor" the project as it proceeds, Fine added.

Critics aren't convinced yet. Sen. Patrick Leahy, the Judiciary Committee's Democratic co-chairman, said at the May hearing that he remained "very concerned" about progress on what he called an "essential task."

"The bureau's effectiveness hangs in the balance," he said, "and the American people cannot afford another fiasco."

There are plenty of skeptics off Capitol Hill as well. Jim Harper, director of information policy studies at the Cato Institute, said he didn't see any reason to believe the Sentinel project will be better managed than its predecessors.

"The problem is institutional; when an organization's membership doesn't enjoy feast or famine based on the success of the organization, very little can bring it into focus and create success," he said in an e-mail interview with CNET News.com. "Congressional and public oversight is a weak, weak substitute for competitive pressure."

Computer blamed

The push for computer upgrades at the FBI picked up after the Sept. 11 attacks. Critics, including former Attorney General John Ashcroft, blamed neglected, incompatible systems for possibly hindering investigators' ability to gather and share intelligence on terrorists.

Those scathing assessments have already led to some changes.

By April 2004, the FBI completed the first two components of a now-defunct project called Trilogy. After forking over $337 million--nearly $100 million more than originally projected--the agency replaced its employees' desktop computers, more than 13,000 of which were already between 4 and 8 years old during the late 1990s.

The bureau also scrapped an even older network, bearing speeds roughly equivalent to those of a 56Kbps (kilobits per second) modem, and deployed a new "wide area network" that it said enhances the ability of FBI offices and other law enforcement organizations to communicate.

"Without getting into sensitive and classified information," Mueller told senators at a February 2005 hearing, "I can assure you that our ability to intercept and decipher communications and to otherwise monitor criminal activity and gather intelligence is among the best in the world."

But agents continue to struggle with day-to-day tasks related to managing case files and records through a mainframe system that dates to the 1980s. Officials and auditors have called that Automated Case Support, or ACS, system cumbersome, ineffective, "severely outdated" and insufficiently user-friendly.

The ACS system is essentially a repository of hard-copy documents, manually scanned and uploaded for electronic viewing. Information is not readily searchable, and "agents and analysts cannot easily acquire and link information across the FBI," said an Inspector General's report from March.

On average, it takes 13 keystrokes just to bring up a single document, FBI Chief Information Officer Zalmai Azmi said in a phone interview. With single case files containing as many as 100,000 separate documents and pieces of evidence, that's bound to be a serious shortcoming, auditors have said.

"You have to put commands in there; you have to do everything manually," Azmi said, acknowledging that "we don't have any mouse interaction with that version."

The first phase of Sentinel, according to planning documents, is supposed to yield a Web-based portal that will allow investigators a more streamlined way of accessing and entering data in the existing case-management system.

Later, the agency plans to begin a transition to a fully paperless process and to install a more sophisticated database designed to allow agents to "connect the dots" among cases. The final goal is to retire the ACS system in favor of an entirely new--and exclusively electronic--case management system that eradicates the need for paper files.

That objective is not unlike that of the failed Virtual Case File, or VCF, project, which the FBI discontinued last year after three years of development, expenditures of $104.5 million and harsh criticism from auditors. Although VCF and Sentinel have seemingly similar aims--namely, a Web-based, ultimately paperless interface--the Inspector General's March report said it was unclear how much of the investment in VCF could be directly applied to Sentinel.

The FBI, for its part, has made a concerted effort to distance Sentinel from its predecessors.

Speaking before senators in May, Mueller said he expected the new project to offer "greater capabilities" and said he wanted "to emphasize that the Sentinel program is not a reincarnation of the Virtual Case File."

Keeping costs in check has not been the FBI's strong suit, according to auditors of its activities.

Earlier this year, the Government Accountability Office issued a report that faulted the FBI for squandering $10.1 million on "questionable contractor costs," including customized ink pens and highlighters for training sessions, and misplacing more than $7 million in equipment related to the Trilogy project.

The agency said it's determined not to repeat those mistakes with the Sentinel program. Among its plans are frequent meetings with the contractors, biweekly updates on the variations in the intended project schedule, financial incentives for meeting performance standards, and a new program office slated to include 76 staffers dedicated exclusively to the project.

The goal, CIO Azmi said, is to reverse previous pitfalls "so there are no rogue operations and there are no ad hoc developments within the bureau."



Comment on this Article


Lieberman's 'Judas kiss' could seal his primary fate

By Rupert Cornwell in Washington
The Independent
14 July 2006

In today's intense Democratic politics in Connecticut, "The Kiss" does not refer to great works of art. Speak of "The Kiss" and you conjure up an embrace immediately after the President's State of the Union address in January 2005. The embrace was between George Bush and the state's junior senator, Joe Lieberman. A better name for it would be the kiss of Judas - or the kiss of death.

Mr Lieberman is one of the Democratic Party's grandees, a vice-presidential candidate in 2000 who, two years later, ran for President. Today, however, he is in the fight of his life; a senator of 18 years standing who must endure the ignominy of a primary against a dangerous challenger who has built his campaign on his opposition to the war in Iraq.

The candidate himself remembers his brush with Bush slightly differently. "I don't think he kissed me," he told Time magazine. "He leaned over, gave me a hug, and said, 'Thank you for being a patriotic American.'"

But in anti-Bush and anti-war Connecticut, the dispute is academic. Bush's alleged words only remind voters of Mr Leiberman's still unwavering support for the invasion of 2003.
"He's a Republican mole in the Democratic party," says Pravil Banker, director of a financial company and a man who in other circumstances might be a natural Lieberman supporter.

"He's the guy who goes on [Republican-supporting] Fox News. He's the tame Democrat that even conservatives can stomach.

"He's too much a part of the Washington establishment. We must have someone who's in touch with us."

The setting for those forthright words is a an Indian restaurant in downtown Stamford, a booming town in the richest county of super affluent Connecticut, where representatives of the state's 50,000-strong Indian-origin community are hosting a 'get-to-know-you' event for Mr LiebermanÕs potential nemesis, a wealthy cable network executive called Ned Lamont.

As a primary opponent, Mr Lamont is surely an incumbent's worst nightmare. He is articulate and charming, a boyish 52-year old who graduated from Harvard and built an impressive business career, yet who finds time for pro-bono work at local schools.

His great grandfather was chairman of JP Morgan, bluest of Wall Street blueblood firms. His father served in the Nixon administration.

Only last year, Mr Lamont was a Lieberman contributor. He has switched from friend into foe - but in sorrow rather than anger. "I kept thinking Joe was going to change on Iraq, that he'd stand up and say it isn't right," he says. "But he did the opposite, and that inspired me to get into the race."

On Iraq, he says: "We've distanced ourselves from our traditions, we've ignored our values and are the weaker for it." But he rejects the Lieberman camp's charges that he's a single-issue candidate. "Iraq is only a part of it, there's a whole range of areas where the country has made bad decisions."

Among them are jobs, energy policy, and the country's failure to provide 47 million Americans - one in six of the population - with health coverage. "We have to insist on universal health care, and not go on spending $250m a day in Iraq."

And the message is getting through. At the start of the year, Mr Lamont trailed his opponent by more than 30 per cent. According to one recent poll, the gap is now down to 6 per cent among likely voters. And in the process, a local primary election has suddenly become a bellwether of the times.

The Lamont-Lieberman struggle is a battlefield in the civil war within his party. The race will set the tone for the mid-term election campaign this autumn, and have a large bearing on the contest for the Democratic nomination for the White House in 2008.

If all that sounds oddly familiar, it is. In 2004, a similar conflict played out, as the populist Howard Dean, a previously little known governor of Vermont became the darling of the activists. Propelled by internet-raised millions and the enthusiasm of his volunteer supporters from across the country, the governor briefly seemed a sure thing for his party's nomination.

Moderates were horrified. A vote for Mr Dean, warned Mr Lieberman, would be "a ticket for nowhere", that could sent the party "back to the political wilderness for a long time".

Today the roles are reversed. The bloggers and activists have rallied behind Mr Lamont, making him the symbol of what Markos Moulitsas, founder of the Daily Kos, current king of the liberal blogs, calls "the people-powered movement".

Daily Kos, and organisations like Moveon.org, have thrown all their energies into toppling Mr Lieberman. The primary outcome will thus also be a measure of the true influence of the blogs, held by some to be the new arbiters of American politics. Alas however, even the vote count on the evening of 8 August may not settle things.

In an extraordinary admission of weakness, Mr Lieberman has said he will run as an independent in the November general election if he loses the primary, and is already collecting signatures to that end.

Even he does lose, the likelihood is still that the next Senator of Connecticut will be named Joseph Lieberman. As a centrist, he is well placed to scoop up independent, even moderate Republican voters. One poll gives him 44 per cent in a three way general election, as much as Lamont and the official Republican candidate combined.

But in other ways, the damage is already done. The primary has rubbed raw Democratic divisions over Iraq, offering a precious opening for Republican master strategist Karl Rove. Once again the man called 'Bush's Brain' is casting the upcoming midterm elections as a referendum on national security, traditionally the weak point of the Democrats. Once again charges are flying that Democrats will just "cut and run" from Iraq and the rest. And if the 'kiss of death' helps that strategy, then from Mr RoveÕs point of view, so much the better.



Comment on this Article


Big Brother


White House to allow review of domestic spying program: lawmaker

by Stephanie Griffith
AFP
July 13, 2006

WASHINGTON - The White House will allow a secret US court which oversees intelligence matters to review the legality of its controversial domestic eavesdropping program, a top Republican lawmaker said.

Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Arlen Specter said he reached a breakthrough deal late Wednesday with White House negotiators, ending a bitter impasse over outside oversight of the administration's domestic wiretapping program run by the secretive National Security Agency.

"The bill provides that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court will have the jurisdiction to consider the program as a whole, and make a decision on it," he said.
Specter said White House negotiators worked for weeks with lawyers from his office to hammer out a bill that would allow a "one-time review" of the warrantless wiretap program under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

"The whole program, kit and kaboodle, should go to the courts" for approval under the legislation, Specter said, predicting the bill would have no problem clearing Congress.

In applying to use the wiretap program in the future, the administration would have to provide "an explanation as to how the program is reasonably designed to ensure that the communications intercepted involve a terrorist, agent of a terrorist, or someone reasonably believed to have communicated or associated with a terrorist," Specter said.

The Republican senator said the deal treads a fine line between protecting civil liberties of Americans and providing the administration needed tools to combat terrorism.

"I believe this is a very important matter for balancing the country's need to fight terrorism," Specter said.

He added: "The president does not have a blank check. It is a balancing. It is a weighing of the interests of security to fight terrorism with privacy interests."

Some in Congress however decried the use of what they called a "closed-door deal" between Specter and the White House, at the very time when critics are calling for greater transparency in how and when the White House uses this and other secret programs as it fights the US war on terror.

The deal "should not exempt the secret program from thorough congressional scrutiny," Democratic Representative Ed Markey said in a statement after the agreement was announced.

"The closed-door deal reached with Senator Specter should be the beginning of full congressional review of the program and any legislation that is based on the agreement -- not the end of the story," said Markey.

"The secret domestic surveillance program has operated in the shadows - now is the time for the courts and the Congress to shed some light on it," he said.

Specter told reporters that the legislation would in some respects strengthen the provisions of the original FISA bill, which passed in 1978.

The proposed new bill gives the administration "greater flexibility" by allowing it to take seven days, rather than the current three, before asking the FISA court for wiretap authority.

Specter said the legislation also would modify existing law to allow a "roving wiretap" -- "that is, to follow the individual, as opposed to a fixed telephone," he said.

"I think we got a pragmatic result. It allays a lot of concerns" about violation of civil liberties, he added.

The electronic surveillance program sparked a firestorm after its existence was first disclosed in December by the New York Times.

Comment: Let's review: The White House spies on Americans. When questioned about this, officials have to obtain White House agreementsecret court to make sure that the Bush gang is not doing anything illegal. Now, what's wrong with this picture??

Comment on this Article


White House sends mixed signals on detainee trials

By Vicki Allen
Reuters
Thu Jul 13, 2006

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration is sending Congress conflicting signals on how to try foreign terrorism suspects despite earlier calls for Congress to ratify the current system struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, senators said on Thursday.

The White House was grappling with whether to expand legal rights of detainees by basing policies on the U.S. military justice code to satisfy the court, or try to preserve much of President George W. Bush's plan for military commissions that limits access to counsel and evidence, the senators said.

Sen. John McCain said White House national security adviser Stephen Hadley told him the administration would base its proposal on the Uniform Code of Military Justice, not its commissions system that the Supreme Court said violated U.S. military rules and had not been authorized by Congress.
But administration officials at hearings earlier this week urged Congress to pass legislation enacting Bush's military commissions, with some minor changes.

"Hadley told us in a meeting face to face that we would use the UCMJ as a basis," McCain, an Arizona Republican, said. "I don't know what to make of this."

Congress is crafting a process to try terrorism suspects -- mostly held at the U.S. naval facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba -- after the Supreme Court slapped down the commissions system Bush established in the wake of the September 11 attacks.

Bush has faced international criticism for the indefinite detention and allegations of mistreatment of detainees, mostly scooped up in the war in Afghanistan.

U.S. military judge advocates general, appearing before the
Senate Armed Services Committee, agreed Congress should not ratify the current system. Most said Congress should base legislation on the military justice code, but with changes to allow interrogations without legal counsel, protect classified information, allow some hearsay testimony and other measures.

'NOT CONSISTENT'

That follows the course advocated by Democrats and a number of Senate Republicans.

Sen. John Warner, the committee's chairman, said he was "somewhat perplexed" by administration testimony earlier this week which he said was "not consistent with what the national security adviser told me."

The White House was working through differing views and planned to present a policy soon after Bush returns from the Group of Eight summit in Russia, the Virginia Republican said.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, speaking to reporters, appeared to back more limited legal rights, saying he believed the best way to try the cases "is through military commissions, and we want to get on with it."

A number of House of Representatives Republicans also indicated they likely would back much of the current system, setting up a potential clash with the Senate. They said the military code, geared to protect U.S. uniformed personnel, would give terrorism suspects too many rights and compromise national security.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, an Alabama Republican, also was skeptical of using the military code for "unlawful combatants," many of whom he said were "obsessively committed to suicidal destruction of American lives."

Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts said Congress must clarify Geneva Convention language barring inhumane treatment of prisoners that the Supreme Court said applied to U.S.-held detainees.

Interrogators who got information leading to last month's killing of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, al Qaeda's leader in
Iraq, "could conceivably be held accountable" for war crimes under current language, the Kansas Republican said.



Comment on this Article


Suspect Padilla gets access to secrets

By CURT ANDERSON
Associated Press
July 13, 2006

MIAMI - Amid tight security, alleged al-Qaida operative Jose Padilla is being permitted to personally view U.S. government secrets in advance of his trial on charges of conspiring to wage and support international terrorism.

Under a federal judge's order, Padilla is being allowed to examine classified documents and videotapes detailing his statements during 3 1/2 years in Defense Department custody as an unlawful "enemy combatant." That designation was dropped last fall when he was charged in a Miami terrorism case.

Defense lawyers in terrorism cases are regularly permitted to examine such classified material if they obtain government security clearances, but it is unusual for an actual terror suspect to be given direct access to secrets.
"There is not a long history of this. There have not been a lot of terrorist prosecutions in civilian courts," said Aitan Goelman, a former Justice Department terrorism prosecutor now in private practice in Washington.

Padilla is a U.S. citizen once accused by the Bush administration of plotting to detonate a radioactive "dirty bomb."

U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke's order, issued July 5, allows Padilla to view 32 Defense Department documents that summarize statements Padilla made during his years in military custody. He also can examine 57 videotapes of interrogations he underwent during that same period.

Padilla's attorneys said in court papers that they must examine the materials with their client to discover whether he was mistreated by interrogators, to refresh his memory and find possible leads for their defense, and to ensure that prosecutors have turned over all necessary material.

The attorneys and a spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in Miami declined to comment Thursday on the arrangement. It was unclear whether Padilla had already begun examining the documents.

Security will be extraordinarily tight for the sessions. Padilla will be brought to a secure inner area in the court complex but the door must remain open so a U.S. marshal can keep constant watch.

Cooke's order said the marshal must maintain "an appropriate distance" to prevent overhearing defense trial strategy. But if the marshal does overhear, "those communications shall not be communicated to any member of the government prosecution team," the judge said.

The challenge in national security cases is in striking a balance between a defendant's right to prepare an adequate defense and the government's interest in protecting its secrets, particularly sources and methods used to obtain intelligence.

"I think the government, in an abundance of caution these days, is protecting as much as it can," said Carl Tobias, law professor at the University of Richmond. "There is a tension between his constitutional rights to defend himself and see the evidence against him on the one hand and national security on the other hand."

Padilla and two co-defendants are scheduled to go to trial in September on charges of conspiracy and providing material support to Islamic extremist groups around the country. All three have pleaded not guilty.

Padilla, a former Chicago gang member and south Florida resident, was arrested in 2002 at O'Hare Airport. Authorities claimed then he had plotted to set off a "dirty bomb" as an al-Qaida soldier, but the Miami indictment does not mention that.

A co-defendant, Kifah Wael Jayyousi, had sought dismissal of the charges against him on grounds that they were based on his newsletter, the Islam Report, which he contended deserved free speech protections.

But a federal magistrate ruled Monday that the charges also involved terror fundraising and recruitment, and said the indictment should stand.



Comment on this Article


House rejects changes to Voting Rights Act

By LAURIE KELLMAN
Associated Press
July 13, 2006

WASHINGTON - The House voted Thursday to renew the 1965 Voting Rights Act, rejecting efforts by Southern conservatives to relax federal oversight of their states in a debate haunted by the ghosts of the civil rights movement.

The 390-33 vote sent to the Senate a bill that represented a Republican appeal to minority voters who doubt the GOP's "big-tent" image.

All of the "no" votes came from Republicans, in defiance of their own leaders.
"The liberties and freedom embedded in the right to vote must remain sacred," House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said in a statement. "Principles like these cannot wait for discrimination to rear its ugly head."

Southern conservatives complained that the act punishes their states for racist voting histories they say they've overcome.

"By passing this rewrite of the Voting Rights Act, Congress is declaring from on high that states with voting problems 40 years ago can simply never be forgiven," said Rep. Lynn Westmoreland, R-Ga., one of several lawmakers pressing for changes to the law to ease its requirements on Southern states.

"I sincerely hope the U.S. Senate corrects these problems so when the bill returns to the House for final passage I can vote for it," said Rep. John Shadegg, R-Ariz., whose state is one of those under federal scrutiny.

The House overwhelmingly rejected amendments that would have shortened the renewal from 25 years to a decade and would have struck its requirement that ballots in some states be printed in several languages.

Supporters of the law as written called the amendments "poison pills" designed to kill the renewal because if any were adopted by the full House, the underlying renewal might have failed.

Supporters used stark images and emotional language to make clear that the pain of racial struggle - and racist voting practices - still stings.

Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., displayed photos of civil rights activists, including himself, who were beaten by Alabama state troopers in 1965 as they marched from Selma to Montgomery in support of voting rights.

"I have a concussion. I almost died. I gave blood; some of my colleagues gave their very lives," Lewis shouted from the House floor, while the Rev. Jesse Jackson, another veteran of the civil rights movement, looked on from the gallery.

"Yes, we've made some progress; we have come a distance," Lewis added. "The sad truth is, discrimination still exists. That's why we still need the Voting Rights Act and we must not go back to the dark past."

The very debate over changes to the act is testament to the influence of Southern conservatives, even over their own GOP leaders who had hoped to pass the renewal as a fresh appeal for support from minorities on Election Day.

With rare bipartisan support among leaders of the House and Senate, the renewal was widely expected to sail through Congress and on to the White House for President Bush's signature.

Republican leaders, however, were forced to postpone a House vote last month when conservatives rebelled during a closed meeting.

Unable to satisfy the dissenters and eager to pass the bill this week, Republican leaders announced late Wednesday they would allow the House to consider amendments, none of which passed.

The amendment that would have extended the act for a decade, rather than the 25 years in the bill, was rejected 288-134. The proposal to strike requirements in the law that ballots in districts with large populations of non-English speakers be printed in other languages failed 238-185.

"What unites us? It's our language, the English language," said Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif. Without the amendment, the act is "hurting America by making it easier not to learn English."

Democrats made clear early in the day they would vote against the renewal if any of the amendments were added.

"Any one of them would be a weakening of the Voting Rights Act," said Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California.

The White House also weighed in during the debate, saying in a statement that the Bush administration "supports the intent" of the renewal. The statement did not take a position on the amendments proposed by lawmakers who represented the GOP's conservative base.

Their objections to the renewal already were being echoed by some Senate colleagues from the same states.

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., noted that the act doesn't expire until next year.

"It's 13 months away and we're creating a political situation that doesn't need to be created," Coburn said in an interview. He said changes such as those proposed by the House amendments needed time for consideration.

Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., called lawmakers who wanted to loosen the requirements in the law "ideological soul mates" of lawmakers who opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

"For them, this is not a debate about fairness, it is about ideology. Ideology has no place in today's debate," Hastings said. "We should do this not for the partisan benefit but because, as John Kennedy said, it is right."

The bill is HR-9.



Comment on this Article


e-Passports: Ready or not here they come

By Christian Zappone
CNNMoney.com
July 13, 2006

NEW YORK -- Imagine being overseas and your identity being available for the taking - your nationality, your name, your passport number. Everything.

That's the fear of privacy and security specialists now that the State Department plans to issue "e-Passports" to American travelers beginning in late August.

They'll have radio frequency identification (RFID) tags and are meant to cut down on human error of immigration officials, speed the processing of visitors and safeguard against counterfeit passports.

Yet critics are concerned that the security benefit of RFID technology, which combines silicon chips with antennas to make data accessible via radio waves, could be vastly outweighed by security threats to the passport holder.
"Basically, you've given everybody a little radio-frequency doodad that silently declares 'Hey, I'm a foreigner,'" says author and futurist Bruce Sterling, who lectures on the future of RFID technology. "If nobody bothers to listen, great. If people figure out they can listen to passport IDs, there will be a lot of strange and inventive ways to exploit that for criminal purposes."

RFID chips are used in security passes many companies issue to employees. They don't have to be touched to a reader-machine, only waved near it. Following initial objections by security and privacy experts, the State Department added several security precautions.

But experts still fear the data could be "skimmed," or read remotely without the bearer's knowledge.

Kidnappers, identity thieves and terrorists could all conceivably commit "contactless" crimes against victims who wouldn't know they've been violated until after the fact.

"The basic problem with RFID is surreptitious access to ID," said Bruce Schneier security technologist, author and chief technology officer of Counterpane Internet Security, a technology security consultancy. "The odds are zero that RFID passport technology won't be hackable."

The State Department argues the concerns are overstated. "We wouldn't be issuing the passports to ourselves if we didn't think they're secure," said Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Passport Services Frank Moss, who noted that RFID passports have already been issued to core State Department personnel, including himself. "We're our own test population."

How skimming works

The equipment needed to skim an RFID chip neither has to be large nor expensive. Nokia sells cell phones capable of reading RFID chips. Texas Instruments sells kits to do the same thing.

In May, researchers at the University of Tel Aviv created a skimmer from electronics hobbyist kits costing less than $110. The equipment was small enough to fit into a briefcase or be disguised in any manner of luggage or clothes that could hide the 15-inch copper tube antenna.

The antenna boosts the read-range from a few inches to a few feet. To extend the range of surreptitious access much further, a second piece of equipment is needed to fake the RFID reader into sending a "read" signal, which is then relayed via radio waves to the skimmer's reader near the targeted RFID chip.

In 2005, a researcher at Cambridge extended the range to about 160 feet while successfully accessing a contactless smart card's details.

ID thieves who figure out a way around the security precaution on RFID passports, which includes anti-skimming material in the cover, can use this method in a crowded airport terminal or hotel lobby to conceivably "borrow" someone's ID data and spoof it to another official reader, effectively cloaking themselves in another's persons ID.

Or they could learn a person's nationality, or confirm the identity of someone they were searching for to harm.

"It's a great way for unfriendly elements to set up their own RFID scanning systems and pick Americans right out of a crowd...If you put an RFID scanner in a doorway or maybe a lamp-post," said Sterling, "you can just sit there automatically counting the passing passports."

Even if the skimmed data is encrypted -- as e-Passport information would be -- skilled hackers could potentially save the information and crack it elsewhere.

Researchers at the Dutch security test lab Riscure cracked the encryption on a mocked up RFID passport in two hours using a PC in 2005.

U.S. passports are issued for ten years, which means the RFID chip technology of those passports, along with their vulnerabilities, will be floating around for a decade. Technology would have to "stop cold" Schneier of Counterpane says for improvements in skimming and hacking equipment not to occur.

Moss said the State Department "recognizes that technology will change during the 10 year life cycle of US passports" and that's why it's focusing on more than one technology to protect data.

Sterling, however, compares RFID passports to a "nice yellow armband" -- a big sign on your body announcing your identity. "Would you pay anything for that device?" Sterling asks. "Would you buy it in a travel store because you thought it made you feel safer? Or would you conclude that this technology existed so that you could be treated like a can on a grocery-food shelf?"

Schneier says there are a number of ways to improve the security of RFID passports but the best trick is to not create RFID passports at all. "Someone in the government got it in their head to make it RFID. Yes, its cool technology," said Schneier, "but don't do it because it's cool."



Comment on this Article


Rail Security Pilot Project Tests Groundbreaking Body Screening Solution

SPX
July 14, 2006

New York, NY - L-3 Communications announced today that its Security and Detection Systems subsidiary is participating in the second phase of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Rail Security Pilot (RSP) project, which will screen transit passengers for explosives.

This phase of the project will use L-3's innovative ProVision body screening portal at the Port Authority Trans Hudson Corporation's (PATH) Exchange Place Station in Jersey City, New Jersey. The trial is scheduled to take place from July 13 through July 27, 2006.
The ProVision system, developed by L-3 SafeView, reveals the presence of explosives and concealed objects anywhere on the body in as little as two seconds. The system uses state-of-the-art, non ionizing active millimeter wave (MMW) imaging technology to detect virtually any material, including wire, liquid, ceramic, plastic, and metal.

"The vulnerability of the nation's transit systems to terrorist threats cannot be overemphasized," said Thomas Ripp, president of L-3 Security and Detection Systems.

"Protecting the public requires a comprehensive, realistic, and forward-thinking approach to mass transit security. L-3 is dedicated to bringing the very best technology to bear on this vital mission, and we're very pleased to be part of this critically important project."

Used to screen travelers at some of the world's busiest airports, including Mexico City and Amsterdam's Schiphol, a key advantage of ProVision over alternative body screening methods or technologies is the system's high throughput rates.

"Maintaining passenger throughput levels is essential, especially in high-traffic situations," Mr. Ripp added. "In demonstrating ProVision's consistent performance at a rail station with high ridership, we are making the case that thorough, accurate, and reliable passenger screening is easily achievable. We can detect a wider range of threats, dramatically increase the likelihood of detecting them, and protect the public to a greater degree than ever before."

Serving more than 200,000 passengers each weekday, the PATH's Exchange Place Station is the primary rail transit link between lower Manhattan and New Jersey.

L-3's novel body-screening portals have enhanced security at railway stations in the UK, border crossings in Israel, international airports, ferry landings in Singapore, and government and commercial buildings in The Hague and Tokyo. L-3 SafeView portals also safeguard soldiers and workers in Iraq's Green Zone.

Earlier this year, L-3 participated in the first phase of the RSP, screening passenger baggage at Exchange Place Station with its APS-II checkpoint X-ray system. Combining powerful material analysis technology and dual X-ray data to reveal the most cleverly masked suspicious substances, L-3's APS-II automatically analyzes each piece of baggage and automatically signals the presence of threat substances and contraband, including narcotics.

The port authorities of New York and New Jersey collaborated with the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate's (DHS S&T) Countermeasures Test Beds program on the trial.



Comment on this Article


Around the World


India warns Pakistan over terror

BBC
Friday, 14 July 2006

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has said that Pakistan needs to curb terrorism if the peace process between the two countries is to make progress.

Mr Singh was speaking after visiting victims of Tuesday's bombings in India's financial capital, Mumbai.

"We are also certain that... terrorist modules are instigated, inspired and supported by elements across the border," he said.
Nearly 180 people were killed in Mumbai's serial blasts, police say.

The BBC's Sanjoy Majumder in Delhi says that Mr Singh's comments represent a hardening of positions against Pakistan for the first time since Tuesday's attacks.

But with the investigations making little tangible progress, our correspondent says the Indian government is under increasing pressure to act and demonstrate that it is not a soft target.

Pakistani has denied involvement in the blasts.

Gen Musharraf has condemned the loss of "precious lives" in the attacks, in which seven commuter trains were bombed in less than 15 minutes.

But in the days since, there have been sharp exchanges between government ministers in India and Pakistan.

On Thursday night, Gen Musharraf said: "I assure Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that the Pakistan government and I myself are with him in any investigation he wants to carry out."

'No stone unturned'

Mr Singh said on Friday that "acts of terrorism" were "despicable acts of desperate people".

"We will leave no stone unturned in ensuring that terrorist elements in India are neutralised," he told journalists at a news conference after visiting bomb victims.

Suspicions that Pakistan-based militants may have been involved have raised tensions between the two states.

Indian security officials have suggested that the Mumbai bombings bore the hallmarks of Lashkar-e-Toiba, a Kashmiri militant group operating from Pakistan.

But the Indian government has not directly accused the group which has denied any responsibility.

A Muslim organisation banned in India, the Students' Islamic Movement (Simi), has also denied involvement in the attacks.

Sketches of three men wanted over the bombings have been published in the Indian media, but officials have admitted they have been making slow progress with investigations.

Prime Minister Singh flew into Mumbai on Friday amid tight security and immediately drove to the Sion hospital where he met some of the blast victims.

"The prime minister was saying to the patients 'what you want, I will give you,'" Agnes George, who was visiting one of the injured, told the AFP news agency.

Nuclear rivals Pakistan and India began peace talks in January 2004.

They followed a prolonged period of tension after militants attacked the Indian parliament in December 2001. That attack led to both sides amassing troops along their border.

Although both sides have made some progress in improving travel and other ties between them, there has been little sign of progress in solving their core dispute over the divided territory of Kashmir, which both countries claim.



Comment on this Article


Mideast flare-up follows Bush to Russia

By TOM RAUM
Associated Press
July 14, 2006

HEILIGENDAMM, Germany - President Bush has a straightforward message for Russian leader Vladimir Putin and world leaders at their summit: when possible, speak with a single voice in combating crises such as the flare-up in the Middle East.

It is Bush's fierce support for Israel that is putting him at odds with some members of the Group of Eight nations.

The president also is pressing his case with Putin that Russia should be more tolerant of political liberties and a free press. Bush says he will make his point in a respectful way.
A host of global troubles is following Bush ahead of his visit to Russia on Friday.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Bush was certain to discuss Israel's attacks on Lebanon and the counterattacks on Israel when he meets first with Putin and then over the weekend with other members of the G-8: Germany, Britain France, Italy, Japan and Canada.

Rice told reporters it seemed likely those countries would issue a statement on the rising violence in the Middle East.

"You know how the G-8 is. It's unthinkable that these leaders could get together and not discuss what's going on there," she said.

She said a three-person team sent by the United Nations to the region should get a chance to try to defuse the crisis.

"Everybody is very focused on helping the U.N. general secretary's mission," she told reporters in a news briefing.

At the same time, she said, "We don't want to send confusing signals. The too many cooks in the kitchen is one we want to avoid."

Bush planned to have dinner Friday with Putin after arriving in St. Petersburg.

Bush and Putin are meeting as U.S. and Russian negotiators try to conclude a deal to let Russia join the World Trade Organization. The presidents could announce it as early as Saturday.

Russian officials cited a breakthrough in the talks, but U.S. officials said some tough issues remained.

Before dinner with Putin, Bush was meeting with 20 civil society activists. They are involved in promoting human rights, education, environmental protection, public health and other issues.

Bush defended Israel's attacks in Lebanon on Thursday but raised concerns that they could weaken or topple the fragile government in Beirut.

Rice met with reporters and put even more emphasis on the need to not jeopardize Lebanon's fledgling Democratic government.

"It is extremely important that Israel exercise restraint in its activities of self-defense," she said after a day of telephone diplomacy with leaders of the region.

Bush's strong support of Israel put him at odds with
European Union allies two days before U.S. had sought a united stand at the G-8 summit against Iran's nuclear ambitions and North Korea's long-range missile test.

The Israeli attacks on Lebanon were criticized by both G-8 members Russia and France.

Russia and the United States have resolved a key issue over Russia's acceptance to the World Trade Organization, and a final agreement could be signed by the end of the week, some Russian officials said Thursday.

But Dan Bartlett, counselor to the president, said, "There still are some sticky issues that have to be resolved." He said he understood the Russia desire to have an announcement during Bush's visit, but that they weren't quite there yet.

Bush finished his German visit by joining Chancellor Angela Merkel for a wild boar barbecue feast at a restaurant in the small village of Trinwillershagen. He told invited guests that, coming from Texas, being treated to a barbecue was "one of the greatest compliments."

"Let's go eat," he said, then shook the hands of hunter and restaurant owner Olaf Micheel and sliced several pieces off the boar on it spit and served them to guests.

Comment: "Speak with a single voice", "too many cooks in the kitchen"... In other words, the Bush administration wants to be the only voice and the only cook in the kitchen.

Comment on this Article


No.10 fights to stop police from questioning Blair

BILL JACOBS
Scotsman
Thu Jul 13, 2006

DOWNING Street was today fighting to stop Tony Blair being quizzed by police over the "cash for peerages" affair after the arrest of his personal fundraiser Lord Levy.

No 10 was denying that the Prime Minister would be questioned by officers as part of their rapidly growing inquiry.

But senior opposition politicians were convinced that Mr Blair had to be interviewed as the next stage of their investigation.
The fight between the Metropolitan Police and Mr Blair's inner circle came as Deputy Assistant Commissioner John Yates was to meet senior MPs in private to discuss the progress of the probe.

The arrest of Lord Levy, Labour's chief fundraiser who secured the controversial £14 million worth of undeclared loans for the party before the last election, stunned Westminster.

His solicitors issued a statement saying he was more than happy to co-operate with the inquiry and was surprised and angry the police used their powers of arrest when he turned up to be interviewed at a London police station.

Lord Levy was being interviewed by detectives again today.

He answered bail this morning and was being interviewed at a London police station, believed to be Colindale.

Some Labour MPs think it is no coincidence the arrest came as Mr Yates was preparing to meet the House of Commons Public Administration Committee to update them on the matter.

The all-party group has agreed not to question key witnesses while the investigation was proceeding, but has warned that if it doesn't see signs of progress it will break the agreement and go-ahead with a hearing.

Mr Yates was expected to tell them that the probe could go on till September as officers from the Met specialist crime directorate sifted through documents obtained from Lord Levy yesterday.

They are also using specialist software to go through e-mails between Labour and potential donors including tracking down those that have been deleted.

Lord Levy was the second person linked to Labour to be arrested and bailed without charge, following headmaster Des Smith's interview after he claimed that supporting Mr Blair's pet city academy projects in England could guarantee a peerage.

The investigation by the police under the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925 and the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 is a result of claims that Labour donors and lenders were being nominated for peerages of a result of their financial generosity.

Three days ago it was claimed that Lord Levy had told one of the four lenders to Labour, curry tycoon Sir Gulam Noon, that he need not declare the loan to the committee vetting his nomination to become a member of the House of Lords.

Despite Downing Street's denials that Mr Blair would be investigated, opposition politicians claimed it was now inevitable.

Tory Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said he expected Mr Blair to be questioned in person.

He said: "The police are clearly taking this seriously. , It must be pretty worrying for the top ranks of the Labour Party."

SNP leader Alex Salmond said: "Lord Levy is Tony Blair's personal friend, his bag man, his fundraiser, his personal envoy to the Middle East.

"It is inconceivable that Lord Levy could be up to anything - if indeed he was up to anything - without the knowledge and consent of the Prime Minister.

"I think, therefore, we can say that the waters are lapping around the Prime Minister's ankles."



Comment on this Article


Spain prepares to lay bare its darkest era

By Graham Keeley in Barcelona
The Independent
14 July 2006

Seventy years on from the start of the Spanish Civil War, Madrid is trying to come to terms with its past by rescuing - and making public - millions of documents from around the world that help shed light on one of the darkest periods in its history.

As the country prepares to remember the beginning of the war next week, the government has published an array of diplomatic reports, personal letters, documentary films and secret police files held in 12 countries including Britain, Russia, France, Mexico and the United States which will reveal much that has remained unknown for decades.
Already, researchers have discovered a Russian documentary showing Pablo Picasso digging a trench in a Madrid park, and they have found French secret police reports on Republican exiles and British diplomatic reports on General Francisco Franco before he came to power. The documents will be stored at a new Centre for Memory in Salamanca.

They are a symbol of an increasing desire in Spain to talk more openly about what happened during the war. Before, a pacto de olvido (or "collective pact of forgetting") was adopted to ensure the country could move on after Franco's death in 1975.

Ten million documents held in Russian military archives could provide clues to how much military aid Stalin gave to the Republican government. New light may also be cast on one of the most intriguing and controversial episodes of the war - the fate of 400 tons of Spanish gold that was shipped to Moscow to pay for arms, but which exiles claimed had been stolen by Stalin.

The historian Enrique Moradiellos told the Spanish daily El Pais: "What we want to see are the files of Marshall Voroshilov on Operation X, the Soviet plan to aid the Republic. If you want to know about Russia's influence, you have to go there." The Russian archives also contain information about the International Brigades, which included British volunteers such as George Orwell and detailed accounts of the defence of Madrid.

Ramon Cruz, the culture ministry's deputy director of archives, said: "They aren't just films about fighting, a lot of it is about ordinary people, recording how they lived during the war."

Apart from the surprising footage of Picasso, researchers found film of a Communist hero, Dolores Ibarruri, known as "La Pasionaria", who rallied Republican troops.

Files held in Britain include personal correspondence from the Duke of Alba, Franco's ambassador in London during the war, and the verdict of British diplomats in Spain on Franco.

Mr Moradiellos said: "The British diplomatic service was the best in the world at that time, the most extensive and best trained.

"They produced an annual report on the country which included a section called 'living personalities' giving an idea of what they thought of Franco in 1935."

Secret police reports from France detailed the political activities of Republicans who fled after the war. They include information on exile associations, inside 30 boxes from the Spanish Federation of Deportees and Political Prisoners.

Rogelio Blanco, another historian, said: "There are files on all the survivors, their pension details, photographs and publications, even the German concentration camps they were sent to." The account of passengers on the ship Winipeg, chartered by the poet Pablo Neruda to take 2,000 refugees to his native Chile in 1939, is also to be given to Spain.



Comment on this Article


Poll finds white lies a necessary evil

By JOCELYN NOVECK
AP National Writer
Tue Jul 11, 2006

It can be hard to get people to face the truth sometimes. Especially about lying. You don't want your kids to eat too much, so you say all the cookies are gone. You don't feel like going out, so you tell your date something important came up. You're overloaded with errands, so you call in sick.

Lies, all of them - but we don't really like calling them that. In a new Associated Press-Ipsos poll, over half of respondents said lying was never justified. Yet in the same poll, up to two-thirds said it was OK to lie in certain situations, like protecting someone's feelings.
Apparently white lies are an acceptable, even necessary, part of many lives - even though we dislike the idea of lying.

Rebecca Campbell knew exactly what she was doing when she recently told her 4-year-old son that there were no more cartoons on TV. And she didn't like it. "One day, he'll probably figure it out," she says. "There are cartoons on all the time!"

But, says the 25-year-old mother from Quincy, Ill., "We couldn't have the TV on all day." Deep in her heart, she knew that telling him the truth would have been better, though more time-consuming, as discipline often is. "It's the easy trap of a lie," she says ruefully. "It's easier than telling the truth."

Which is, of course, why new haircuts receive so many compliments, notes Teresa Velin, a mother in Palm Desert, Calif.

Velin says it was just too darned hot and she didn't feel up to getting dressed and leaving home for a recent movie date. So she told a friend she was busy. "I'm not always as busy as I appear to be," says Velin, 27. "But I don't want to ruin a friendship over a broken movie date."

Nearly two-thirds of Americans agree. In the AP-Ipsos poll, 65 percent of those questioned said it was sometimes OK to lie to avoid hurting someone's feelings, even though 52 percent said lying, overall, was never justified.

Among those 52 percent, if he'd been alive and reachable, would have been the 18th century German philosopher Immanuel Kant, who believed all lying was bad - every single lie, even one that could save someone's life.

But most moral philosophers would disagree, assures noted ethics columnist Randy Cohen, who himself is so far from the Kantian view as to proudly proclaim: "I'm a big fan of lying."

"Not only is lying justified, it is sometimes a moral duty," says Cohen. An obvious example is when you're lying to protect someone from serious harm. But much less extreme cases often call for lies, Cohen says.

An example he likes: Your fictional spouse, about to accept a Nobel prize, asks if they look fat. "If you're on the way to the award ceremony, you say, 'You look fabulous,'" Cohen instructs. "Anything else would be cruel." If you're still in the hotel room, a suggestion of a different outfit might be appropriate.

Still, every lie has its cost, Cohen says, and that's just another factor you need to consider. One key cost is credibility: Once a person finds out you lied, you lose currency in their eyes.

For Harold Smith, it was worth the risk when he lied to his adult daughter about his health when undergoing treatment for a kidney tumor. "Why get her all traumatized?" says Smith, 64, of Pioneer, Calif. "I tried to protect her. It slowed down the anxiety. Later, I told her what really happened."

In the poll of 1,000 adults taken June 23-27, four in 10 people said it was OK sometimes to exaggerate a story to make it more interesting, and about a third said it was OK to lie about your age. (In interviews, though, some specified that meant lying backward in time, not forward, as in trying to get past the drinking age.) The poll was taken June 23-27 and had a margin of error of plus or minus three points.

A third also said it was OK to sometimes lie about being sick to take a day off work. Very few would admit to thinking it was OK to lie on a resume, cheat on taxes or lie to a spouse about an extramarital affair.

Among the groups more likely to say lying was sometimes OK: people aged 18-29, college graduates and those with higher household incomes. "People have this idea that lying is bad," says Bella DePaulo, a visiting professor at UC Santa Barbara who's studied the phenomenon of lying. "But when you really start going through it, it's not that simple."

In a study in the late '90s, DePaulo asked 77 college students and later, 70 people in the Charlottesville, Va. community to track every lie, however small, in a journal for a week. Of the 77 students, only one reported having told no lie. Of the other 70 people, six made that claim.

"People who say lying is wrong are often thinking in the abstract," DePaulo says. "In our real lives, we can't always pick honesty without compromising some other value that might be as important" - like maintaining a happy relationship. If you're at a party and your partner is saying something you disagree with, for example, you might stay quiet, in the name of marital harmony.

Of course, there are inherent problems with any study that asks people to be honest about, well, being dishonest.

In the AP-Ipsos poll, for example, four in 10 people answered that they'd never had to lie or cheat. But one in 10 of THOSE people said in the very next answer that yes, they might have told a lie in the past week.

Which means they might have misunderstood the question - or, ahem, they may have lied.



Comment on this Article


For Your Health


Ultrasound good, drugs bad for knee injury

By Anthony J. Brown, MD
Reuters
Thu Jul 13, 2006

NEW YORK - Treatment with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound can hasten the healing of torn ligaments in the knee, while the use of NSAID drugs, such as Celebrex (celecoxib) and Motrin (ibuprofen), has the opposite effect, findings from an animal study suggest.
Ligaments are strong fibrous bands that connect bones and help control their range of motion. They are closely related to tendons, which connect muscles to bone.

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and NSAIDs have both been used to treat ligament injuries, but their effects on the healing process, when used alone or together, have not been determined.

To investigate, Dr. Stuart J. Warden, from Indiana University in Indianapolis, and colleagues assessed healing in 60 adult rats with experimentally induced injuries to ligaments in both knees. The animals were treated with Celebrex in a carrier solution or with the carrier alone. In each animal, one knee was treated with active ultrasound, while the other received ultrasound without the equipment actually being on.

The researchers' findings appear in The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

Active ultrasound "accelerated ligament healing," Warden told Reuters Health, while "celecoxib did the opposite. Knees treated with these modalities reached the same level of healing, it just took longer when celecoxib was given."

When both Celebrex and active ultrasound were given, the effects canceled each other out. The end result was that these knees healed about as fast as those exposed to inactive ultrasound and vehicle solution.

As to how NSAIDs impair ligament healing, Warden said that it is thought to relate to a reduction in the formation of collagen, the protein responsible for the strength of ligaments.

"NSAIDs are fine if you just use them to control inflammation and pain for 3 or 4 days after injury," Warden noted. "But our findings suggest that you should get off of them as soon as you can because they can impair ligament healing."

For people still experiencing pain beyond 3 or 4 days, Warden recommended the use of acetaminophen (e.g., Tylenol), known as paracetamol in many countries.



Comment on this Article


Tests confirm Indonesian child died of bird flu

Reuters
July 14, 2006

JAKARTA - A three-year-old Indonesian girl who died this month has tested positive for bird flu according to tests by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, a health ministry official said on Friday.

The child's death takes the number of human bird flu deaths in the country to 41.

Lily Sulistyowati, the health ministry's spokeswoman, said the toddler had contact with sick fowl, the usual route of transmission of the H5N1 virus, which is endemic in poultry in almost all of Indonesia's 33 provinces.
"There was one dead chicken in her backyard," she said.

Sulistyowati said there was no information on whether any other members of the toddler's family were also infected.

Indonesia has seen a steady rise in human bird flu infections and deaths since its first known outbreak of H5N1 in poultry in late 2003, and has registered more deaths this year than any other country.

It has the second highest number of human deaths from bird flu after Vietnam.

Bird flu remains essentially an animal disease but many countries around the world are on alert over fears it might mutate into a form that passes easily among people and trigger a pandemic, possibly killing millions.

Indonesia drew international attention in May when the virus killed members of a single family in North Sumatra. Experts said there could have been limited human-to-human transmission in the cluster case.

On Thursday, leading science journal Nature reported that multiple mutations have been found in the H5N1 virus that killed the seven family members in Sumatra although scientists are unsure of the significance of the mutations.



Comment on this Article


One Dose of Radiation Causes 30 Percent Spongy Bone Loss

SPX
July 13, 2006

Washington DC - The study, which appears in the online edition of the Journal of Applied Physiology, has implications for patients receiving radiation therapy and astronauts traveling on long space flights.

"We were really surprised at the extent of bone loss," said lead researcher Ted A. Bateman of Clemson University. "We're seeing bone loss at much lower doses of radiation than we expected."
The mice suffered the loss of trabecular bone, the spongy area of bone inside the dense outer area known as the cortical bone.

"It's interesting that the trabecular bone, not the cortical bone, suffered the damage," said Bateman, a bioengineer who studies bone biomechanics. The remaining spongy bone must redistribute the load to bear the weight, but this makes the bone support structure less efficient and leaves the bone more vulnerable to fracture.

"A murine model for bone loss from therapeutic and space-relevant sources of radiation," by Sarah A. Hamilton, Neil D. Travis, Jeffrey S. Willey, Eric R. Bandstra and Ted A. Bateman, Clemson University; and Michael J. Pecaut, Daila S. Gridley and Gregory A. Nelson, Loma Linda University and Medical Center, appears in the online edition of the Journal of Applied Physiology, published by The American Physiological Society.

Mouse model applies to humans

The results of a mouse study cannot be directly applied to humans. However, both mice and humans lose bone after radiation exposure, so the results raise a red flag. Bateman noted that a recent clinical study of 6,000 cancer patients reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that post-menopausal women who received pelvic radiation for cervical and colorectal cancer increased their bone fracture risk by 60%. Radiation following anal cancer increased the risk of fracture by 200%, he said.

Astronauts lose 2% of bone mass for each month they are exposed to the effects of microgravity. So far, astronauts have not been exposed to the increased radiation of outer space, but that will change when they undertake a proposed 30-month trip to Mars, Bateman said. NASA has focused on radiation's cancer-causing properties and its ability to compromise the central nervous and immune systems. But the effect on bone health is an unexamined concern.

The murine (mouse) model such as the one in this study provides a way to study the physiological effects of radiation using controlled experiments. Clinical studies of people who undergo radiation to treat cancer are limited because of the complicating factors of the illness itself and the chemotherapy which often accompanies it. "You can't study this in people, so having a well-defined animal model is important," Bateman said.

Study focuses on four types of radiation

In the current study, the mice received a single 2 Gray (Gy) dose, which is comparable to the single dose of 1-2 Gy that human cancer patients receive. However, cancer patients receive a series of doses over the course of therapy, totaling 10-70 Gy. (The amount of radiation in a Gy varies, because it is calculated based on the recipient's weight.)

The mice were divided into five groups. The control group received no radiation. Each of the remaining four groups received a different type of radiation: gamma, proton, ion or carbon. Those exposed to the carbon radiation suffered 39% spongy bone loss; proton, 35%; ion, 34%; and gamma, 29%. The loss of spongy connections in the four groups ranged from 46-64%, he said.

Cancer patients typically receive either gamma or, less commonly, proton radiation. Astronauts on a Mars mission are expected to receive extended periods of low-dose radiation of multiple types, including protons and heavy ions, Bateman said.



Comment on this Article


French laboratory clones American horse

AFP
July 12, 2006

PARIS - Gene scientists on Wednesday announced the birth of a cloned horse - son of a prizewinning showjumper - who they hope will pass down the genes of his sire to future generations of champions.

The foal, named E.T. Cryozootech-Stallion, was born on June 2 at College Station in the US state of Texas, the French laboratory Cryozootech said in a statement. He is in good health, Cryozootech founder Eric Palmer told AFP by telephone.
The foal's sire, E.T., a 20-year-old stallion who has won two world showjumping cups, was castrated at age three as is common practice for jumpers, and was therefore incapable of reproducing normally.

In cooperation with E.T.'s Austrian jockey Hugo Simon, scientists performed a biopsy on the stallion in 2003, removing cells which were then kept frozen in liquid nitrogen at minus 196 degrees Celsius (minus 320 Fahrenheit).

As a genetically identical copy of his sire, the cloned foal will be used exclusively for breeding purposes from age three onwards, said Cryozootech.

He is to be raised at Cryozootech's stables in France from the autumn and could produce his first descendants through artificial insemination from 2009, the statement said.

The French laboratory has produced two previous equine clones, including one of the 1994 and 1996 world endurance champion Pieraz. The world's first cloned horse, Prometea, was born in 2003.

Since 2003, equine cloning has taken off in the United States, where the practice is widespread for pigs and bovines. One US firm, Viagen, recently announced it was capable of producing 100 horse clones per year.

But thoroughbred racing rules do not allow artificial insemination, cloning or any kind of fertility treatment, to produce racehorses.

Cryozootech has a gene bank from 49 horses, all exceptional in disciplines such as endurance, jumping and dressage - all of which use geldings, horses whose testicles are removed at an early age - to be used for reproduction.

Two more equine clones are due to be born shortly in its laboratories, one this summer - son of the champion high-jumper Calvaro V - and another to be cloned next year from the dressage champion Rusty, it said Wednesday.

For each cloned horse, Cryozootech issues subscriptions - 200 in the case of E.T.'s clone - worth EUR 5,000 (6,360 dollars), which give holders the right to use the stallion for reproduction.

Scientists say that the cloning of complex multi-celled organisms is still at an early technological stage.

Cloning entails taking an egg, removing its nucleus, and replacing it with the nucleus of any cell taken from the donor animal.

This nucleus contains almost all of the donor's genetic code, so if the egg is then transplanted into a surrogate and results in a birth, the offspring should be a genetic duplicate in all but neglible detail.

However, most cloning attempts result in miscarriages because the egg fails to develop properly.

In addition, cloned mammals face a high risk of falling sick or dying young, apparently because of flaws inflicted to the genetic code during the cloning process.

Comment: Thank god it wasn't Mr. Ed.

Comment on this Article


Speaker Hastert hospitalized for skin infection

CNN
Thursday, July 13, 2006

WASHINGTON -- Speaker of the House J. Dennis Hastert was hospitalized Thursday for treatment of a skin infection, his office said.

Hastert, 64, was admitted to the National Naval Medical Center -- commonly called Bethesda Naval Hospital -- for treatment of cellulitis, a bacterial infection. He will remain hospitalized over the weekend and off his feet for at least three days "so that it can be properly treated with intravenous antibiotics," the statement said.

The infection appeared several days ago on his lower left leg.

Its symptoms are a swollen, red section of skin that feels hot and tender. Untreated, it can spread quickly and be life-threatening, according to the Mayo Clinic's Web site.




Comment on this Article


Big Blue Marble


Record California power demand expected Friday

By Bernie Woodall
Reuters
Thu Jul 13, 2006

LOS ANGELES - California's power grid is expected to post a new electricity demand record on Friday as air conditioners across the state battle a powerful heat wave, the California Independent System Operator said on Thursday.

The Cal ISO manages the power grid that connects major power lines in the state.

The grid operator called on Californians to conserve electricity by calling a "power watch" from Friday to Monday, said Stephanie McCorkle, spokeswoman for the ISO.
By Thursday evening, there had been no weather-related outages, McCorkle said.

"New temperature data (are) indicating a warm air mass is pushing up temperatures even more than expected," McCorkle said. "Definitely Friday and Monday we are looking to possibly set new records for peak demand."

The highest demand is expected Monday when the hottest temperatures are forecast in the current heat wave over most of the western United States.

Friday demand is forecast about 46,225 megawatts around 4 p.m. PDT, which would break the record of 45,431 set last July 20, the Cal ISO said. Thursday's peak demand was 44,655 megawatts.

Monday's peak is expected to be 46,500 megawatts, also around 4 p.m. PDT.

"We have had some load growth since last summer and this is going to be a strong regional heat wave that is driving demand for electricity," McCorkle said.

There is little chance of major blackouts even as records are expected Friday and Monday, said McCorkle and several utility companies.

Since the 2000-2001 energy crisis in California, increased generation capacity and transmission lines and upgrades to distribution systems across the state have made power delivery more reliable, said Jeff Smith, spokesman for Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

Although the major change is more infrastructure, the crisis five years ago was also linked to a failed market deregulation law and market manipulation by some traders that triggered power blackouts.

Earlier on Thursday, the Cal ISO called on generating plants contributing to the state's power grid to restrict plant maintenance from noon until 10 p.m. PDT on Thursday.

Californians were asked to cut power use by raising thermostats to 78 degrees Fahrenheit when they are home and to at least 80 F -- or turning air-conditioners off altogether -- when they are away.

Homeowners are being asked to avoid running big appliances during the hottest parts of the day.

Weather forecaster Meteorlogix said that in California the highest temperatures in most major cities will be Monday or on the weekend.

In Fresno, Monday's high will be 110 F, 14 F higher than normal. Tuesday's high will be 105 F and Wednesday's, 103 F.

Los Angeles will be 4 degrees F above normal with a high of 78 F on Friday and it will remain in the uppers 70s to low 80s through next Wednesday. In the San Fernando Valley near Los Angeles, highs will be over 100 F through early next week.

Sacramento will have highs 5 F more than normal on Friday and 12 F higher than the normal on Monday, when it will have a high of 103 F. Tuesday's high will be 100 F and Wednesday's 97 F.

Those forecasted temperatures from Meteorlogix were issued early Thursday before weather experts said the coming warm air mass Friday through Monday will be even hotter than first predicted.



Comment on this Article


Hundreds of thousands evacuated as tropical storm hits China

AFP
Friday July 14, 2006

At least 326,000 people were evacuated as severe tropical storm Bilis hit southeast China after killing 14 people in the northern Philippines.

The storm landed around midday in Fujian province's Xiapu county, Xinhua news agency said, citing sources with Fujian's meteorological observatory.

Over 256,000 evacuees, many of whom are seafood farmers and fishermen, were moved from their coastal homes in Fujian early Thursday, China Central Television station said.
Some 42,000 fishing boats were also directed back to harbor, it said, while Xinhua news agency reported that 70,000 were evacuated from dangerous areas of neighboring Zhejiang province.

The storm was heading northwest at around 15-20 kilometers (10-13 miles) per hour and packing winds of up to 108 kilometers per hour near its center, the report said.

Fujian's education bureau ordered schools to suspend classes and cancel outdoor activities. All parks have also been closed.

Passenger liners in the province had suspended services, and flights to Hong Kong and elsewhere have been cancelled while those to Beijing have been delayed, state television said.

Meanwhile, workers were checking reservoirs in preparation for flooding as the storm was expected to bring up to 25 centimeters (10 inches) of rain from Thursday night, Xinhua said.

Nearby provinces were also bracing for the storm.

In Zhejiang, in addition to evacuating 70,000 residents, officials called 180,000 boats and ships back to shore as of Friday morning, Xinhua said.

The storm brought strong winds to Zhejiang measuring 10-12 degrees on the Beaufort Scale on the sea and 8-10 degrees on land, said Xinhua.

Torrential rains have hit Zhejiang since Thursday noon.

Bilis lashed the northern Philippines Thursday. The 14 victims were killed by falling trees, flashfloods, and landslides, officials said.

The storm also hit Taiwan without causing any casualties.



Comment on this Article


Monsoon rains kill 25 in Pakistan

AFP
Fri Jul 14, 2006

ISLAMABAD - At least 25 people died as torrential monsoon rains lashed Pakistan, flooding roads and disrupting communications in several cities, officials said.
Six members of a gypsy family including two children were killed as they slept Thursday night when the sodden wall of a neighbouring house collapsed on them, police and newspapers said.

Three people were electrocuted in the eastern city of Lahore by poorly maintained powerlines, officials said.

Another six people died in house collapses in Punjab, while further casualties were reported from the province's rural areas, they said.

"A total of 25 people have died over the past two days," health ministry official Amir Arsalan said.

About 170 millimeters (6.9 inches) of rain had fallen on Islamabad since Wednesday, meteorological officials said.

The monsoon rains follow a scorching heat wave when temperatures neared 50 degrees celsius (122 Fahrenheit) in some areas, claiming dozens of lives.



Comment on this Article


Spaced Out


Mystery object crashes to earth at Carson golf course

By Doug Irving
DAILY BREEZE
July 12, 2006

Bill Waddell heard the whump of the object's arrival. He turned, stared at the strange fragment, and then called his golf buddies over for a look.

"You know," he told them, "there's a big chunk of metal there.

"It didn't come far from hitting me."

Later, all five men who were there would tell the same story of what happened Tuesday afternoon. The sky was clear blue. Not an airplane in sight. Nothing that could have lost a piece as it flew over Carson's Victoria Golf Course.

And yet there, lying in the clipped grass near the 17th hole, was a heavy chunk of metal too hot to touch.
"I really think this came out of orbit," offered Warren Straley, a member of the fivesome and a resident of Manhattan Beach. He once worked as a chief scientist for Hughes Aircraft.

"You know," he added, "there's tons of scrap metal up there."

The object, a solid square of metal with a hexagonal depression in the center and a hole punched through it, measures about 2.5 inches on each side. It weighs almost 2 pounds.

It has been bashed, blunted, scuffed and scarred. Most of it has been burnished to a rock-like dullness, but there are gashes that cut across its surface and lay bare a bright, silvery metal. Raised letters just visible on one side look like two C's.

The sudden arrival of the strange object interrupted the weekly outing of the senior men's golf club of Rolling Hills Covenant Church. The five retirees who gathered around it as it lay in the grass all guessed it came from the sky.

"My first thought was, this had to be a piece of space junk," one of them, Dave Nichols of Torrance, said later.

"It came down hard," said Mac Mc-Cardle, who also lives in Torrance.

"We were just glad that nobody was killed," said Robert Daligney of San Pedro. "It wouldn't even have to hit him in the head."

But while the object may have dropped out of a clear, blue sky, it probably didn't have all that far to drop. Some of its characteristics suggest it had an origin much closer to home than outer space, said Bill Ailor, director of the Center for Orbital and Re-entry Debris Studies at The Aerospace Corporation in El Segundo.

For one thing, it's too heavy. Spacecraft favor lighter materials that are easier and less costly to launch, Ailor said.

Then there are the scratches and machine marks. An object plunging through the atmosphere undergoes more than enough heat to melt steel, leaving it -- if it survives -- much smoother than the chunk that hit the golf course.


Still, Ailor said, objects that seem at first to have come from the heavens often have stories to tell, even when their origins turn out to be entirely terrestrial. Not long ago, a hot piece of metal crashed into a New York apartment. Investigators finally determined it was the overheated brake shoe of a big truck that had blown off.

Ailor reviewed a photograph of the chunk from the golf course. Asked to guess its origins, he said: "It looks like something that came off a heavy truck."

Whatever it is, the object was too hot to pick up when the golfers found it. They had to let it cool in the grass for 10 minutes before they could balance it on a golf ball and carry it to their carts.

And then they finished their round.

"As a matter of fact, that next hole was a mess," said Waddell, who lives on the Palos Verdes Peninsula and came a few feet from getting hit by the object.

"But I don't blame it on that," he added. "The 18th hole was all right."



Comment on this Article


Hubble Advanced Camera Back In Business

SPX
July 14, 2006

Greenbelt, MD - After a brief hiatus, the Advanced Camera for Surveys aboard the Hubble Space Telescope is back in full operation, NASA announced Thursday. The instrument is now involved in a quest to understand the nature of the universe's most dominant but mysterious constituent: dark energy.
Discovered in 1998, dark energy seems to percolate out of empty space and provides a repulsive force that is causing the universe to expand at an ever-faster rate.

This is one of the first images taken after the ACS camera resumed science operation on July 4. The camera remained offline for nearly two weeks as NASA engineers switched to a backup power supply after the camera's primary power supply failed.

The picture on the left is of a rich galaxy field containing a distant galaxy cluster 9-billion light-years away (at redshift 1.4).

In a program conducted by Saul Perlmutter of the University of California, Berkeley, Hubble periodically revisits about 20 distant galaxy clusters in an attempt to capture the glow of a class of exploding star called a Type Ia supernova.

Astronomers have directed Hubble to study the clusters because they could reveal the effects of dark energy at a distance too great to be observed easily from the ground.

Type Ia supernovae are bright celestial distance markers that are considered invaluable for measuring how dark energy is influencing the universe. Ultimately, detailed observations like this will allow astrophysicists to understand the nature of dark energy and its influence on the future evolution of the universe more clearly.

When Hubble scanned this field in April 2006, (upper right) the area was dark, but when the telescope revisited the sky coordinates in June 2006, looking at a galaxy about 1-billion light-years closer (redshift 1.2), the supernova appeared.

So, right after ground controllers successfully returned the ACS to operation, they aimed Hubble at the field again to measure the fading stellar explosion (arrow lower right).

The bright core of the host galaxy is adjacent to the glowing supernova, which can briefly become as bright as an entire galaxy of stars.

The quality of the April and July images demonstrate that the ACS is operating perfectly and sending back detailed views of the distant universe, NASA controllers said in a news release.



Comment on this Article


Supernova Leaves Behind Mysterious Object

SPX
July 14, 2006

Paris, France - ESA's XMM-Newton satellite has produced data allowing scientists to examine closely an object discovered more than 25 years ago and find it is like none other known in the Milky Way galaxy.
The object is in the heart of supernova remnant RCW103, the gaseous remains of a star that exploded about 2,000 years ago. Taken at face value, RCW103 and its central source would appear to be a textbook example of what is left behind after a supernova explosion: a bubble of ejected material and a neutron star.

A deep, continuous 24.5-hour observation has revealed something far more complex and intriguing, however. The team, from the Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica of the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica in Milan, Italy, has found that the emission from the central source varies with a cycle that repeats itself every 6.7 hours.

This is an exceptionally long period, tens of thousands of times longer than expected for a young neutron star. Also, the object's spectral and temporal properties differ from an earlier XMM-Newton observation of this very source in 2001.

"The behavior we see is especially puzzling in view of its young age, less than 2,000 years," said Andrea De Luca of IASF-INAF, the lead author. "It is reminiscent of a multimillion-year-old source. For years we have had a sense that the object is different, but we never knew how different until now."

The object is called 1E161348-5055, which the scientists have conveniently nicknamed 1E (where E stands for Einstein Observatory which discovered the source).

It is embedded nearly perfectly in the centre of RCW 103, about 10 000 light years away in the constellation Norma. The near-perfect alignment of 1E in the centre of RCW 103 leaves astronomers rather confident that the two were born in the same catastrophic event.

When a star at least eight times more massive than the Sun runs out of fuel to burn, it explodes in an event called a supernova. The stellar core implodes, forming a dense nugget called a neutron star or, if there's enough mass, a black hole.

A neutron star contains about a sun's worth of mass crammed into a sphere only about 20 kilometers (12 miles) across.

Scientists have searched for years for 1E's periodicity in order to learn more about its properties, such as how fast it is spinning or whether it has a companion.

"Our clear detection of such a long period together with secular variability in X-ray emission makes for a very weird source," said Patrizia Caraveo of INAF, a co-author and leader of the Milano Group.

"Such properties in a 2000-year-old compact object leave us with two probable scenarios, essentially a source that is accretion-powered or magnetic-field-powered," Caraveo added.

1E could be an isolated magnetar, an exotic subclass of highly magnetized neutron stars. Here, the magnetic field lines act as brakes for the spinning star, liberating energy.

About a dozen magnetars are known. But magnetars usually spin several times per minute. If 1E is spinning only once every 6.67 hours, as the period detection indicates, the magnetic field needed to slow the neutron star in just 2000 years would be too big to be plausible.

A standard magnetar magnetic field could do the trick, however, if a debris disk, formed by leftover material of the exploded star, is also helping to slow down the neutron star spin. This scenario has never been observed before and would point to a new type of neutron star evolution.

Alternatively, the long 6.67-hour period could be the orbital period of a binary system. Such a picture requires that a low-mass normal star managed to remain bound to the compact object generated by the supernova explosion 2000 year ago. Observations do allow for a companion of half the mass of the Sun or even smaller.

1E would be an unprecedented example of a low-mass X-ray binary system in its infancy, a million times younger than standard X-ray binary systems with light companions.

Young age is not the only peculiarity of 1E. The source's cyclic pattern is far more pronounced than that observed for dozens of low-mass X-ray binary systems calling for some unusual neutron star feeding process.

A double accretion process could explain its behavior: The compact object captures a fraction of the dwarf star's wind (wind accretion), but it is also able to pull out gas from the outer layers of its companion, which settles in an accretion disc (disc accretion).

Such an unusual mechanism could be at work in an early phase of the life of a low-mass X-ray binary, dominated by the effects of the initial, expected, orbital eccentricity.

"RCW 103 is an enigma," said Giovanni Bignami, director of CESR,Toulouse, and co-author. "We simply don't have a conclusive answer to what is causing the long X-ray cycles. When we do figure this out, we're going to learn a lot more about supernovae, neutron stars and their evolution."

Had the star exploded in the northern sky, Cleopatra could have seen it and considered it to be an omen of her unhappy end, Caraveo said. Instead the explosion took place deep in the southern sky, and no one recorded it. Nevertheless, the source is a good omen for X-ray astronomers hoping to learn about stellar evolution.



Comment on this Article


Violence as Usual


40 inmates injured in brawls at L.A. jail

AP
July 14, 2006

CASTAIC, Calif. - Forty inmates were injured in brawls that broke out in a Los Angeles County jail complex between black and Hispanic inmates, authorities said.

Guards used tear gas, rubber "stingballs" and pepperballs to quell the fighting involving 1,275 inmates within 20 minutes, said sheriff's Sgt. John Hocking. Eleven inmates were taken to a hospital for moderate injuries and 24 were treated by the jail's medical staff.
The fight followed another scuffle involving 339 inmates at four dorms at the jail's north facility, Hocking said. Five inmates were taken to a hospital for moderate injuries.

"We don't know what provoked the fights," Hocking said.

Both facilities, about 40 miles north of downtown Los Angeles, were locked down, and inmates were confined to their dormitories and rooms except to shower and eat.

The jail complex was the site of a series of fights between blacks and Hispanics that occurred earlier this year. One inmate was killed in a Feb. 4 battle. Another collapsed and died after a fight in a cell at the downtown Men's Central Jail.



Comment on this Article


Prosecutor: 2 Mich. officers beat suspect

By DAVID N. GOODMAN
Associated Press
July 13, 2006

DETROIT - Two officers removed a handcuff from a suspect's wrist, apparently to provoke an assault, then repeatedly struck the man in a scuffle taped by cameras inside a police department, authorities said Thursday.

The officers in suburban Pontiac were suspended July 1, the day of the incident, Police Chief Valard Gross said. Both have been charged with misdemeanor assault and battery, and an internal investigation is ongoing.
"This sort of behavior won't be tolerated," Gross said.

The chief said the suspect, who was being arrested after firing a weapon, was not seriously hurt.

Mark A. Jones was in an elevator and was being taken to the police department lockup when he and the two officers exchanged words, authorities said.

One handcuff was removed from Jones' wrist, a scuffle ensued and the two officers repeatedly struck him, said Oakland County Prosecutor David Gorcyca.

Police reports and the camera images showed that "the manner and number of times that Mr. Jones was struck was not appropriate," Gorcyca said.

A sergeant who overheard talk about the altercation reviewed the camera images and alerted superiors, Gorcyca said.

He said the officers, Joe Brinson and Ed Lasseigne, were expected to surrender for arraignment soon. The charge against them carries up to 93 days in jail and a $500 fine.

Brinson, 42, has been on the police force for nine years and Lasseigne, 35, for 10 years, and had no disciplinary history, Gross said.

The officers' lawyer, Arthur J. Weiss, said the two would not comment.

Jones remained jailed Thursday on charges of carrying a concealed weapon, being a felon in possession of a firearm, and using a firearm in the commission of a felony.

A telephone message was left Thursday for his lawyer.

Pontiac is about 20 miles northwest of Detroit and has 112 police officers.



Comment on this Article



Remember, we need your help to collect information on what is going on in your part of the world!
Send your article suggestions to: sott(at)signs-of-the-times.org