[...]
OFFICES OF STRATEGIC DECEPTION
In its comprehensive paper on post-war findings,
the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace recently
accused the Bush administration of systematic misrepresentation.
They concluded that Bush had prior knowledge of
the absence of any evidence regarding Saddam Hussein's
chemical and biological weapons programmes before
taking the decision to go to war. Referring to the
October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate report
they further high-lighted "an unusual number
of dissenting views by intelligence officials",
as well as the pressing of intelligence analysts
to come to "more threatening" conclusions
regarding Iraq. The lead author of the CEIP report,
John Cirincione stated: "The NIE was wildly
off the mark." In other words - they systematically
lied. If so why? Why was an administration allowed
to go against intelligence both from sub-divisions
within the FBI and analysts within the Oval Office?
Clearly there is an agenda of epic proportions.
Having faith in decades of "information domination"
and the "dumbing down" of its populace
gave the neo-cons considerable justification for
pursing this agenda. Elements within the Pentagon
were heating the hype to stratospheric levels immediately
after the twin-towers attack as part of an operation
that had obviously been encouraged perhaps years
before the event. With a vision of a lucrative conquest
in sight under the sop of fighting terrorism, the
Office of Strategic Influence was born in early
2002 with the objective of initiating "black
propaganda" actions against foreign press and
journalists. The Office represented much more than
the age-old re-telling of major geo-political porkies.
The Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld went out
of his way to bypass the enormous intelligence agency
briefings and to go to his own personalized office
where he could sift through and present the intelligence
that supported the war on Iraq and to jettison any
embarrassing data that could lead them away from
a unilateral military expansion. Indeed, it was
because many within the intelligence agencies had
been providing hard data that logically screamed
at the administration NOT to attack Iraq that the
OSI was created, fitting neatly into the existing
executive shadow government. Once the totally fictitious
link between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden
had been established and primed in the minds of
mass America, Al Qaeda could be given first billing
spawned from covert and complex manipulations by
the CIA, Pakistani ISI and the Israeli Mossad. Bush
could then initiate the "shock and Awe"
of a "Christian crusade" against the terror
organisation and focused propaganda attack on anyone
else who disagreed with that "God-given"
right. What better way to ensure a panacea of domination
than by creating an enemy that is instantly malleable
and forever open to serve the ends of a specific
doctrine of control?
The Department of Defence had been sidelined in
favour of the concentrated "war room"
of OSI headed by Brig. Gen. Simon P. Worden of the
Air Force, and according to a Guardian report from
February 18 2002 "the new office has begun
circulating classified proposals calling for aggressive
campaigns that use not only the foreign media and
the Internet, but also covert operations."
The article further states: "One of the office's
proposals calls for planting news items with media
organizations through outside concerns that might
not have obvious ties to the Pentagon, officials
familiar with the proposal said. General Worden
envisions a broad mission ranging from "black"
campaigns that use disinformation and other covert
activities to "white" public affairs that
rely on truthful news releases, Pentagon officials
said." To illustrate this point, on September
8th 2002 the Bush administration planted a story
in The New York Times written by Judith Miller and
Michael Gordon entitled: US says Hussein intensifies
quest for A-Bomb Parts, coming of course, from "unnamed
Bush officials." This was one of many examples
of basic media propaganda via "sympathetic"
journalists. The story was perfectly timed as an
effective advert for Saddam Hussein's Weapons of
mass destruction and the sought after vindication
of the US crusaders. The fact that the evidence
was false didn't matter. By the time journalists
dug around to find that the purchases of aluminium
tubes were obviously not intended for nuclear uses,
the damage had been done; further escalating the
fear and enabling Bush to carve another notch in
his propaganda stick which he continues to beat
the American public with. [...]
The Office of Strategic Influence appeared to be
dismantled in February 2002 after considerable jitters
within Pentagon circles and a minor media backlash.
However, this was wholly untrue. The name merely
changed to Office of Special Plans to appease the
critics, this time headed by Undersecretary of Defence
Douglas Feith with parental care from Wolfowitz
and Rumsfeld, very much still doting on their propaganda
baby.
The OSP continued to broaden its aggressive evangelical
mission into all so-called allied nations in the
Middle East, Asia and Western Europe. Being spearheaded
by the shadow executive government and thus closely
tied to the future plans for FEMA and the designs
of the military industrial complex, more wholly
undemocratic funnelling is taking place from the
$10 billion emergency supplement to the Pentagon
budget, though the amount has not been disclosed.
What is more worrying, but not altogether surprising
from a record of increasing secrecy, is the fact
that the majority of senior Pentagon officials and
Congressional military aides had no idea about the
plans of the OSP. The Pentagon however deemed it
acceptable to pay $100,000 a month (presumably of
tax payers' money) to a Washington-based international
consulting company called The Rendon Group run by
John W. Rendon Jr., a former campaign aide to President
Jimmy Carter. With their website opening catch-phrase:
"Information as an element of power,"
one can immediately see why their PR and high level
spinning is so attractive, having already worked,
most notably for the CIA and the Kuwaiti royal family.
Although the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence
Agency are barred by law from propaganda activities
in the United States, to place undue credence on
this naive piece of legislation is to align ourselves
with wishful thinking on the scale of Chamberlain's
"peace in our time." Perhaps it was a
purposeful ruse to keep Congress and outer government
minions satisfied. If so, it would simply be following
the normal pattern of "natural selection"
within US policy making. In the present circumstances
such laws are not, and never have been worth the
paper they are written on. When these pieces of
paper are waved in Congress as a feeble reminder
of democratic ideals, executive orders can be passed
and applied to counter such moves. And when confronted
with the few independent journalists and government
employees who have dared to speak out, they simply
shout "treason," deny, obfuscate and rely
on the mainstream media to douse the flames of truth
that will naturally, albeit briefly appear amid
the ever-present smokescreen.
In such an unhealthy climate the creation of the
OSP and other less "official" and highly
secretive operations can press ahead under the direction
of the shadow executive branches. If the government
is brazenly implanting draconian measures at home
and flouting international laws abroad as the official
face of governmental policy, then it becomes a matter
of simple logic that highly classified plans and
operations are being developed and finalized far
beyond the press, public and Congress. But it is
also likely that many personnel within governmental
departments and divisions within the intelligence
agencies remain partially ignorant, as analysts
and governmental workers discovered during the 9/11
cover-up, which of course, still continues.
PSYOPS/"INFORMATION DOMINANCE"
A rather infamous military unit with a less than
all-American, apple pie history has been assigned
to implement the policies of the OSP: the Army's
Psychological Operations Command (PSYOPS). The unit
is known to have been deployed in Central America,
Afghanistan and the Balkans and is currently authorized
to use computer network attacks, psychological activities
and deception, as well as facilities and staff of
the military global public affairs apparatus that
are now "officially" mandated. Control
of the Internet, the development of electronic warfare
against disobedient media, and the control of commercial
satellites are also part of its remit. For example,
In March 2000 the website fair.org (Fairness and
Accuracy in Reporting) published the story from
the French Intelligence newsletter and the Dutch
newspaper Trouw that several officers from the PSYOPS
unit at Fort Bragg were allowed to work at CNN (though
the report title quotes more than 1,500 unconfirmed).The
story received little coverage.
In the 1980s, officers from the 4th Army PSYOPS
group staffed the National Security Council's Office
of Public Diplomacy (OPD), where stories were planted
in the US media in order to strengthen and support
Reagan's controversial Central American policies.
Equally disturbing was an investigation by the congressional
General Accounting Office who found that OPD had
engaged in "prohibited, covert propaganda activities,"
and as the Iran-Contra scandal broke and the subsequent
investigations that followed, the office was eventually
shut down. However, the 4th PSYOPS unit is still
very much in operation and with, it seems, a new
lease of life.
In combination with the National Security Agency's
major forays into highly advanced electronic surveillance
systems and mind control experimentation, PSYOPS
takes on a much greater threat than most of us realise
or indeed, will be prepared to accept.
Rauni Kilde, MD, former Chief Medical Officer of
Finland, lectures and writes about an NSA Mind Control
system using radio implants and microchips connected
to satellites that are similar to what can be find
in past "NSA PSYOPS" documents. Kilde
writes: "With electro-magnetic frequency (EMF)
brain stimulation fully coded, pulsating electromagnetic
signals can be sent to the brain, causing the desired
voice and visual effects to be experienced by the
target. This is a form of electronic warfare."
Most certainly. And this form of extreme harassment
is increasing, though by its very nature, it is
notoriously difficult to obtain the evidence, assuming
of course that prosecution is a viable option which
in truth, it is not.
Citizens Against Human Rights Abuse (CAHRA) supports
many of the claims of systematic surveillance stalking
and virtual torture via electromagnetic waves and
electronic interference not just within the US.
The disturbing nature of the NSA and its famously
secret activities no doubt produces its fair share
of internet bunkum. Equally, there is far too much
correlative and corroborative evidence from a variety
of sources to suggest that it is merely conspiracy
"cranking" at work. It may well be all
in the mind, but not in the way some may prefer
to think.
According to one researcher amongst many, Dr. Armen
Victoria's 1998 essay regarding 'The Military Use
of Electromagnetic Microwave and Mind Control Technology'
states the capability of cloning human EEGs for
targeted mind control purposes where a variety of
emotional responses and instinctive reactions:
have been identified and isolated from the EEG,
as 'emotion signature clusters'. Their relevant
frequencies and amplitudes have been measured,
then the very frequency/amplitude cluster is synthesised
and stored on another computer, each one of these
negative emotions properly and separately tagged.
'They are then placed on the Silent Sound carrier
frequencies and will silently trigger the occurrence
of the same basic emotion in another human being.'
It appears that The Tri-Service Electromagnetic
Advisory Panel (TERP) represents the interests of
all three military services in the U.S. It is still
conducting some of the most advanced research in
the world which in turn stems from the investigations
made by the Russian pioneers in mind control technology
during the early 1960s and 1970s. The U.S. Air Force
has been research into ocular injury by exposure
to millimetre wave system, bio-effects of High Power
Microwave in low microwave regions (S band) and
Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR). The use of High
Power Microwave (HMP), by each of the military services
seems to be commonplace. Judging by the wealth of
research on the subject the US Navy is also getting
extremely excited at the prospect of utilizing electro-magnetic
waves as a psychotronic weapon.
We may then understand that the recent Iraq invasion
represented an opportunity to test out not only
the new developments in microwave weaponry and other
aberrations, but a valuable opportunity to experiment
with the latest PSYOPS advances. As Guardian columnist
John Sutherland put it: "The battlefield will
be the testing ground for the US samurai. No more
rhesus monkeys or pigs but real, live Iraqis."
According to Dr. Oliver Lowry who has had the dubious
honour of working for the US military on several
classified projects, Iraqi soldiers may have been
the latest unwitting guinea pigs to further such
advances which include:
…Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS),
sometimes called SQUAD…'According to statements
made by captured and deserting Iraqi soldiers,
however, the most devastating and demoralizing
programming was the first known military use of
the new, high-tech, type of subliminal messages
referred to as ultra-high-frequency "Silent
Sounds" or "Silent Subliminals".
Although completely silent to the human ear, the
negative voice messages placed on the tapes alongside
the audible programming by PsyOps psychologists
were clearly perceived by subconscious minds of
the Iraqi soldiers and the silent messages completely
demoralized them and instilled a perpetual feeling
of fear and hopelessness in their minds.'
If this weren't horrifying enough we then have
the sector of "information dominance"
to complement such invasive excursions into our
minds. According to American military experts the
first two components of "information dominance"
consist of: 1) Building up and protecting friendly
information; and degrading information received
by your adversary. 2) The ability to deny, degrade,
destroy and/or effectively blind enemy capabilities.
This is nothing new, though the Iraq war and the
phantom linkage of a terrorist plot will tend to
burnish the steely resolve of those who favour profitable
exploitation and the search for omnipotence. Perhaps
this is one of the many reasons for the 15 Information
domination centres already established in the US,
Kuwait and Baghdad. The Ministry of Defence and
the Foreign office in the UK are reflecting Tony
Blair's evangelical attachment to Bush's coat tails
by placing information operations firmly on the
agenda with close links to the aforementioned centres.
A network of global connections are therefore being
created in order to formerly set in motion a huge
cross fertilisation of data which can then be re-packaged
and sent out to the world's media and finally, the
public.
The very fact tentative reporting of information
domination and PSYOPS operations are now even being
discussed in mainstream broadsheets – though
still few and far between – does not reflect
a sudden and rapid sea change within the military
nor that it suggests a previously wholesome, honourable
and humanitarian approach to geo-political and intelligence
maneuverings, much as the American people would
like to believe in their moral exceptionalism. The
manipulation of information to serve a specific
end has a long history. Rather, we see an Orwellian
control system becoming less covert due to the climate
of stimulated fear and social engineering; it can
therefore be allowed to come to the fore without
many impediments to its continuing progress. If
the mainstream US media isn't towing the line due
to naive belief systems, then it is most assuredly
sitting in the lap of the Bush Administration through
vested political/corporate interests and/or the
Zionist lobby who have extraordinary leverage in
American society, let alone news reporting. What
this means is that bureaucratic barriers and constitutional
safeguards that once at least slowed the propensity
for civil and human rights abuses and breaches in
international law are effectively non-existent.
America has placed the world on a "see-saw"
colour-coded alert according to its own purposely
exacerbated terrorism threat.
PSYOPS is the tool of an oligarchy and an empire
that is highly secretive and conspiratorial by nature.
Most governmental operations take place in secrecy
as an inherent dynamic of hierarchical, organizational
behaviour. Therefore, it is only a natural, albeit
disturbing chain of entropic events which are leading
to a rapid integration of propaganda and news media
into the military command structure. With a majority
of reports from Iraq by "embedded" journalists
relaying reports which are "positive"
or "neutral," we can then recognize the
mainstream media as effective instruments of "friendly"
information bolstering. The line is steadily blurring
the distinction between friend and foe, with PSYOPS
operations and the media (e)merging as one.
LIGHTS…CAMERA...REACTION!
On May 1st 2002, in a premature display of perceived
victory and bravado, the president honoured the
gung-ho and neo-macho premise of the movie Top Gun
by swaggering across the aircraft carrier USS Abraham
Lincoln and posing for photographers. Photos of
Bush with a "thumbs up" sign appeared
in magazines and internet sites. One could almost
here the cheesy rendition of the movie's soundtrack:
"highway to the danger-zone." Better still,
as you can see under the headline of this column,
we could buy a George Bush doll in authentic "Elite
Force Aviator" attire for the bargain basement
price of $39.99! Why of course! What price the life
of Iraqi civilians? A plastic "George Bush"
for American kids and cluster bombs for Iraqi children
six thousand miles away. It betrays an extraordinary
level of collective ignorance, cynical profiteering
and astonishing disrespect for lost civilian lives.
An inauguration of a world "danger-zone"
it will most certainly be, with US policy dictating
and creating the required "danger" for
its own purposes as it sees fit.
The Top Gun type mentality along with all the other
gun-slinger-dirty-dozen-rootin'-tootin'-meanest-varmint-this-side-of-Texas
clichés are on show here. Osama and Saddam
are the designated villains with the Middle East
as the town that's only big enough for Bush and
his magnificent seven. It remains to be seen whether
Bush will ride off into a desert sunset with his
less than stable spoils or ransack the next town
as self appointed sheriff. Whichever way the rig
the next election, the neo-con administration has
and will avail itself of one of the most potent
moulders of our perceptions: Movies.
The entertainment industry has long since been
the tool of successive shadow administrations and
affiliated "think-tanks." Fear and disinformation
is the province of the CIA. It secretly subsidizes
many authors, media critics and journalists via
private foundations and front organizations which
are indirectly or directly linked to the Hollywood
industry. The present propaganda machine has subsumed
this medium into a potent weapon of subliminal and
downright ham-fisted mass programming to a greater
degree than ever before. For instance, did you ever
wonder why there was a steady flurry of war movies
spear-headed by Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan
in 1998? From 2000 to 2002 there was a tangible
increase in war film production both in the cinema
and on T.V. reaching a peak prior to 9/11 including:
Windtalkers, Black hawk Down, U-571, Band of Brothers
(T.V.) The Thin Red Line, The Patriot, We Were Soldiers,
The Sum of all Fears, K-19, Hart's War, Behind Enemy
Lines, and the most objectionable piece of sensational
tripe in the form of Jerry Bruickheimer's epic Pearl
Harbour, where the US rewrote history in true "Forest
Gump" style. This latter movie was perhaps
the most obvious piece of propaganda designed to
elicit the response of "America under attack"
and the accompanying mass expression of righteous
indignation that was required. Since 9/11 more than
one third of Hollywood productions are war movies
or associated fear mongering. "The Sum of All
Fears" directed by Phil Alden Robinson, and
released in 2002 is a case in point. A group of
terrorists get their hands on a nuclear device,
which they explode in a US city, hoping to start
a war with Russia. It received the endorsement and
support of both the Pentagon and the CIA. I wonder
why.
It is also interesting to note
that the most commercially successful Hollywood
director Steven Spielberg has been responsible for
some of the most popular movies in motion picture
history and the collective thought patterns that
followed. With this in mind, it is also highly probable
and for reasons we can only guess at, that he is
an artful propagandist in the pay of Bilderberg
Grp. and its affiliated shadow executive aspirations.
En masse, some of these films may have played a
minor role in moulding the psyche of this troubled
nation, just as they did during the intense paranoia
of the cold war era. They may serve to engender
a sense of patriotism, and an erroneous star spangled
heroism that inflates the national pride, and simultaneously
demands an emotional outlet. (Even those in the
so-called anti-war category may do this by feeding
into the aura of "war fever.") If the
democrats are afraid to speak out against the present
fascism for fear of not supporting the troops (most
of whom are demoralised and utterly desperate to
return home) then the same can could be said of
the public at large where the herd mentality can
be at its strongest involving God, the military,
and the beloved home soil. Hollywood is US culture.
By the same token, the deification of the movie
market ensures that it is not simply a way to relax
and enjoy our leisure time – they have become
the incessant analgesic and anesthetic to our own
imagination and creativity; numbing our cognitive
abilities with bland, iconic formulas for living;
programming trite solutions for love and relating;
substituting voyeurism, violence and titillation
for the potential of cultivating true understanding
and greater awareness. Once we rely more and more
on the buffering arena of entertainment we become
progressively open to the subtle tinkering of our
already pliable emotions. It seems this objective
fact has not been lost on the neo-cons and it's
military.
The BBC picked up on this
stratagem in a report from October 2001.
We discover that US intelligence specialists sought
in secret, "advice on handling terrorist attacks
from Hollywood film-makers." According to the
trade paper Variety "a discussion group between
movie and military representatives was held at the
University of Southern California…"
And further: "The group is said to have been
set up by the US Army to discuss future terrorist
activity in the wake of the attacks of 11 September."
Regardless of the wisdom of consulting Hollywood
for advice on anything let alone military tactics,
is this not rather strange for such a plan of action
to take place barely a month after the 9/11 attacks?
Unless of course, it represented a single stage
within a long-term strategy. The report continues:
"Among those reported to have been involved
were Die Hard screenwriter Steven E.De Souza and
Joseph Zito, director of Delta Force One and Missing
in Action. Other, more conventional, feature makers
were also said to have been present, including Randal
Kleiser, who made Grease."
"Grease"? Perhaps the military will dance
and sing their way into Syria? If only. The fact
that military intelligence are considering the advice
of B-movie writers and directors is disturbing enough,
it becomes especially worrisome when we consider
the bizarre reversal of those that are in the business
of killing, looking for advice from those who present
killing as sure-fire entertainment. It surely becomes
apparent that such an exercise would prove a potential
asset if they were considering how to capitalize
on future terrorist attacks along with the associated
emotional manipulation that could be carried out
within such scenarios. As a Variety spokesman mentions:
"the entertainment industry can offer expertise
in understanding plot and character, as well as
advice on scenario training." Sound familiar?
Evidence strongly suggests, not only did the President
know about the imminent attack on the Twin towers,
there was also substantial circumstantial and solid
empirical evidence that this may have been carefully
crafted with major elements of simulation from within
the US itself. In other words, 9/11 was largely
manufactured to achieve ideological and political
goals most of which we are now witnessing. Finally,
the end piece of the report allows us to read between
the lines:
The US Army is also behind the university's [of
Southern California] Institute for Creative Technologies
(ICT). The ICT calls upon the resources and talents
of the entertainment industry and computer scientists
to help with virtual reality scenario simulation.
Variety reported that the ICT's creative director
James Korris confirmed that the meetings between
the film-makers and the US Army were taking place.
However, the paper added that Mr Korris had refused
to give details as to what specific recommendations
had been made to the US government.
Obviously more than his job's worth. The above
piece is I suspect, only the tip of the iceberg.
When we tie this in with the NSA classified surveillance
and PSYOPS technology that is far in advanced of
anything we see in the market place then such pooling
of entertainment utilities to bolster this same
insider technology is not at all far-fetched. But
more importantly, it becomes another method in which
to utilize the psychopathology of a nation and much
of our world that lives through movies. It is also
clear that there is an open and "official"
dimension to this propaganda which has moved outwards
to the second tier of pyramidal operations. In other
words, they are so cocksure of their abilities to
keep the wool over our eyes they simply don't care
anymore.
Since the Second World War we are now observing
a "bleed-through" of such experimentation
across all intelligence and military endeavours
which necessarily must include the moulding of the
population through ALL means at their disposal.
Or in the words of one President Abraham Lincoln:
"Public sentiment is everything. With public
sentiment nothing can fail. Without it nothing can
succeed. He who moulds opinion is greater than he
who enacts the laws." And when you have control
of both the laws and all possible outlets for propaganda
then public opinion is effectively the clay that
is permanently on the potter's wheel. The waters
of our sedentary lifestyles on the one hand and
the ever-increasing storms of hardship on the other
act to keep the clay manageable and open to "problem-reaction-solution"
scenarios such as the rightly dramatic but Hollywood
laden overtones of the twin towers attack. It will
not be too long before you have a T.V. movie or
a heavily financed "blockbuster" depicting
the events of 9/11 on the scale of The Towering
Inferno. You can be sure that Wim Wenders won't
be in the director's chair.
Many movies can be wonderfully inspiring art. However,
in a world where the lowest common denominator rules,
there are few that make it beyond the market maw
of commercial constraints, and if they do, then
distribution is weak. High culture is not an easy
buck. And apparently we now have a movie of The
Alamo in production with the tag line: "Stand
your ground." Who knows? Perhaps Dubya will
consider implementing an executive order for the
lead role. It matters little the path to glory:
politics to acting – acting to politics; both
are understandably gaining a pre-nuptial relationship
where the concept of serving the people is as meaningful
as the residue from a "Mr. Slurpee" milk-shake.
Taken as one spoke in the wheel of a culture whose
denial is spinning way out of control, many movies
represent another sub-weapon in the formidable armoury
of the propaganda war.
SELF-ELECTION
The most dangerous slice of the propaganda pie is
flying full into voters' faces in the shape of seriously
flawed electronic voting systems. Vital questions
surrounding thousands of ballots which disappeared
from state polling results – most notably
Florida - have not been answered. With a little
help from blackmailing and back scratching within
the Supreme Court George Bush was finally dumped
on his self-appointed electoral throne like a spoilt
child with a new toy to play with. Indeed, the administration
is already pumping money into sophisticated data
analysis for the presidential campaign, and with
the heightened praise and adulation of the religious
right gaining ground we will see a powerful public
impression of an electoral "democratic"
battle. But this is unfortunately a smoke-screen.
There are, without doubt, many disaffected and angry
Americans determined to vote this false president
out of office and a well-spring of opposition to
the governments polices. Nevertheless, it remains
to be seen if the media and the majority of the
sleeping public have sufficient will, courage and
the moral imperative to resist corruption for a
second time. What is more disheartening still is
the growing realisation that the neo-cons may have
been planning an election game that guarantees Bush
another term in office. [...]
Notes
1. Coming to re-election campaigns
and toy boxes near you. Dana Milbank, Washington
Post, August 12, 2003
2. For details on the hyper-dimensional perspective
of a control system reality please take time to
read: http://cassiopaea.org/cass/index.html
3. John Pilger on Bush's occupation of Iraq "They
put the lie to their own propaganda"
November 21, 2003 Socialist worker.
4. See the original defenselinks. interview transcript.
5. Mossad links see: http://cassiopaea.org/cass/mahmoud_ahmed.htm
http://cassiopaea.org/cass/coup.htm
6. For further information on attacks see World
Socialism:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/nov2001/jaz-n21_prn.shtml
7. Iraqi officials ban Aljazeera Sunday 01 February
2004,
8. Their website can be found at http://www.rendon.com/
9. For further information on mind control experiments/PSYOPS
see: http://www.raven1.net/
10. ibid
11. http://www.rense.com/general40/secret.htm
12. Ariel Mind Control by Judy Wall, Editor/Publisher
Resonance
Newsletter of the MENSA Bioelectromagnetics Special
Interest Group http://www.raven1.net/commsolo.htm
13. ibid
14. The Guardian "Information dominance,"
David Miller, Thursday January 8, 2004,
15. Spielberg said: "If Bush, as I believe,
has reliable information on the fact that Saddam
Hussein is making weapons of mass destruction, I
cannot not support the policies of his government".
See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2282774.stm
See also Spielberg's attendance at Bilderberg Meetings:
http://www.bilderberg.org/
16. BBC News: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/film/newsid
New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/19/international/19PENT.html
17. Visit http://www.votescam.com/
|