Health & WellnessS


Bacon n Eggs

Paleo Diet Fights Back- response to US News Health & Wellness rating Paleo diet last

Dieta Paleolitica
© UnknownThe paleo is the most evidence based and sound diet ever developed, and the only one that is 2 million years old.
As The Paleo Diet has continued to grow exponentially every year, it is now creating some jealousy and detractors. Its growth is driven by the fact that it is a strong science, whereas most other diets have a weak scientific basis. Due to its strong science, The Paleo Diet works much better than other diets. The latest criticism has been from US NEWS Health and Wellness. Prof Loren Cordain has written a rebuttal to their comments which you can read here. And below is what I have to say on the topic.

The Paleo Diet is not just some diet that some guy wrote one weekend (unlike some diet books). It is a major international scientific movement involving thousands of scientists- doctors, dentists, dietitians, biochemists, physiologists, paleontologists, archaeologists, and other dedicated scientists.. It is the most evidence based and sound diet ever developed, and the only one that is 2 million years old. Because it is a SCIENCE, it can be IMproved but scarcely DISproved. Similarly you cannot disprove chemistry but you can improve it.

Because it is a science, Paleo diet gladly embraces all scientific research. Paleo diet concepts have steadily improved for the past 60 years or so, to the point where it is the most healthful diet known, and unlikely to make major changes in its recommendations.

Comment: See also Some anti-paleo arguments you might encounter and how to refute them


Bacon

Critics say: We don't know what constitutes a true paleo diet

Image
Critics often lambast the Primal Blueprint and other ancestral/paleo ways of eating for what they see as fatal flaws:

First, that we don't know what our ancestors were truly eating.

Second, that there wasn't just one paleo diet.

Third, that even if we could know exactly what our ancestors were eating, it doesn't mean those foods were the ideal foods; they were trying to eat whatever was available, not whatever was most nutritious or synergistic with their genome.

Before I address these, I want to make an important point. The anthropological record provides a framework for further examination of nutritional science; it does not prescribe a diet. It gives us somewhere to start so we're not flailing blind men dropped off in the middle of a strange city. That is why we're interested in what early humans ate (and didn't eat).

Syringe

Vaccine industry watchdog obtains CDC documents that show statistically significant risks of Autism associated with Thimerosal

Biochemist Brian Hooker, scientific advisor to A Shot of Truth, reveals CDC knew of risks for over a decade.

Image
“We must ensure that this and other evidence of CDC malfeasance are presented to Congress and the public as quickly as possible. Time is of the essence. Children’s futures are at stake.” -Brian Hooker, Ph.D, PE
For nearly ten years, Brian Hooker has been requesting documents that are kept under tight wraps by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). His more than 100 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests have resulted in copious evidence that the vaccine preservative Thimerosal, which is still used in the flu shot that is administered to pregnant women and infants, can cause autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

Dr. Hooker, a PhD scientist, worked with two members of Congress to craft the letter to the CDC that recently resulted in his obtaining long-awaited data from the CDC, the significance of which is historic. According to Hooker, the data on over 400,000 infants born between 1991 and 1997, which was analyzed by CDC epidemiologist Thomas Verstraeten, MD, "proves unequivocally that in 2000, CDC officials were informed internally of the very high risk of autism, non-organic sleep disorder and speech disorder associated with Thimerosal exposure."

When the results of the Verstraeten study were first reported outside the CDC in 2005, there was no evidence that anyone but Dr. Verstraeten within the CDC had known of the very high 7.6-fold elevated relative risk of autism from exposure to Thimerosal during infancy. But now, clear evidence exists. A newly-acquired abstract from 1999 titled, "Increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to Thimerosal containing vaccine in first month of life" required the approval of top CDC officials prior to its presentation at the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) conference. Thimerosal, which is 50% mercury by weight, was used in most childhood vaccines and in the RhoGAM® shot for pregnant women prior to the early 2000s.

Apple Red

Children exposed to more brain-damaging chemicals than previously thought

children chemical exposure
© Reuters / James Glover
A troubling new study has found that the number of chemicals capable of impairing child development worldwide is more than double what was previously believed, according to a new story by Time Magazine.

Back in 2006, researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai pinpointed five industrial chemicals that they linked to brain disorders such as autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), reduced IQ, and more.

These chemicals were lead, methlymercury, polychlorinated biphenyls (a coolant fluid in motors), arsenic (found naturally and also in pesticides), and toluene (in paint thinner, nail polish, and more).

In a review of their 2006 study, though, the same scientists have now discovered brain development in children could be negatively disrupted by another six chemicals. These chemicals are: chlorpyrifos, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, fluoride, manganese, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, tetrachloroethylene.

Alarmingly, the researchers discovered that manganese and fluoride, both of which are present in drinking water, can lead to poorer performance in school, lower math scores, and increased hyperactivity. High levels of fluoride, in particular, are potentially capable of lowering a child's IQ by seven points.


Chlorpyrifos, meanwhile, is a common pesticide that is still used in public areas and in agriculture despite the fact that the Environmental Protection Agency banned it from residential areas in 2001. According to a report by CNN in 2012, even low levels of chlorpyrifos could result in disrupted brain development.

"It's out there and we do not know what the longer term impact is of lower levels," Virginia Rauh, professor of Clinical Population and Family Health at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, told CNN. "But it does seem to be associated with cognitive damage and structural changes in brain."

As RT reported this week, some health experts believe the increased rate of severe birth defects in rural Washington state could possibly be linked to prolonged exposure to pesticides, though officials have been unable to determine the precise cause

Red Flag

Toxic chemicals linked to 'Global, Silent Pandemic' striking children worldwide

Image
"We have the methods in place to test industrial chemicals for harmful effects on children's brain development—now is the time to make that testing mandatory," stated study co-author Philippe Grandjean.
"The presumption that new chemicals and technologies are safe until proven otherwise is a fundamental problem," study authors write

Toxic chemicals including some pesticides and solvents may be behind the increasing number of cases of neurodevelopmental disabilities - including autism and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder - among children, researchers warn.

The findings are presented in a study by Philippe Grandjean, adjunct professor of environmental health at Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and Philip Landrigan, Dean for Global Health at Mount Sinai published online Saturday in Lancet Neurology.

"The greatest concern is the large numbers of children who are affected by toxic damage to brain development in the absence of a formal diagnosis. They suffer reduced attention span, delayed development and poor school performance. Industrial chemicals are now emerging as likely causes," said Grandjean.

Ambulance

FDA reevaluating safety of pain medications following multiple studies showing major harm

Image
A U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel has rejected a petition filed by Bayer HealthCare to have its over-the-counter (OTC) pain medication Aleve (naproxen) declared to be safer for the heart than competing alternatives like Advil and Motrin (ibuprofen). According to reports, the drug giant tried but failed to take advantage of ongoing investigations into the safety of OTC pain drugs, which are increasingly being linked to heart attacks and strokes, by pushing for Aleve to be rebranded as a safer alternative.

But the evidence was severely lacking, according to information relayed by USA Today, and Bayer was ultimately denied asylum for its pain medication, which makes sense, because it is more than likely just as dangerous as ibuprofen when it comes to heart health. A host of new research, in fact, implicates virtually all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with increasing the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, liver damage, heart attack and erectile dysfunction, among many other conditions.

Smoking

Puppy dies from acute nicotine poisoning after chewing up its owner's electronic cigarette

Image
© SWNS.comStaffordshire bull terrier Ivy who died after eating an E-cigarette.

A dog has become the first pet in Britain to be killed by an electronic cigarette. Staffordshire Bull Terrier Ivy died within hours of chewing on a bottle of nicotine-laced liquid used to fuel the smoke-free vaporiser.

Her owner Keith Sutton, 56, bought the device in a bid to cut down on his tobacco habit. The battery-powered aid works by heating up the 'e-liquid' into a gas which the user inhales like real cigarette smoke.

Coach driver Mr Sutton, of Redruth, Cornwall, had left a bottle of the liquid on his dining room table when 14-week-old Ivy bit into it. She immediately started frothing at the mouth and vomiting and Keith rushed her to the vets, where she was given huge doses of steroids, but died from nicotine poisoning early the next day.

There are currently warnings on the bottles but grandfather Keith wants to see e-liquid become a controlled substance before it kills another animal.

He said: 'I peered round the corner from the kitchen and the dog was on the floor with the bottle of e-liquid. 'She had chewed it and pierced the plastic container. She had only ingested the tiniest amount but by the time I picked her up she was frothing at the mouth.

Stop

Let the poisoning begin - AMA recommends fluoride for kids under 2

Fluoride
© TheHoustonFreeThinkers.com

Despite hundreds of independent studies suggesting that fluoride is poison, mainstream media and the American Dental Association (AMA) are now suggesting that parents actively participate in reducing their children's IQ's and feeding even their toddlers a toxic substance that is an industrial waste leftover from the phosphate fertilizer trade.

Sold to the public through the AMA and corporate propaganda, fluoride has been linked to numerous cognitive disorders, and Colgate even admitted in 1984 that a tube of toothpaste with fluoride in it was toxic enough to kill a small child. But the mainstream media is owned by corporate interests, and you can bet they will push their own agenda over the health of you and your family - even your babies as they just begin to develop teeth.

The AMA tells parents they should use fluoride as soon as a child's teeth start to come in - at less than two years of age. Like the FDA, and CDC, these agencies are pushing a toxic health agenda on us all. The American Medical Association tells us we need to fluoridate our kids now (as if our water wasn't enough) even though multiple other countries have banned this toxic substance, including: China, Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, Hungary, and Japan. Nearly all of Europe's water supply is also fluoride-free.

Arrow Down

Novartis's Japan unit faces criminal probe for hypertension drug marketing

Drug
© George Shuklin/Wikimedia CommonsValsartan
Tokyo - Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare today asked public prosecutors to investigate a possible criminal violation of drug marketing laws by the Japanese subsidiary of the giant Swiss pharmaceutical firm Novartis. The ministry says the company may have exaggerated the benefits of its hypertension drug valsartan.

Last July, Novartis Pharma admitted that a former employee created a conflict of interest by participating in clinical studies of valsartan, sold under the trade name Diovan, conducted by five Japanese medical schools while concealing his affiliation with the company. Several of the studies were retracted after investigations by the medical schools and the health ministry turned up data manipulation that skewed results.

Novartis Pharma advertisements had pointed to the studies as showing that the use of Diovan reduced the risk of heart attack and stroke in hypertension patients better than alternative medications. According to Japanese press reports, potential fines could be just $20,000, but there is a small chance that executives could face jail sentences.

Also today, Novartis Japan posted a statement in Japanese on its website acknowledging the investigation and apologizing "to patients, their families, health care workers and citizens for causing great worry and trouble." As in previous statements, Novartis pledged to fully cooperate with authorities but did not admit any wrongdoing.

Water

Human Guinea Pigs: Chemicals leaching into food from packaging raise safety concerns

Image
© Martin GodwinPackaged burger and chips. Synthetic chemicals in packaging include phthalates, known to disrupt hormone production.
Scientists, in BMJ paper, warn of potential long-term damage of exposure to synthetics, including formaldehyde in drinks bottles

Synthetic chemicals which are used in the processing, packaging and storing of the food we eat could be doing long-term damage to our health, environmental scientists warn.

The concerns have been raised in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, part of the British Medical Journal group.

The scientists claim that tiny amounts of synthetic chemicals leach into food. While these minute quantities in themselves do no harm, no one knows how safe we are from a lifetime's exposure to the chemicals, such as formaldehyde, through eating food previously wrapped or stored in plastics.

In a commentary piece in the journal the scientists note that some of the chemicals that could cause concern are regulated but this does not prevent their being used widely in food packaging. They say that people who eat packaged or processed foods are likely to be chronically exposed to low levels of these substances throughout their lives.

Far too little is known about the long-term impact and especially about our exposure to such chemicals at critical points in human development, such as in the womb and during early childhood.

The writers, who include Jane Muncke, from the Food Packaging Forum Foundation, in Zurich, say there is cause for concern on several grounds. Chemicals known to be toxic, such as formaldehyde, a cancer causing substance, are legally used in these materials. Formaldehyde is widely present, albeit at low levels, in plastic fizzy drinks bottles and melamine tableware.