Health & WellnessS


People 2

How love can warm you up: Feeling affection and even holding a heated object boost brain activity

Nick Mcdermott
The Daily Mail, UK
Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:36 UTC
  • Declarations of support and affection actually leave us feeling physically warmer, claim scientists
  • The findings suggest closeness to others create feelings of contentment as it triggers the same physical responses involved when keeping warm
Feeling loved really can give you a warm glow inside.

Declarations of support and affection actually leave us feeling physically warmer, claim scientists.

They also discovered that holding a heated object can boost our closeness to others. Using MRI scans, they found feelings of social and physical warmth both result in increased activity in the same part of the brain.
Image
Warming: Researchers found that receiving affectionate messages triggered the physical responses involved in keeping warm
Read More...
USA

Veterans routinely given psychiatric drugs even without diagnosis of mental disorder

Ethan A. Huff
Natural News
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 04:06 UTC
Image
© thecheapplace.com
A major indicator of the deteriorating quality of conventional medical care in the U.S. is its growing reliance on pharmaceutical drugs as a catch-all for pain and disease management. And a new study published in the American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry shows that this dire situation is only worsening, as many conventional doctors are no longer even properly diagnosing patients but instead just handing out medications willy-nilly in order to get patients out the door.

This is definitely true for millions of American veterans currently taking psychiatric drugs, many of whom have alleged mental conditions that were never clinically diagnosed. According to a new report out of Yale University, roughly one-third of all U.S. veterans between the ages of 65 and 85 currently taking psych drugs never received any sort of mental health diagnosis. As it turns out, less than 40 percent of those taking such drugs but not getting mental health treatment from a specialist have a legitimate mental illness diagnosis.

Comment: It is obvious that War causes mental illness in soldiers, are prescription drugs really helping to remedy the problem? Read more to learn how soldiers are guinea pigs for big pharma:

25 disturbing facts about psych drugs, soldiers and suicides
Military suicides hit epidemic levels - is it stress or the drugs used to treat it?
Are US Soldiers Being Prescribed Drugs That May Make Them Kill Themselves?
VA testing drugs on war veterans - Experiments raise ethical questions
Pain Killers Carry Risks For Veterans With Post-Traumatic Stress
Whistleblower accuses government of neglecting suicidal veterans and suppressing science

Read More...
Cheeseburger

Food companies spend $10 Million to keep junk food covered by SNAP

Willy Blackmoore
Takepart.com
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 03:53 UTC
Image
© Lauren Wade
With one in seven Americans receiving federal food assistance, the food stamp market is big business.

In South Texas, not far from the Rio Grande, the area known as Little Mexico could easily be mistaken for an impoverished village on the south side of the border. Eli Saslow of the Washington Post describes the slapdash homes, chickens wandering through the streets, a mule munching on trash in the middle of an intersection.

Except, as the immigrant parents of Blanca, a diabetic single mother of two who relies on food stamps, told their daughter about the border, "On one side you're skinny. On the other you're fat."
Read More...
Heart - Black

UK hospital caught falsifying records to meet government cancer treatment targets

Diane Taylor
The Guardian
Sat, 09 Nov 2013 14:30 UTC
Image
© Nick Ansell/PAAt least 6,000 patients at Colchester general hospital may have had their records falsified to meet treatment targets.
At least 6,000 patients could be affected in scandal at Colchester general hospital as inquiry looks at CEO's role in bullying

The scandal over cancer treatment at a leading hospital has widened after it emerged that its own officials now fear that at least 6,000 patients may have had their records falsified to meet treatment targets.

Investigations by the Observer into the crisis at Colchester general hospital have also established that inquiries into whether staff were bullied into changing records will include the questioning of the hospital's chief executive, Gordon Coutts.

It emerged last week that the hospital's cancer unit is being investigated by police after staff said they had been "pressured or bullied" into changing data relating to patients in order to meet targets for cancer treatment. The healthcare watchdog, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), said the records of 22 patients, out of a sample of 61 that were examined, had been altered to conceal the fact that they had faced "extensive" delays for treatment, which in some cases could have put their lives at risk.

Data was changed to make it appear that the hospital was meeting national cancer targets, which demand that patients wait no more than 62 days from urgent GP referral to completion of the first phase of treatment.

Initially it was reported that the records of the 22 patients appeared to have been changed and that 30 patients or next of kin had been written to, offering to review their treatment. However, sources close to the investigation now say that 6,000 or more patients referred to the Essex hospital between 2010 and 2013 may be caught up in the scandal.
Read More...
Life Preserver

"Hidden caves" in the brain open up during sleep to wash away toxins

Jeremy Dean
PsyBlog
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:23 UTC
Image
© HaoJan Chang“Hidden caves” that open up in the brain may help explain sleep’s amazing restorative powers.
A new study published in the prestigious journal, Science, has found that the brain may wash away toxins built up over the day during sleep.

The research discovered "hidden caves" inside the brain, which open up during sleep, allowing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to flush out potential neurotoxins, like β-amyloid, which has been associated with Alzheimer's disease.

To reach their discovery, researchers injected mice's brains with a dye and monitored the flow while they were awake, asleep and anaesthetised (Xie et al., 2013).

One of the study's authors, Dr Maiken Nedergaard, explained the results:
"We were surprised by how little flow there was into the brain when the mice were awake. It suggested that the space between brain cells changed greatly between conscious and unconscious states."
For a long time the real physiological purpose of sleep has remained a mystery.

We know that lack of sleep causes all kinds of psychological problems like poor learning, decision-making and so on.
Read More...
Syringe

Rise in Autism rates go hand-in-hand with increased vaccinations

Paul Fassa
Natural Society
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 03:31 UTC
Image
Another effort to discount vaccinations as a source of autism has gone into research to prove defective genes as the major culprit. Some epidemiological studies based on twins with autism spectrum disorders was done as early as the mid-1970s. Since then, autism has increased 40-fold. All this from a sudden case of bad genes? This rapid autism rise has coincided with a dramatic increase of early childhood vaccination schedules over the same period, which has been an almost four-fold increase.

The gene theory does not explain how healthy babies suddenly became autistic after undergoing part of an intense series of vaccinations, some shots with multiple-vaccines, at newly born or toddler age.

As a matter of fact, there is very little effort to objectively pursue the autism-vaccination connection. Gene research opposition to the gene theories of autism, or gene theories of many diseases, comes from those who consider environmental causes as primary causal factors, not vaccinations.

Comment: How Safe Are Vaccines? Read the following SOTT articles to learn more:

Read More...
Monkey Wrench

USDA 'Organic-Washing': Another way to mislead the U.S. consumer?

Sayer Ji
Greenmedinfo.com
Sat, 09 Nov 2013 03:19 UTC
Image
USDA organic certification affords the U.S. consumer one of the only food quality protections available today, but does it really guarantee a product is chemical free?

What's a consumer to do today? Between cause - and patently false-marketing, looking beneath the surface appearances of product packaging and advertising becomes a necessity, lest we harm ourselves or the environment unknowingly, or support industries that don't have our best interests in mind.

You may already know about green-washing, pink-washing and so-called gene-washing (i.e. 'natural' labeled products containing GMOs), but prepare yourself for the next level of @%@#!% with "organic-washing."

We hit upon this topic recently in our exposé on USDA organic baby formula containing a chemical ingredient used as a pesticide, but the problem extends to many other "certified organic" products and brands on the market.
Read More...
Footprints

Millions Against Monsanto: Five lessons from the battle against GMOs

Ronnie Cummins
Organic Consumers Association
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 03:01 UTC
Image
Twenty years after the controversial introduction of unlabeled and untested genetically engineered foods and crops, opposition to GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) and Monsanto has created one of the largest netroots-grassroots movements in the U.S.

There are arguably more important issues facing us today than the battle against Frankenfoods. The climate crisis and corporate control over the government and media come to mind. But the rapidly growing anti-GMO Movement illustrates the powerful synergy that can develop from the combined use of social media, marketplace pressure and political action. Recent developments in this sector indicate that out-of-control corporations, media, politicians and the proverbial "one percent" can be outsmarted and outmaneuvered. And quite possibly defeated.

In the wake of high-stakes multi-million dollar GMO labeling ballot initiatives in California in 2012, and Washington State in 2013, an army of organic food and natural health activists have put Corporate America and the political elite on the defensive. We've demonstrated that aggressive populist issue-framing; unconventional "inside-outside" coalition-building; marketplace pressure; and online list-building, mobilization and fundraising - strategically channeled into local and state-based political action - can begin to even up the odds between David and Goliath.
Read More...
Arrow Down

Former pro-GMO scientist speaks out against GMO dangers

Elizabeth Renter
Natural Society
Sun, 10 Nov 2013 02:08 UTC
As mounting evidence shows genetically modified foods have dangerous health and environmental repercussions, the number of scientists willing to step forward and speak out against them is similarly growing. Dr. Thierry Vrain is just the latest of many scientists to buck Monsanto and their hired goons, changing his stance on GMOs and shouting their dangers to anyone that will listen.
Dr. Thierry Vrain
© Natural Society
Dr. Vrain is a former research scientist for Agriculture Canada. It was his job as scientist of his institute to address the public and others, assuring them of the safety of genetically engineered crops and foods. Now, 10 years after his retirement, he's changed his tune.
"In the last 10 years I have changed my position. I started paying attention to the flow of published studies coming from Europe, some from prestigious labs and published in prestigious scientific journals, that questioned the impact and safety of engineered food.

I refute the claims of the biotechnology companies that their engineered crops yield more, that they require less pesticide applications, that they have no impact on the environment and of course that they are safe to eat."
The studies commissioned by Monsanto understandably come to the conclusion that genetically modified foods and crops are both safe for the environment and safe for people. They are commissioned by the people who want that outcome. Studies from objective researchers, however, often come to very different conclusions.
Read More...
Life Preserver

Your ancestors didn't sleep like you


Slumber Wise
Thu, 16 May 2013 08:47 UTC
Image
Ok, maybe your grandparents probably slept like you. And your great, great-grandparents. But once you go back before the 1800s, sleep starts to look a lot different. Your ancestors slept in a way that modern sleepers would find bizarre - they slept twice. And so can you.

The history

The existence of our sleeping twice per night was first uncovered by Roger Ekirch, professor of History at Virginia Tech.

His research found that we didn't always sleep in one eight hour chunk. We used to sleep in two shorter periods, over a longer range of night. This range was about 12 hours long, and began with a sleep of three to four hours, wakefulness of two to three hours, then sleep again until morning.

References are scattered throughout literature, court documents, personal papers, and the ephemera of the past. What is surprising is not that people slept in two sessions, but that the concept was so incredibly common. Two-piece sleeping was the standard, accepted way to sleep.

"It's not just the number of references - it is the way they refer to it, as if it was common knowledge," Ekirch says.

An English doctor wrote, for example, that the ideal time for study and contemplation was between "first sleep" and "second sleep." Chaucer tells of a character in the Canterbury Tales that goes to bed following her "firste sleep." And, explaining the reason why working class conceived more children, a doctor from the 1500s reported that they typically had sex after their first sleep.

Comment: For more information, see our forum discussion Are You Getting Enough Sleep? Sleeping properly?

Read More...