Health & WellnessS


Evil Rays

When Annoying Sounds Spark Major Rage: Driven to Distraction, and Worse, By Noise, Misophonia Sufferers Seek a Solution

Ever since she was a little girl, mealtime has been a torture for Adah Siganoff. The eating sounds - the chewing, the slurping, the chomping - drove Adah to distraction. The noises grated on her nervous system, sparking anxiety and rage. To this day, she can't sit next to her husband at dinner time - she has to go to the peace and quiet of another room to eat.



"The fear is that I won't control the rage," Siganoff told TODAY's Mara Schiavocampo. "It's huge. It's physical. It's everything I have turns into a boiling pot of rage. And then I have to talk myself down because this isn't the way you're supposed to live."

Comment: Candida, or Candidiasis is known to cause sensitivity to noise, extreme irritability and impatience among other things. Of course, there is no way to know for sure if Adah Siganoff's symptoms are caused by candida overgrowth, but there is no doubt that she would benefit from low-carb high-fat diet that would stabilize her gut flora and calm her highly agitated nervous system.


Bulb

Stimulating the vagus nerve: Memories are made of this

Image
© Unknown
Psychobiologists show how the vagal pathway links hormones outside the brain to neurotransmitters inside the brain to lock in memory of emotional or stressful events.

University of Virginia psychologists have moved the science of memory forward, reporting that stimulating the vagus nerve, which carries sensory messages to and from the brain, releases the neurotransmitter norepinephrine into the amygdala, strengthening memory storage in limbic regions of the brain that regulate arousal, memory and feeling responses to emotionally laden stimuli.

Their findings, which appear in the February issue of Behavioral Neuroscience (Vol. 118, No. 1), outline the neural pathway through which hormones that are released in the body affect specific parts of the brain during meaningful or emotionally arousing events in order to strengthen memories that will later foster sentimental pleasure or torture us with relived trauma.

The researchers--psychobiologists Cedric L.Williams, PhD, Derrick Hassert, PhD, and Teiko Miyashita, PhD--conclude that the vagus nerve is the "missing link" between the hormone epinephrine outside the brain and the neurotransmitter norepinephrine inside the brain.

Comment: There is one proven technique that can assist you with reducing your stress, calming and focusing your mind, creating better links between body and mind and thus improving quality of life, increasing sense of connection with others in your community. It will help you to have improved overall health, a stronger immune system, better impulse control, reduced inflammation, etc. It will also help you to heal emotional wounds; anything that may hinder or prevent you from leading a healthy and fulfilling life.

To learn more about Vagus Nerve Stimulation, through breathing exercises, and naturally producing the stress reducing hormone Oxytocin in the brain, visit the Éiriú Eolas Stress Control, Healing and Rejuvenation Program here.


Health

Chewing The Fat

Fats
© Dr.Joe Today

It has become "settled science" that fat is bad for us. We hear it all the time. Yet despite the push for low fat diets and low fat foods from health authorities, the same authorities keep telling us we are losing the "war" on obesity and that rates of illnesses associated with diet are increasing.

So what if there is a hole in the story? What if we have been led up the wrong path? It is so ingrained that fats are bad and that fatty foods are unhealthy that to even suggest something like this will provoke outrage in some quarters.

Two major reviews published on PubMed, which is part of the National Institute of Health, throw a massive question mark over our assumptions. A review of 500 trials published in the Archives of Internal Medicine (The Journal of The American Medical Association) showed NO correlation between dietary fat intake and Coronary Heart Disease. A second analysis of nearly 350,000 people over 23 years showed no association between dietary fat intake and either heart disease or stroke!

That's right! Despite all the years of study and all the claims by authorities that going low fat is good for the heart-there is not actually any evidence to support this.

Health

Birth Control Pills Affect Memory, Researchers Find

Pills
© Hamiza Bakirci / FotoliaWomen who use contraceptives like birth control pills experience memory changes, according to new UC Irvine research. Their ability to remember the gist of an emotional event improves, while women not using the contraceptives better retain details.

Women who use contraceptives like birth control pills experience memory changes, according to new UC Irvine research. Their ability to remember the gist of an emotional event improves, while women not using the contraceptives better retain details.

"What's most exciting about this study is that it shows the use of hormonal contraception alters memory," UCI graduate researcher Shawn Nielsen said. "There are only a handful of studies examining the cognitive effects of the pill, and more than 100 million women use it worldwide."

She stressed that the medications did not damage memory. "It's a change in the type of information they remember, not a deficit."

The change makes sense, said Nielsen, who works with neurobiologist Larry Cahill, because contraceptives suppress sex hormones such as estrogen and progesterone to prevent pregnancy. Those hormones were previously linked to women's strong "left brain" memory by Cahill's research group.

"This new finding may be surprising to some, but it's a natural outgrowth of the research we've been doing on sex differences for 10 years," Cahill said.

A neurobiologist not involved in the latest work agreed it was a logical and intriguing next step in the examination of memory differences between the sexes. Like any research, she added, it would be important to validate it further.

Cheeseburger

Stamping Out Hunger with Fast Food?

Image
© frugivoremag.com
"Restaurants want a piece of food stamp pie" blared a recent USA Today headline. The article focused on lobbying by fast food restaurants, particularly Yum! Brands, the parent company of Taco Bell and KFC, which is enthusiastic about feeding food stamp recipients its market-tested concoctions. It caused a stir on Twitter and even got Gothamist's snark-filled attention.

The prospect that the food scientists who came up with the gut-busting Double Down sandwich would start a relentless marketing campaign aimed at low-income consumers in an era of rising obesity is alarming. Indeed, Kelly Brownell, director of Yale's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, called the idea of Yum! restaurants participating in the program "preposterous."

I was surprised to hear of this lobbying campaign; I had understood that food stamps could not be used at restaurants - and that recipients are barred from using their benefit to purchase prepared foods. But USA Today indicated that several states, including California, Michigan, and Arizona, currently allow such purchases; Rhode Island just started a pilot program limited to a handful of Subway restaurants, while Florida allows it in a single county.

Coffee

The Coffee Illusion: What the Magic Brew Really Does to Your Brain

Image
© stationbay.com
Coffee does not make you "superhuman." The truth is that you become addicted to caffeine quickly, and soon you are drinking coffee to cure withdrawal more than for stimulation.

The Misconception: Coffee stimulates you.

The Truth: You become addicted to caffeine quickly, and soon you are drinking coffee to cure withdrawal more than for stimulation.

Mmmm, a warm cup of coffee with delicious cream, topped with a frothy head.

You smell it brewing and feel cozy inside as you browse cakes and brownies, scones and biscotti.

You get some of it in you, and you feel alive again - you feel superhuman.

Suddenly, you feel like John Nash, you can't keep up with your own mind as geometric symbols float over the magazine articles in your lap. Someone strikes up a conversation about health care, and suddenly everything you've ever heard about the topic is at the tip of your tongue.

Damn, coffee is awesome.

Except, of course, much of this is an illusion.

Attention

New Meta-Analysis Confirms: 'Genetically Modified Feed is Toxic'

Image
© unknown
EXTRACTS: A meta-analysis on 19 studies confirms kidney and liver toxicity in rats and mice fed on GM soybean and maize, representing more than 80 percent of all commercially available GM food; it also exposes gross inadequacies of current risk assessment.

A team of independent scientists led by Gilles-Eric Séralini at Caen University in France carried out a meta-analysis combining the results of 19 previous studies [1], and their report concluded:
"From the regulatory tests performed today, it is unacceptable to submit 500 million Europeans and several billions of consumers worldwide to the new pesticide GM-derived foods or feed, this being done without more controls (if any) than the only 3-month-long toxicological tests and using only one mammalian species, especially since there is growing evidence of concern."

Health

Moms' plasticizer exposure troubling for baby boys.

Kim, Y, EH Ha, EJ Kim, H Park, M Ha, JH Kim, YC Hong, N Chang and BN Kim. 2011. Prenatal exposure to phthalates and infant development at six months: Prospective Mothers and Children's Environmental Health (MOCEH) Study. Environmental Health Perspectives http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1003178.

A woman's exposure to commonly used plasticizers - called phthalates - during pregnancy may be associated with suboptimal development in babies, finds a South Korean study.

Increasing exposure to plastic-softening chemicals in pregnant women was associated with poorer development in their baby boys, finds a study that examined mental and motor skills in 6-month-old infants.

The results show that the higher the exposure to phthalates in the moms, the lower the scores of infant development, including both cognitive and motor behavior. However, the association was only identified in sons, not in daughters.

Given that phthalates are short-lived in people, reducing exposure in pregnant women will effectively reduce the possibility of fetal exposure to these chemicals. The study is important because it adds more evidence to the growing human health concerns about these chemicals, especially with boys.

Ambulance

UV blocker curtails male hormone made in human cells, mice

Kim, Y, JC Ryu, H Choi and K Lee. 2011. Effect of 2,2,'4,4'-tetrahydroxybenzophenone (BP2) on steroidogenesis in testicular Leydig cells. Toxicology http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2011.06.013

A UV-blocking chemical added to stabilize personal care products works as an endocrine disruptor and reduces the production of male reproductive hormones.

Researchers show an ultraviolet (UV) radiation blocker - designated BP2 - found in a variety of cosmetics and personal care products decreases testosterone hormone production in both cultured human testes cells and in male mice.

This is the first study to report that BP2 exposure can impact reproductive processes in mammals, including human cells. The new findings - when combined with results from prior studies - suggest more research is needed to understand if BP2 poses endocrine-related health risks when used to stabilize personal care products.

Benzophenone (BP) chemicals absorb and thus filter out ultraviolet light. The one known as BP2 is added to cosmetics and personal care products to prevent sunlight from breaking down the products. Perfumes, lipstick, hair and skin care products and plastics for packaging can contain BP2. People can be exposed as BP2 has been detected in human urine.

Alarm Clock

Global cancer cases rise 20 per cent in a decade to hit 12million a year

Image
Diseases such as cancer, heart disease and diabetes are some of the biggest health challenges facing the world, experts have said.

The number of new cancer cases worldwide stands at 12 million a year - up a fifth in under a decade.

This is more than four times the annual number of new HIV infections, and 2.8 million of these cancers are linked to poor diet, a lack of exercise and being overweight.

The number of cancers that could potentially be prevented is expected to rise dramatically over the next decade as more people lead sedentary lifestyles and become obese.

Comment: Can someone please explain how it can be that the incidence of lung cancer has risen over the past 10 years despite the fact that the numbers of smokers has dropped drastically in the US and Western Europe over the past 30 years, as a result of government propaganda? Can someone please explain why governments continue to cite smoking as the major cause of lung cancer?