OF THE
TIMES
Journalist Matt Taibbi posted details from the company's internal communications on Friday about how the company's team of executives, which Taibbi dubbed a "high-speed Supreme Court of moderation," made decisions about election-related content during the 2020 election. The thread is part of a series of releases related to Twitter's permanent suspension of former President Donald Trump.See also:
"We'll show you what hasn't been revealed: the erosion of standards within the company in months before J6," Taibbi said. "Decisions by high-ranking executives to violate their own policies, and more, against the backdrop of ongoing, documented interaction with federal agencies."
...
Taibbi also said certain content moderation decisions were made by key Twitter executives, including former Head of Trust and Safety Yoel Roth, former Head of Legal, Policy, and Trust Vijaya Gadde, and former legal counsel Jim Baker. The group's approach was a "high-speed Supreme Court of moderation, issuing content rulings on the fly, often in minutes and based on guesses, gut calls, even Google searches, even in cases involving the President," Taibbi claims.
Roth also met with officials from the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to discuss election security on a weekly basis. He also posted details about a Slack channel in which Twitter employees debated details about whether to moderate certain tweets in relation to election misinformation. For example, Taibbi notes an exchange regarding a tweet in which former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) joked about mailing in ballots for his "deceased parents and grandparents."
"I agree it's a joke," a Twitter employee said, "but he's also literally admitting in a tweet a crime."
These decisions were made in an attempt to regulate Trump's efforts to affect the 2020 election. "Twitter, in 2020 at least, was deploying a vast range of visible and invisible tools to rein in Trump's engagement, long before J6. The ban will come after other avenues are exhausted," Taibbi concluded.
...
Twitter's team panicked on Jan. 6, according to Taibbi. The company's "executives on day 1 of the January 6th crisis at least tried to pay lip service to its dizzying array of rules. By day 2, they began wavering. By day 3, a million rules were reduced to one: what we say, goes," the journalist said.



Comment: See also: