Puppet MastersS


Attention

Frmr Czech ambassador: CIA, FBI, Dems secretly working to remove Trump is "a thing of dictatorships"

Jim Holt
Gateway Pundit
Sun, 03 Nov 2019 00:00 UTC
Jaroslav Basta
© Parlamentni ListyFormer Czech Ambassador to Russia and Ukraine, Jaroslav Bašta
Former Czech Ambassador to Russia and then Ukraine Jaroslav Bašta spoke to iDNES.cz news last week. The discussion centered around the 2016 US presidential election and the current political situation in the United States.

Bašta, who is familiar with the politics in Ukraine, accused the FBI, CIA and US Democrats, along with the former Ukrainian government, of colluding in the interest of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election. Bašta added, "And it is not just some conjecture, everything is well documented by the Ukrainian authorities and now also based on the first court decision."

Bašta also told iDNES.cz that what Joe Biden and his son did in Ukraine is much worse than anything Donald Trump did, saying, "It can be said that Stalin behaved as arrogantly as Biden to Ukraine."

Ambassador Bašta also claims the FBI, CIA and Democrat party are acting behind the scenes to remove the duly elected president, "It's a thing typical of dictatorships."

Interview Via iDNES.cz:
Read More...
Nuke

Tehran to start using centrifuges at Fordow plant after EU's refusal to meet compliance deadline for Nuclear Deal


Sputnik
Tue, 05 Nov 2019 18:55 UTC
gas centrifuges
© 2015.atomexpo.ru
The statement comes just one day after the head of Iran's nuclear programme, Ali Akbar Salehi, announced that the country is now operating 60 IR-6 advanced centrifuges, a violation of the terms of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani announced that the Islamic Republic will start injecting uranium gas into 1,044 centrifuges on Wednesday, stressing that the signatories to the 2015 Nuclear Agreement have to implement the deal within two months to stop Tehran from suspending its obligations under the accord.

He also noted that all the decisions taken by Iran are reversible, underscoring that the nation will comply with the nuclear deal if the other parties to the accord do the same.

Under the JCPOA, Iran is supposed to repurpose its Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant as a centre for the production of stable isotopes, refraining from enriching uranium and leaving Natanz as the only uranium enrichment facility.

Comment: Not only that, the Iranians had a stern warning for any country hosting U.S. military bases, in the event of an American attack:

Read More...
Arrow Up

Syria: OPCW whistleblowers merely confirm what we already knew

Tony Cartalucci
New Eastern Outlook
Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00 UTC
OPCW
© unknown
Whistleblowers have come forward revealing what many had known all along - that the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) had deliberately altered various reports and suppressed evidence regarding alleged chemical weapon attacks in Syria to help bolster US war propaganda.

The Courage Foundation - comprised of various whistleblowers and investigative journalists - in a statement titled, "Panel Criticizes 'Unacceptable Practices' in the OPCW's investigation of the Alleged Chemical Attack in Douma, Syria on April 7th 2018," would conclude (emphasis added):
Based on the whistleblower's extensive presentation, including internal emails, text exchanges and suppressed draft reports, we are unanimous in expressing our alarm over unacceptable practices in the investigation of the alleged chemical attack in Douma, near the Syrian capital of Damascus on 7 April 2018. We became convinced by the testimony that key information about chemical analyses, toxicology consultations, ballistics studies, and witness testimonies was suppressed, ostensibly to favor a preordained conclusion.

Comment: See also:

Read More...
Arrow Up

US Treasury sanctions Khamenei's son and Iranian general staff to commemorate US embassy takeover


RT
Mon, 04 Nov 2019 17:12 UTC
Mojtaba Khameni/Rally
© Wikipedia/AFP/Atta KenareMojtaba Khamenei • Iranian rally on 40th anniversary of Iranian hostage crisis
Nine people, including the son of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the General Staff of Iran's Armed Forces, were blacklisted by the US on the 40th anniversary of the seizure of the US embassy in Tehran in 1979. The new round of sanctions against Tehran were announced on the US Treasury Department's website.

Khamenei's son, Mojtaba Khamenei, is an influential religious and political figure in the country, with European sources previously mentioning his name among the possible successors of his father as Iranian supreme leader.

Iran's head of judiciary and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's chief of staff were also among those who fell under American restrictions. On top of that, the said restrictions targeted unelected officials from Ali Khamenei's inner circle, who have been helping the supreme leader "implement his destabilizing policies," US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in a statement.

Those on the list were linked to being involved in the bombings of the US Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983 and the Argentine Israelite Mutual Association in 1994, as well as torture, extrajudicial killings and repressions, he claimed. The sanctions freeze all US assets of the restricted individuals and forbids American entities from doing business with them.

Comment: Sputnik, 4/11/2019: Iranian Foreign Ministry slams US sanctions as useless
The Iranian Foreign Ministry on Monday suggested that the new US sanctions against Tehran are useless, stressing that the unilateral measures reveal the helplessness and inability of the Trump administration to use diplomacy.

"As we have repeatedly stated before, such measures only show the plight and helplessness of this regime, which does not know how to use rational diplomacy mechanisms", a spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, Abbas Mousavi, said, condemning the sanctions and noting their futility.


Read More...
Rocket

Iranian military warning: States hosting US bases will be targeted in event of American aggression


Sputnik
Mon, 04 Nov 2019 14:44 UTC
Shekarchi
© tasnimnews.comBrigadier General Abolfazl Shekarchi
The US and Iran have repeatedly threatened one another with deadly consequences in the event of hostilities, with the US move to send a carrier strike group to the Middle East and to set up a maritime security coalition to protect shipping in the Persian Gulf leading tensions to spike to dangerous new levels.

Iran has the ability and will to target any and all territories sheltering the US or its allies in the region in the event of aggression against Tehran, Armed Forces spokesman Brig. Gen. Abolfazl Shekarchi has warned.
"Any place and any territorial point sheltering the interests of the United States and its allies would be threatened (in case of any war) and the Islamic Republic has proved that it has the capability to do so. Even if a country does not directly participate in any possible war but its territories host the enemy, we consider that country as a hostile territory and will treat it as an aggressor."
Emphasising that Iran would never be the instigator of a war of aggression, the spokesman also stressed that
"if an aggressor commits a strategic mistake" and starts a war, "that aggression will be confronted with the strongest and most crushing response over a geographic expanse beyond what the ill-wishers of the Islamic Republic could imagine."

Comment: As Iran addresses a potential US military threat by laying out its strategic response to any and all countries that host US forces as complicit and therefore targets, it has not forgotten the sting of the broken JCPOA and the absence of meaningful action by other signatories. In that regard, Iran is moving rapidly on the nuclear enrichment front in defiance of prior restrictions and agreements. From Sputnik, 4/11/2019: Centrifuge prototype to be 50x faster than agreed in nuclear deal
The head of Iran's nuclear program, Ali Akbar Salehi, has announced that the country is now operating 60 IR-6 advanced centrifuges, which is twice the amount that was previously known, and which appears to be a violation of the terms of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Actions (JCPOA) also known as the Iranian nuclear deal.

He also declared that Iran is now working on a prototype centrifuge which would be 50 times faster as those that are allowed by JCPOA.

Salehi made this reveal to state television on the 40th anniversary of the US embassy takeover in Tehran, adding that the IR-6 centrifuges are capable of producing enriched uranium 10 times as fast as the first generation IR-1 centrifuges that were permitted by the deal which limited Iran to using only 5,060 of the IR-1s.


Read More...
Bizarro Earth

Are the Democrats moving left, or returning to their roots?

Joshua Zeitz
Politico
Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:35 UTC
FDR roosevelt new deal democrats
© Library of Congress/WikimediaRoosevelt Signs The Social Security Act: President Roosevelt signs Social Security Act, at approximately 3:30 pm EST on 14 August 1935.
Be advised: "Democrats are in danger of going too far left in 2018." So warn Republicans like Mitt Romney and ex-Democrats like Joe Lieberman and public personae as diverse as James Comey and Howard Schultz. In recent months, the pundit class has determined that the party's leftward lurch heralds the rise of a "liberal tea party" — a movement that could very well unmoor Democrats from their longstanding center-left traditions, in close imitation of the spiral of events that caused the Republican Party to turn sharply to the right in recent years.

What's fueling this argument? For one, more Democrats have rallied, either noisily or cautiously, around such policy innovations as "Medicare for all," universal college and a universal basic income. That a smattering of Democratic candidates have elected to call themselves "democratic socialists" has only fueled the claim that such programs are "socialist." "The center is Harry Truman and Daniel Patrick Moynihan, not Eugene Debs and Michael Harrington," warned New York Times opinion columnist Bret Stephens recently. (Debs and Harrington were self-identified socialists.)

Comment: Mr. Zeitz waxes nostalgic for an illusory Democratic party that never was. It was, let it be remembered, the party of slavery and division, not 100 years before FDR's New Deal. The southern Democrats triggered the Civil War in an effort to keep their slave-owning privileges. After their defeat, they enacted the "Jim Crow" laws and organized the Klan to keep the newly-freed slaves in line. Those genes are still with it. Although there may have been some constructive policies put forth by the Dems since then, what the current lunatic progressive members of the Democratic Party propose is far cry from the utopia he imagines the party to be.

Read More...
Bullseye

Moscow slams illegal US presence in Syria amid reports of new military bases being built in oil-rich province


RT
Tue, 05 Nov 2019 17:46 UTC
us troops
US actions to bolster its 'illegal presence' in Syria violate international law, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Vershinin said on Tuesday.

The statement comes shortly after Turkish media reported that two new American military bases are under construction in the oil-rich Deir ez-Zor province.

The Russian diplomat was asked for the ministry's take on the reported US plans; his response echoes Russia's position on the matter, previously stated by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and President Vladimir Putin.
Any actions whatsoever - we are not talking about anything in particular now - that the United States undertake to keep themselves militarily present in Syria are unacceptable and illegal from our point of view and under international law.
Turkish media reported earlier on Tuesday that the US has started constructing two new military bases in the Deir ez-Zor governorate which is known for its oil reserves. It is claimed that one of the facilities is being built near the former Syrian Air Defense Forces' 113th Brigade base and another in the al-Sur region.

Speaking on Friday, US President Donald Trump reaffirmed US intentions to retain troops in Syria to "keep the oil", and even gained credit from Syria's President Assad for being the "most transparent American President."
Read More...
Document

House Intelligence Committee releases first transcripts in Trump impeachment probe


RT
Tue, 05 Nov 2019 17:35 UTC
Schiff
© REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
Formerly secret interviews with former US Ambassadors Marie Yovanovitch and State Department adviser Michael McKinley have been made public by the House, as part of the Democrats' impeachment probe of President Donald Trump.

House Intelligence Committee chair Adam Schiff (D-California) released the transcripts of the interviews on Monday, under the rules of House Resolution 660. Adopted by the House last week, over the objections of all the Republicans and two Democrats, the resolution retroactively authorized the impeachment probe three committees had been conducting, and put Schiff in charge of it.

Yovanovitch was the US ambassador to Ukraine until she was recalled by Trump in May. She testified on October 11. McKinley served as adviser to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo until he resigned on October 10, accusing Pompeo of failing to support Yovanovitch and other State employees. He appeared before the impeachment committees six days later.
Read More...
Magnify

'You know': Ambassador Yovanovitch's 300-page testimony reveals only assumptions, innuendo and what's in the papers


RT
Tue, 05 Nov 2019 17:29 UTC
Marie Yovanovitch
© REUTERS/Jonathan ErnstFormer U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch smiles as she departs after testifying in the U.S. House of Representatives impeachment inquiry
The highlights of impeachment testimony paint Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch as a victim of character assassination by corrupt Ukrainians and US President Donald Trump. We read through all 317 pages to see what's actually inside.

Yovanovitch testified before the House Intelligence Committee last month, and the transcript of the all-day proceedings was among the first made public by Chairman Adam Schiff (D-California) on Monday. Schiff's office also released a nine-page "highlights" reel, which most reporters were all too happy to focus on.

Rather than accept the pre-sliced serving of this particular political sausage, we rolled up our sleeves and got to reading the whole thing ourselves. The final result is far less dramatic. It reveals a diplomat who made a whole lot of assumptions and retrospective conclusions based on media reporting. Her most frequently used phrase was "you know" - but she didn't actually know a whole lot at all.

In the opening remarks that she ended up sharing with the Washington Post - despite the hearing being held behind locked doors - Yovanovitch denied being anti-Trump, favoring Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, or ever suggesting to anyone in Ukraine to refrain from prosecuting corruption.

She described her ouster as "based, as far as I can tell, on unfounded and false claims by people with clearly questionable motives." (p. 23)
Read More...
Vader

China - not Iran - is the real reason US troops will never leave Iraq

Darius Shahtahmasebi
RT
Tue, 05 Nov 2019 17:22 UTC
power plant
© Global Look Press / Xinhua
Recent developments suggest that the US and its allies have become increasingly wary of China's expanding influence inside Iraq, even while Washington continuously points out the threat supposedly posed by Iran instead.

Over the past few weeks, Iraq has slowly but surely begun its re-descent into chaos. According to reports, tens of thousands of people have taken to the streets to protest Iraq's current state of governance, with over 250 already being killed in clashes with security forces. One protester even died last week, after being hit in the chest by a tear-gas canister in Baghdad. At the time of writing, Iraqi protesters have just stormed Iran's consulate in the holy city of Karbala, resulting in four further deaths and at least 19 injuries.

I can't help but notice that, when Iraq is being ruled as a US client state, clashes with security forces that see hundreds of civilian deaths are no big deal. It's not as if the US can hustle the international community to legitimize another invasion of a country it's invaded twice before. It does therefore ring quite hypocritical when the sole basis of Washington's call for the Syrian government to step down in 2011 seemed to be based on allegations of a similar fact scenario. But that is a topic for a separate article.

Then again, it was the US who plunged Iraq into chaos to begin with. The US, together with the UK, toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003, fired close to 500,000 police and military personnel (which to some extent contributed to the rise of ISIS), and facilitated the deaths of over one million Iraqi civilians in the process.
Read More...