Puppet MastersS

Handcuffs

Erdogan says Turkey captured Baghdadi's sister and wife in Syria - UPDATE

baghdadi
© Reuters / Alaa al-MarjaniIraqi youth watch the news of Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi death, in Najaf, Iraq October 27, 2019
An unnamed Turkish official said the woman is being interrogated along with her husband, but did not provide further details.

A senior Turkish official claimed Turkey captured the older sister of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, previously killed during a US raid in Syria's Idlib province, AP reported Monday.

The official called the arrest an "intelligence gold mine," the report says.

According to the report, the 65-year old woman, named Rasmiya Awad, was captured in a raid conducted Monday. Awad was living in a trailer near the town of Azaz, north of Aleppo, a region under Turkish control since 2016 Operation Euphrates Shield.

"This kind of thing is an intelligence gold mine. What she knows about [Daesh] can significantly expand our understanding of the group and help us catch more bad guys," the official said, according to AP.

The Turkish official said Awad was taken into custody along with her husband, daughter-in-law and five children. The adults are reportedly being interrogated. Rasmiya is suspected to be affiliated with the Daesh terror group, the official said, without providing further detail.

Comment: Communications Director at the Turkish Presidency Fahrettin Altun confirmed the news. "We have been leading in the fight against terrorism in all its forms. Our strong counter-terrorism cooperation with like-minded partners can never be questioned", Altun stated.

Erdogan added that Baghdadi's wife was captured too:
"Baghdadi has committed suicide in a tunnel. We have caught his wife in Syria, but we have made no noise of it. I'm now announcing this for the first time. We have also caught his sister and her husband," Erdogan said in an address in Ankara.
A bit strange that what seems to be Baghdadi's entire family was hanging out in Turkish-controlled areas of Syria... But no, take the Turkish government's word for it: they're fighting the war on terror.

UPDATE 7 Nov 2019

According to Erdogan, Turkey detained at least 10 relatives of Baghdadi:
"Al-Baghdadi's close circle is paying a lot of attention to our country. We recently captured his sister's husband and their child in [Syria's] Azaz, and sent them to migration camps. Let's see what decision our Ministry of Justice will make. His wife has been in our hands for 1-1.5 years. It will be the same process. The number of [al-Baghdadi's relatives detained by Turkey] is already in the double digits", Erdogan told reporters.

He added that together with the wife of the killed Daesh leader, a child, whose kinship to al-Baghdadi was proved by DNA analysis, had been detained.

Later, he specified the exact number of al-Baghdadi' associates and relatives apprehended by the country's security forces.

"We now have 13 people from his inner circle", the Turkish president said.
As Moon of Alabama writes:
Eight and a half years ago when the war on Syria began, Turkey played the most important role. Weapons were smuggled from Libya through Turkey to be delivered to 'Syrian rebels'. Over the years tens of thousands of foreign Jihadis traveled through Turkey to join the various groups fighting against the Syrian government. After the Islamic State came into existence even more followed.

When the U.S. changed course and started to fight ISIS it urged Turkey to clamp down on the stream of fresh fighters. Turkey did so to some extent after several ISIS bombings killed dozens within Turkey. But recent events show that Turkey still does not see ISIS as an adversary. Nor do ISIS leaders fear Turkish authorities.
The rest of his article is worth reading. For example:
After being shamed over its willful negligence towards ISIS assets in areas it controls Turkey took some diversionary steps.

On November 1 it captured the Belgian Islamic State member Fatima Benmezian in Kilis, Turkey. Benmezian had escaped from a refugee camp in northeastern Syria a few weeks ago when it was bombed by Turkey.

On November 4 Turkish forces captured the sister of Baghdadi, Rasmiya Awad, alongside her husband and daughter-in-law. They were living in a container trailer near the town of Azaz in Aleppo province. Azaz is only a few kilometers south of Kilis and under Turkish control.

Today Turkey claimed that it had captured another wife of Baghdadi but it did not say where she was found.

None of those persons Turkey nabbed have any operational value. They are expendables.

But it is really remarkable that all these ISIS persons happened to live in Turkish controlled areas near Turkish border crossings. Are we to believe that they had chosen an area where no other ISIS members are around? It is quite more likely that there are many more ISIS members who are now living in those border areas of Syria which are more or less under Turkish control.



Light Sabers

'I served in the war she championed!' Tulsi & The View's Behar face off in tense exchange over Clinton & 'Russian asset' smears

tulsi
Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard faced off in a fiery exchange with The View's Joy Behar after taking issue with being branded a "useful idiot" by the co-host on a previous episode of the show.

A clearly fed up Gabbard confronted the hosts who have previously maligned her as a Russian asset and "Assad apologist" over her views on the war in Syria. The anti-Gabbard media hysteria was kicked up a notch after failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton also suggested she was being groomed by Moscow to run as a third party disrupter candidate.

"Some of you have accused me of being a traitor to my country, a Russian asset, a Trojan horse or a useful idiot, I think was the term that you used," she said, directing her words at Behar.

Magnify

Best of the Web: Transcript of US ambassador to Ukraine reveals leaked 'smoking gun' testimony based on hearsay & 'fake news' media

Former US ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor
© Reuters / Carlos JassoFormer US ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor
Impeachment testimony from former US ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor reveals the fatal 'quid pro quo' at the center of the probe rests on mere hearsay, even as Taylor's words are held up as a smoking gun by Trump's enemies.

In the course of his October 22 deposition, made public on Wednesday, Taylor explains it was his "clear understanding" that "security assistance money would not come" until Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky "committed to pursue the investigation" of natural gas firm Burisma Holdings, where Democratic presidential frontrunner Joe Biden's son was a director.

That understanding, however, came from being told by Trump adviser Tim Morrison that another ambassador - US envoy to the EU Gordon Sondland - had informed a Zelensky aide of the condition.

Chess

Iran cancels accreditation of UN nuclear inspector as it restarts uranium enrichment

atomic enrichment
© Atomic Energy Organization of Iran via AFPThe atomic enrichment facility in Nataz
Iran has stripped a UN nuclear watchdog inspector of accreditation after the international official reportedly tried to carry "suspicious materials" inside one of the Iranian nuclear sites she was scheduled to inspect.

Permission to visit the sites was revoked from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspector after she was caught trying to enter the Natanz uranium enrichment facility carrying "suspicious materials," according to Iran's national atomic agency.

With no access to the sites, her mission to monitor Iran's nuclear program was impossible to execute, so she left the country on Wednesday, Iranian media said.

Dominoes

Ukraine joining NATO would take world dangerously close to nuclear war

masked protester
© Getty Images / STR / NurPhoto
Ukrainian membership of NATO would be a brazen provocation that could finally break the back of Moscow's patience. Besides, very few seem to worry about the ontology of Ukrainian nationalism.

The Berlin Wall fell 30 years ago and with it eventually the "Iron Curtain" which had divided Europe from Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic.

Russia accepted this on the basis of a clear assurance from the US that NATO would not expand its frontline any closer to Russia's borders. A promise that wasn't worth the paper it wasn't written on.

That much is demonstrated daily by the presence of US missiles in Poland and Romania, periodic war-games which are clearly predicated on possible war with Russia, and now with the renewed "offer" to the Ukraine of membership of the NATO war alliance.

Bullseye

SOTT Focus: Russiagate is a Cult, Complete with Unquestionable Doctrine, Dissent-Shaming, and Us-vs-Them Cosmology

praying
© Getty Images / Louise OLIGNY
Americans still clinging to the idea that their candidate lost the 2016 election because of meddling by the Russian state have much in common with victims of brainwashing cults. For them, doctrine has eclipsed reality.

Russiagate true believers are already screaming about foreign interference in the 2020 election and it hasn't even happened yet. Months after the long-awaited special counsel's report failed to serve up the promised evidence of "Russian collusion," they have held fast to their conviction that President Donald Trump is a Russian asset placed in office by Vladimir Putin, and the intelligence agencies that serve as their oracles have predicted further "meddling" will occur to keep him in office. Indeed, their beliefs only grow stronger the more contrary evidence is presented, to the point where they have more in common with a cult than any other political group.

Russiagaters are back in the headlines after the Justice Department, the Pentagon, and a cluster of intelligence agencies released a joint statement on "ensuring security" for the 2020 elections on Tuesday. But to be fair, they never really left. Just last month, they were pearl-clutching about Russians on Facebook targeting Democratic presidential frontrunner Joe Biden, and before that, it was a non-story about Trump supposedly telling Russian officials he wasn't concerned about the (still-unproven, but who's counting) Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Eye 2

Best of the Web: Killing the messenger by proxy: Heads roll over ABC News' Epstein coverup โ€” at CBS, for exposing it

amy robach espstein project veritas
© D Dipasupil/Getty Images for AWXII, Project Veritas
A CBS News staffer believed to have leaked unaired footage of ABC News anchor Amy Robach saying the network quashed a bombshell report on Jeffrey Epstein has been fired, according to a report.

The Huffington Post's Yashar Ali, citing two sources familiar with the situation, said Thursday morning that CBS News has "fired the staffer in question."

"This comes after ABC informed CBS that they had determined who accessed the footage of Amy Robach expressing her frustrations about the Epstein story," noted Ali.

Comment: National Review comments that Robach's backpeddling excuses make no sense:
Sorry, but Robach's response to the firestorm doesn't square with her initial comments, in which she states that "Roberts had pictures, she had everything . . . it was unbelievable what we had. [Bill] Clinton, we had everything."

"Everything" sure sounds like sufficient corroborating evidence. Even if employing the most scrupulous journalistic standards, a giant news organization wouldn't need three years to substantiate โ€” or dismiss โ€” a story with pictures, dates, and a credible witness.

We certainly know that ABC didn't need "everything" โ€” or much of anything, for that matter - when it was running scores of pieces online and on television, highlighting every risible accusation against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

I'm not even talking about the prime accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, whose allegations still haven't been corroborated, but rather about someone such as Julie Swetnick, who was all over the ABC News at the height of the confirmation battle. Swetnick accused Kavanaugh not only of sexual assault but also of being present at parties where women were being drugged and "gang raped." She wasn't even remotely credible.

Yet here is Robach's colleague, former Clinton adviser George Stephanopoulos, meeting ABC's editorial standards by allowing Swetnick's shyster lawyer Michael Avenatti to smear Kavanaugh without offering a shred of substantiating evidence for her claims.
[...]
By the way, has Robach wrapped up that reporting on Clinton, yet?

The notion that she believes she was venting during "private moment" isn't plausible, either. Any regular guest โ€” and Robach is on TV every day โ€” knows that a gaggle of producers are listening to everything that's being said, and that everything that's being said is going to be on tape.

Paired with NBC News' burying of the Harvey Weinstein story, we now have evidence of two major media institutions protecting serial abusers. One wonders how many young women might have been saved if they hadn't.
ABC News' Stephanopoulos is drawn into the Epstein maelstrom:
Word that ABC News spiked a story on Jeffrey Epstein, left, shined a spotlight on chief anchor George Stephanopoulos' ties to former President Clinton.

However, what's really raising eyebrows is a 2010 report of a party Stephanopoulos attended that Epstein had hosted.

Page Six reported that the convicted pedophile held an event in honor of Prince Andrew, who was one of the high-profile figures implicated in the scandal, in his New York City townhouse, and on the guestlist were several members of the media, including Stephanopoulos.

[..]

Stephanopoulos is known to be highly influential inside ABC News, but a spokesperson told Fox News he had "no involvement" in Robach's interview.
Who else will be implicated as the Project Veritas exposes continue?


Bell

Coroner in Skripal-Sturgess case forced to announce new inquest hearing under threat of breaking law and lying to press

david ridley
Under threat of formal investigation for breaking the law and lying to the press, David Ridley (lead image), the English county coroner in charge of investigating the alleged Novichok poisoning death of Dawn Sturgess, has announced a new inquest hearing. This week through the coroner's office in Salisbury, a new date was confirmed: the next court session is scheduled to take place on February 18, 2020. Sturgess died on July 8, 2018.

Asked to explain his reason for another four months of delay, Ridley refused to say that fresh evidence in the case has been found, or is expected to be uncovered by continuing police investigation. Instead, he has asked the press spokesman for the Wiltshire County Council to claim on his behalf that there is "complex legal argument in respect of which the Senior Coroner needs to give appropriate and careful consideration to before handing down a written ruling".


Comment: In other words, he's stuck between a rock and a hard place, forced to produce something when he has nothing?


The coroner's silence signals that after fifteen months of investigation by one of the largest police, military and intelligence service operations in recent British forensic history, the allegation that there was a Russian chemical warfare attack in England last year cannot be substantiated in a court of law.

The story of British Government allegations that a Russian military intelligence service (GRU) operation with nerve agent Novichok was responsible for the poisoning death of Sturgess was last reported on October 14. This revealed that the county coroner in charge of the inquest into the cause of Sturgess's death was lying to the press in an attempt to postpone the inquest indefinitely.

That in turn was necessary because Ridley, Senior Coroner for Wiltshire and Swindon, appears to have concluded, but cannot acknowledge in court, that police evidence, if revealed on oath, would fall short of confirming that Novichok was the cause of death. The domino effect of this was also exposed: insufficient evidence and no ruling in the Sturgess case means insufficient evidence in the case of Sergei and Yulia Skripal, allegedly attacked by the same Russian assassins with the same Novichok, on March 4, 2018.

Target

Kiev mayor, ex-heavyweight champ Vitali Klitschko investigated over treason & embezzlement in Ukraine

Klitschko
© Reuters / Vasily FedosenkoVitali Klitschko at the Maidan rally in central Kiev in 2014.
He used to be judged by referees in the ring, but now his political activities may land Vitali Klitschko in front of an actual judge, as a criminal case on treason and embezzlement is launched against the Kiev mayor.

The National Anti-Corruption Bureau went after Klitschko and two of his deputies following complaints by the Ukrainian MPs who suspected the trio of abuse of power during the reconstruction of a bridge in the capital. They claimed that the city officials deliberately overstated the amount of funds used in the project.

The three-time world boxing champion was also accused of treason, using Kiev's budget to illegally enrich private individuals, unauthorized land grab and other wrongdoings.

The case against the mayor was launched amid months of fruitless attempts by the administration of Ukraine's new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, to remove him from office.

Rocket

New report from London think tank claims Iran has effective military advantage over US and their allies in Middle East

Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps
© AFPMembers of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps march during a military parade in Tehran.
A fresh in-depth study of Iran's military capabilities and balance of power in the embattled Middle East has assumed that regional wars are being waged on two layers - between states and in a so-called "grey zone", where no conventional force can counterbalance Iran's sovereign dominance.

As one of the most detailed assessments of Iran's military strategy suggests, the Islamic Republic's "third party capability" has becomes Tehran's most prominent weapon of choice.

The 16-month study by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) called Iran's Networks of Influence claims that the networks, including Shia militias fighting in what it says is a "grey zone", for instance, are something Iran heavily relies on, even to a greater extent than conventional military forces.

The network is said to be operating differently in most countries, having been designed by Tehran as a key means of countering regional instability and international pressure alike, with the policy "having consistently delivered Iran advantage without the cost or risk of direct confrontation with adversaries".

Although the report concedes that overall military balance is still in favour of the US and allies, the balance of effective forces has shifted towards Iran and is currently in the Islamic Republic's favour. The study goes on to claim that "Iran is fighting and winning wars 'fought amongst the people', not wars between states".

Comment: RFE/RL quotes one Iranian official's response to the report:
In response to the IISS study, titled Iran's Networks Of Influence In The Middle East, a spokesman for the Iranian Embassy in London told the BBC, "If the report means that Iran's role in its region should be respected, it is a welcome sign."

"The policy of ignoring Iran did not work. Iran resisted. Iran has also successfully controlled damages of U.S. economic terrorism," the Iranian Embassy spokesman said.

Iran "is a powerful nation and has a lot of relations with other nations with a lot of initiatives for regional cooperation," he added.
This is the real reason Iran is considered an enemy by the U.S. and Israel - because they are formidable. If Iran were weak, they wouldn't matter so much, but because they have successfully built up their military power, they are deemed a threat. Israel cannot practice absolute hegemony in the region, and the U.S. cannot control Iran and thus protect Israel. The only reason Hezbollah is considered a terrorist organization is because they are a threat to Israel. Iran's 'effective power' is also the reason why the U.S. has yet to attack them as they did Iraq - a war with Iran would not be a cakewalk.