Puppet MastersS

Sheriff

Best of the Web: Putin's epic annual conference fielding questions from the world's media

putin 2019 press
© Sputnik / Alexandr Vilf
Hundreds of Russian and foreign journalists are attending the annual 'big press conference' with President Vladimir Putin. RT is reporting live from the event.

08:11 GMT The press conference is expected to last anywhere from three to four hours, and will primarily focus on domestic policy, including specific issues of various Russian regions voiced by the media from those places. Foreign policy is usually given about a quarter of the time.

08:11 GMT The Russian president usually hosts the 'big press conference' in December, using the occasion to provide a year-end report on the state of the nation to the Russian people. This Thursday's event is the 15th for Putin.

09:07 GMT Putin's big presser begins.

Comment: Comment: RT provides more detail on some of the discussion above:
Russia only seeks to protect itself from foreign meddling - Putin on 'sovereign internet' & 'foreign agents' laws

During his major annual press conference, Putin was asked about two controversial laws regarding 'sovereign internet' and 'foreign agents' - which have been criticized as big steps towards having a closed society.

The legislation, commonly known as the 'Sovereign Internet Bill,' was adopted earlier this year and took effect on November 1. It envisions a system that would ensure the autonomous functioning of the Russian-language segment of the global web in case of a global internet shutdown. Critics of the law, however, expressed concern that the government might use it to impose strict control over the web, manipulating the flow of information and censoring online content.

"Free internet and sovereign internet are not mutually exclusive concepts. The law is aimed only to prevent negative consequence of being potentially cut off from the global web, which controls are located primarily abroad," Putin stated, dismissing allegations of conspiring to impose strict state control over the web.

The law, which introduced the mandatory designation of 'foreign agent', was initially focused on foreign-funded NGOs, but later its scope was expanded to media outlets. Organizations designated as 'foreign agents' are obliged to disclose their leadership architecture, their spending, as well as undergoing frequent audits. Late this year, the law was expanded again, now affecting private individuals, too.

The legislation still requires certain improvements, the Russian president said, warning against a "broad interpretation" of it, especially regarding private individuals, to not harm actual humanitarian work. The law was expanded to private individuals since foreign-funded organizations have been trying to circumvent the restrictions - they have started receiving money from locals, who, in turn, receive cash from abroad, Putin explained.

"If you get money from abroad to partake in domestic political activities - say so explicitly. He who pays the piper calls the tune, you know. And if you receive funding from abroad, there are strong reasons to believe you are taking orders from those who pay you."

Every nation seeks to protect itself from foreign meddling, and the legislation has been designed as a tool to minimize that influence, Putin said. Similar legislation exists in many countries, and the 'foreign agent' designation itself originated from the US, where it has been in active use since the late 1930s, he noted. Unlike in the US, however, the repercussions in Russia for not being registered as a foreign agent while acting as one are very mild - organizations and individuals are only subject to fines, Putin added, bringing up the case of Russian gun activist Maria Butina.

"[In the US] it affects private individuals as well. Our citizen Maria Butina is a private individual. Yet she was thrown behind bars without any reason. What kind of agent is she? She's nowhere near being one. But she was jailed, spent time behind bars - and was even threatened with a lengthy prison term."
On the US initiated arms race:
Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that a global arms race is inevitable if the US and Russia do not agree to extend the ten-year Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), which is due to expire in early 2021.

Speaking at a Q&A session with reporters in Moscow on Thursday, Putin said that Russia stands ready "to simply renew the existing New START agreement," even if it happens as fast as by the end of this year.

"They can send us the [agreement] tomorrow, or we can sign and send it to Washington. Let their designated official sign it too, including the president, if they're ready to do so."

"But so far our proposals have been left unanswered" by the US, Putin stressed.

"If the New START ceases to exist, nothing in the world will hold back an arms race. I believe this is bad."

Signed by the US and Russia in 2010, the treaty limits the development and deployment of nuclear weapons and their means of delivery.
On how dialogue is necessary dialogue between Kiev and the breakaway regions in Eastern Ukraine if they're to work towards peace:
Putin was asked about crisis resolution in Ukraine and the future of the Normandy Four talks between the leaders of Russia, Ukraine, France, and Germany. The president said that some progress has been made in resolving the crisis, but it is direct dialogue between the authorities in Kiev and the people of Ukraine living in the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics that could really help the cause. Yet, this is precisely what is lacking.

"A direct dialogue with Donbass is needed. Yet, there is no dialogue."

Any move related to the status of the rebellious eastern Ukrainian regions should be coordinated with those regions, Putin said, adding that Kiev should not unilaterally take decisions on any "decentralization" issues that go beyond the framework of the Minsk Agreements which still remain the only plausible way to resolve the Ukrainian crisis.

Some positive steps have been made, the president admitted, such as troop withdrawal from several areas in eastern Ukraine, and the extension of the law on the special status of Donbass. Some new areas along the line of contact were further designated for troop withdrawal in 2020, during the latest Normandy Four meeting.

Yet, it is not enough, Putin added, questioning in particular Kiev's reluctance to pull its forces out from the entire line of contact in Donbass. "It was Kiev that cut the Donbass off by imposing a blockade of this territory," Putin told the media conference.
On the issue of security cooperation with countries and of terrorists, as highlighted by the Chechen militant killed in Berlin:
"We see how such people [like this terrorist] are freely roaming the European capitals," Putin told reporters at a Q&A event in Moscow on Thursday.

"And what will happen if people who are currently sitting in [prison] camps [for terrorists in Syria] come to you? Would you like that? Would allow them to freely walk in your cities too?"

Putin said there should be comprehensive cooperation between Moscow and Western states on tackling extremists. He reminded everyone that Moscow alerted the US about Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev before the brothers bombed the Boston Marathon in 2013.

"We requested for them to be extradited [to Russia] and said they were dangerous. We were then simply ignored... And here you had criminals like that strolling through Berlin."
Putin denies there's a military alliance with China, although it is helping it develop defensive technologies, the US, however, is seeking to form a military block in Asia with Japan and South Korea:
"This system does not push a nation to any form of aggression but only helps it defend its territory."

Besides, such a development would not significantly affect the regional or global balance of power as China is capable of creating such a system on its own, Putin argued. Russia only helps to develop it faster.

While little is known about the early warning system developed for China, such complexes usually involve a network of ground-based radars and orbital satellites. The devices are used for long-range detection of missile launches, giving a nation's air defenses the maximum time to respond to a sudden strike. Since it takes a matter of minutes for a strategic missile to reach its target, such a system is a game-changer, significantly increasing the chances of repelling a massive - and in all likelihood, nuclear - strike.
Putin highlighted that Russia has surpassing the US and Canada to become the world's number 1 exporter of wheat and other agricultural produce:
"The Soviet Union was always buying grain, we were one of the largest buyers of grain, wheat. I would like to mention that today Russia is the largest supplier of wheat to the world market, we are number one," he said, adding: "We are ahead of the United States and Canada."

According to data published by the Russian Federal State Statistics Service on Thursday, grain harvest in Russia increased by 6.5 percent this year, up to 120.6 million tons in net weight. The production figure is better than that projected by the Russian Ministry of Agriculture.

Putin earlier said that Russia has ensured its independence on the global wheat market. According to the Russian president, enormous natural resources should serve as a guarantee for high-quality food production and should be used specifically to increase the production of organic, non-GMO food products.
On the 25% discount Russia is ready to offer Ukraine on natural gas:
"I think we will find an agreement with Ukraine on gas," he said during his press conference, adding "there's no desire to escalate this situation with energy."

According to the president, Russian gas transit through Ukraine will continue despite the construction of alternative pipelines because Moscow itself is interested in keeping the route.
On the issue of Ukraine and how the US should put its money where it's mouth is:
Putin's words come as the US Senate approved a $738 billion defense budget this week, which includes funds to "counteract Russia" in different spheres, as well as sanctions against the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline, and military assistance to Ukraine.

"They practically never give money - they only give guarantees for possible loans, and this is not real money. There is no real support, and the IMF, which is ruled by the US, requires that all discounts on energy resources, including gas, be canceled," said Putin. As a result, Ukraine's citizens will see more gas price hikes, he added.

"They accuse us of something in relation to Ukraine. They claim they want to help. But what do they want us to do? Help Ukraine replenish its budget at Russia's expense? Give them money yourself, give good loans at good rates for a long period," the Russian president suggested.
On how his hardest moments as President were Russia's terror attacks:
During Thursday's Q&A session in Moscow, reporters asked Putin what events affected him the most during his years in power. The president said that the "most difficult" moments for him personally were the two major terrorist attacks in Moscow and the city of Beslan in the North Ossetia region in southern Russia in the early 2000s.

"I will never forget it," Putin said.

The first tragedy occurred in October 2002, when Chechen militants took 916 people hostage in the Dubrovka Theater Center in Moscow. The standoff lasted for nearly four days, after which 130 people died and others were freed, as SWAT teams stormed the building and killed all the militants.

In 2004 in Beslan, terrorists took more than 1,000 students and teachers hostage in a school during celebrations of the beginning of the school year. More than 330 of them died during a three-day siege. All of the terrorists were killed, except for one attacker who was captured alive and sentenced to life in prison.

When asked about the brightest moments, Putin preferred to talk about the most important achievements, among which he stressed growing incomes.



Bullseye

EU citizens should worry about what Johnson left out of his second Queen's Speech

queen elizabeth
© Pool via REUTERS / Matt Dunham
Queen's Speeches are like London buses: there's none for years and then two turn up at once - and the comparison between October's speech and today's should worry EU citizens living in Britain.

A week after newly re-elected Tory Prime Minister Boris Johnson secured a Labour Party-destroying majority, he has drawn up and handed his revamped plans to the Queen to read out at the opening of (yet another) Parliament, as is the tradition. Quite an annoying tradition for her, because she only did this for Johnson a couple of months ago, and it's fair to say little progress has been made.

It's hard to know whether she finds the whole process dull or laborious, because the Queen reads like a well-bred automaton who's seeing the words for the first time. Presumably this is so she doesn't let slip any political leanings that may influence events. I think, however, we can safely assume she would vote Conservative.

Light Saber

Sen. McConnell rips Dem's impeachment effort: 'Most rushed, least thorough & most unfair' vote in history which sets 'toxic' precedent

Mitch McConnell
© REUTERS/Aaron P. BernsteinSenate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell addressed the House voting to impeach President Donald Trump from the Senate floor and said the effort is "rushed" and unlike any other in history.

Speaking from the Senate floor on Thursday morning, McConnell blasted the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump as "the most rushed, least thorough and most unfair" in American history.

House Dems were celebratory on Wednesday night after passing articles of impeachment against Trump. The charges are abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. McConnell said the standard for the charges are based on a "pandora's box of subjective political impeachment" and they set a "toxic" precedent.

Comment: And the circus rolls on. After the vote, Pelosi said the matter would not be sent immediately to the Senate. Trump shot back


He then pronounced Pelosi's move as political suicide march for the Democratic Party, with Steve Scalise weighing in:
Trump noted the difference as he fired back at Democrats at a campaign rally in Battle Creek, Michigan.

"We did not lose one Republican vote and three Democrats voted for us," he said. "The Republican Party has never been so affronted but they have never been so united as they are right now."
"Think of it, three Democrats went over to our side, no Republicans - it's unheard of."
Taking aim at the impeachment saga itself, Trump did not mince words, calling it "illegal, unconstitutional and partisan," and predicting it would spell the end of the Democratic Party since Democrats "have branded themselves with an eternal mark of shame."
"The do-nothing Democrats are declaring their deep hatred and disdain for the American voter. This lawless partisan impeachment is a political suicide march for the Democratic Party"

Still, there were some voices of sanity to be heard if you tried hard enough. Tulsi Gabbard distinguished herself by refusing to participate in the hysterics and garnered some support for doing so:
Voting "present" instead of "yes" or "no" in Wednesday's full House vote for two impeachment articles passed in committee last week, Gabbard became one of only a tiny minority of Democrats to swim against the current in her own party.

"I could not in good conscience vote for impeachment because removal of a sitting President must not be the culmination of a partisan process, fueled by tribal animosities that have so gravely divided our country," Gabbard said in a lengthy statement after the vote.



While the sanest of the sane, Russian president Vladimir Putin called out the lunacy for what it was:
"This is just political infighting. A party that lost the elections, the Democrats, now seeks to achieve its goals with some other means. They first accused Trump of colluding with Russia but later it turned out that there was no collusion and it could not be used as a reason to impeach him, so they came up with accusations related to some alleged pressure he exerted on Ukraine..."




Dollar

Edward Snowden must give government money from book because ex-intelligence contractor didn't get approval first, judge says

Edward Snowden
© MSNBCEdward Snowden in Moscow speaking with Brian Williams on Sept. 16, 2019.
Edward Snowden, the former intelligence contractor whose disclosures about highly secret U.S. surveillance programs rocked the nation's espionage agencies, must pay the federal government proceeds from his new book because he failed to first get approval for that book's contents as required by employment contracts, a judge has ruled.

The decision by Judge Liam O'Grady in U.S. District Court in Eastern Virginia did not detail how much Snowden should have to pay the U.S. government in connection with his book "Permanent Record."

That amount likely will be decided later by O'Grady.

The judge's ruling Tuesday came in response to a request by the government to grant summary judgment in a lawsuit against Snowden for violating the terms of secrecy agreements he signed while working at the Central Intelligence Agency as an employee and contractor, and at the National Security Agency as a contractor.

The Justice Department is seeking to recover "all proceeds earned by Snowden," it has previously said.

In a tweet on Thursday, Snowden wrote, "The government may steal a dollar, but it cannot erase the idea that earned it."

"I wrote this book, Permanent Record, for you, and I hope the government's ruthless desperation to prevent its publication only inspires you read it โ€” and then gift it to another."

Bad Guys

The Saker: An autopsy of the Minsk Agreements

Macron Merkel Zelensky Putin normandy four Ukraine
© REUTERS/Benoit Tessier; AFP / Nicholas Kamm; AFP / Gints Ivuskans; Sputnik / Sergey Mamontov(L-R) Emmanuel Macron, Volodymyr Zelensky, Angela Merkel, Vladimir Putin
The recent Paris summit and the few days following the summit have brought a lot of clarity about the future of the Minsk Agreements. Short version: Kiev has officially rejected them (by rejecting both the sequence of steps and several crucial steps). For those interested, let's look a little further.

First, what just happened

First, here are the key excerpts from the Paris Conference and from statements made by "Ze" and his superior, Arsen Avakov right after their return to Kiev:

Star of David

Latest leak of Trump's 'deal of the century' annexes settlements to Israel, cynically establishes 'New Palestine'

Dome of the Rock
© AP Photo / Lefteris Pitarakis / FileThe Dome of the Rock Mosque at the Al Aqsa Mosque compound, know by the Jews as the Temple Mount, is seen from the Mount of Olives in east Jerusalem.
Lebanon's Al Mayadeen TV published details on Monday from a reportedly leaked draft of the Trump administration's Middle East peace plan, or deal of the century, marking a second time this year unconfirmed documents have revealed plans to establish a demilitarized state of "New Palestine" alongside Israel.

The draft allegedly contains a series of clauses describing a trilateral agreement between Israel, the PLO and Hamas, which would constitute a departure from the U.S.'s longstanding position of refusing to negotiate directly with Hamas, the Islamic group governing the Gaza Strip.

According to the report, the state of New Palestine will exist in the West Bank and Gaza, connected via a raised highway constructed 30 meters off the ground. All Israeli settlement blocs would be annexed to Israel, signaling consistency with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's statement last month that "The establishment of Israeli civilian settlements in the West Bank is not per se inconsistent with international law."

Comment: A state that cannot defend itself is not a state. Isn't that what Israel has trumpeted from the beginning. Yet Israel and the U.S. expect Palestine to kneel and gratefully accept the 'deal of the century'.


Bullseye

Nancy Pelosi's stomach-turning impeachment charade damages America

pelosi
It is said there are two things you should never watch being made: sausage and government budgets.

Now we can add impeachment to the list of stomach-turning sights to avoid.

The arcane rules, phony cordiality and debates over the second sentence in paragraph G of Point Six were bad enough, but the nausea meter hit the roof when Nancy Pelosi took the microphone. Wearing a funereal black dress, she stood next to a cardboard American flag and recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

I would have counted her more honest if she had pledged her allegiance to a Democratic donkey.

As the leader of a party that has marinated its mind in unadulterated hatred of President Trump, Pelosi bears unique responsibility for this calamity. She could have stopped it.

Red Flag

Praise a Nazi: Ukraine President Zelensky's adulation of footballer Zozulya is backwards step in fight against fascism

zelensky
© Sergei SUPINSKY / AFP (main); trecebarras_ Instagram (inset)
How times have changed from when people would pontificate over the ethics of 'punch a Nazi' practices. Now Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky wants to "shake the hand" of far-right linked "patriot" footballer Roman Zozulya.

It seems hostilities towards an ideology that shunted the world backwards by decades, adopted to ensure a repeat will never occur, have not only thawed but melted into warm, fuzzy greetings.

Zelensky hailed Ukraine international footballer Zozulya "a patriot" after Spanish fans showered the Albacete midfielder with chants of "You f*cking Nazi!" during a Segunda Division match away to Rayo Vallecano at the weekend, which forced its abandonment.

After the unsavory event, Zelensky took to Facebook to voice his support of the 33-times Ukraine-capped Zozulya.

Light Saber

Assange lawyer says UK-US treaty prohibits extradition of WikiLeaks publisher

Assange protest support
© REUTERS / Hannah McKa
Attorneys for Julian Assange will fight a U.S. extradition request by reasoning it should be blocked under a bilateral treaty, a lawyer for the WikiLeaks publisher said Thursday.

Defense lawyer Edward Fitzgerald said during a hearing held at London's Westminster Magistrates' Court that Mr. Assange's legal team will argue that a treaty in place between the U.K. and U.S. prohibits individuals from being extradited from one nation to the other for political offenses, multiple British media outlets reported.

"We say that there is in the treaty a ban on being extradited for a political offense and these offenses as framed and in substance are political offenses," Mr. Fitzgerald told the court, according to Reuters.

Comment:


Snakes in Suits

Bojo will finally pass Brexit but EU divorce is far from 'done', no deal still possible

Johnson
© Jessica Taylor / AFPBritain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaking in the House of Commons during the first sitting of Parliament since the election on Tuesday.
It was repeated like a mantra throughout the election campaign. Prime Minister Boris Johnson really, really wanted voters to know he was going to "get Brexit done."

This promise helped propel his Conservative Party last week to its most emphatic election victory in three decades.

It means Johnson looks certain to finally pass a Brexit deal in Parliament on Friday after years of political deadlock, a huge symbolic moment that will ensure Britain leaves the European Union next month.

So Brexit will be "done," right?

The most likely answer is no.

Comment: LOL!

No one knows what leaving the EU looks like much less feels like in tangible terms, yet it's the only thing Jack here 'knows' is going to happen!

The whole thing is one big nothing-burger.

See also: The story of the UK general election is not Brexit, it's the coming break up of Britain