Puppet MastersS


Heart

Trump: 'I Decided Not to Kill A Lot of Iranians...I Like Iranians So Much'

IranFlagTrump
© Real IranUS President Donald Trump
In response to a direct question -- "Are we going to have a war with Iran, Mr. President?" -- Donald Trump said he hopes not:

"Well, I hope we don't, but we're in a very strong position if something should happen, we're in a very strong position," President Trump told the Fox Business Channel's Maria Bartiromo on Wednesday.

"It wouldn't last very long, I can tell you that. It would not last very long. And I'm not talking boots on the ground. I'm not talking we're going to send a million soldiers. I'm just saying if something would happen, wouldn't last very long.


Comment: That's debatable. Iran's policy at the moment is to retaliate upon launch of an attack on Iran. That means the instant they detect American missiles headed their way, they will launch attacks on American targets (among others) in the region. And even if the Americans are able to take out a majority of Iranian weapons systems, the war will likely spread, for example, to Israel. See: Russia reinforces Iranian air defense, mobilizes advisers for support


Trump said he's been "very nice" to the Iranians:

"They shot down our drone, I decided not to kill a lot of Iranians. I know a lot of Iranians. I like Iranians so much. And that plays into the decision, too. They're human beings. They're people. I didn't want to kill 150 people when they shot down an unmanned drone, so I didn't do that."

Comment: The Trump-Bolton strategy isn't working, and it won't work. Sanctions and threats will not help. And the U.S. hasn't proven itself trustworthy in negotiations. So Khamenei is justified in saying the following:

And the U.S. can't count on a coalition of willing allies as they did when they invaded Iraq. For instance:
"We do not want our territory to be a staging post for any hostile action against any of our neighbors, including Iran," Iraq's President Barham Salih told CNN, noting that there is no agreement between Baghdad and Washington that could make Donald Trump think he can use it as such.



TV

First Democratic primary debate: Trump calls it "boring," Tulsi Gabbard steals the show

first Democratic debate
© Reuters / Mike Segar
The first Democratic debate saw 10 largely-interchangeable candidates square off to trade platitudes in a free-for-all plagued with technical difficulties, mysterious shifts into Spanish, and belligerent posturing.

President Donald Trump didn't seem too worried about being unseated in 2020 by any of the ten candidates duking it out on the first night of the Democratic primary debates in Miami, leveling a characteristically acerbic tweet in lieu of detailed analysis. Others declared him the winner of the debate.

Republican senator Lindsey Graham gave a sarcastic thanks to NBC for the technical difficulties that forced the station to go to a commercial early, and even the left-leaning Daily Show poked fun at the forgettable showing of a large chunk of the candidates, showing them turning into, well, a large chunk. Of mayonnaise.

Comment: It seems that in a sea of npc mediocrity, it was very easy for Tulsi Gabbard to shine. Google, the social networks and the mainstream media will now have to go into overdrive to suppress Gabbard's visibility and message - because its obvious none of the other political hacks even come close to her. And we can't have an actual thinking leader that's against US wars of aggression in the White House now, can we!!

Some more on Gabbard's successful debate appearance. First this from Ryan Dawson:
Watching the Democrat debate/take turn interview, makes it clear why they lose. Everyone there played up a demographic niche and there were no real people. The first words out of some their mouths were qualifiers based on the "as-a" complex. It was rehearsed as heck. Trump will eat these disconnected robot people. There was one exception and that was Tulsi Gabbard. She was the only one who did any real debating. She was the only one to challenge a position that is promoted by the majority of both parties. She was the only one to outline an issue that is actually up to the president, foreign policy.

The rest of them were giving high sounding platitudes about healthcare and the environment, things that are up to the legislative branch where many of them already are and yet have done nothing about. The president does not dictate education or healthcare. The president does however act as Commander and Chief and can decide to waste trillions of dollars on military misadventures, something Democrats and Republicans are both guilty of supporting. Regardless of what domestic issues are of concern, the bottom line in the bottom line. How are you going to pay for them? You can either increase taxes, lower costs, or reduce spending. Ending the warfare for welfare state would both reduce spending and lower costs. No one but Tulsi suggested this. All anyone else had to say was horrible rhetoric about carbon taxes, and costly regulations, something the public can not stomach or stand for or afford. Dear Democrats, Stop Punishing the Working Class or you will lose again.

Tulsi sticks it to the chicken-hawk neocons


Tulsi explains basics of Afghanistan to a nobody loser. This reminded me of Ron Paul putting John McCain in his place.


Not surprisingly, the cast of MSNBC hipsters, comprised of Miss Russiagate conspiracy theorist Rachel Maddow, self righteous Chuck Todd and the jabronis, did not see it fit to ask about Internet censorship even right after Google was exposed in an undercover investigation of aiming to hack the elections. This is something mad dog Maddow accused the Russians of doing basically daily for the past couple years. It is very telling of the MSM that they simply ignored this huge story and threat to democracy.
The Drudge Report further showed that Gabbard had, of all the candidates, made the most favorable impression:
The Drudge Report political website posted a surprising instant poll showing that its visitors believed Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii was the overwhelming victor of the first Democratic presidential debate, polling at almost 35% with 12,314 votes.

Her closest competitor was Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who was polling at just under 13.5% and 4,791 votes. Julián Castro of Texas and Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey were polling the lowest with less than 5% each.

Drudge poll
Tulsi Gabbard also won the Washington Examiner poll. by a strikingly similar margin - 34.15% for the Hawaii congresswoman and 23.06% for Warren.
Tulsi Gabbard also won the Washington Examiner poll. by a strikingly similar margin - 34.15% for the Hawaii congresswoman and 23.06% for Warren.
Although unscientific, the two polls indicated that the Hawaii congresswoman, 38, who had attracted attention for her silver-streaked hair and denunciation of President Trump's "chicken hawk cabinet" had made a major impact on the nine-candidate stage.

An Iraq war veteran, she served in the Hawaii Army National Guard and was also deployed to Kuwait from 2008-2009. In her January 2019 campaign kickoff, Gabbard promised to end regime change wars and to only authorize war on direct enemies of the United States. In the debate, she promised to end America's wars, saying: "This insanity must end."

Gabbard's most famous international foray was to Syria in 2017. In Damascus for a "fact-finding" mission," she met Syrian dictator Bashar Assad, who stood accused of using chemical weapons against his own people during the country's civil war, killing hundreds.

In April 2017, she said she was "skeptical" the Assad regime was behind the attack and called for an investigation after the U.S. launched a missile strike in response. "Assad is not the enemy of the United States because Syria does not pose a direct threat to the United States," she said.

The second-youngest of the 25 candidates in the Democratic race, she is married to Abraham Williams, a cinematographer and surfer who is seven years her junior. She was previously married to Eduardo Tamayo, her childhood sweetheart, divorcing in 2006 after four years of wedlock.



Quenelle

Iran says US like farting lion in Persian fable, warns Arab countries facilitating US attacks

iran drone
STRIKE: Iran claims this is the drone it shot down with a missile
Iran has summoned the United Arab Emirates' chargé d'affaires in Tehran to protest that the UAE allowed the US to use its Al-Dhafra base in UAE to launch the Global Hawk surveillance drone (worth some $130 million) that was downed on the 20thof June by the Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps' (IRGC) air defence missile system. The Iranian message was clear: this is not a diplomatic gesture and complaint but a straight warning that any country hosting a US military base which allows a hostile military action against Iran will be considered under attack, along with the US base it is accommodating.

Iran is informing Arab countries that any US attack starting from any neighbouring or Middle Eastern country will be considered an act of war by the country itself, in the words of a high ranking IRGC officer. The IRGC - recently designated a terrorist organisation by the US State Department - is the force in charge of protecting the Strait of Hormuz, and is coordinating on a varying scale with the regular Army intending to stand against the US in case of war.

Comment: See also:


Light Sabers

Online war between liberals and conservatives in US obscures real threat of government censorship

facebook
© REUTERS/Akhtar Soomro
With sudden suspensions and hasty banning sprees, social media giants are censoring more than ever. High-profile spats between liberals and conservatives often grab the spotlight - but that's the tip of the censorship iceberg.

Liberal rage mobs calling for provocative conservatives to be "cancelled" or "deplatformed" are loud - and they attract plenty of attention both on social media and across centrist and liberal-leaning mainstream media.

The simultaneous banishment of right-wing agitator Alex Jones from major platforms last year was a litmus test; a way to gauge whether such bans would be palatable to the mainstream. When few raised their voices to object, the corporations had their answer: It was going to be easy to push out similar voices - and they could probably even start to widen the net.

When Vox journalist Carlos Maza insisted that conservative YouTube host Steven Crowder be banned for using homophobic slurs against him, it made headlines. In their haste to comply with this and other demands from the outrage police, platforms have been concocting new 'rules' and 'guidelines' on the fly. The result has been that even the most innocuous accounts have found themselves caught up in the maelstrom. Incredibly, history teachers even had their YouTube channels suspended for "hate speech" because they published resources for students to learn about Nazi Germany.

Comment: See also:


Newspaper

US Air Force veteran released from captivity in Libya - Amidst accusations of being a militant mercenery

Khalifa Haftar
Libyan Strongman Khalifa Haftar salutes during a military parade in the eastern city of Benghazi on May 7, 2018.
US Air Force veteran Jamie Sponaugle was released from captivity in Libya this week where he has been held since early May by the Libyan National Army on accusations of being a mercenary, according to US government officials and a source familiar with the matter.

Sponaugle was freed after being held captive for weeks by forces loyal to renegade Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar, commander of the Libyan National Army, which in April began an offensive to seize the Libyan capital of Tripoli from the United Nations-backed Government of National Accord (GNA).

While the State Department claims that US policy of supporting the GNA remains enact, President Donald Trump's praise for Haftar earlier this year signaled a departure from previous administration statements condemning the rogue Libyan general's march on the capital.

Comment: See also: And for insight into the current situation in Libya, check out SOTT radio's: NewsReal: Interview With The Moriartys - New Light on Benghazi, And Liberating Libya


Heart - Black

Russian Orthodox Church seeks ban on free abortions, embryo experimentation, genetic screening

abortion Moscow
© Global Look Press / Komsomolskaya PravdaFILE PHOTO: A rally against abortion is held in Moscow on November 15, 2016.
The right to life should be guaranteed for embryos, the Russian Orthodox Church has said as it presented a document which calls for abortions and scientific experiments on human embryos to be banned.

"An embryo is a human being, who therefore has certain rights that should be protected," the paper, rolled out for public discussion, states. The document specifically lists the right to life, human identity, and personal developments as indispensable to any unborn child from the moment of conception.

The Orthodox Church has asked the Russian government to grant doctors a right to refuse to perform an abortion on grounds of conscience. It also called for a ban on any experiments on human embryos and freezing them.

Comment: The other issues are debatable, although, for most cases, highly unnecessary. Regarding abortion, it seems a reasonable approach has already been addressed by Russia's Deputy Health Minister:
"We won't solve the problem with restrictive measures, but only make it worse," Deputy Health Minister Tatyana Yakovleva said, adding that she was a pediatrician herself and knew the issue from the inside.

Making abortions illegal "will only lead to increased maternal and infant mortality as well as criminalization of the situation. No way!" she warned the guests of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF).

Besides, the Russian state has already successfully managed to bring the abortion rate down through consulting and supporting women, Yakovleva pointed out. According to her stats, 582,000 such operations, not caused by medical grounds, were performed in the country in 2013, while last year the number of abortions requested by females only stood at 294,450.

The trend reveals that women in Russia are themselves trying to avoid having an abortion if it's possible, she said.
See also: Also check out SOTT radio's: Objective: Health - Law or Flaw? Let's Talk About Abortion


Black Cat

'Unmasker in Chief' Samantha Power spewed anti-Trump bias in government emails

samantha powers_obama
Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power may share an unflattering stage with a text-loving FBI agent and his Donald Trump-hating paramour from the bureau.

Fired agent Peter Strzok and ex-FBI lawyer Lisa Page are infamous today for texting on FBI phones their anti-Trump sentiments while allegedly having an affair. They played key roles in the now-debunked Russia collusion investigation.

It turns out that Power - the diplomat whose authority inexplicably was used to unmask hundreds of Americans' names in secret intelligence reports during the 2016 election - engaged in similar Trump-bashing on her official government email, according to documents unearthed by an American Center for Law and Justice lawsuit. The conservative legal group is run by Trump defense attorney Jay Sekulow.

The discovery could add a new dimension - a question of political bias - to a long-running congressional investigation into why Power's authority was used to unmask hundreds of Americans' names in secret National Security Agency intercepts during the 2016 election. That practice of unmasking continues to grow today.

Post-It Note

Iran: Message sent - message delivered

rouhani trump
It is clear that Iran is sending the U.S. a stern message. And that message is we can hurt you asymmetrically as much as you hurt us.

Over the weekend Iran's leadership made it clear there was no mistake in their actions last week. They purposefully shot down one of our most advanced drones to send the U.S. a very clear warning.

'Our capabilities far exceed your tolerance for withstanding them.'

The more we learn about this incident the more the initial story concocted by the U.S. looks specious. Drone in international airspace? Most likely not.

Trump said someone made a mistake? No, completely deliberate.

The drone that was shot down, an RQ-4A Global Hawk, was the cream of our surveillance drones. It was flying in tandem with an anti-submarine Poseidon P-8 spy plane, which, according to Elijah Magnier was carrying far more than its normal crew of 9.

Try 38.

That was not reported at first either in the initial flush for war. Iran then revealed just how loose with the truth the U.S. turned out to be and that forced a complete rethink of the situation.

Rocket

The Indian-Turkish embrace of Russia's S-400 is a punch to the gut of US "Full Spectrum Dominance"

Russia’s advanced S-400 defense system
India and Turkey's recent embrace of Russia's advanced S-400 defense system represents a major turning point in the international battle now underway between two opposing paradigms of global affairs.

Both nations are standing up to immense pressure by an Anglo American empire which has been working desperately since 2007 to build a vast military infrastructure around Russia under the utopian doctrine of "Full Spectrum Dominance" (aka: the belief that a nuclear war can be won with a first strike monopoly). This missile shield began to target China and Russia's South Pacific flank in 2011 when Obama unveiled the military branch of the anti-Chinese "Pivot to Asia" (1).

The S400 Solution to Full Spectrum Dominance

However if nations like India, and Turkey who were meant to be participants of the encirclement of Russia and China were to adopt next generation defensive radar/missile systems like Russia's S400, then the entire formula for unipolar dominance breaks down. Already, China has adopted the S400 as of 2015 which features short to long range supersonic interception of missiles, aircraft and bombs at altitudes of 38 km and at distances of 400 km. Other nations which have expressed interest in the S400 include Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Algeria, Morocco and Vietnam.

The rise of the S400 and the new security architecture which comes with it has come to be known as "Full Spectrum Defense" and is one of the most important transformations of the world order. When considered in tandem with the globally extended Belt and Road Initiative (which is tightly integrated with the Eurasian Economic Union and Shanghai Cooperation Organization), represents the greatest hope for mankind currently available.

Snakes in Suits

Mueller agrees to publicly testify before Nadler and Schiff led committees

mueller
© Reuters/Jim BourgSpecial counsel Robert Mueller: accused of "scorched earth" methods and "Gestapo tactics."
Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller will testify before open House committee hearings on July 17 following issuance of a subpoena compelling his appearance, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee announced Tuesday night. (UPDATE at end: each committee will hear from Mueller separately the same day.)

"I am pleased to announce that @HouseJudiciary and House Intel will have Special Counsel Robert Mueller testify in open session on July 17, pursuant to a subpoena issued this evening. We look forward to having Mr. Mueller testify, as do all Americans."