OF THE
TIMES
The UN rapporteur on torture has written a scalding op-ed in support of Julian Assange, in which he says the publisher was the victim of a smear campaign. Now he claims many leading MSM outlets are snubbing the piece.
[...]
The piece ends with a list of the media's 'big guns', which Melzer says were offered the op-ed to publish but wouldn't. The list includes the Guardian, the Times, the Financial Times, the Telegraph, the Washington Post, and Reuters. The text was subsequently published on Medium, a blogging website.
Holding governments accountable by exposing their misdeeds is the job of the free press, to which those listed by Melzer supposedly belong. Some observers also note that maintaining silence on Assange's case amounts to complicity in the wrongdoings against him.
The case against Assange was aimed not only at keeping him at bay, but also at "shutting down dissent," renowned journalist John Pilger recently said.It's mainly about shutting down investigative journalism.
Blatantly threatening to launch a nuclear war against another country is not only illegal under international law, Iranian FM explained, but proves that President Trump does not think through the ramifications of his rhetoric.And this from Twitter:
"There is a United Nations charter, and threat of wars is illegal," Javad Zarif told CNN paraphrasing Article 2.4 of the UN Charter, a day after President Trump spoke menacingly about "obliterating" Iran if the Islamic Republic endangers "anything American." "That statement indicates that US intentions are certainly illegal. The United States is not in a position to obliterate Iran, they do not have the capability other than using prohibited weapons to do this."
Reminding the American commander-in-chief "that we don't live in the 18th century," Zarif suggested Trump to hire new advisers, people who can fully understand the Iranian position and who can offer viable solutions to the crisis. Trump receives "wrong information, wrong analysis, and now President Trump finds himself in a situation where he believes that he needs to get out," Zarif said.
New Delhi will have nothing but its own interests in mind, when following on the deal to purchase S-400 air defense missile systems from Moscow, the deal the US is strongly opposed to. [India's FM] Subrahmanyam Jaishankar made his comments while responding to a question about the S-400 at a presser with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during his visit to New Delhi. "We have relationships with several countries, many of which are of some standing. They have a history. We will do what is in our national interest."
Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Vladimir Putin signed the $5 billion defense contract in October. US officials tried to dissuade India from acquiring the state-of-the-art Russian missile defense systems, warning that buying weapons from Moscow can impact future arms deals with Washington. The Pentagon also promised to offer India "potential alternatives" to the S-400s.
Pompeo, for his part, hailed US-India relations, adding that "great friends are bound to have differences."
Comment: If the leftist media was scared of Trump, portraying him as an out-of-control buffoon, they must be absolutely terrified of an intelligent, no-nonsense candidate like Tulsi Gabbard. All the stops will be pulled out in an effort to derail her campaign