Iraq's Joint Operations Command said on Tuesday that the three missiles, which landed near the US embassy in the so-called green zone overnight, had been launched from the southeastern Baghdad district of Al-Zafraniya.

"The Baghdad Operations Command found rocket launching sites in the Al-Zafraniya district," the military said.

Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi ordered to start an investigation into the incident.

• Iraqi lawmakers approve bill to expel US forces from country - UPDATES: US has NO plans to leave
• Ron Paul: The Iraqi people have spoken, time for US to move out
• Iraqi lawmakers demand US withdrawal from their country - a violation of their sovereignty
• US, Iraqi military resume joint operations, ignore parliament's call to expel US troops
• Iraqi popular military warns US: Will target your forces if you don't leave after anti-ISIL operations

• Julian Assange's lawyers were placed under surveillance. But that's not the whole story
• Assange's lawyer: WikiLeaks co-founder was subjected to espionage & extortion
• El Pais publishes tape transcripts of Spaniards' attempt to extort Julian Assange: "This material is worth €3m"
• Outrageous: UK court blocks Spanish judge from questioning Julian Assange as a witness over spying allegations
• 'Absolutely unaware': Assange testifies in trial of Spanish company that spied on WikiLeaks founder inside embassy
• Assange was sold for $4.2 BILLION - Former Ecuadorian President confirms IMF loan in exchange for Assange

Talking heads in the media and Hollywood tried to paint the pro-Second Amendment supporters in Richmond, Virginia as racist or potentially violent, creating a much gloomier image than the one that transpired in reality.

CNN said ahead of the rally that the FBI was working with law enforcement to prepare for "threats of violence." They later had to report that the event ended "peacefully." One video even showed protesters cleaning up after themselves as the rally came to a close.

We have long maintained that the alleged chemical attack in Douma, Syria, on April 7 2018 was faked by Jihadists shortly before they were evicted from that Damascus suburb.

By the end of last year leaked documents and a whistle blower from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) had proven that the OPCW managers had manipulated the report their staff had written about the incident. The OPCW inspectors who had investigated the case on the ground in Douma found that there was evidence that a chemical attack had happened. The murdered people seem in videos from the alleged attack must have died of other causes. The yellow canisters found at the locations of the alleged attack were not dropped from helicopters but clearly manually placed.

Using the Arria-formula, a procedure to have witnesses testify to the UN Security Council, Russia and China invited other UN members to listen to the testimony of OPCW inspector Ian Henderson. He denounced the false final report the OPCW management had published. Henderson, a South African engineer, was a team leader at the OPCW where he had worked for more than twelve years.

Henderson's testimony can be watched here. Transcript here.

[...]

In his closing remarks at the UNSC Russia's Permanent Representative at the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, said:

Today's discussions reveal one thing clearly - that something fishy is cooking in the OPCW. When we point at it, our colleagues tell us every time that OPCW, the 2013 Nobel peace prize laureate, is the gold standard of professionalism, integrity and impartiality. We would like it to be such and we adopted a PRST in November 2019 exactly aiming at this. Unfortunately, the impartiality and integrity of the OPCW TS is seriously questioned, and not just by us and other member states, as today's presentation demonstrated. Members of the "Courage Foundation" can hardly be labeled as "Russian agents". They are reputable personalities and include such figures as Jose Bustani, first OPCW DG, respectable members of academic community, former senior officials of the US and UK intelligence community, and such names as Noam Chomsky and Oliver Stone to name a few. (You were provided with a copy of their letter and related materials).

Why do some of our colleagues so vehemently defend the reports by the OPCW FFM, which some are believed were fabricated? Because any seed of doubt about chemical episodes conclusions would lead to challenging the expediency and legitimacy of already illegitimate missile attacks against a sovereign UN member state. In that light the Douma incident plays a key role. Because if it transpires that the FFM report was made up, it would lead to questioning earlier episodes like Khan-Shaykhun and others, which resulted in the termination of [Joint Investigation Mechanism].
...
Our colleague from Viet Nam asked what to do next, what are the nest steps. I think that this issue must be discussed at the OPCW. Legitimate questions and issues that member states face should be addressed and discussed. The question why the first report of the OPCW FFM was shelled initially, and then disappeared and destroyed should be answered. So far we are denied - we and other member states - are denied such an opportunity.

Videos from Douma at the time of the incident showed some 30 bodies of dead persons. Most were children. It is up to day unknown who they were and who had murdered them. The OPCW manipulation of the original reports of its inspectors' findings is a cover up for that huge crime.

• Newsweek gags journalist who commented on MSM silence of OPCW Douma scandal
• 'Pack of lies' on behalf of Al-Qaeda: Security experts rip into 'Douma chemical attack' probe after latest OPCW leak
• Senior OPCW official ordered deletion of 'all traces' of dissenting report on 'Douma chemical attack' - WikiLeaks' new leak
• Wikileaks provides further evidence of OPCW Douma cover up
• Newsweek trusts Bellingcat more than Reuters - journalist who quit over 'suppressed' OPCW story to RT
• Newly leaked evidence OPCW suppressed, altered findings on Douma 'chem attack'