Puppet MastersS


Airplane

Critics slam Biden over report he is considering travel restrictions against Florida, other states

biden
© Michael Reynolds/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Critics slammed Democrat President Joe Biden on Wednesday over a report that his administration is considering implementing domestic travel restrictions on Florida, calling it politically motivated.

While most of the reporting on the measures that the Biden administration is considering appeared to be primarily focused on Florida, they also mentioned California to a slightly lesser extent, undercutting the narrative that the move would be political in nature.

"Outbreaks of the new variants — including a highly contagious one first identified in the United Kingdom, as well as others from South Africa and Brazil that scientists worry can evade existing vaccines — have lent urgency to a review of potential travel restrictions within the United States," the Associated Press reported Wednesday. "The U.K. variant, known as B.1.1.7, has recently exploded in Florida, where over a third of all cases in the United States have been identified."

"While COVID-19 cases in Florida have declined in recent weeks, the U.K. variant has spread rapidly in the state during that time," the report later added. "It now accounts for up to 15% of new cases in Florida, according to estimates from a team of researchers modeling the variant's growth across the country — up from about 1% at the beginning of January."

The CDC says that the U.K. variant of the coronavirus "spreads more easily and quickly than other variants" and that experts in the U.K. think that it could be more deadly than other variants, but there needed to be additional studies to confirm whether that was true. For context, British officials have claimed that there are estimated to be up to 4,000 variants of the coronavirus around the world.

Newspaper

Putin tells private meeting France's Macron refused to send Russia Navalny medical analysis - report

navalny
© Instagram / navalny
Russian President Vladimir Putin has revealed that the Kremlin asked Paris for evidence that opposition figure Alexey Navalny was poisoned, but French President Emmanuel Macron refused to provide it.

That's according to Alexey Venediktov, the head of radio station Ekho Moskvy, who was present at a private meeting between Putin and editors-in-chief of Russian news outlets on Wednesday.

Writing on his Telegram channel, Venediktov revealed that Putin explained how Russian doctors did not find any traces of toxic substances in Navalny's body. Putin also noted that Macron refused to send the French analysis to Moscow, wouldn't allow Russian doctors to go to France to conduct tests, and rejected proposals to send French specialists to Moscow with the results.

Comment: What has France got to hide?


Sherlock

Iranian nuclear physicist was killed by Israeli AND Iranian spies with satellite controlled gun claims The Jewish Chronicle

Fakhrizadeh
© Wikipedia / Tasnim News AgencyPhysicist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh
The assassination of Iranian nuclear physicist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh November 2020 was a devastating blow for the Islamic republic's sphere of atom science. While no entity has taken responsibility for the crime, it has been widely attributed to Israel in recent reports.

The high tech weapon that killed ranking Iranian nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh was brought into the country by Mossad (Tel Aviv's version of the CIA), The Jewish Chronicle (TJC) reported on Wednesday, citing unnamed intelligence sources. The newspaper "confirmed" that "the hit was carried out by Mossad, Israel's feared intelligence service."

According to the news outlet, a group of more than 20 spies of Israeli and Iranian origin smuggled the weapon with a total weight of one ton, by small deconstructed pieces. The set-up for the killing reportedly took eight months of "painstaking surveillance" on the target by intelligence officers.

Comment: See also:


Bad Guys

NATO mouthpiece Stoltenberg tells Ukraine "door remains open" for membership - provoking Russia yet again

Stoltenberg
© NATO imageTuesday's joint press conference
During a Tuesday press conference the head of NATO, Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, issued some hugely provocative words aimed at Russia while standing beside Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal at a joint press conference in Brussels. It comes after Joe Biden has vowed a tougher response to alleged Russian 'interference' in the West's affairs.

Asked specifically to respond to claims that Russia is expanding military exercises and deployments abroad in order to "distract" from the Alexei Navalny saga and protests at home, Stoltenberg said, "What I will say is we have seen a significant Russian military buildup over the last years."

"We have seen a significant Russian buildup in the Black Sea, not least with the illegal annexation of Crimea, and also with more naval presence in the year," he added. Citing past years' conflicts and 'Russian aggression' in Ukraine and Georgie, Stoltenberg continued, "This is a military buildup very closely monitored and followed at NATO. It has triggered the largest and strongest reinforcement of NATO's collective defenses since the end of the Cold War."

Comment: Taken with Biden's recent and predictably stupid and inflammatory rhetoric, it looks very much like the US/NATO intends to stoke even more tension, and greater increase the potential for war with Russia:


Wall Street

Best of the Web: Who are the ultimate war profiteers? Wall Street, that's who

Wall Street

Comment: After reading the following one may be forgiven for wanting to add the word 'Financial' to the term "Military-Industrial-Complex" given the foundational way that Wall Street's "services" help prop up the very business of war.


While war corporations, or so-called "defense contractors," make billions in profits, Wall Street is the ultimate beneficiary of today's nonstop wars. The prosaic nature of war profiteering — far from the work of a shadowy cabal — is precisely why the collusion is so destructive and should be outlawed.

The U.S. ruling class deploys the military for three main reasons: (1) to forcibly open up countries to foreign investment, (2) to ensure the free flow of natural resources from the global south into the hands of multinational corporations, and (3) because war is profitable. The third of these reasons, the profitability of war, is often lacking detail in analyses of U.S. imperialism: The financial industry, including investment banks and private equity firms, is an insatiable force seeking profit via military activity.

The war industry is composed of corporations that sell goods and services to the U.S. government and allied capitalist regimes around the world. Investment banks and asset management firms hold most shares of every major public war corporation.
The best-known financial firms holding the stock of war corporations include: Vanguard Group, BlackRock, State Street, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Wellington Management.

Comment: Having no new wars over the past four years must have had many of these characters worried. It was time to help usher in a new leader - with new policies - that could be relied upon to massively increase the coffers.

See also:


Bomb

UN atomic watchdog says Iran has started producing Uranium metal in violation of 2015 accord

International Atomic Energy Agency head Rafael Grossi
© Ronald Zak (AP)International Atomic Energy Agency head Rafael Grossi
Iran has begun producing small amounts of uranium metal, the UN atomic watchdog said on February 10, in the latest breach of Tehran's 2015 deal with world powers as it seeks to ramp up pressure on U.S. President Joe Biden's new administration.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) head Rafael Grossi told member nations that inspectors had confirmed on February 8 that 3.6 grams of uranium metal had been produced at a nuclear facility in Isfahan.

Although the amount is small and not enriched, uranium metal could be used to form the core of a nuclear weapon.

Comment: In concert with Israel the Biden administration is seeking a justification to wage war on Iran. This is more or less a similar scenario as we have seen play out against Iraq previously.

The US may again use the IAEA's reports - this time against Iran - to aledge that Iran is producing nuclear weapons, or is near to producing one.

It looks very much like the rhetoric coming out of Washington points to using an old screenplay and creates the strong possibility for the attempted destruction of Iran, and the potential for massive loss of life.


Bad Guys

UK, US & Singapore push for vaccine passports and yearly Covid-19 vaccinations

border uk passport
© REUTERS/Luke MacGregor
UK Transport Secretary Grant Shapps has signalled that vaccine passports may be required for international travel in the future, while insisting that there are still no plans to roll out similar ID for domestic purposes.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4 on Wednesday, Shapps said that he has been consulting with his counterparts in Singapore and the United States, as well as a major aviation lobbying group, about the implementation of a globally recognised certification system to verify Covid-19 vaccinations status and test results.


Comment: No consultation of the British public who will be subjected to these decrees has or is likely to go ahead. Even if it violates their human right to freedom of movement.


"I imagine that in the future there will be an international system where countries will want to know that you have been potentially vaccinated or potentially had tests taken before flying," the transportation secretary told the BBC.

Comment: While the West prepares a dystopian future for its citizens, Russia is saying that soon enough none of these measures will be necessary because herd immunity will have been achieved and citizens should be free to go back to life as normal.

The Sun reports that the UK intends for these experimental coronvirus vaccines to become like the useless, albeit dangerous, flu vaccine. Note that the safety of these vaccines is still up for debate, Switzerland, as just one example, has banne d their use until more data is available:
"We should start to think about it as a flu jab, as something elderly or vulnerable people make sure they have every year.

"I have no doubt that the vaccines will get better and better at being able to cover for all variants."

Boris
© AFP or licensorsBoris said today the nation would have to get used to rolling vaccinations
He had earlier told MPs at Prime Minister's Questions: "We, I think we're going to have to get used to the idea of vaccinating and then revaccinated in the autumn, as we as we come to face these new variants."

At the weekend scientists and ministers warned a boost jab might be needed for people later this year to tackle the new variants which are spreading across the world.

The vaccines so far do have an affect on the new strains, according to early research, but some mild illness is still occurring in some studies.


In order to combat that, scientists are looking at tweaking their vaccines, ready for boosters later in the year if needed.

It comes after The Sun revealed last night just one Covid jab offers two-thirds protection against the virus, the first official data from the vaccine blitz reveals.

Findings — due out in days — will show the Pfizer vaccine starts to work in as little as two weeks and is equally effective in OAPs as younger adults.

The Oxford/AstraZeneca jab offers similar protection.


Europe has banned AstraZeneca's for OAPs and the vulnerable - what they claimed to be the target audience - because of safety concerns.


The good news — as Sir Michael Caine backed the jabs drive and the number vaccinated rose to 12.65million — raises hopes of an earlier exit from lockdown.


This contradicts the claims above that all need to be vaccinated before lockdown will be lifted.


The dose reduced the symptomatic infection risk by 65 per cent in younger adults, and 64 per cent in over-80s.

Experts found Brits given two shots of the jab saw protection rise to between 79 and 84 per cent, depending on age.


Russia's Sputnik V is 91% effective after one dose and this has been confirmed by independent testing.


Although lower than the 95 per cent efficacy shown in clinical trials, the figures remain hugely encouraging.

Early data suggests hospital cases among immunised older Brits have started falling to a "fraction of previous levels".


They've also changed the threshold in the faulty PCR tests.


A Government source said: "One of the key findings is the Pfizer vaccine is having just as big an impact in over-80s as in under-65s.

"The only difference is that protection starts after 15 days in younger age groups, but it takes three weeks for it to work in older people."

Paul Hunter, professor of medicine at the University of East Anglia, said the data was "quite amazing".

He told The Sun: "If these numbers are borne out, then they are very reassuring.

"If they are achieving 65 per cent protection after three weeks with both jabs, then I think that's really good.

"And that's a vindication of our current strategy as it protects more people than giving two doses three weeks apart.

"I am still, despite the South African strain, quite confident that we will see a gradual opening of the society, probably starting with schools opening early March."
Fox News reports that Johnson & Johnson's vaccine is pending emergency authorisation by the FDA - this means that its not proven to be safe to use - and they're also claiming that these vaccines will become like annual flu jabs:
"Unfortunately, as [the virus] spreads, it can also mutate," Alex Gorsky, Johnson & Johnson CEO recently told CNBC. "Every time it mutates, it's almost like another click of the dial so to speak where we can see another variant, another mutation that can have an impact on its ability to fend off antibodies or to have a different kind of response not only to a therapeutic but also to a vaccine."


Johnson & Johnson's vaccine, which is pending FDA emergency use authorization, is a one-dose jab that was developing using an adenovirus rather than mRNA technology relied on by Moderna and Pfizer. Interestingly, Johnson & Johnson's vaccine showed 66% efficacy in a global trial, whereas the other two showed around 94% to 95% efficacy against the virus.

The company also has a two-dose vaccine in the works, but trial data is not expected until later this year, Gorsky told CNBC.

Both Moderna and Pfizer have vouched for their vaccines' ability to fend off coronavirus variants, though Dr. Anthony Fauci has said the South African variant may prove troublesome as has shown to have "clinical consequences."


Fauci said the variants should serve as a "wake-up call" to governments and companies currently developing vaccines that it is essential to "be nimble to be able to readily adjust, readily make versions of the vaccine that actually are specifically directed toward whatever mutation is actually prevalent at any given time."

That said, Pfizer has previously touted its mRNA technology's "flexibility," which could easily allow for tweaks to the product should the need arise.
For more on these experimental vaccines, see: And check out SOTT radio's NewsReal #34: Covid By Numbers:




Eye 2

6 takeaways from opening arguments in Trump's Senate trial

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md.
© Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call/Getty ImagesThe House's lead impeachment manager, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., prepares Tuesday for the start of the second Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump.
The historic opening day of the first Senate impeachment trial of a former president was fiery and emotional in some moments.

Democrat House managers and lawyers for former President Donald Trump primarily clashed over the constitutionality of trying a private citizen who was impeached seven days before his term as president expired.

The House impeached Trump on Jan. 13 on a single charge of "incitement to insurrection" for his Jan. 6 speech at a rally near the White House as rioters began to break into the Capitol to try to stop lawmakers' count of electoral votes for president in a joint session of Congress.

Comment: Democrats' got President Donald Trump's second impeachment trial off to a start with a more than 13-minute video of footage from the Capitol riots. The video splices together footage from the riots with damage inside the Capitol and fights with police officers:

Apparently Trump was none-to-happy with his defense team's performance at the trial. From the Daily Wire:
Former President Donald Trump is reportedly "furious" with the way that his impeachment defense team performed on day one of his Senate trial.

"Two sources in fact, who spent time with the former president today described him as being quote, 'furious and beyond angry' with his impeachment defense team," Fox News correspondent Kevin Corke reported. "He was especially upset with attorney Bruce Castor, as you pointed out for his quotes, 'rambling opening argument'. The former president spending the day watching the trial from inside his private quarters at Mar-A-Lago, no golf with the very same plan for tomorrow."

"Meanwhile, at a time when he certainly could opt to reduce the political temperature in the country, Mr. Biden apparently is taking a pass, opting instead to not weigh in as his predecessors being impeached once again, despite what critics have called hypocrisy on the left, and a deafening silence from the White House," Corke added.

Trump's impeachment defense team underwent some issues recently with numerous high-profile lawyers parting ways with the team just days before the Senate trial started this week. The Daily Wire reported at the end of last month:
Multiple reports indicated that Butch Bowers, a South Carolina lawyer who assembled the impeachment defense team, and Deborah Barbier, a criminal defense lawyer in South Carolina, were no longer going to be part of Trump's team and that the decision was "mutual." Josh Howard, a North Carolina attorney, has also reportedly left Trump's team, and South Carolina lawyers Johnny Gasser and Greg Harris are also reportedly out. ...

CNN, The New York Times, and The Associated Press noted that the team fell apart after Trump wanted them to focus on claims that the election was stolen from through election fraud — a claim that former Attorney General William Barr, a favorite in Trump world, had completely dismissed as false. The lawyers reportedly said no, and that was when the parties decided to part ways.



Snakes in Suits

Biden throws weight behind Newsom as campaign to recall California governor says it nears 1.5mn signatures needed to trigger vote

Newsom Biden
© Reuters / Patrick T. Fallon; Reuters / Joshua Roberts
US President Joe Biden is "clearly" opposed to the drive to oust California Governor Gavin Newsom from office, the White House said, as more than 1.4 million people have reportedly signed a petition to recall the governor.

Biden's spokeswoman, Jen Psaki, took to Twitter on Tuesday to voice support for the embattled governor, stating that the president considers him an ally in many areas and does not endorse the fast-growing recall campaign.

"In addition to sharing a commitment to a range of issues with Gavin Newsom from addressing the climate crisis to getting the pandemic under control, [President Biden] clearly opposes any effort to recall Gavin Newsom," Psaki tweeted.


Comment: Yeah. Sure. A significant number of deeply upset and seriously harmed citizens make an attempt to oust a totalitarian disaster of a politician and they get called: "right-wing conspiracy theorists, white nationalists, anti-vaxxers" and "groups who encourage violence on our democratic institutions."

Lest anyone forget why the citizens of California have tried to oust this pseudo-reality-espousing and power-grabbing sociopath, just take a gander at the following - and remember that our puppet-in-chief supports him:


Vader

DOJ confirms Biden will continue push for Assange's extradition as human rights groups call to drop case before US appeal deadline

assange
© Reuters / Hannah McKay
The Joe Biden administration will continue to pursue extradition for Julian Assange, the Justice Department said, rebuffing calls from rights groups to reverse course ahead of an appeal deadline in the WikiLeaks co-founder's case.

DOJ spokesman Marc Raimondi said on Tuesday that Washington has not abandoned plans for Assange's extradition from the UK, noting that Biden will still challenge a January ruling from a British judge barring extradition over concerns that Assange might take his own life in American custody.

"We continue to seek his extradition," Raimondi told Reuters, signaling that the new Biden administration will pick up where ex-president Donald Trump left off in seeking to charge the anti-secrecy activist for his publication of classified documents.

The statement from the DOJ comes mere days before a February 12 deadline for the US government to submit its "grounds for appeal" in Assange's extradition case, in which American attorneys will argue against UK Judge Vanessa Baraitser's ruling against the move.

Comment: At least there is partisan agreement on one thing in Washington: whistleblowers will be prosecuted! Anyone who "outs" the actions of the War Party will become persona non grata in their world.