Puppet MastersS

Attention

Best of the Web: US Senate ACQUITS Trump in second impeachment trial after final 57-43 Senate vote

trump double thumbs up
© Reuters / Carlos BarriaDonald Trump gives two thumbs up to the crowd during a campaign rally in Cleveland, Ohio, November 5, 2018.
The Senate acquitted former President Donald Trump Saturday on a single impeachment article of incitement of insurrection, falling 10 votes short of the two-thirds necessary to convict with 57 voting guilty vs. 43 not guilty.

All Democrats and 7 Republicans voted guilty on Saturday, including Richard Burr of North Carolina, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mitt Romney of Utah, Ben Sasse of Nebraska, and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania.

House managers and Trump's defense team had agreed Saturday to move to closing arguments for up to 4 hours in the Senate impeachment trial of the former president.

Comment: Surprisingly, McConnell said ahead of time he'd vote to acquit. From The Hill:
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Saturday that he will vote to acquit former President Trump, ending weeks of speculation about what he would do.

McConnell's decision, confirmed to The Hill by a GOP senator, comes hours before the Senate is expected to take a final vote on whether to convict Trump of "high crimes and misdemeanors" over an article accusing him of inciting insurrection during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

McConnell has criticized Trump's role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, including saying the former president "provoked" the mob. He disclosed to reporters last month that he hadn't spoken to Trump, with whom he aligned himself closely for years, since Dec. 15.

But he also kept his caucus guessing on how he would ultimately vote, saying that he wanted to listen to the arguments from both House impeachment managers and Trump's legal team.

"Based on his comments over the past two months, I really had no idea what he was going to do," said Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), a member of GOP leadership.
And Lindsey Graham says he'll meet with Trump to discuss the future of the GOP. Also from The Hill:
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said on Friday that he'll meet with former President Donald Trump to talk about the future of the Republican party and his role in it.

"I'm going to try and convince him that we can't get there without you, but you can't keep the Trump movement going without the GOP united," Graham said, according to Politico.

"If we come back in 2022, then, it's an affirmation of your policies. But if we lose again in 2022, the narrative is going to continue that not only you lost the White House, but the Republican Party is in a bad spot."

Although the Republicans lost the Senate and White House during the 2020 elections, they gained seats in the House. Trump also received the second most votes in a presidential election in U.S. history, even while he trailed Biden significantly in the popular vote and the Electoral College.

Since then, however, Trump's actions contesting the election, culminating in the ugly and deadly mob attack on the Capitol that led to his second impeachment, has raised new questions in GOP circles about moving on from the former president.

At the same time, Trump retains a high level of support in the GOP grassroots.

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel has talked before about Trump's future in the party saying that the party will keep a neutral stance on the former president as he has caused strife in the party.

"Trump's got to work with everybody," Graham said. "You got to put your best team on the field. If it's about revenge and going after people you don't like, we're going to have a problem. If this is about putting your best team on the field, we've got a decent chance at coming back."
Meanwhile the New York Times runs its own mock impeachment trial and finds Trump guilty (shocking!). From RT:
In a decision that will shock few and surprise fewer, the New York Times editorial board has declared Donald Trump guilty. No matter the charges or evidence, the Times has been making this case for four years.

"If you fail to hold him accountable, it can happen again," the Times' editorial board wrote on Friday, in a plea to Republican senators to convict the former president.

"To excuse Mr. Trump's attack on American democracy would invite more such attempts, by him and by other aspiring autocrats," they declared. "The stakes could not be higher. A vote for impunity is an act of complicity."

That the New York Times would call for Trump's conviction is unsurprising. This is the same editorial board that described Trump's re-election campaign as "the greatest threat to American democracy since World War II," demanded lawmakers impeach the president back in 2019, then "Impeach Trump Again" after his supporters rioted at the US Capitol last month, and called for the overhaul of the entire political system to prevent someone like Trump ever coming to power again. In fact, the only decision of Trump's the board praised was his use of missile strikes against Syria in 2018, which it called "reassuring."
Trump's attorney Michael Van der Veen has since been 'interviewed' by MSM, at which point he tore them a new one:




Binoculars

Globalists' America-last agenda focused on crushing the middle class

World Economic Forum
Two things occurred this week that should have your attention.

And, no, one of them is not the cartoonish second impeachment trial of a former president. Don't let the media lure you into this drama.

As the first two days of the trial proved, this is nothing more than emotion-driven theatrics.

Democrats are notorious for murdering the facts and appealing to people's base emotions, and this trial is more of the same.

Its purpose has little to do with the former president and everything to do with you, Mr. and Mrs. Conservative American.

If they can criminalize the former president, or at the very least tarnish his reputation beyond repair, they will use that to criminalize and/or tarnish those who supported his America-first policies. That's what they're really after, so don't let them get into your head. Call it what it is, openly and boldly. Dramatic theater meant to sway the ignorant and uninformed.

The ignorant will be ignorant. Let them go.

USA

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter

Trump supporters
In order for tyranny to be established, people who love freedom must first be demonized.

It seems like this would be an easy historic fact to accept, however, it's very common for state propagandists and establishment shills in the media to cloud the argument. The conflict between the political left, globalists, conservatives and patriots is awash in misdirection. This article is my appeal to cut through that engineered fog, but before anything else is discussed, we need to recognize a fundamental truth:

If leftists and globalists were not trying to take away our individual and inherent liberties, then we conservatives and moderates would have no reason to fight.

The political left and the globalists are the ONLY people consistently using censorship, mob intimidation, violence, economic ransom, subversion and government oppression to get what they want. And, what they want is control; there is no denying it.

Again, let's think about this for a moment: Who are the real villains in this story? The people who want to be left alone to live their lives in quiet freedom? Or, the people that want to forcefully impose their will on the world by any means necessary?

Dig

Tearing down the edifice of American democracy

U.S. Supreme Court
© Joe LauriaU.S. Supreme Court
The joists & beams that hold U.S. democracy are not as flexible as they appear, writes Scott Ritter. They are the byproduct of societal passion of two political parties and are on the brink of failure.

The fact of the matter is that politics โ€” at least how it is practiced in the United States โ€” is more about perception than reality. The nuance associated with lawmaking, the arcane art of manufacturing the rules and regulations that hold society together, are hidden and therefore unknown to the vast majority of those who participate in the electoral processes that are the hallmark of American democracy.

Most Americans have not taken the time to follow a bill as it makes it way through the legislative process. Instead, they may hear about it at its inception, and then, if the bill is adopted, watch as the Executive signs it into law. They get the headline version โ€” what the brokers of "truth" in the media opt to say about the legislation, and not what it really represents: an amalgam of special interest money sprinkled with a modicum of societal need, want or desire.

Americans get their news like a baby bird gets its meal โ€” waiting for a "mother" figure to digest it and then regurgitate it down their collective throats. They are not informed so much as shaped, the byproduct of a system that is built on manufactured consent derived from half-truths, myths and outright lies.

Snakes in Suits

Shameless grifter Lincoln Project, facing multiple scandals, accused by co-founder of likely criminality

Lincoln Project founders
© 60 Minutes screen captureLincoln Project founders from l to r: Mike Madrid, Rick Wilson, Steve Schmidt, Reed Galen
The group of life-long Republican Party consultants who, under the name "The Lincoln Project," got very rich in 2020 with anti-Trump online messaging has spent weeks responding to numerous scandals on multiple fronts. Despite the gravity of those scandals, its conduct on Thursday night was in a whole new category of sleaze. It not only infuriated their long-time allies, but also constituted the abuse of Twitter's platform to commit likely illegal acts.

That the primary effect of the Lincoln Project was to personally enrich its key operatives by cynically exploiting the fears of U.S. liberals has long been obvious. Reporting throughout 2020 conclusively demonstrated that the vast majority of the tens of millions of dollars raised by the group was going to firms controlled by its founders. One of its most prominent founders โ€” GOP consultant Rick Wilson โ€” personally collected $65,000 from liberals through GoFundMe for an anti-Trump film he kept promising but which never came; to this date, he refuses to explain what he did with that money.

A study conducted after the 2020 election found that the group's effect on the election's outcome was trivial to non-existent โ€” not surprising given its penchant for spending money on ads that aired in electorally irrelevant places such as Washington, D.C. or which circulated almost exclusively in liberal cable news and social media venues, and thus had no purpose other than to enable its consultants to take large commissions from the ad spending. They were producing ads solely for liberals, with the overriding intent not of defeating Trump but inflating their net worth. And it worked: until they were no longer needed.

Heading into the 2020 election, most of the U.S. media was uninterested in, if not outright hostile to, any reporting that might have helped President Trump's re-election bid. As a result, the Lincoln Project continued to enjoy media veneration even as the magnitude of its scam became increasingly obvious. But with Trump now safely vanquished, the Lincoln Project is dispensable, and the protective shield it enjoyed against any real journalistic scrutiny is โ€” like its reputation and prospects for future profiteering โ€” rapidly crumbling.

Better Earth

Great reset? Putin says, 'Not so fast!"

Putin
© UnknownRussian President Vladimir Putin
Did you happen to catch the most important political speech of the last six years? It would have been easy to miss given everything going on. In fact, I almost did, and this speech sits at the intersection of nearly all of my areas of intense study.

The annual World Economic Forum took place last week via teleconference, what I'm calling Virtual Davos, and at this year's event, of course, the signature topic was their project called the Great Reset.

But if the WEF was so intent on presenting the best face for the Great Reset to the world it wouldn't have invited either Chinese Premier Xi Jinping or, more importantly, Russian President Vladimir Putin.

And it was Putin's speech that brought down the house of cards that is the agenda of the WEF.

Russian Flag

Kremlin wants to improve ties with EU, but will prep for the worst as Brussels threatens sanctions

Kremlin
© SputnikThe Kremlin, Moscow, Russia
President Vladimir Putin's spokesman has denied media reports that Russia will imminently sever diplomatic ties with Brussels, saying his government would consider extreme measures only in response to hostile actions.

On Friday, Dmitry Peskov told reporters that comments by Foreign Secretary Sergey Lavrov had been taken out of context by Russian-language media. In a preview of an interview aired earlier that morning, the diplomat was asked whether Moscow was heading for a break with the EU. "Our starting point is that we are ready," he said.

However, Peskov argued that the resulting headlines overlooked the fact that Lavrov was saying such a move would be considered only in response to damaging sanctions that hit sensitive areas of the economy. "This sensational headline is being presented without context," he said, "and this is a big mistake by the media. It changes the meaning." Lavrov added:
"Collectively, [the EU] is still our largest trading and investment partner. Many companies are working here. There are hundreds, thousands of joint ventures. If business is mutually beneficial, we will continue it."

Comment: Distraction is the priority when states are self-destructing:
Borrell said ministers will have the opportunity to debate any measures at a meeting on February 22:
"I wanted to test whether the Russian authorities are interested in a serious attempt to reverse the deterioration of our relations and seize the opportunity to have a more constructive dialogue. The answer has been clear: No, they are not. I will put forward concrete proposals."
Both the EU and the US have said they are mulling sanctions as a result of the arrest and imprisonment of opposition figure Alexey Navalny. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken told CNN on Monday that the White House was contemplating taking action against Russia:
"It seems apparent that a chemical weapon was used to try to kill Mr. Navalny. That violates the chemical weapons convention and other obligations that Russia has. We're looking at the situation very carefully and when we have the results, we'll look at that in the appropriate way."
Moscow has slammed the West for seeking to change the facts of the case. Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told Moscow news outlet RBK last week:
"Don't meddle in the internal affairs of a sovereign state. And we recommend that everyone deals with their own problems. Believe me. they have enough of their own problems in these countries. There are plenty of issues to deal with."



Footprints

Lincoln Project co-founder resigns

Schmidt
© Jamie McCarthy/Getty ImagesLincoln Project co-founder Steve Schmidt
Lincoln Project co-founder Steve Schmidt is resigning from the group's board amid a series of scandals that has rocked the high-dollar anti-Trump super PAC, Axios has learned.

Why it matters: Schmidt, a veteran Republican operative, is the latest and most high-profile departure from the group, which is reeling from revelations that another co-founder, John Weaver, used offers of professional advancement in a series of attempts to solicit sex from young men.

Background: Schmidt's resignation comes amid a wave of damaging stories for the Lincoln Project.
  • The New York Times reported last month on allegations from 21 men that Weaver sent them unsolicited and sexually charged messages. One was 14 years old at the time, according to the report.
  • Multiple people have reportedly been contacted by federal law enforcement regarding the alleged conduct. The Lincoln Project said it has hired an external law firm to conduct an investigation into the matter.
  • The AP reported that the majority of the $90 million that the Lincoln Project has raised was paid to consulting firms tied to the group's founders and senior staff.
  • On Thursday, the group's official Twitter account tweeted screenshots of messages between a former senior staffer and a reporter writing a story on the group. Lincoln Project co-founder George Conway suggested the disclosures may have been illegal.

Comment: Schmidt exits with mea culpas:

Lincoln Project co-founder Steve Schmidt resigned from the embattled anti-Trump organization Friday night, claiming he did so to
"make room for the appointment of a female board member as the first step to reform and professionalize the Lincoln Project. Presently, the Lincoln Project is made up of four middle-aged white men. That composition does not reflect our nation, nor our movement. I am resigning my seat on the Lincoln Project board to make room for the appointment of a female board member as the first step to reform and professionalize the Lincoln Project.

"My purpose in writing this isn't to express what and when I knew about John Weaver, but how I feel about him, what he did and how many people he hurt. This is my truth. John Weaver has put me back into that faraway cabin with Ray, my Boy Scout leader. I am incandescently angry about it. I am angry because I know the damage that he caused to me, and I know the journey that lies ahead of every young man that trusted, feared and was abused by John Weaver."

While Schmidt said he is "enormously proud of the Lincoln Project," he offered an apology to co-founder Jennifer Horn, who resigned from the group last week, over the public dispute that was launched. He called her
"an important and valuable member of our team. She deserved better from me. She deserved a leader who could restrain his anger. I am sorry for my failure. Private messages should never have been made public.

"For me, it's time to step back from the front - to get healthy mentally, physically, and spiritually. Stay strong, There is much work to be done."
Besides Lincoln Project advisers Tom Nichols and Kurt Bardella, as well as LPTV host Nayyera Haq stepping away from the organization, fellow adviser and LPTV host Tara Setmayer also indicated her potential exit on Twitter. In addition, CNBC reported Friday that top megadonors are considering abandoning the group.

Last week, co-founder Jennifer Horn announced her resignation, which sparked a public spat between her and the group. Late Thursday, the Lincoln Project allegedly published private Twitter messages Horn sent to a reporter. Those tweets were later removed after co-founder George Conway, who left the group in August, warned that its actions may have broken federal law.
See also:


Dollars

Duterte to US: You want VFA? You have to pay

Duterte
© UnknownDuterte and members of Iligan Infantry
Brigade
Rodrigo Duterte served notice to the United States government that it should pay the Philippines to resume the activities under the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA}.

"I want to put notice, if there is an American agent here, if you want VFA, you have to pay. You have to pay because it is a shared responsibility," Duterte said at the inspection of new air assets of the Philippine Air Force in Clark Air Base in Pampanga on Friday night. "Your share of responsibility does not come free because after all, when the war breaks out, we all pay," he added.

Inked between the Philippines and the United States in 1999, VFA allows American forces to hold joint military exercises, counter intelligence training and engage in humanitarian aid missions with their Filipino counterparts.

The VFA, however, prohibits US troops from engaging in combat operations.

Eye 1

DC court denies FOIA documents, ruling Trump tweet wasn't admission CIA funded Al-Qaeda in Syria

jihadist
© AFP 2021 / RAMI AL-SAYED
A DC Court of Appeals has sided with the US Central Intelligence Agency in claiming that just because former US President Donald Trump tweeted about something is not proof that it actually existed.

The case concerned a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by Jason Leopold of BuzzFeed News for documents on CIA funding for anti-government rebels in Syria after Trump tweeted about ending the program.

"The Amazon Washington Post fabricated the facts on my ending massive, dangerous, and wasteful payments to Syrian rebels fighting Assad," Trump tweeted on July 24, 2017, as part of a rant about media bias.

The tweet formed the basis of Leopold's FOIA request for "payments to Syrian rebels fighting Assad," which the CIA refused to answer, saying that by giving an answer to his request it would be admitting to something that was illegal.

Loepold then sent a second request, this time seeking "agency records relating to payments to Syrian rebels," according to a suit filed in a DC federal court in 2019 seeking release of the documents. At first, the court came down on the reporter's side, but the intelligence agency appealed and a new trio of judges reversed the previous order.