Puppet MastersS


Megaphone

Best of the Web: Worst lie since fake claim sparked Iraq war? OPCW report behind Syria bombings was altered, whistleblower tells UNSC

OPCW
A former inspector with the OPCW has accused the chemical weapons watchdog of issuing a sanitized report on the alleged 2018 attack in Douma, Syria, arguing it ignored serious reservations of its own fact-finding team.

The OPCW's final report on the Douma incident, released last March, omitted key findings of its own inspection team which would have cast serious doubt on whether a chemical attack took place at all, a now former OPCW specialist, Ian Henderson, told members of the United Nations Security Council in a recorded video address - after his visa application to attend the meeting in person was rejected.

"The findings in the final [Fact Finding Mission] report were contradictory, were a complete turnaround with what the team had understood collectively during and after the Douma deployments," Henderson said.

Comment: Moon of Alabama comments:
We have long maintained that the alleged chemical attack in Douma, Syria, on April 7 2018 was faked by Jihadists shortly before they were evicted from that Damascus suburb.

By the end of last year leaked documents and a whistle blower from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) had proven that the OPCW managers had manipulated the report their staff had written about the incident. The OPCW inspectors who had investigated the case on the ground in Douma found that there was evidence that a chemical attack had happened. The murdered people seem in videos from the alleged attack must have died of other causes. The yellow canisters found at the locations of the alleged attack were not dropped from helicopters but clearly manually placed.

Using the Arria-formula, a procedure to have witnesses testify to the UN Security Council, Russia and China invited other UN members to listen to the testimony of OPCW inspector Ian Henderson. He denounced the false final report the OPCW management had published. Henderson, a South African engineer, was a team leader at the OPCW where he had worked for more than twelve years.

Henderson's testimony can be watched here. Transcript here.

[...]

In his closing remarks at the UNSC Russia's Permanent Representative at the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, said:
Today's discussions reveal one thing clearly - that something fishy is cooking in the OPCW. When we point at it, our colleagues tell us every time that OPCW, the 2013 Nobel peace prize laureate, is the gold standard of professionalism, integrity and impartiality. We would like it to be such and we adopted a PRST in November 2019 exactly aiming at this. Unfortunately, the impartiality and integrity of the OPCW TS is seriously questioned, and not just by us and other member states, as today's presentation demonstrated. Members of the "Courage Foundation" can hardly be labeled as "Russian agents". They are reputable personalities and include such figures as Jose Bustani, first OPCW DG, respectable members of academic community, former senior officials of the US and UK intelligence community, and such names as Noam Chomsky and Oliver Stone to name a few. (You were provided with a copy of their letter and related materials).
Why do some of our colleagues so vehemently defend the reports by the OPCW FFM, which some are believed were fabricated? Because any seed of doubt about chemical episodes conclusions would lead to challenging the expediency and legitimacy of already illegitimate missile attacks against a sovereign UN member state. In that light the Douma incident plays a key role. Because if it transpires that the FFM report was made up, it would lead to questioning earlier episodes like Khan-Shaykhun and others, which resulted in the termination of [Joint Investigation Mechanism].
...
Our colleague from Viet Nam asked what to do next, what are the nest steps. I think that this issue must be discussed at the OPCW. Legitimate questions and issues that member states face should be addressed and discussed. The question why the first report of the OPCW FFM was shelled initially, and then disappeared and destroyed should be answered. So far we are denied - we and other member states - are denied such an opportunity.
Videos from Douma at the time of the incident showed some 30 bodies of dead persons. Most were children. It is up to day unknown who they were and who had murdered them. The OPCW manipulation of the original reports of its inspectors' findings is a cover up for that huge crime.
See also:


Nuke

Russia slams US for giving wrong idea about Iran's right to enrich uranium

nuclear reactor
© REUTERS / WANA
Moscow accuses Washington of misinforming the international community about Iran's right to enrich uranium, the Russian Foreign Ministry said on Monday.

Last Friday, US Special Representative for Iran Brian Hook told journalists about an alleged UN resolution passed in 2006 or 2007 prohibiting Tehran from uranium enrichment.

"We consider it necessary to respond to the US special representative for Iran Hook about the existence of some kind of 'UN standard' prohibiting the Islamic Republic of Iran from enriching uranium. Unfortunately, such mythmaking has long been a par of the course in the US approach toward nuclear non-proliferation ... In this case, we have, essentially, an accusation against the UN Security Council of making decisions contradicting the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)", the ministry said in a statement.

It also recalled that the aforementioned treaty allows the signatories to develop nuclear energy for non-military purposes.

"In other words, the NPT puts no limitations on the non-nuclear countries regarding uranium enrichment or developing other stages of the nuclear fuel cycle. There is only one condition: that all work must be directed toward peaceful ends and be under IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency ] supervision", the ministry noted.

Comment: See also:


Eye 1

Here's why Iran (and the western media) is not being honest about Ukraine flight 752

iran plane crash
Most believe the reason behind Iran's shooting down of flight 752 from Tehran to Kiev has been cleared up. The narrative that it was an unfortunate accident (mainly) by a single individual: Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Commander Hajizadeh is being widely accepted. The message was further broadcast by Major General Hossein Salami, chief of that same IRGC.

However, there's still plenty of questions which are left unanswered which, according to me, return part of the veil which most believe to have been uncovered.

The Flight's Delay

Although flight delays happen all the time and are nothing to fret about in and by themselves, given the outcome of 752 we should ask the question why the delay was there. According to Reuters' quoting of the president and CEO of the airline, Mr. Yevhenii Dykhne, the flight was delayed because "it was too heavily loaded". Aviation experts know that any which flight does not only hold the passenger's luggage but also parcels, mails, diplomatic packages and so on. Some sources I have heard suggested that 9 bags were taken out of the cargo hold (which is distinct from the passenger luggage hold).

The questions become: was the decision to stall the aircraft a decision by the captain himself? If it was not, which cargo was offloaded? Was this important material which could not be destroyed?

Comment: See also:


Magic Hat

The Old Playbook: BBC passes the MI6's Skripal pack of lies to Bellingcat and then reports their claims as truth to the world

The Skripal File Gang


@bears_with


In September of 2018, BBC reporter Mark Urban (lead image, left) ended his book The Skripal Files with a report of the favour MI6 had arranged, so that he could visit Sergei Skripal's house in Salisbury, and report that a souvenir of British country life which MI6 agent Pablo Miller had presented to Skripal after his recruitment as a double agent, was still on a shelf in the living-room. For a double agent, that was a bad slip - not Skripal's, Urban's.

Urban's book is the only one published to date on the attack against Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia on March 4, 2018.

Comment: George Galloway has his say on Mr. Higgins and Bellingcat:


For more on Higgins and his Bellingcat information psyops funhouse (not an exhaustive list and in no particular order) : As for the Skripal's:

We Can Actively Assume That Skripal Was Poisoned by The British Government

As for Urban:

Newsnight correspondent Mark Urban interviewed Sergei Skripal multiple times last year - BBC won't release correspondence


Rocket

India successfully test-fires 3500 km strike range K-4 underwater Ballistic Missile

India has succesfully tested k-4 ballistic missiles. It's one of the two underwater missiles that were being developed by DRDO.
K-4 missile image representation
© Reutersimage representation
India has successfully fired 3500 kilometer strike range nuclear capable submarine launched K-4 ballistic missile off coast in Andhra Pradesh. The missile under development by DRDO will be equipped on indigenous INS Arihant class nuclear powered submarines of Navy.

Comment:
First squadron of Su-30MKI fighter jets inducted in South India, set to watch over Indian Ocean

India has supplied Thanjavur air base on its strategic southern coast with Su-30MKI air superiority fighter jets as part of an ongoing effort to boost the defenses of the Indian Ocean region.

On Monday, the jets were officially inducted at Thanjavur Air Force Station in the southern state of Tamil Nadu, which is set to be home to the No. 222 Squadron, known as 'Tiger Sharks'.
...
The squadron will have five to six planes, with the number expected to rise to 18 in the future, according to local media. The new aircraft are being equipped with BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles, which were jointly developed by India and Russia and have a range of 300km (186 miles).
...
The Sukhoi-30 MKI was developed on the basis of Russia's Sukhoi-30 especially for India ('MKI' means Modernised Commercial Indian by its first Russian letters). The planes are highly-maneuverable, equally capable of striking ground targets during a raid and conducting dogfights. In Thanjavur, they will be tasked with defending India's southern coasts and patrolling maritime areas.

Several days before the ceremony, Air Marshal Amit Tiwari, who leads the Southern Air Command, said that the IAF are ready to "extend the reach into the vast Indian Ocean region." The strategic region has "an important role to play in regional peace, security and prosperity," he said.
Sukhoi Su-30MKI
...
The aircraft is tailor-made for Indian specifications and integrates Indian systems and avionics as well as French and Israeli sub-systems. It has abilities similar to the Sukhoi Su-35 with which it shares many features and components.
...



Black Cat

Welcome back, swamp monsters: Bush-era warmonger David Wurmser covertly pushing Trump to start a war with Iran

trump supporter
© Reuters / Joshua RobertsA supporter of US President Donald Trump with a "Drain the Swamp" sign, Montana, US, July 5, 2018.
Despite Trump's pledge to 'drain the swamp' and reduce the US military's global footprint, a chief architect of the 2003 Iraq War has the ear of the White House on Iran. What could possibly go wrong?

As Donald Trump's first term dwindles, it appears his new campaign slogan will be "if you can't beat the swamp, join it." That much seems evident not only from the Trump administration's courting of diehard hawks - gung-ho guys like Elliott Abrams and Mike Pompeo - but by the recent news that David Wurmser was offering counsel to John Bolton, former National Security Advisor to the White House.

It should be briefly recalled that Wurmser - who has worked for a number of think tanks, including the influential American Enterprise Institute - contributed heavily to the report that argued Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was harboring weapons of mass destruction. That claim was eventually proven to be false, but not before a whole lot of damage was done. The outcome of the disastrous 2003 Iraq War that followed in the wake of that 'bad intelligence' is well documented by now, with the Iraqi people still suffering the consequences.

Comment:


Bad Guys

Appeal to the Israeli-Italian lobby? Matteo Salvini will recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital if elected prime minister

Matteo Salvini Italy
© Sputnik / Alessandro RotaMattaeo Salvini
His statement comes a day after Honduras' President Juan Orlando Hernandez promised to move the country's embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, if Israel in turn opens an embassy in the Honduran capital Tegucigalpa.

In an interview with the Israeli newspaper Israel Hayom, former Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini said he would recognise Jerusalem as the Israeli capital if he becomes prime minister. "Yes, absolutely", Salvini said, answering a reporter's question. On 6 December 2017, US President Donald Trump reversed decades of foreign policy and announced that Washington would recognise the ancient city as the capital of Israel and move its embassy to Jerusalem. The US move was heavily criticised worldwide.

The fierce debate over Jerusalem's status was reignited as President Trump said that the whole city belongs to Israel, while other countries maintain that the city must be divided between the Israelis and Palestinians. Following Trump's decision, Guatemala announced that it would move its embassy to the city of Jerusalem.

Comment: Why is Salvini connecting his efforts to protect the integrity of his country to Bibi's personal criminal actions? Courting a voting block seems to be the logical answer.


Better Earth

Berlin peace talks on Libya: Can international community help finish what Russia, Turkey started? -UPDATES

HaftarLavrov
© Sputnik/Vladimir AstapkovichRussian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Libyan National Army Commander Khalifa Haftar during a meeting in Moscow on January 14.
Talks in Berlin between warring Libyan factions could finally deliver a lasting ceasefire after a decade of chaos ushered in by NATO regime change there. Could the mediation efforts, kick-started by Moscow and Ankara, bear fruit?

All eyes in Europe and beyond are set on Berlin, as PM Fayez al-Sarraj of the Government of National Accord (GNA) and Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar of the Libyan National Army (LNA) arrive on Sunday for peace talks hosted by Germany and attended by representatives from 11 countries, including Russia's Vladimir Putin.

Comment: RT, 19/1/2020: Erdogan comments on upcoming Berlin talks
"We see the ceasefire as a particularly important step toward reconciliation and political settlement" in Libya, Erdogan said, reiterating that peace can be achieved only through dialogue.

Putin and Erdogan are also scheduled to participate in the talks, alongside French President Emmanuel Macron and US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

The proposed draft communiqué from the Berlin meeting, which was leaked to the media, reportedly describes monitoring groups tasked with observing the "comprehensive" ceasefire and the creation of a joint government and presidential council in Libya.

Erdogan said that he has not yet seen the draft and that it's too early to discuss concrete measures ahead of talks.
RT, 19/1/2020: Putin, Erdogan set the stage
The Libyan peace talks in Berlin were yet to begin, but Russia's Vladimir Putin and Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdogan already voiced their positions on the conflict, Erdogan speaking against Haftar and Putin calling for dialogue.

"Haftar has proven himself to be in favor of a military solution [to the conflict]. Here in Berlin, the ceasefire must be confirmed. Haftar's aggressive behavior must be stopped so the political process and settlement can happen," Erdogan said.

Putin in turn recalled how, during their Istanbul meeting on January 8, the two had "taken a very good step by calling on the warring parties in Libya to end hostilities." Despite several violations of the ceasefire, "both sides have listened to our call and have ended large-scale military actions," Putin said. We don't lose hope that the dialogue will continue, as we seek to resolve the conflict [in Libya].

Some 11 countries, including Russia, Turkey, Britain, France, Germany, and the US, and several international organizations attended the event aimed at reaching a lasting ceasefire between Haftar and his rival Fayez al-Sarraj, the prime minister of the UN-backed Tripoli-based Government of National Accord (GNA).
Fast forward to 1:57:20



Press conference given by Russian FM Lavrov just minutes before this posting.

UPDATE RT, 19/1/2020: Libya peace talks end on positive note
An arms embargo and a draft plan to work toward a lasting ceasefire to end Libya's years-long civil war has been agreed on in Berlin during a day of intensive peace talks, drawing on the process kickstarted by Russia and Turkey. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres presented the results of the talks at a final press conference on Sunday evening.

Guterres told reporters that "all participants today committed to support the ceasefire," while Merkel announced that the warring sides in Libya's conflict agreed that an arms embargo is necessary to reach a lasting ceasefire.

Italian PM Giuseppe Conte said Italian was willing to play a leading role in monitoring the Libya peace accord. Italy is "absolutely available to be on the frontline" when it comes to monitoring the peace, he told reporters, although whether or not the warring sides agree to that is still unclear.

Neither Haftar nor al-Sarraj were present in the room for the final press conference and Merkel said two men did not meet each other face-to-face during talks earlier either, with the chancellor hosting the rivals for separate discussions.

Merkel said the discussion in Berlin "will not solve all of the problems of Libya" but the talks were intended to "give new impetus" to the peace process. Guterres added that he was very worried that several of Libya's oil ports and an oilfield had been shutdown after Haftar's forces shut off production, a move which could badly impact the country's economy.

Merkel stressed that it is crucial that the arms embargo holds so that the truce can hold properly.
UPDATE: Sputnik, 20/1/2020 Conference participants made the following joint statement:
"We call for a comprehensive process of demobilization and disarmament of armed groups and militias in Libya and the subsequent integration of suitable personnel into civilian, security and military state institutions, on an individual basis and based on a census of armed groups personnel and professional vetting. We call upon the United Nations to assist this process."

"We support the establishment of unified Libyan national security, police and military forces under central, civilian authority, building upon the Cairo talks, and the documents produced therein."

Movement of forces:
"We call for the termination of all military movements by, or in direct support of, the conflict parties, in and over the entire territory of Libya, starting from the beginning of the ceasefire process."

"We commit to refraining from interference in the armed conflict or in the internal affairs of Libya and urge all international actors to do the same."

UN Role:
"We call upon the United Nations to facilitate ceasefire negotiations between the parties, including through the immediate establishment of technical committees to monitor and verify the implementation of the ceasefire."

"We call upon the UNSC to impose appropriate sanctions on those who are found to be in violation of the ceasefire arrangements and on Member States to enforce these."

Oil:
On Friday, Libya's National Oil Corporation (NOC) issued a statement warning that shutting down oil terminals would have far-reaching negative consequences for the national economy, as protesters reportedly entered and blockaded the Zueitina oil port in eastern Libya.

"We stress that the National Oil Corporation (NOC) is Libya's sole independent and legitimate oil company, in line with UN Security Council Resolutions 2259 (2015) and 2441 (2018). We urge all parties to continue to guarantee the security of its installations and refrain from any hostilities against all oil facilities and infrastructure. We reject any attempt at damaging Libya's oil infrastructure, any illicit exploitation of its energy resources, which belong to the Libyan people, through the sale or purchase of Libyan crude oil and derivatives outside the NOC's control and call for the transparent and equitable distribution of oil revenues."

Political Process:
On 17 December, 2015, the Libyan Political Agreement on the settlement of the internal conflict was signed in Morocco's Skhirat, under the auspices of the United Nations. The main point of the document, which took 14 months to coordinate, dealt with the formation of an interim Government of National Accord (GNA), which would operate during a transitional two-year period.

"We commit to accepting and supporting the outcome of this intra-Libyan political process."

Conference participants expressed support for the 2015 Libyan Political Agreement as a viable framework for a political solution to the conflict in the country.

Further Actions:
"We herewith create an International Follow-Up Committee (IFC) consisting of all countries and International Organisations that participated in today's Berlin Conference on Libya in order to maintain coordination in the aftermath of the Berlin Conference on Libya, under the aegis of the United Nations."

Senior-level plenary sessions will be held each month to evaluate the implementation of the conference's conclusions and, if necessary, "exert leverage".

Four technical groups will meet at the expert level twice a month during the first implementation stages. The groups will be led by UN representatives and work in four areas — address obstacles to the implementation, exchange information, coordinate operational requirements and support the mandate of the UN Security Council.
UPDATE: FRN 19/2020 Haftar orders end to Libyan oil exports
Haftar representatives ordered to stop oil exports from five ports of Libya. "National Oil Corporation" (NOC) was forced to comply. Affected were Bregu, Ras al-Anuf, Kharig, Zuweitin and Sidra, now under the control of the Haftar army.

"This will result in a decrease in production by 800 thousand barrels per day and daily financial losses of approximately $ 55 million."

Prime Minister of the Government of National Accord (GNA) Fayez Sarraj called on the international community to respond. The field marshal "is not looking for a peaceful or political solution," and the closure of the ports demonstrates his unpreparedness for a truce.
UPDATE: Sputnik 19/1/2020 National oil forecasts drop in crude output due to blockades
The Libya National Oil Corporation (NOC) has declared a force majeure. The production of crude could be cut to just 72,000 barrels per day (bpd).

The NOC has condemned the move and slammed Haftar's maneuvers as "setting fire to your own house. Shutting down oil exports and production will have far-reaching and predictable consequences. If the shutdown is prolonged, we face collapse of the exchange rate, a huge and unsustainable increase in the national deficit, the departure of foreign contractors, and the loss of future production, which may take years to restore. The main beneficiaries of this act will be other oil-producing states, and the harm will be entirely to Libyans."
UPDATE: Sputnik 20/1/2020 Final document from Berlin
The final document agreed at the Berlin conference on Libya on Sunday contains a clause stating that all Libyan people are entitled to the country's energy resources, Russia's acting Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said.

"There is a section on the political process, on how to solve Libya's economic problems, taking into account the fact that all Libyan parties - professional, military, political groups should have access to natural resources."

"The agreed final document is rather detailed, with recommendations and suggestions on how to overcome the current Libyan crisis. The document has several chapters. It has a chapter focused on security efforts, including the need to try to make the ceasefire sustainable,"

"It is clear that in the end it will be up to the Libyans to decide. It is clear that so far attempts to establish a sustainable, serious dialogue between them have failed — too big of a difference in stances. Nevertheless, the recommendations outlined in the Berlin conference's final document add up to the bank of ideas that the international community offers the Libyan sides so that they can agree on circumstances conducive to resuming dialogue."

Military Committee:
Lavrov highlighted that the newly-created military committee to resolve the Libyan conflict will seek a lasting ceasefire in Libya with UN assistance.

"The newly created military committee consisting of five representatives from [GNA's Fayez] Sarraj and [LNA's Khalifa] Haftar, will be engaged in the development of concrete confidence-building measures that will make the ceasefire lasting under UN supervision."
UPDATE: RT 20/1/2020 Fayez al-Sarraj to respect ceasefire, no talks with Haftar
The head of the UN-backed Government of National Accord, Fayez al-Sarraj has said he would stick to the truce supported at the Berlin peace conference but would still not engage in direct talks with General Khalifa Haftar.

"For me it's clear... We will not sit down again with the other side." Sarraj said he's rejecting Haftar's condition of profit sharing for the lifting of port blockades.
UPDATE: RT 20/1/2020 Erdogan: Turkey has not sent troops to Libya, only 'advisers'
Ankara has not yet deployed its military forces to Libya, A group of advisers and trainers arrived in the war-torn country to aid the UN-backed Government of National Accord. "If the ceasefire that we called for together with [Russian President Vladimir] Putin is held, political process will be opened."

He does not see Turkey's role as that of a mediator in Libya. Instead, Ankara would lend its support to the UN-backed government against Haftar, whom Erdogan described as an "illegitimate leader."

The Turkish president also warned that Ankara would not hesitate to "do what is necessary" should Haftar's forces violate the truce. Earlier, Erdogan vowed to teach the general he denounced as a "putschist" a "lesson" if he does not stop his offensive on Tripoli.



Arrow Up

2011 Libya: Neither Russia nor Turkey stopped NATO, now they speak loudest trying to end 9 years of chaos

PutinErdogan
© Sputnik/Aleksey Nikolskyi/KremlinTurkish President Recep Tayip Erdogan • Russian President Vladimir Putin • Berlin, Germany January 19, 2020
Moscow and Ankara are not responsible for starting the conflict which has ravaged Libya, but they may have a decisive role in ending it, as they lead international diplomatic efforts at the Berlin peace conference.

The two countries opposed the US-led NATO intervention to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi nine years ago but, despite Turkey being a NATO member and Russia being on the UN Security Council, neither exercised their veto prerogatives.

Both states went on to bitterly regret sitting out, as the increasingly violent and morally muddy Arab Spring swept through the Middle East, dragging both into proxy conflicts. But being untainted by the calamity of Western intervention serves the two powers well as they attempt to mediate the many-sided Libyan civil war.

Airplane

There's more to flight 752 tragedy than first appearances reveal

debris field
© UnknownDebris field of flight 752
On 3 January 2020 a drone, believed to be operated by the United States, fired a missile upon a convoy of cars departing Baghdad airport, killing at least nine persons. Amongst the victims was Major General Qassem Solemani, a high ranking Iranian general who at the time of his murder was engaged in what is accurately described as a peace mission. He was carrying documents from the government of Saudi Arabia that are understood to have been peace proposals, including a possible cessation of Saudi military actions in the region.

The content of the documents has not been disclosed in detail, and in the flurry of events following Solemani's assassination, they have tended to disappear from the news cycle. If they were in fact proposals governing a possible ceasefire agreement, then there would be ample motivation for their disappearance.

It has been further suggested that the Saudi initiative was with the knowledge of and tacit consent of the Americans. If this is true, and again there has been a general silence on the point, then it would represent a new level of double-dealing by the Americans.