Scott Adams is the creator of the famous cartoon strip,
Dilbert. It is a strip whose brilliance derives from close observation and understanding of human behavior. Some time ago, Scott turned those skills to commenting insightfully and with notable intellectual humility on the politics and culture of our country.
Like many other commentators, and based on his own analysis of evidence available to him, he opted to take the Covid "vaccine."
Recently, however, he
posted a video on the topic that has been circulating on social media. It was a
mea culpa in which he declared, "The unvaccinated were the winners," and, to his great credit, "I want to find out how so many of [my viewers] got the right answer about the "vaccine" and I didn't."
"Winners" was perhaps a little tongue-in-cheek: he seemingly means that the "unvaccinated" do not have to worry about the long-term consequences of having the "vaccine" in their bodies since
enough data concerning the lack of safety of the "vaccines" have now appeared to demonstrate that, on the balance of risks, the choice not to be "vaccinated" has been vindicated for individuals without comorbidities.What follows is a personal response to Scott, which explains how consideration of the information that was available at the time led one person - me - to decline the "vaccine." It is not meant to imply that all who accepted the "vaccine" made the wrong decision or, indeed, that everyone who declined it did so for good reasons.
Comment: It's a safe bet that there is strategy to their actions. But the Ukies are largely just rage-machines, the 'orcs' they project onto Russians. The real strategists with 'cooler heads' are their American and British NATO and intelligence commanders discretely directing operations.