sott.net




Featured Book:

2500 Strand: Growing up in Hermosa Beach, California, during World War II

NEW!! Available Now!


SOTT Focus Listing

· SOTT Focus articles listed by author





Latest Topics on the Signs Forum
· Thank you for the podcasts!
[ aragorn ]
· Why China's buildings crumbled
[ dave613 ]
· Blood Ties That Blind
[ Laura ]
· Orphan work bill - Artists copyrights in the US in danger
[ Tigersoap ]
· Shine on You Crazy Diamond
[ starsailor ]
· NYC tomorrow - join the event in solidarity with Palestinians
[ Keit ]
· Vatican says aliens could exist
[ John G ]
· Migun, Far Infared, and Negative Ion Therapy
[ mamadrama ]

Firefox 2
This site best viewed
with Mozilla Firefox

SuperSearch Help

 


Science Daily
Sun, 11 May 2008 22:41 EDT

Health & Wellness

A team of Canadian scientists using a lotion which glows under ultraviolet light have shown that up to a third of patient toilets are not properly cleaned. Their findings also show that spores from the nasty bacteria Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) linger in the loo even when it has been thoroughly wiped down.

Michelle Alfa and a team of scientists from Manitoba, Canada investigated the spread of so-called superbugs in hospitals. Hospital patients are thought to catch bugs like vancomycin resistant Enterococci (VRE), methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and C. difficile because they are not eradicated from the hospital environment. These bugs may be transferred between patients through cross-contamination in the bathroom.

"Various studies have looked at the most effective cleaning agents, but none of these studies considered whether housekeeping staff were actually cleaning the toilets properly," says Alfa. "It is impossible to assess the effectiveness of any action against these bacteria unless you can be sure that cleaners comply with protocols."

Alfa's toilet inspectors smeared the UV lotion under the seats of 20 toilets and commodes being used by patients with diarrhoea at a hospital in Winnipeg. Seven of these patients had C. difficile infection, while 13 others did not. The toilets and commodes were tested every weekday for six months and checked using UV light to determine how well they had been cleaned. In addition, samples were taken from toilet surfaces to determine whether C difficile spores were present.

The UV marker revealed that the commodes for the seven patients isolated with C. difficle infections had not been properly cleaned 72% of the time. The toilets fared slightly better, with half of the samples taken showing no residual UV lotion after cleaning. The 13 patients not on isolation had much cleaner toilets, with only 14% glowing brightly under UV light. Further assessments showed that differences in toilet cleaning were "ward dependent" and since specific cleaners work on different wards, the results likely reflect characteristics of the individual cleaning staff.

More worryingly, C. difficle was still detected in 40% of samples taken from the cleanest toilets (i.e. those with no detectable UV marker). "This suggests that both the physical cleaning action as well as the disinfectant/cleaning agent were ineffective for killing and/or removing C. difficile from toilets," notes Alfa.

"Our data suggest that without an agent with some activity against C. difficile spores the physical action of cleaning alone cannot be relied upon to effectively eradicate this organism from the toilets of patients who are shedding this type of spore. Nevertheless, we would still recommend that monitoring with a UV marker becomes a routine part of a hospital's housekeeping quality assurance programme.

Journal reference:

1. UV-visible marker confirms that environmental persistence of Clostridium difficile spores in toilets of patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea is associated with lack of compliance with cleaning protocol - Michelle J. Alfa, Dueck Christine, Olson Nancy, DeGagne Pat, Papetti Selena, Wald Alana, Lo Evelyn and Harding Godfrey. BMC Infectious Diseases (in press)

Adapted from materials provided by BMC Infectious Diseases, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Discuss on SOTT Forum


Reader Comments
 
(Register to add your comments!)
 
And No Mention Of Protection For The Cleaning Staff? By Deej

You can bet the chemicals used to decontaminate hospital bathrooms isn't healthy to spend too much time around.

No doubt a few years of breathing the vapors from the stuff will have a long term impact on the workers -- but of course they're low-paid staff and easily replaceable in today's failing economy.

And I've never known a hospital ethics committee to even consider protecting the workers from such toxic assault. - That would be beneath them.


Added: Sun, 11 May 2008 23:41 EDT


 

Donate to Signs

Donate once - or every month! Click here to learn how you can help!

Have a question or comment about the Signs page? Discuss it on the Signs of the Times news forum with the Signs Team.

Emails sent to Signs of the Times, Ark, Laura, or Cassiopaea become the property of Quantum Future Group, Inc and may be republished without notice.

Some icons appearing on this site were taken from KDE-look.org, Afterglow, Mayosoft, Everaldo, IconDrawer, VisualPharm, IconFactory, Klukeart, Icons-land, and TpdkDesign.net
.

Remember, we need your help to collect information on what is going on in your part of the world!
Send your article suggestions to: SOTT e-mail address


Original content copyright 2008 by Signs of the Times. See: Fair Use Policy

78 people have viewed this page since Sun, 11 May 2008

ATOM Feed   RSS

[Valid Atom 1.0]   [Valid RSS 2.0]