So, some may say, Saddam Hussein hanging at the end of a rope was a loser �" others may be foolish enough to wonder : "But were his policies really those of a tyrant?"

Because Mr. Hussein is now universally dismissed in the U.S. media (including alternative media) as having once been the very breath of Evil itself �" "We all know that he surely did all those bad things everybody says he did, but he should not have been hanged that way …," etc. But, when one asks, "What was the direct personal knowledge of his accuser …," "What was the direct knowledge of their sources …," all of a sudden we find ourselves in the soup of what may eventually be called the largest and most successful psychological barrage possibly in the history of Zionist propaganda.

Compare the educational policy in Iraq under Mr. Hussein to that of the U.S. under its presidents in the same time period.

It is not unusual that in the U.S. a young university student might have to finance an almost perpetual "educational debt" (ranging from $10,000 to $1,000,000, for example, for an engineering degree from a state university, or a medical degree from an Ivy League school, respectively). Moreover, these so-called educations will have been predicated on the twisted ethics of their deans, and on the presumption of "profits by free trade," where a cheaper man is a better man, and on the inevitability of "globalization." In the U.S., students are actually taught creative ways to "spend their way out of debt."

Under leadership of Mr. Saddam Hussein, every student in Iraq finished his or her university education �" completely debt free �" male and female, in roughly equal proportions �" Shi’ia and Sunni in roughly in the same proportion as the national population.

Every student graduating debt free �" is that the educational policy of a tyrant? Were Saddam such a tyrant, would he not have feared that the students of his nation might be told �" go forward young men and women, use your education, predicated on honesty in labor and productivity through science, in the fields of agriculture, architecture, or engineering, or medicine or whatever, do good and be debt free?

Is that public educational policy of a tyrant? �" or, is that a system of education which racists from Texas would perceive as a threat to the so-called "precious style of life" so dear to their children? What would happen to "the American democracy," of, by and for millionaire rogues, if the example of Mr. Hussein’s educational policy were to catch on, not only in the rest of southwest Asia, but even … in America itself?

In the U.S., 40% of the population lack access to basic health care, and the poor are charged from 10% to 100% in fictitious interest when they have to use their credit cards for basic health care.

Under leadership of Mr. Hussein, every citizen in Iraq had access to basic health care, be they male or female, be they Shi’ia or Sunni.

Is this the health care policy of a tyrant? Or, would the Iraqi health care system, under the so-called "tyranny" of Mr. Saddam Hussein, be perceived as a threat to the U.S. system, which is managed by profiteers and eugenicists.

Would not Mr. Hussein’s example of universally available basic health care be perceived as a threat to the Hollywood geniuses of the American lie, and their notions of "Hollywood democracy." (even some of us Americans have figured out that, although there is no shortage of Jewishness amongst the Jowdets and the Kurds, the rest are either Sunni or Shi’ia. Under the so-called "tyranny" of Saddam Hussein, Iraq had joined three races, Arabic, Persian, Kurdish, and two religions, Shi’ia and Sunni, under one official language, currency system, and government.)

In the U.S., the idea of a "democratic" Congress has devolved into the idea of a glorious Zionist infestation, where liars are given unregulated legislative powers, in league with the Hollywood pornographers and the millionaire homosexuals who appoint them to power.

By comparison, under the so-called "tyranny" of Mr. Saddam Hussein, predatory liars, paedophiles, child rapists, homosexuals and pornographers were put into prison �" or even killed, as apparently many should be.

However, under the American theory of democracy, which in reality is a system of bank fraud under a Hollywood system of currency reserves, our politicians have become sellouts to predatory liars, paedophiles, child rapists, homosexuals and Hollywood pornographers, e.g. "Capitol Hill." Is it any wonder, that these politicians then appoint baby-killers as generals of their armies, and given them extravagant pensions with full benefits, including funeral by parade. (But, OH! say the generals, the ratio of one Iraqi child murdered per clueless American "volunteer" during the occupation, is only a collateral statistic �" a kind of non-damage, a kind of no-visible-effect phenomenon, which therefore can never come back to weigh on the souls of the baby-killing foot soldier, because Iraqi children don’t have any souls yet, so evil was their tyrant, Saddam Hussein �" so say the U.S. generals whose appointments were arranged by the self-same infestation who operate "Capitol Hill" as if it were their private sexual nightclub.

Compare the pay scale of the typical CEO in the U.S., whose pensions in retirement are often a thousand times the pay of the average worker, with that of his Iraqi counterpart. The CEO in the U.S. is compensated largely for his having shifted his productive capital, and hence means of taxation, from the U.S. to China. (China has evolved exactly as planned, into an infestation of free-trading nomads whose long-standing enemy has been the civilized Asian, including China, Persia, India, and Russia. It was created first by isolation of U.S. ally, Chiang Kai-shek, by grants of heavy military equipment, from Harry Truman, whose first act was to grant full recognition to Israel, to Ho Chi-Minh and Kim Il-Jung, which allowed Chairman Mao, who was chamber pot boy for an infestation of British-Zionist-Marxists into Chinese culture, to liquefy Chinese-Confucian culture, re-establish an economically huge British slave-labor plantation system, and consolidate it into an anti-American war machine, for the purpose of economically eradicating the principle of general welfare that was first stated in the United States Constitution.)

These American CEOs, who build castles in America while shifting their factories to, and paying taxes to, China, and whose salaries include, with approval of the so-called "Central Compensation Committee" reckless emissions of a new form of Wall St. currency known as stock options, which are now being freely printed without regard for reality or for any competent regulating authority, other than a Zionist-racist and eugenicist one, and whose Hobbesian style of life now goes way beyond the dangers of indolence which our Jefferson so worried about in regard of early American slavery and apartheid, and which is now being crystallized into a globalized domain of racism and eugenics �" these so-called CEOs are anointed as "business leaders" in America. Compare that with the so-called tyranny of Mr. Saddam Hussein, where treasonous profiteers, were, without regard to religious protection, removed from society and put in prison, where they belong. Is that the policy of a tyrant? But, HEY!, say the American CEOs, we can shift our factories to China (which must really be understood as Zionist-operated China) �" we can destroy American productive capacity, and thus our freedom to trade �" because we want to! �" These same CEOs will claim that racism and eugenics are simply the artefacts of unlimited freedom for Zionists, and for their Hollywood propaganda frauds, for "our" system of free trade, of globalization, and of "democracy" by bank fraud, will surely last forever and forever.

By comparison to the U.S., and its voluntary and unwarranted use of weapons of mass destruction against the unarmed and economically depressed peoples of Iraq, whose schools and day-care centers, and whose hospitals and clinics, had been destroyed by "smart-bombs" dropped by American pilots flying bravely at 40,000 feet, seven days a week, Sundays and holidays included, for ten years straight, Saddam Hussein, took the peaceful route, and got rid of all of his weapons of mass destruction.

I again suggest that it might not be beyond the veil of reason that Mr. Saddam Hussein will eventually be considered for appointment by the U.S. Congress, for the U.S. Medal of Honor, for his proven humanitarian genius. At a minimum, Mr. Hussein had the military foresight to rid his nation of WMDs, and strip his populations down to their spiritually most powerful and enduring state, their bare humanity. Whatever mistakes he may have made in his youth, in the end, he was smart enough to get rid of his stupid bombs and his weapons of mass destruction.

In a stroke of humanitarian genius, Mr. Hussein prevented his own militia groups from acquiring any form of WMD, knowing that if they fell into the hands of irregular Iraqi militias (who he doubtless foresaw would arise as "neighborhood" militias in the face of the overwhelming U.S. military forces), they would only bring harm to themselves and to their enemy, if they ever got control of them. So he got rid of them. Genius!

By upending his WMD programs, Mr. Saddam Hussein in effect, saved the lives of over 100,000 U.S. soldiers �" who he doubtless saw were as innocent in their economic predicament as would be the Iraqi neighborhood militias in theirs. Was this military wisdom, which saved the lives of Iraqi citizens and U.S. soldiers, the act of a tyrant �" the very breath of Evil itself, as all those Americans with their direct and personal knowledge profess with such surety?

Lastly, unlike the U.S., which since the presidency of Woodrow Wilson, has been borrowing its currency from a foreign power (the Hollywood Dollar being floated as it is in the stench of an equally absurd Hollywood System of Trade Inbalance �" a fictional currency loaned back to its own originating population, with interest owed to a foreign power, e.g. with interest charged against its own original and sovereign population, through a deception known as the Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve System, a Zionist apparition which is neither open, nor market, nor federal, nor reserve) �" the currency of the people of Iraq, the Dinar, under protection of "the tyrant" Mr. Saddam Hussein, was not to be borrowed from a foreign power, specifically the Zionist power that charges interest against the U.S. population for its own internal use of its own sovereign currency. Under his leadership, the Dinar was emitted into circulation by the sovereignty of the Iraqi nation itself, and thus from the domestic population which created their own scientific and reality-based economy to correspond with their own currency. (The test of formation of a Palestinian State will be in the answers to the questions, From whom, e.g. from what foreign power, shall the Palestinian people borrow their own sovereign currency? and who shall control the custom houses of the Palestinian people?)

Is this the signature of a tyrant, who would protect his people from Zionist usurpation, of the individual sovereignty of each citizen and the human dignity of their future grandchildren?

Or, might not Mr. Hussein’s system of honesty in banking, and in the sovereign emission of Iraqi currency, be seen as a threat to the racists and pedophiles who now control the institutions of credit and the emission of new currency in the United States?

(For those who might not know, contrary to the universal bank frauds which lie at the heart of all of Marx’ theorizing, be it Marxist left or Marxist right, the power to organize representative governments on principles of general welfare, and then to declare sovereignty and emit new currency in proportion to the growth of the physical economy of a population, is an act of internal and domestic human rights. (Marx’ silence on this point of sovereignty over national institutions of credit, currency and customs, and his juxtaposition of the interests of financial capitalists against the interests of wandering mobs, where both were borrowing currency from apparitions like the Federal Reserve, are the key to understanding Marx as a fraudster…)

The power to organize into a sovereign government and emit a national currency is a basic human right, from God, inherent in everyone, who desires to participates in a scientific and reality based economy �" that is the message of sovereignty and protectionism which U.S. Constitution of Hamilton represents, and that is the message for which the Zionists of the world have long filled their souls with the venom of jealousy and hatred.

Contrary to the predicates of Marx, which he plagiarized from Mandeville and Smith, the "means of production" does not emanate from offshore gambling houses �" credit, when organized on principles of science, sovereignty and general welfare, as opposed to being emitted on principles of racism, eugenics and Hobbesian greed, can then be "matriculated" into forward economic motion, by proportionate circulation of new currency, from an internal banking house, and from that, scientific economic progress and lawful pursuit of happiness can be organized �" without need to pay interest on use of fictitious "reserves" of Hollywood perverts.

Some in America will say, that they have direct and personal knowledge that Saddam Hussein dreamed of boiling his grandmothers in oil, and then cutting up their pickled flesh and serving it to his armies of hungry generals, his favorite Grandmother’s Caesar salad �" at evening soirees softly illuminated by oil lamps glowing in his many open-air gardens, covered with shades made from the skins of his grandchildren �" so evil was he, and so certain are the Americans, who claim universal and direct personal knowledge of their accusations.

Others will say, Saddam built castles for himself! His bathroom faucets were plated in gold and made in America! To which, one might ask, What was Saddam planning to do, take his American faucets with him? Were not "his" so-called castles dedicated to use as a government buildings? �" the beauty of which, but for the rage of a few malcontents, was possibly appreciated by many Iraqi citizens. Private occupation �" yes, but castle ownership �" is that not more the Hollywood fantasy of American CEOs and British oligarchs. Was Saddam’s use of a government "castle" the action of a tyrant within his own culture?

Still others will say, but Saddam ordered, in a time of war some decades ago, an exemplary military response, the killing 148 persons who were planning to overthrow of his government.

Yes, perhaps he did respond, as a humanitarian leader should in time of war, when a band of assassins, arguably financed by a foreign power representing unregulated financial frauds of Wall Street pornographers and legislative frauds of Capitol Hill liars and pedophiles, were planning to create an economic chaos which would bring in an armed infestation of American baby-killers and pimps.

But the more important question might be, What American can lay claim to any standing by which he might accuse Mr. Hussein of brutality for this act, when, for example, a particular Governor of the State of Texas, oversaw the systematic and foreseeable murders of over 400 inmates in his prison system, each year he was in office, for the crime of Being Happy in Black Skin? And that is the murder rate in just one of the fifty state prison systems in the U.S., for a period of only one year.

What American has standing to accuse Mr. Hussein of brutality for making a public example, in time of war, of small band of assassins acting as if they were agents of a foreign power, when Americans are killing many times that number of their own population, for the crime of being Happy while Black?

Was Saddam Hussein a loser? �" we shall see, for one day it shall be prophesied that, will come the day, the bravest men of the most powerful nation in the history of the world, will one day be reduced to trembling in their socks and quaking in their underpants, their Senators bedwetting themselves as they try to legislate reality from the dais of their lies, their wives shredding their own good Constitution for fear that their brave husbands might suffer another panic attack �" panic brought on by an as yet unnamed form of psychological fear, that a bearded little Mickey Mouse from Yemen, who spends all his days and all his nights crawling about in caves, hiding, in mountainsides half way around the world, might poke his hairy little noggin out of a cave, and say Cocoo or something.

"Quick Honey, before he might say ‘cocoo’ again, feed another page of the Constitution into the shredder …" cried the bravest of the brave in this hyper-powerful nation, "Osama bin Mickey Mouse might poke his nose out �" Oh, dear! I feel another panic attack coming … quick! … feed the shredder faster!!"

What might be the consequence, in this prophesy yet to come, should a nation of such brave men suddenly march themselves off into war, with supply lies extending half-way round the globe while CEOs are moving their factories to China, on the singular predicate that the pornographic anonymity of their media-lies is so invincible, the racist frauds of their financial-chimera so perpetual, the powers of their bombs so smart, that surely, God must, by comparison, be so stupid?

So, some may say, Saddam Hussein hanging at the end of a rope was a loser �" others may be foolish enough to wonder : "But were his policies really those of a tyrant?"