A remarkable series of videos appear to show three unidentified flying objects zooming past the surface of the moon.
The mysterious dark objects seem to pass close the celestial body and amazingly one looks like it's powered by rocket jets.
The UFOs were captured by an expert cameraman who spends many days videoing the sky and documents what he finds.
Crrow777, as he is identifed by his user name, put the clips on YouTube and claims to never post any hoax footage.
He does use some effects, like zoom, colour and contrast, but only to highlight anomalies.
Speaking on one clip, he says: "I am not saying this is an alien, but it is a ship being intelligently controlled."
The object are not satellites, he says, because they take almost a minute to pass the moon's surface.
Man made objects orbiting the earth would take just two or three seconds, he claims.
He said: "You will see only video I have personally shot.
"Everything is in high definition, and a lot of it is shot through an eight-inch telescope.
"I have shot UFOs, chem trails and the UFOs that accompany them, the moon, lunar UFOs and space anomalies.
"I make a pledge to all subscribers on my channel to never run false or deceptive clips and I will never edit the clips in a way that is deceptive.
"What you see is what I observe through my camera and telescope."
Many people watching the videos have been very impressed with the footage.
One posted: "Consistent with NASA's video of the tether incident.
"They do exist and are watching us.
However another added: "Have you considered the possibility that you just saw an errant space rock?
"As we all learned from the Chelyabinsk meteor [which exploded unexpectedly over Russia in October 201], we don't exactly know about all the rocks flying around out there."
..what sott.net really is if they don't touch the not-a-round-globe subject. I have already done my own experiments and still have more to do but it's obvious we are 'living' NOT on a ball.
Just a shadow of something. Satellite, meteor or some other junk. The object itself is probably static, but the shadow moves due to the movement of the moon-sun-or earth if the object happens to be in earth orbit.
There is so much experiments showing that the earth has no curvature . From 4 miles lasers to cameras with lent's that aloud us see boats 40 miles in distance on the horizon( what is impossible on globe earth). To balloons with cameras taking photos from high altitudes( not go pro fish lent's) to the study of the sun and moon light reflecting on the clouds. From the fake NASA photos from space to Stanley Kubrick and the fake moon lands. The subject of flat earth is of so much importance , that would change the way we see the earth, (that we are on the center of the creation), and would turn us more connected with spirituality and the soul. I personally have being deeply affected by conviction I have now that the earth is flat. Conviction that came by studying facts and more facts that exile prove flat earth. Also I think Laura Knight J. has to ask the Cassiopeians about flat earth, what by my surprise she is not doing. She refuse to analyze scientific experiments and mathematical facts proving flat earth. It is sad because we learn so much reading her books and she is always a woman who research everything deeply and we love her., but she is not doing this on the subject of flat earth. Globe earth is one of the biggest lies that the controller's have impose on us and that has one profound effect on peoples mind and heart. Globe earth divide and isolate us in the universe. Flat earth brings union and spiritual soul wakening. Aloha.
I totally agree with all the comments about "Earth" not being a sphere, there are too many things that don't add up when looking at or measuring distances/curvature as we have been taught.
So again in agreement, why when it has been raised and questioned are SOTT not looking more into it? Instead they post images under Quantum Quirks that seem to be mocking the people just looking for truth and honest answers. The "Quirk" is not in the Quantum it is in whosoever's head that is posting these images.
SOTT readers are here looking for something more and not the BS that the media feed us (as we all know its all spin lies and propaganda to keep us behind our screens). The more i read of the content and what other people are commenting again I see segregation and treatment others like they were sub-human. This again is another proof of how deluded and programmed we all are in this system.
This has to stop, treat others fairly even if you have conflicting views, especially while search of answers.
So ask yourself have we all been duped about living on a ball right from the start?
Can we spread the message and stop war/financial ruin/poverty/hunger? YES but we all need to stop lying cheating and stealing
This is for whoever is putting Quantum Quirk pictures - no, 'gravity' is not an illusion, but it is possible by moving constantly upwards at a speed of 9.8m/s.
If you believe that there is 'gravity' because of 'core' of a 'planet' then think again.
They taught us that 'gravity' is a force, the only one without any form, without any particles (but still propagates through vacuum) and without opposite sign to it. Yeah, right... all the king's PH Doctors...
I thought I was the only person not institutionalized who knows the Earth is - well, not exactly flat, but analogous to flat with far more validity than the sphere analogy.
In 30 years, I have never once encountered this. My wife thinks I'm completely insane (not necessarily wrong, mind you. Just insane). She is gonna crap her pants when I show her this!
Of the Earth, there is no edge, because 3D, space, with its linear trajectories, is a perceptual/cognitive experience, not an actuality. It is only our optical system that is curved, and only neural processes that operate in linear time and in a field analogous to out concept of 3D space.
"Of the Earth, there is no edge, because 3D, space, with its linear trajectories, is a perceptual/cognitive experience, not an actuality. It is only our optical system that is curved, and only neural processes that operate in linear time and in a field analogous to out concept of 3D space."
I really being think about this: how our mechanical vision distorts the edge of our view giving the appearance of slight round edges when we look the horizon. I agree with this commentary, but in respect to a infinity plane? Old ancient text books from all over the world , by example: Bhagavathan(india) talk about a possible firmament. The is a video explaining the how The Book Bhagavathan explains the universe:[Link]
Do you guys know that the shade of the moon is warmer then the light of the moon? Put a infrared thermometer and check yourself. Do you know if you put a 4 miles laser you will not see curvature at all? Did you know the GPS is ground base and on the south hemisphere goes on blank and doesn't work after 100 miles for all airplanes? While in the north hemisphere works perfectly. Did you check and compare the flat earth map and the globe maps with the airline routes? Do you know that the study of old ancient believes ,and sacred books from India(Bhagavathan),and other ancient cultures all over the world show that the earth is flat and explaining this. If you analyze all photos from NASA and the discrepancy between them it is proved that they are fake and photoshop, like the fake moon Apollo videos and photos. Aloha
Yes to all, and also, there are no flights on the southern 'part of the globe', and also, flights like for example, SA280 (SAA280, and returen flights SA281 and/or SAA281) flying from Australia to South Africa do disappear from websites light flightradar24.com after an hour or two, and then reappear just before the destination city. Just please look at the southern hemisphere flights on live online radar. You will not find one you can track from start to end, not even one that's between southern 'continents'.
And this SHOWS how the 'boats disappearing behind the horizon' effect works.
Humans were perhaps not significantly different in general than ours, in general. Neither, I'm guessing (and such can, in fact, only be a guess - anyone who claims knowledge of such is self-deluded) were their neural hardware systems.
Their generated neural/ cognitive fields, on the other hand, were presumably less complex than ours, or at least mine - I can't be at all certain that anyone but me is actually generating a complex field, since all I can know is what is presented. Repeating or even slightly modifying complex input and generating complex output may seem to imply intelligence, but I've been wrong too many times to take such for granted. Fooled once, shame on you, fooled twice...no, screw that, I don't get fooled twice...
So while I might be able to absorb input from, say, the Baghavad Gita or the Hebrew Bible, process this verbiage, and generate some very useful (to me) and entertaining neural fields, I am not at all convinced that this should be conceived of as what might be termed "understanding the thoughts" of ancient writers. It is quite probable that, given the copious amounts of high-speed, complex input I have habituated to processing in the modern world, as well as the monumental amount of formalized information I have processed ("education") which an ancient person likely had no access to, that what I am doing when interpreting the words in the Bible is more precisely described as, "making shit up" that has only an abstract isomorphic resemblance to what they were imagining when they made that shit up and encoded it in those words.
As for complex geometries, they may be more precisely encoded using mathematics than, say, encoding visions of God using verbiage, but it should not be taken as a given that even math generates an identical or even a functionally identical field in two neural systems separated by time and/or space.
In other words, I can't even be sure that I understand what y'all are saying, much less some ancient zealot. But it sure is compelling, often entertaining, to talk to people or read a book.
Andre...have you ever been scuba diving? Density, pressure, buoyancy, mass...all part of the same interactive physicality, and directly experienced in tbe extreme when breathing compressed air at depth. As the tank empties and becomes buoyant enough to rise off of your back, a perfect adjustment of body motion and breathing brings an experience that can be described as "weightless." It is not weightlessness, of course, just ambient density/mass, which is possible because we are mostly water. I have taken a woman with MS who said afterwards than it was a "vacation from gravity."
It does get confusing if you exchange words, though - "lighter" and "less dense" are not the same, to me. But I THINK I get what you are saying, and it is intelligent for sure if what you are thinking resembles what I am thinking you are thinking
[Link]