Gigi Jordan
© Jefferson Siegel/NY Daily NewsGigi Jordan was convicted of manslaughter Wednesday for killing her 8-year-old autistic son in a hotel room in February 2010.
The multimillionaire Manhattan mom accused of killing her 8-year-old autistic son was found guilty Wednesday of manslaughter.

But Gigi Jordan escaped a murder conviction that could have sent her to jail for life.

Instead, Jordan faces anywhere from five to 25 years in prison when she is sentenced for killing Jude Mirra in her rented room at the Peninsula Hotel.

"Gigi Jordan showed no mercy to her son, and should receive none at the time of her sentencing," Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. said in a statement.

Jordan "poisoned her son, giving him extremely high doses of prescription medications, forcing many down his throat with a syringe," Vance said.

Dressed in a long gray button-down jacket, navy shirt and dress pants, Jordan showed little emotion when the verdict read.

Because Jordan has said she would make post-conviction arguments asking for the verdict to be "set-aside," no sentencing date was set. She has already complained that Supreme Court Justice Charles Solomon prevented her from presenting witnesses and documents that would buttress argument that this was a mercy killing.

When it was over, Jordan, 53, was returned to her cell on Rikers Island.
Jude Mirra
© APJude Mirra was killed in February 2010 after his mother fed him a lethal cocktail of drugs and alcohol
During four days of often wrenching testimony, Jordan claimed she killed her son in February 2010 because she believed her ex-husband intended to kill her - and feared that would leave the boy in his clutches of the biological father who abused him.

"I didn't see any way out of this situation," said Jordan, a former nurse who made her $50 million fortune in the home health care industry. "I made a decision that I was going to end my life and Jude's life."

Her testimony echoed what she told Daily News columnist Denis Hamill earlier in a 2012 jailhouse interview.

"I tried to kill myself along with my son to save him from a life of sexual torture," she said.

Neither of Jordan's exes were at the trial and both denied her allegations.

Jordan told the jury it was supposed to be a murder-suicide. But after the drugs began taking hold of Jude, she got second thoughts and desperately tried to revive him.

Prosecutors said Jordan jammed a syringe containing a deadly cocktail of painkillers, tranquilizers and sleeping pills mixed with alcohol and orange juice down the boy's throat.

While he lay dying in the $2,300-a-night suite, they said, Jordan was on her laptop siphoning $125,000 from his trust fund.


Comment: A proof that all her stories above about the boy being abused and the alleged murder-suicide plan are nothing but big fat lies! She should have gotten a murder conviction, because that what it was, a cold blooded murder.


"Clearly, he would not be needing it anymore," prosecutor Matthew Bogdanos said.

In his closing bid to the jury, Jordan's lawyer Allan Brenner said his client "did it because she loved" Jude.

Brenner asked the jury to consider manslaughter not murder, saying she was under an "extreme emotional disturbance."

Bogdanos urged the jury not to be distracted by "shiny things" and called Jordan's killing of her son a "deliberate, intentional, calculated act."

In the end, the seven-man, five-woman jury bought Brenner's argument and convicted Jordan on the lesser charge.

A fuming Bogdanos refused to speak with reporters as he left the courtroom. A juror who asked not to be identified said "it came down whether there was a preponderance of evidence that Jordan was in extreme emotional distress - regardless of whether her fear was warranted or not."

"The woman injected enough pills into her kid to kill Alaska," he said. "It's clear there's a lot of stuff going on with her."

Jordan's lawyers included Brenner, Earl Ward, and Norman Siegel.

"We said this was always about her state of mond, for better or for worse and the jury accepted this. They seemed to reject the notion that there was some nefarious or insidious motive in this," Brenner said.