In an op-ed for The Guardian, the newspaper that originally published his first leaks, Snowden said he asked about Russia's surveillence in order to push the conversation and Putin's response into the public dialogue.
"I expected that some would object to my participation in an annual forum that is largely comprised of softball questions to a leader unaccustomed to being challenged," he wrote. "But to me, the rare opportunity to lift a taboo on discussion of state surveillance before an audience that primarily views state media outweighed that risk. Moreover, I hoped that Putin's answer - whatever it was - would provide opportunities for serious journalists and civil society to push the discussion further."
Snowden wrote that his question was meant to mirror the exchange last summer at Senate intelligence committee hearings between Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and director of national itelligence, James Clapper, about whether the NSA collected records on millions of Americans.
After Snowden's surprise appearance at the annual television "town hall" with Putin, several critics said that Snowden was clearly being used by the Russians as part of a public relations stunt.
"Sorry, Snowden: Putin lied to you about his surveillance state - and made you a pawn of it," Eli Lake wrote in The Daily Beast, before detailing how the Russians monitor activities within their country and beyond.
"I was surprised that people who witnessed me risk my life to expose the surveillance practices of my own country could not believe that I might also criticise the surveillance policies of Russia, a country to which I have sworn no allegiance, without ulterior motive. I regret that my question could be misinterpreted, and that it enabled many to ignore the substance of the question - and Putin's evasive response - in order to speculate, wildly and incorrectly, about my motives for asking it," Snowden wrote.
I guess it takes one to know one.