Image
© FBI
I think that 9/11 was the birth of two distinct realities emerging on Earth and beginning to separate. The mass-media/mass-hypnosis version of the world that we grew up in, and the alternative-media/_truth_-media
that's growing evermore powerful.

It all seems to be at some sort of breaking point now with Boston. There is the lynch-mob mentality there, waving flags and chanting "USA," having convicted the brothers before proof is established. And there's the alternative media with better evidence that "security forces" at the Marathon are the culprits.

And now there is evidence The Boston Globe (is this real, is it fake?) -- that the Globe sent several tweets about a "controlled explosion" that would occur shortly before it actually did. Was there a "white hat" at the Globe doing what he or she could to warn the Marathon? Is it a trickster now implicating the meda with cold and uncaring _foreknowledge_?

If these tweets below really did come from the Globe, we have arrived at two distinct realities. The truth of what's been going on against humanity for a long time, vs. the mass media lynch-mob (who have virtually executed "the terrorists" who have evidently been framed).

And me? I keep wondering _where's an interview_ with the guy whose Mercedes SUV was supposedly hijacked by the brothers for a get-away car? But they rode around together for 30 minutes -- perhaps teaching them how to use the grenades _in that car_ if they got chased? And then the "hijacked guy" was let out alive and well -- after the brothers had committed murder and mayhem everywhere else?? And then the "hijacked guy" did a hysterical act (according to the gas station attendant) and called the police to go after the car that he gave them, so that the dramatic chase and capture could occur?

Where IS that guy? The media has been featuring inputs from every tom, dick, and jane who was "anywhere." But where's the guy who could tell us so much? All we know, from one report early on, was that "he said
the brothers told him they were the bombers and then let him go." Yeah, right.

I know a Time magazine propaganda guy has come up with an account of this, _finally_, but it's almost comical in terms of its amateurishness. It's got so many holes in logic that, if it were swiss cheese, there wouldn't be _anything_ there to eat! I'm an amateur writer and he's a pro. But ANYONE can see, he sucks! Link below.

An e-mail to me:* On the day of the bombings during the Boston Marathon, _The Boston Globe tweeted_:
"Officials: There will be a controlled explosion opposite the library within one minute as part of bomb squad activities."
(And then _it happened,_ just a little bit later than that. "Controlled" explosion?" Wouldn't that mean "harmless?" Or did it just mean "authorized?" Opposite the library? Exactly where the worst carnage occurred.)

Brief video: Look at the location, look at the tweets:


AND BELOW, THIS _TIME MAG_ (rag) THING SAYS TO "GIVE THANKS FOR DUMB TERRORISTS." I SAY THANKS FOR DUMB WRITERS LIKE THIS, WHO ARE OBVIOUSLY TRYING TO MAKE A FALSE SCENARIO SEEM "LOGICAL"
http://swampland.time.com/2013/04/21/give-thanks-for-dumb-terrorists/?hpt=hp_t2