Unusual: Is this quake from a previously unknown fault this close to the shoreline or might other factors be at work here...like the area of growing weakness of the planet's magnetic field in the South Atlantic Anomaly? Natal is virtually near the epicenter of the SAA. The South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) is an area where the Earth's inner Van Allen radiation belt comes closest to the Earth's surface dipping down to an altitude of 200km (124mi). This leads to an increased flux of energetic particles in this region and exposes orbiting satellites to higher than usual levels of radiation. The effect is caused by the non-concentricity of the Earth and its magnetic dipole, and the SAA is the near-Earth region where the Earth's magnetic field is weakest. -The Extinction Protocol
The SOUTH ATLANTIC ANOMALY
and the charge field
by Miles Mathis
...
That is, the charge enters at the poles, in this case the north pole. Charge is emitted near the equator, but in this case it gets partially blocked by dense tectonic plates under Indonesia, which reflect it back through the Earth, as in the diagram. This should create a gravitational low there (at SAA), and the GOCE model confirms that also:
As you see, we have a blue patch centered over Rio de Janeiro. Blue models a gravitational low. Check that against the diagram under title. We have a match, since the South Atlantic Anomaly is also centered over Rio.
If you haven't read my GOCE paper or my Unified Field papers, you won't understand why there is a gravitational low there, so I will quickly gloss it. The Unified Field unifies solo gravity and charge. The two together are what we now call gravity. Solo gravity still points in, charge points out in the field of the Earth. Therefore, if you increase local charge, as in this reflection, you get a UF reduction.
What we call gravity will decrease. And the mechanism is simple: the photons come up from under you, hit your feet, and thereby dampen the gravity effect. You are being partially levitated by charge right now. If this sounds like a wild assertion, you should know that I have shown where the charge field exists in the equations of Newton, Coulomb, and Lagrange. I have pulled apart the current field math, including the Lagrangian, showing exactly where the charge field is in the variables.
...
Now we just have to explain the magnetic low. Why would we have a magnetic low with a gravitational low? We should have a charge high, since it is charge that is being reflected. Shouldn't we also have a magnetic high? No, because the reflection also changes the photon spin direction. In other words, it will turn photons into anti-photons, or the reverse.
Here is how it normally works, without reflection: As photons move through the Earth, they suffer many collisions, but most of these collisions are deflections, not reflections. In other words, the angles are more than 90 degrees. Some individual photons suffer reflections, of course, because anything that can happen will happen, with photons. But in general we don't see large-scale reflections in the recycling of the charge field. We sum all the deflections to get the curve from pole to equator. Reflections are a smaller phenomenon, and they are overwhelmed by the summed deflections. But in the case of this anomaly, we are seeing a large-scale reflection and its outcome. The upsidedown photons that are created by the reflection create an upside down magnetic field, which acts just like any other magnetic field until it meets an upside-up field. This happens when the charge goes up and hits the ionosphere and then the Van Allen belt. We get spin cancellations and thereby a reduced magnetic field. This reduced magnetic field cannot hold up the Van Allen belt as well, and the belt falls lower. This is why the belt tightens in that area.
...
[Link]