LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
"the solar max in 2013-2014 to capture more aurora activity"
The only interesting line in this entire story.
Solar Max in 2013/14 ??
I see a better than even chance that what might be seen in 2013/14 is a Solar Fizzile. At least the Northern half of the Solar Cycle is well on it's way to doing just that. Fizzling out. Poof.
Actually its not, although it is on track to being the lowest intensity solar cycle since 1906.
But considering the span of one hundred years giving to almost 10 cycles and compared to the eons of time of Solar activity in the past this current cycle as it stands is neither a "blast" nor a "fizzle"; just a bit lower in its usual activity.
[Link]
even if it dropped off the charts to no activity it still has pumped up enough activity so far in this cycle to be more than just a fizzle.
What is the period of the sun sunspot cycle?
It is not 11 years, as commonly referred.
Look at the NASA predictions above.
It way well be, too, that this is just the 'lull before the storm'.
Lame Stream Media.
There's a lot more proof out there than this. The above reminds me of the The National Enquirer's cover of how, from a freeze frame or Pic of the billowing smoke - perhaps photoshopped, for all I know - who did 9/11? (Dana Carvey voice) "Could it be . . . . Satan?.)
Or, instead, Try explaining this one [Link]or countless others with the now standard "two drunks with boards and ropes.*
Hell, even WeeWeePeePeeDuh can't hide enough truth that's out there: [Link]
R.C.
* You've heard this: "A lie can be halfway round the world before the truth has got its boots on." [Link]
Well that old BS tale of drunks with plywood and rope has proven a lie's value as a "perpetual motion" machine, beyond its speed alone.
RC