LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
good observation: a society without human employment cannot purchase products.
but: the stupefying type of labor that the robots are replacing shouldn't have even existed in the first place. even if those kind of jobs were highly paid - they are able to drive the most evenly mannered person insane. because they are inhumane, repetitive - stupefying. so thank god humans don't have to do them anymore!
thank god it frees up people from economic slavery.
food, shelter, water, clean air - all those things are basic human rights and one should not have to work like a robot just to have them. they should be free.
zeitgeist, with all its flaws and having turned into a dogma by now so it seems - does get this one right: a resource based economy where no one has to do a robot's job to have all the necessities and basics of life is a solution.
no laws. no governments. no money. no authorities. food and shelter and all other necessities of life are free. no one has to toil like a slave/robot to be able to survive.
but of course to acknowledge that, sott.net and its editors would actually have to overcome their ego and admit that there are other people who have good ideas, too, but who do not agree with sott's ideas. just like zeitgeist would have to overcome theirs to acknowledge that a resource based economy or whatever new and shiny architecture they come up with for a new society is doomed to fail if they continue to be blind to the question of psychopathy.
oh well ... and so it goes ... lol ... what else is new ?? lol
Some good points, while i don't really see alot of ego issues with the editors I do wish they would expand their reading on economics; rothbard, G. edward griffin for starters. The liberal articles are getting tiring. Hurting someone to help another (taxation/welfare/bailouts/debt) is morally wrong, even...psychopathic I wager.
As to this article I think it's great. If a robot can do a mans job we need to order a bunch more it will lower the cost of goods. Provided it can do a quality job. Being a worker doesn't entitle you to a job, if you thought it did you should probably re-read the contract you signed for employment. You knew when you signed it what the terms were, if that isn't good enough then don't sign it. Besides, I bet a lot more jobs are being created making robots now. Robots can never do "all" the work.
If robots do all of the manual labor, do you think the elite would need normal people around?
Is technology really liberating? I don't think so. Since we got computers, people work more and more hours. Productivity goes up, but the average worker gets no wage increases. You think those who own the resources would want to share with the rest of us? You think they would give us ownership of resources?
That is assuming that the leaders of said society would follow conscience and fairness. So far they haven't... the need of workers to do jobs makes them share resources. When people don't have that bargaining chip (actually , less and less with the destruction of unions and true democracy), there is just the owner and the owned.
And whats this about the ego of the editors? I don't notice it. I usually see people who want to disagree with someone else, call them on their Ego. What about the ego of the ideas of Zeitgeist, their utopian ideals don't make sense when you see the psychology of the owners.
Everyone has an ego, what matters is to have it align as much as possible with reality. History and facts are used to try to figure out reality.
A society is not necessarily builded on rules like : to get an object you have to buy it with money, you get money if you have a job
and false assumptions : you create money when you work (it is magic), that is why the government can tax you and get a part of this wealth to build schools and motorways
Comment: A society without human employment cannot purchase products made by robots.