Work stress, job satisfaction and health problems due to high stress have more to do with genes than you might think, according to research by Timothy Judge, professor of management at the University of Notre Dame's Mendoza College of Business.
The lead author of "Genetic influences on core self-evaluations, job satisfaction, work stress, and employee health: A behavioral genetics mediated model," published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Judge studied nearly 600 twins - some identical, some fraternal - who were raised together and reared apart. He found that being raised in the same environment had very little effect on personality, stress and health. Shared genes turned out to be about four times as important as shared environment.
"Assume James and Sandy both work in the same organization," Judge says. "James reports more stress than Sandy. Does it mean that James' job is objectively more stressful than Sandy's? Not necessarily. Our study suggests strong heritabilities to work stress and the outcomes of stress. This means that stress may have less to do with the objective features of the environment than to the genetic 'code' of the individual."
The battle of nature vs. nurture shows that even at work, nature wins. Changing a job to free yourself of stress is probably not going to do the trick unless you appreciate your own predispositions toward stress.
"This doesn't mean we shouldn't do things as employers or individuals to avoid stressful jobs," Judge says. "However, we also shouldn't assume that we're 'a blank slate' and therefore be overly optimistic about what the work environment can and can't do as far as stress is concerned. More of it has to do with what's inside of us than what we encounter outside in the work environment."
Specializing in personality, leadership, moods, emotions and career and life success, Judge has published more than 130 articles in refereed journals, including more than 80 in top-tier journals. His studies "Do Nice Guys - and Gals - Really Finish Last?" and "On the Value of Aiming High: The Causes and Consequences of Ambition," both published last year, were widely cited in the media.
...in our culture. I don't think it will ever go away.
But it is perverse and inexcusably ignorant on this planet today to seriously advance that argument.
If you share the same genes, what environmental experiences do you also share?
1) Living as a fetus inside the same woman.
2) Getting born at roughly the same time under very similar conditions.
That's what, at a minimum, twins share. And that's plenty! Inadvertent mental programming can easily take place during the prenatal period and birth. So, the "raised separately" concept is missing 9 of the most important months of those people's current lifetimes. And in those first nine months ALL those twins were "raised together."
Beyond this, the whole philosophy of "avoiding stress" is extraordinarily short-sighted. If a being goes through its whole life "avoiding stress" and then gets into a stressful situation that it can't get out of, what's going to happen? The stressor will win, and the being will lose. We need to be teaching people how to conquer stress, not avoid it. Hell, that's the problem with this whole society right now!