LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
What was their immediate reaction, upon discovering the "masterpiece?" How much it would fetch at auction, not where to display it.
People buy "a Picasso" to own it, not to look at it.
"Art" as a commodity. "Art" as an ostentatious display of wealth. "Art" as an investment opportunity.
At the risk of committing a massive faux pas, I say that Picasso's works were ucking fugly!
You wrote:
"At the risk of committing a massive faux pas, I say that Picasso's works were ucking fugly!"
and truth to tell I'm not far behind you.
I was reminded of pieces the kids brought home from school when they were little . . . which, of course, were simply beautiful
True, but like those children's work, sometimes you have to be a parent/patron to really appreciate it. It does seem to symbolize the breakdown of society well. Look at how well the degradation of people is displayed in this work. Isn't it quite disgusting? Isn't that art? Mr G would probably say it is an appropriate reflection of our times. What more could you want?
Now, what I really wonder is how many more 'lost' works will be found, especially when funding gets low? This cottage industry does keep a few employed, so as usual, the harm is only done to the ignorant, which usually means the masses... who don't like this mirror image at all.
heh
I would say its a piece created by a master rather than a masterpiece! but then beauty is in the eye of the few that can afford to buy it.