OF THE
TIMES
Nothing is an accident.
Having an open border with Mexico for four years was a bad idea too.
Why was Palestine left in such a precarious position in the first place, when Israel was forced upon them? Was it planned back then to let Israel...
I am wondering how big is the IDF? Do they have that many soldiers, or are they getting help from US?
"And does Iran Have a Nuke"... Iran didn't have ambition to build or "Have a Nuke". The enrichment program was part of their nuclear power program...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
...in support of Iran, see a recent MT Keshe post that is supposed to be about the real reason that Iran is being attacked.
I don't know anything about Mr. Keshe. He is supposed to be a "nuclear scientist."
In his post he asked readers to advise him of any errors, so I downloaded the whole post and re-wrote it in good English (well, pretty good) and sent it to him. It was not written in very good English.
In the post, Keshe states that Iran, because of an accident in Canada, as well as its own industriousness, has held a monopoly on medical (radioactive) isotopes for about a year now. However, Germany has financed the construction of a European facility in Belgium, and when that goes into operation, Europe will be free to attack Iran.
He says they want to attack Iran because it has independently developed the ability to use several technologies that Europe (and the US) did not want to fall into their hands. In particular, peaceful use of nuclear reactors. He reports that a "Triad" of countries (US, UK, France) was planning to totally monopolize the production of electricity using nuclear reactors, and that Europe and other countries would be forced to invest in this technology due to huge increases in oil prices.
But he says that Iran has also developed an advanced technology that it intends to use for defensive purposes which disables any sort of electronic system and can also make certain objects heavier. He claims that any attack on Iran with conventional weapons launched from sea, land, air, or from some other continent will result in the attacking missiles falling and blowing up before they reach Iran, or the attack vectors (jets, submarines) ceasing to operate.
The piece is a stirring example of Persian rhetoric, and I hope, for Iran's sake, that it's true.
But I must admit that it's hard to take any story I hear at face value these days.