OF THE
TIMES
A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom.
I got my own personnel assets been "confiscated" by these mother fucker - "RSX" out of Van-Eck and mother fuck them - if you steal from a pirate...
I would have eaten a cherry and tried a shot of the brine too!
Just another psyops/hoax, move along nothing to see here.
Risible, farcical & hilarious. First of all the whole science of Stonehenge is a completely farce & lie. Stonehenge was moved long ago...
The case centered around the death of Mexican national Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea, who was found shot to death on Kelly's 170-acre cattle ranch near...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Edward Bernays knew this in 1920!
This has been the whole concept behind targeting advertising and marketing - including the marketing of politicians - since that time!
So: What's new about it???
About the only new aspect to this story is that tracking of your personal likes and dislikes via the internet could allow more precise targeting. In the past, the expense of creating 20 different ads for 20 different personality types and delivering each to the correct person would have been prohibitive. Now this is in the realm of the possible.
The old technique involved: 1) Getting the demographics of your target audience, then 2) using surveys, focus groups, etc. to find the majority personality traits held in common by that group. It was a compromise, but it worked fairly well.
I don't believe these guys one minute when they say this is "something new." It might be new to talk about it in public, but it is most definitely NOT a new idea!