LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
Nice job police. Apparently, they are not happy with non-violent protest, so they are going to be violent themselves. Sadly, violence is inevitable, and I feel that change will only come after more blood runs in the streets. Not all of it will be protester blood. At the same time I am saddened and enraged. I don't want this to be violent, but what else will work? After enough protesters are beaten half to death or worse, and enough people are hungry, I think that people will fight back. Look at Greece for what's going to generally happen here. I'm not glad that it is going in this direction. I really thought for a while that we could do this peacefully. These corporate pirates pretending to be police need to be reminded who they serve.
Will the symbolism ever end?
Guess all that federal 'terrorist' training didn't cover this?
At least the cops can count on their police commission to bail them out right?
Unless a scapegoat is needed.... Hmmm, he isn't dead quite yet, so we'll have to wait on that one.
starring Ben Kingsley, as the namesake character (Yes, the irony of a British Actor portraying an Indian was something, no?)? Anyway, there's a scene in that film - based upon real, greater events - that stirred everyone's heart who saw it: the ranked march to the salt woks wherein protestor after protestor was clubbed for attempting entry. Occupy Wall Street wants broadcast of non-violent iconography and symbolism?: use that. When barricaded or when moving "against" policing, march single file or in ranked fashion to your arrest, one-by-one. There's no greater symbol for order than a single-file line. And, there's no greater opportunity for the visual examination of the induced chaos of that line by the orderlies attempting disorder for control of it. The danger is the opening this gives antithetical militancy. Therefore, such tactic should only be used when arrest or assault by peace-keepers is inevitable (and prior to calls for dispersal, lest the tactic be branded a sign of the way in which this "organization" works against calls for dispersal).
I sure hope he doesn't have kids.
I think the move V for Vendetta might be better. Remember the straw that broke the camel's back in that one? A little girl getting shot. I think this young mans martyrdom will be very bad for the elites as they are going to have a hard time should the vets in this country be shocked into keeping their oaths. I'm more concerned that this could be used by as an excuse for a military coup to replace the current oligarchy because I have no doubt they'd be controlled by the same pathocracy.
I see a lot of talk about the police and who they represent and I see alot people under an illusion about this. They do not represent the people they represent the government and its interests. Its interests rarely are good for the people as these demonstrations so clearly indicate. An aquantance of mine is enrolled in police college it is a two year program and at the end to graduate you must take a personality test. Now does this not look like they are trying to weed out anyone with a conscience from joining a police force. You must look at this from the police point of veiw based on their training and the orders from their supervisor's, they are just doing their job.
If you do the the research (ie.read a police training manual) it will become apparent why police behave the way they do.
Proof positive, in addition to the items you've already stated, is the American flag with gold fringe, on the arm patch. Just like the military, all police forces are directly under executive order and control, and are in essence military troops. They are trained to follow orders, blindly if necessary. Their entire commission is based on protection of corporate assets. The government marches them out first, and if they fail, the government goes standard military troops like national guard, and then if necessary, they will and have brought out artillery. It really isn't about constitution and republic survival like they love to proclaim. It's all about those in the money keeping the money. It's millenia in the making.
BTW, you will also see the executive fringed flag at the side of the altar of your Christian religious institution. In exchange for tax free status, they put state law above any other of the fictional laws that might come into play. This is why your preacher doesn't involve himself with the scumbag cesspool of lying, backstabbing frauds known as politicians, in his preachings at least. They ultimately pay his salary.
Dissolve the Fed and we wouldn't have these problems. All Central banks should be immediately dissolved. This is an orchestrated, planned financial swindle on the world population.
While, I sympathize w/Scott Olsen, I don't hold him any higher than any other US citizen who has been injured by the US "terrorist mercenaries" in these protests.
Having been in 'the military', or 'Iraq' does not, to my mind, equate to 'fighting for one's country'. Iraq, and Afghanistan were/are ILLEGAL WARS and while what the police are doing in Oakland is typical of a totalitarian society, so was what the US military did to Iraq. It is the PROTESTERS who are fighting for our country. NOT the military. So Scott may be a poster child, the protesters are the real soldiers here.
The whole Scott Olsen is a bunch of flag-waving nationalism designed to undermine the objective and draw focus away from the REAL PROBLEM - the FED!
Just my opinion.
I went to a human rights event tonight at which a Washington state senator told us about how her grandson and a bunch of his 4th grade classmates volunteered to do a project on the life of Martin Luther King Jr. In so doing, they learned about the civil rights movement of the late 1950's and 1960's. They learned that the South had been segregated and that people often were subjected to police brutality when they demonstrated for equal rights. They also learned about the Birmingham Alabama Children's Crusade of May 1963. (Something I didn't even know about.) During that demonstration, hundreds of school children were arrested by police (or deputies) each day they tried to march in support of their parents, who were afraid to show public support for desegregation for fear of losing their jobs or being run out of town.
Police brutality is nothing new in the US, nor in the world. And though the police should be given the responsibility for controlling themselves during peaceful demonstrations, I think the story goes much deeper than just a few bad cops. We are seeing that in the non-demonstration-related blow-ups in the NYCPD, too. Those police were goaded to commit crimes on New York citizens by -?- their seniors - or some pressure above or external to the force.