LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
You're stating some "big" things without substantiating them with evidence.
I don't see that gravitons have been mentioned in above article. Regarding waves, forces are "carried" by them (in classical view) and particles can also be viewed as waves.
When you say plagiarism, then you surely have knowledge of some work other people had done that he copied. I would be most interested in seeing that work, so if you could, please, provide some info about it.
And the work with the photovoltaic effect, is probably the only experiencially useful... Relativistic physics isn't science at all...
But the same is the case with types like Hawking, Dawkins & ad nauseam.
The Science game today, (and probably for a long time), has lost most of that pursuit of knowledge aspect.
Can you please explain what you mean about relativistic physics not being science? Laboratory experiments pretty much confirm it.
Also it's a huge stretch to say Einstein was only as talented as Britney Spears. There probably was a "marketing" factor involved, but if it wasn't Einstein, then who discovered the equivalence of matter and energy, something which has led to many other great discoveries?
...or even 'gravity' in general only effective gravity, something that Einstein could have deduced from his own 'space elevator' thought experiment if he had interpreted it right.
That the models comprised in 'Standard Theory' have been modulated to resemble reality enough for us to accept them as fact does not make them any less riddled with holes and inconsistencies, and thus questionable.
A model such as 'the equivalence of matter and energy' may indeed have lead to other discoveries, but that does not mean that the model is necessarily correct, only that it has been tuned to conform to reality enough to be able to draw reasonably accurate hypotheses from it, which can be tuned to the preceding model and to reality enough for them to be accepted as facts in turn.
This is why relativistic physics and many other branches of science today are not really science at all, but the art of convincing enough people that your experimental results and hypotheses are correct to make people willing to give you more funds.
If you want proof I suggest you read the book 'The Final Theory'.
More rubbish from the Scientific community needing funding.
Gravitons do not exist and Gravity is not waves.
Mr. OneStone (Einstein) plagarised most of his output. He was a cleverly marketed creation to expound a certain world view. He had about as much talent as Britney Spears.